“PART 4BASeizure and detention of terrorist cryptoassets

Interpretation

10Z7A

(1)

In this Schedule—

“cryptoasset” means a cryptographically secured digital representation of value or contractual rights that uses a form of distributed ledger technology and can be transferred, stored or traded electronically;

“crypto wallet” means—

(a)

software,

(b)

hardware,

(c)

a physical item, or

(d)

any combination of the things mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (c),

which is used to store the cryptographic private key that allows cryptoassets to be accessed;

“terrorist cryptoasset” means a cryptoasset which—

(a)

is within subsection (1)(a) or (b) of section 1, or

(b)

is earmarked as terrorist property.

(2)

The Secretary of State may by regulations made by statutory instrument amend the definitions of “cryptoasset” and “crypto wallet” in sub-paragraph (1).

(3)

Regulations under sub-paragraph (2)—

(a)

may make different provision for different purposes;

(b)

may make consequential, supplementary, incidental, transitional, transitory or saving provision.

(4)

A statutory instrument containing regulations under sub-paragraph (2) may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.

(5)

In this Part—

“cryptoasset-related item” means an item of property that is, or that contains or gives access to information that is, likely to assist in the seizure under this Part of terrorist cryptoassets;

“senior officer” means—

(a)

a senior police officer;

(b)

an officer of Revenue and Customs of a rank designated by the Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs as equivalent to that of a senior police officer;

(c)

an immigration officer of a rank designated by the Secretary of State as equivalent to that of a senior police officer;

“senior police officer” means a police officer of at least the rank of superintendent.

Seizure of cryptoasset-related items

10Z7AA

(1)

An authorised officer may seize any item of property if the authorised officer has reasonable grounds for suspecting that the item is a cryptoasset-related item.

(2)

If an authorised officer is lawfully on any premises, the officer may, for the purpose of—

(a)

determining whether any property is a cryptoasset-related item, or

(b)

enabling or facilitating the seizure under this Part of any terrorist cryptoasset,

require any information which is stored in any electronic form and accessible from the premises to be produced in a form in which it can be taken away and in which it is visible and legible, or from which it can readily be produced in a visible and legible form.

(3)

But sub-paragraph (2) does not authorise an authorised officer to require a person to produce privileged information.

(4)

In this paragraph “privileged information” means information which a person would be entitled to refuse to provide—

(a)

in England and Wales and Northern Ireland, on grounds of legal professional privilege in proceedings in the High Court;

(b)

in Scotland, on grounds of confidentiality of communications in proceedings in the Court of Session.

(5)

Where an authorised officer has seized a cryptoasset-related item under sub-paragraph (1), the officer may use any information obtained from the item for the purpose of—

(a)

identifying or gaining access to a crypto wallet, and

(b)

by doing so, enabling or facilitating the seizure under this Part of any cryptoassets.

Initial detention of cryptoasset-related items

10Z7AB

(1)

Property seized under paragraph 10Z7AA may be detained for an initial period of 48 hours.

(2)

Sub-paragraph (1) authorises the detention of property only for so long as an authorised officer continues to have reasonable grounds for suspicion in relation to that property as described in paragraph 10Z7AA(1).

(3)

In calculating a period of 48 hours for the purposes of this paragraph, no account is to be taken of—

(a)

any Saturday or Sunday,

(b)

Christmas Day,

(c)

Good Friday,

(d)

any day that is a bank holiday under the Banking and Financial Dealings Act 1971 in the part of the United Kingdom within which the property is seized, or

(e)

any day prescribed by virtue of section 8(2) of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 as a court holiday in a sheriff court in the sheriff court district within which the property is seized.

Further detention of cryptoasset-related items

10Z7AC

(1)

The period for which property seized under paragraph 10Z7AA may be detained may be extended by an order made—

(a)

in England and Wales or Northern Ireland, by a magistrates’ court;

(b)

in Scotland, by the sheriff.

(2)

An order under sub-paragraph (1) may not authorise the detention of any property—

(a)

beyond the end of the period of 6 months beginning with the date of the order, and

(b)

in the case of any further order under this paragraph, beyond the end of the period of 2 years beginning with the date of the first order; but this is subject to sub-paragraph (4).

