Textual Amendments
F1Sch. 34A inserted (15.9.2016) by Finance Act 2016 (c. 24), s. 160(5)
17(1)Sub-paragraph (2) applies if—U.K.
(a)there is (or has been) a person (“Q”),
(b)arrangements (“the defeated arrangements”) have been entered into,
(c)an event occurs such that either—
(i)there is a relevant defeat in relation to Q and the defeated arrangements, or
(ii)the condition in sub-paragraph (i) would be met if Q had not ceased to exist,
(d)at the time of that event a person (“P”) is carrying on a business as a promoter (or is carrying on what would be such a business under the condition in paragraph 3(2)), and
(e)Condition 1 or 2 is met in relation to Q and P.
(2)The event is treated for all purposes of this Part of this Act as a relevant defeat in relation to P and the defeated arrangements (whether or not it is also a relevant defeat in relation to Q, and regardless of whether or not P existed at any time when those arrangements were promoted arrangements in relation to Q).
(3)Condition 1 is that—
(a)P is not an individual,
(b)at a time when the defeated arrangements were promoted arrangements in relation to Q—
(i)P was a relevant body controlled by Q, or
(ii)Q was a relevant body controlled by P, and
(c)at the time of the event mentioned in sub-paragraph (1)(c)—
(i)Q is a relevant body controlled by P,
(ii)P is a relevant body controlled by Q, or
(iii)P and Q are relevant bodies controlled by a third person.
(4)Condition 2 is that—
(a)P and Q are relevant bodies,
(b)at a time when the defeated arrangements were promoted arrangements in relation to Q, a third person (“C”) controlled Q, and
(c)C controls P at the time of the event mentioned in sub-paragraph (1)(c).
(5)For the purposes of sub-paragraphs (3)(b) and (4)(b), the question whether arrangements are promoted arrangements in relation to Q at any time is to be determined on the assumption that the reference to “design” in paragraph (b) of section 235(3) (definition of “promoter” in relation to relevant arrangements) is omitted.
18(1)This paragraph applies if—U.K.
(a)an authorised officer becomes aware at any time (“the relevant time”) that a relevant defeat has occurred in relation to a person ( “ P ”) who is carrying on a business as a promoter,
(b)there have occurred, more than 3 years before the relevant time—
(i)one third party defeat, or
(ii)two third party defeats, and
(c)conditions A1 and B1 (in a case within paragraph (b)(i)), or conditions A2 and B2 (in a case within paragraph (b)(ii)), are met.
(2)Where this paragraph applies by virtue of sub-paragraph (1)(b)(i), this Part of this Act has effect as if an authorised officer had (with due authority), at the time of the time of the third party defeat, given P a single defeat notice under section 241A(2) in respect of it.
(3)Where this paragraph applies by virtue of sub-paragraph (1)(b)(ii), this Part of this Act has effect as if an authorised officer had (with due authority), at the time of the second of the two third party defeats, given P a double defeat notice under section 241A(3) in respect of the two third party defeats.
(4)Section 241A(8) has no effect in relation to a notice treated as given as mentioned in sub-paragraph (2) or (3).
(5)Condition A1 is that—
(a)a conduct notice or a single or double defeat notice has been given to the other person (see sub-paragraph (9)) in respect of the third party defeat,
(b)at the time of the third party defeat an authorised officer would have had power by virtue of paragraph 17 to give P a defeat notice in respect of the third party defeat, had the officer been aware that it was a relevant defeat in relation to P, and
(c)so far as the authorised officer mentioned in sub-paragraph (1)(a) is aware, the conditions for giving P a defeat notice in respect of the third party defeat have never been met (ignoring this paragraph).
(6)Condition A2 is that—
(a)a conduct notice or a single or double defeat notice has been given to the other person (see sub-paragraph (9)) in respect of each, or both, of the third party defeats,
(b)at the time of the second third party defeat an authorised officer would have had power by virtue of paragraph 17 to give P a double defeat notice in respect of the third party defeats, had the officer been aware that either of the third party defeats was a relevant defeat in relation to P, and
(c)so far as the authorised officer mentioned in sub-paragraph (1)(a) is aware, the conditions for giving P a defeat notice in respect of those third party defeats (or either of them) have never been met (ignoring this paragraph).
(7)Condition B1 is that, had an authorised officer given P a defeat notice in respect of the third party defeat at the time of that relevant defeat, that defeat notice would still have effect at the relevant time (see sub-paragraph (1)).
(8)Condition B2 is that, had an authorised officer given P a defeat notice in respect of the two third party defeats at the time of the second of those relevant defeats, that defeat notice would still have effect at the relevant time.
(9)In this paragraph “third party defeat” means a relevant defeat which has occurred in relation to a person other than P.
19(1)In this Part of this Schedule “relevant body” means—U.K.
(a)a body corporate, or
(b)a partnership.
(2)For the purposes of this Part of this Schedule a person controls a body corporate if the person has power to secure that the affairs of the body corporate are conducted in accordance with the person's wishes—
(a)by means of the holding of shares or the possession of voting power in relation to the body corporate or any other relevant body,
(b)as a result of any powers conferred by the articles of association or other document regulating the body corporate or any other relevant body, or
(c)by means of controlling a partnership.
(3)For the purposes of this Part of this Schedule a person controls a partnership if the person is a controlling member or the managing partner of the partnership.
(4)In this paragraph “controlling member” has the same meaning as in Schedule 36 (partnerships).
(5)In this paragraph “managing partner”, in relation to a partnership, means the member of the partnership who directs, or is on a day-to-day level in control of, the management of the business of the partnership.]