25U.K.Part 6A of TIOPA 2010 is amended as follows.
26U.K.In section 259BC (the basic rules), after subsection (8) insert—
“(8A)Income is to be treated as “ordinary income” if it would fall to be brought into account for the purpose of calculating taxable profits of a person but for the fact that the person is a qualifying institutional investor (and, if the person is based in a territory under the law of which there is no relevant tax on income of the kind in question, if the territory had such a tax).
For the meaning of “qualifying institutional investor” see section 259NDA.”
27(1)Section 259EB (hybrid payer deduction/non-inclusion mismatches and their extent) is amended in accordance with sub-paragraphs (2) and (3).U.K.
(2)In subsection (3), at the beginning insert “ Subject to subsections (4A) to (4C) ”.
(3)After subsection (4), insert—
“(4A)No excess is to be taken to arise by reason of a hybrid payer being a hybrid entity for the purposes of subsection (1)(b) so far as it is attributable to a qualifying institutional investor based in a territory under the law of which—
(a)the income or profits of the hybrid entity are treated as income and profits of the investor, or
(b)the hybrid entity is not regarded as a distinct and separate person to the investor.
(4B)Excess is attributable to such a qualifying institutional investor to the extent that ordinary income (arising by reason of the payment or quasi-payment) would fall to be brought into account by the investor if—
(a)where subsection (4A)(a) applies, under the law of the territory the income or profits of the hybrid entity were not treated as income and profits of the investor, and
(b)where subsection (4A)(b) applies, under the law of the territory the hybrid entity were regarded as a distinct and separate person to the investor.
(4C)To determine if a “qualifying institutional investor” is “based” in a particular territory for the purposes of subsections (4A) and (4B) see section 259NDA.”
28U.K.In section 259GB (hybrid payee deduction/non-inclusion mismatches and their extent), after subsection (2) insert—
“(2A)No excess is to be taken to arise by reason of a hybrid payee being a hybrid entity for the purposes of subsection (1)(b) so far as it is attributable to a qualifying institutional investor based in a territory under the law of which—
(a)the income or profits of the hybrid entity are not treated as income or profits of the investor, or
(b)the hybrid entity is regarded as a distinct and separate person to the investor.
(2B)Excess is attributable to such a qualifying institutional investor to the extent that ordinary income (arising by reason of the payment or quasi-payment) would fall to be brought into account by the investor if—
(a)where subsection (2A)(a) applies, under the law of the territory the income or profits of the hybrid entity were treated as income or profits of the investor, and
(b)where subsection (2A)(b) applies, under the law of the territory the hybrid entity were not regarded as a distinct and separate person to the investor.
(2C)To determine if a “qualifying institutional investor” is “based” in a particular territory for the purposes of subsections (2A) and (2B) see section 259NDA.”
29U.K.After section 259ND insert—
(1)This section has effect for the purposes of this Part.
(2)References to “qualifying institutional investor” have the meaning given by paragraph 30A of Schedule 7AC to TCGA 1992.
(3)A qualifying institutional investor is “based” in a territory—
(a)if it is resident for tax purposes in the territory, or
(b)where it is not resident anywhere for tax purposes, if it is established in the territory.”