(3)

A justice of the peace may also exercise the power of a magistrates’ court to make the first order under sub-paragraph (1).

(4)

The court or sheriff may make an order for the period of 2 years in sub-paragraph (2)(b) to be extended to a period of up to 3 years beginning with the date of the first order.

(5)

An application to a magistrates’ court, a justice of the peace or the sheriff to make the first order under sub-paragraph (1) extending a particular period of detention—

(a)

may be made and heard without notice of the application or hearing having been given to any of the persons affected by the application or to the legal representatives of such a person, and

(b)

may be heard and determined in private in the absence of persons so affected and of their legal representatives.

(6)

An application for an order under sub-paragraph (1) or (4) may be made—

(a)

in relation to England and Wales and Northern Ireland, by the Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs or an authorised officer;

(b)

in relation to Scotland, by a procurator fiscal.

(7)

The court, sheriff or justice may make an order under sub-paragraph (1) if satisfied, in relation to the item of property to be further detained, that—

(a)

there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that it is a cryptoasset-related item, and

(b)

its continuing detention is justified.

(8)

The court or sheriff may make an order under sub-paragraph (4) if satisfied that a request for assistance is outstanding in relation to the item of property to be further detained.

(9)

A “request for assistance” in sub-paragraph (8) means a request for assistance in obtaining evidence (including information in any form or article) in connection with the property to be further detained, made —

(a)

by a judicial authority in the United Kingdom under section 7 of the Crime (International Co-operation) Act 2003,

(b)

by an authorised officer, to an authority exercising equivalent functions in a foreign country,

(c)

by the Scottish Ministers in connection with their functions under this Schedule, to an authority exercising equivalent functions in a foreign country, or

(d)

by a person under section 375A or 408A of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (evidence overseas).

(10)

An order under sub-paragraph (1) must provide for notice to be given to persons affected by the order.

Seizure of cryptoassets

10Z7AD

(1)

An authorised officer may seize cryptoassets if the authorised officer has reasonable grounds for suspecting that the cryptoassets are terrorist cryptoassets.

(2)

The circumstances in which a cryptoasset is “seized” for the purposes of sub-paragraph (1) include circumstances in which it is transferred into a crypto wallet controlled by the authorised officer.

Prior authorisation for detention of cryptoassets

10Z7AE

(1)

Where an order is made under paragraph 10Z7AC in respect of a cryptoasset-related item, the court, sheriff or justice making the order may, at the same time, make an order to authorise the detention of any cryptoassets that may be seized as a result of information obtained from that item.

(2)

An application for an order under this paragraph may be made, by a person mentioned in paragraph 10Z7AC(6), at the same time as an application for an order under paragraph 10Z7AC is made by that person.

(3)

The court, sheriff or justice may make an order under this paragraph if satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the cryptoassets that may be seized are terrorist cryptoassets.

(4)

An order under this paragraph authorises detention of the cryptoassets for the same period of time as the order under paragraph 10Z7AC authorises detention in respect of the cryptoasset-related item to which those cryptoassets relate.

Initial detention of cryptoassets

10Z7AF

(1)

Cryptoassets seized under paragraph 10Z7AD may be detained for an initial period of 48 hours.

(2)

Sub-paragraph (1) authorises the detention of cryptoassets only for so long as an authorised officer continues to have reasonable grounds for suspicion in relation to those cryptoassets as described in paragraph 10Z7AD(1).

(3)

In calculating a period of 48 hours for the purposes of this paragraph, no account is to be taken of—

(a)

any Saturday or Sunday,

(b)

Christmas Day,

(c)

Good Friday,

(d)

any day that is a bank holiday under the Banking and Financial Dealings Act 1971 in the part of the United Kingdom within which the property is seized, or

(e)

any day prescribed by virtue of section 8(2) of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 as a court holiday in a sheriff court in the sheriff court district within which the property is seized.

(4)

This paragraph is subject to paragraph 10Z7AE.

