
Print Options
PrintThe Whole
Act
PrintThe Whole
Part
PrintThe Whole
Chapter
PrintThe Whole
Cross Heading
PrintThis
Section
only
Changes over time for: Section 139


Timeline of Changes
This timeline shows the different points in time where a change occurred. The dates will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. The first date in the timeline will usually be the earliest date when the provision came into force. In some cases the first date is 01/02/1991 (or for Northern Ireland legislation 01/01/2006). This date is our basedate. No versions before this date are available. For further information see the Editorial Practice Guide and Glossary under Help.
Status:
Point in time view as at 30/08/2018.
Changes to legislation:
Investigatory Powers Act 2016, Section 139 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 07 March 2025. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations.

Changes to Legislation
Changes and effects yet to be applied by the editorial team are only applicable when viewing the latest version or prospective version of legislation. They are therefore not accessible when viewing legislation as at a specific point in time. To view the ‘Changes to Legislation’ information for this provision return to the latest version view using the options provided in the ‘What Version’ box above.
139Additional requirements in respect of warrants affecting overseas operatorsU.K.
This section has no associated Explanatory Notes
(1)This section applies where—
(a)an application for a bulk interception warrant has been made, and
(b)the Secretary of State considers that a telecommunications operator outside the United Kingdom is likely to be required to provide assistance in giving effect to the warrant if it is issued.
(2)Before issuing the warrant, the Secretary of State must consult the operator.
(3)Before issuing the warrant, the Secretary of State must, among other matters, take into account—
(a)the likely benefits of the warrant,
(b)the likely number of users (if known) of any telecommunications service which is provided by the operator and to which the warrant relates,
(c)the technical feasibility of complying with any requirement that may be imposed on the operator to provide assistance in giving effect to the warrant,
(d)the likely cost of complying with any such requirement, and
(e)any other effect of the warrant on the operator.
Back to top