17.Prior to 2004, the handling of breaches of procedure in unfair dismissal cases was based on case law, and in particular the House of Lords judgment in Polkey v A E Dayton Services Ltd [1988] AC 344, which provided that a dismissal could be unfair purely on procedural grounds, but that in those circumstances the tribunal should reduce or eliminate the compensation payable (other than the basic award) to reflect the likelihood (if any) that the dismissal would have gone ahead anyway if the correct procedures had been followed. At the same time as the Statutory procedures were introduced in 2004, a new section 98A was inserted into ERA 1996. This section provides that a dismissal where an employer does not complete the Statutory procedures is automatically unfair. It also provides that a tribunal may disregard any failure by the employer to comply with other (e.g. workplace based) procedures in respect of the dismissal, if following such other procedures would have had no effect on the decision to dismiss.
18.Following the public consultation, the Government has decided to repeal section 98A of ERA 1996 in its entirety, so as to revert to the situation which applied previously based on the Polkey line of cases.
The data on this page is available in the alternative data formats listed:
All content is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. This site additionally contains content derived from EUR-Lex, reused under the terms of the Commission Decision 2011/833/EU on the reuse of documents from the EU institutions. For more information see the EUR-Lex public statement on re-use.