Further detention of cryptoassets

10Z7AG

(1)

The period for which cryptoassets seized under paragraph 10Z7AD may be detained may be extended by an order made—

(a)

in England and Wales or Northern Ireland, by a magistrates’ court;

(b)

in Scotland, by the sheriff.

(2)

An order under sub-paragraph (1) may not authorise the detention of any cryptoassets—

(a)

beyond the end of the period of 6 months beginning with the date of the order, and

(b)

in the case of any further order under this paragraph, beyond the end of the period of 2 years beginning with the date of the first order; but this is subject to sub-paragraph (4).

(3)

A justice of the peace may also exercise the power of a magistrates’ court to make the first order under sub-paragraph (1).

(4)

The court or sheriff may make an order for the period of 2 years in sub-paragraph (2)(b) to be extended to a period of up to 3 years beginning with the date of the first order.

(5)

An application to a magistrates’ court, a justice of the peace or the sheriff to make the first order under sub-paragraph (1) extending a particular period of detention—

(a)

may be made and heard without notice of the application or hearing having been given to any of the persons affected by the application or to the legal representatives of such a person, and

(b)

may be heard and determined in private in the absence of persons so affected and of their legal representatives.

(6)

An application for an order under sub-paragraph (1) or (4) may be made—

(a)

in relation to England and Wales and Northern Ireland, by the Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs or an authorised officer;

(b)

in relation to Scotland, by a procurator fiscal.

(7)

The court, sheriff or justice may make an order under sub-paragraph (1) if satisfied, in relation to the cryptoassets to be further detained, that condition 1, condition 2 or condition 3 is met.

(8)

Condition 1 is that there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the cryptoassets are intended to be used for the purposes of terrorism and that either—

(a)

their continued detention is justified while their intended use is further investigated or consideration is given to bringing (in the United Kingdom or elsewhere) proceedings against any person for an offence with which the cryptoassets are connected, or

(b)

proceedings against any person for an offence with which the cryptoassets are connected have been started and have not been concluded.

(9)

Condition 2 is that there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the cryptoassets consist of resources of an organisation which is a proscribed organisation and that either—

(a)

their continued detention is justified while investigation is made into whether or not they consist of such resources or consideration is given to bringing (in the United Kingdom or elsewhere) proceedings against any person for an offence with which the cryptoassets are connected, or

(b)

proceedings against any person for an offence with which the cryptoassets are connected have been started and have not been concluded.

(10)

Condition 3 is that there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the cryptoassets are property earmarked as terrorist property and that either—

(a)

their continued detention is justified while their derivation is further investigated or consideration is given to bringing (in the United Kingdom or elsewhere) proceedings against any person for an offence with which the cryptoassets are connected, or

(b)

proceedings against any person for an offence with which the cryptoassets are connected have been started and have not been concluded.

(11)

The court or sheriff may make an order under sub-paragraph (4) if satisfied that a request for assistance is outstanding in relation to the cryptoassets to be further detained.

(12)

A “request for assistance” in sub-paragraph (11) means a request for assistance in obtaining evidence (including information in any form or article) in connection with the property to be further detained, made —

(a)

by a judicial authority in the United Kingdom under section 7 of the Crime (International Co-operation) Act 2003,

(b)

by an authorised officer, to an authority exercising equivalent functions in a foreign country,

(c)

by the Scottish Ministers in connection with their functions under this Schedule, to an authority exercising equivalent functions in a foreign country, or

(d)

by a person under section 375A or 408A of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (evidence overseas).

(13)

An order under sub-paragraph (1) must provide for notice to be given to persons affected by the order.

Safekeeping of cryptoasset-related items and cryptoassets

10Z7AH

(1)

An authorised officer must arrange for any item of property seized under paragraph 10Z7AA to be safely stored throughout the period during which it is detained under this Part.

(2)

An authorised officer must arrange for any cryptoassets seized under paragraph 10Z7AD to be safely stored throughout the period during which they are detained under this Part.

Release of cryptoasset-related items and cryptoassets

10Z7AI

(1)

This paragraph applies while any cryptoasset or other item of property is detained under this Part.

(2)

A magistrates’ court or (in Scotland) the sheriff may, subject to sub-paragraph (9), direct the release of the whole or any part of the property if the following condition is met.

(3)

The condition is that the court or sheriff is satisfied, on an application by the person from whom the property was seized, that the conditions for the detention of the property in this Part are no longer met in relation to the property to be released.

(4)

A person within sub-paragraph (5) may, subject to sub-paragraph (9) and after notifying the magistrates’ court, sheriff or justice under whose order property is being detained, release the whole or any part of the property if satisfied that the detention of the property to be released is no longer justified.

(5)

The following persons are within this sub-paragraph—

(a)

in relation to England and Wales and Northern Ireland, an authorised officer;

(b)

in relation to Scotland, a procurator fiscal.

(6)

If any cryptoasset-related item which has been released is not claimed within the period of a year beginning with the date on which it was released, an authorised officer may—

(a)

retain the item and deal with it as they see fit,

(b)

dispose of the item, or

(c)

destroy the item.

(7)

The powers in sub-paragraph (6) may be exercised only—

(a)

where the authorised officer has taken reasonable steps to notify—

(i)

the person from whom the item was seized, and

(ii)

any other persons who the authorised officer has reasonable grounds to believe have an interest in the item,

that the item has been released, and

(b)

with the approval of a senior officer.

(8)

Any proceeds of a disposal of the item are to be paid—

(a)

into the Consolidated Fund if—

(i)

the item was directed to be released by a magistrates’ court, or

(ii)

a magistrates’ court or justice was notified under sub-paragraph (4) of the release;

(b)

into the Scottish Consolidated Fund if—

(i)

the item was directed to be released by the sheriff, or

(ii)

the sheriff was notified under sub-paragraph (4) of the release.

(9)

If (in the United Kingdom or elsewhere) proceedings are started against any person for an offence with which the property is connected, the property is not to be released under this paragraph (and so is to continue to be detained) until the proceedings are concluded.

PART 4BBTerrorist cryptoassets: crypto wallet freezing orders

Interpretation

10Z7B

(1)

In this Part—

(a)

“cryptoasset exchange provider” means a firm or sole practitioner who by way of business provides one or more of the following services, including where the firm or sole practitioner does so as creator or issuer of any of the cryptoassets involved—

(i)

exchanging, or arranging or making arrangements with a view to the exchange of, cryptoassets for money or money for cryptoassets,

(ii)

exchanging, or arranging or making arrangements with a view to the exchange of, one cryptoasset for another, or

(iii)

operating a machine which utilises automated processes to exchange cryptoassets for money or money for cryptoassets;

(b)

“custodian wallet provider” means a firm or sole practitioner who by way of business provides services to safeguard, or to safeguard and administer—

(i)

cryptoassets on behalf of its customers, or

(ii)

private cryptographic keys on behalf of its customers in order to hold, store and transfer cryptoassets;

(c)

“cryptoasset service provider” includes cryptoasset exchange provider and custodian wallet provider.

(2)

In the definition of “cryptoasset exchange provider” in sub-paragraph (1)—

(a)

“cryptoasset” includes a right to, or interest in, a cryptoasset;

(b)

“money” means—

(i)

money in sterling,

(ii)

money in any other currency, or

(iii)

money in any other medium of exchange,

but does not include a cryptoasset.

(3)

The Secretary of State may by regulations made by statutory instrument amend the definitions in sub-paragraphs (1) and (2).

(4)

Regulations under sub-paragraph (3)—

(a)

may make different provision for different purposes;

(b)

may make consequential, supplementary, incidental, transitional, transitory or saving provision.

(5)

A statutory instrument containing regulations under sub-paragraph (3) may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.

(6)

For the purposes of this Part—

(a)

a crypto wallet freezing order is an order that, subject to any exclusions (see paragraph 10Z7BD), prohibits each person by or for whom the crypto wallet to which the order applies is administered from—

(i)

making withdrawals or payments from the crypto wallet, or

(ii)

using the crypto wallet in any other way;

(b)

a crypto wallet is administered by or for a person if the person is the person to whom services are being provided by a cryptoasset service provider in relation to that crypto wallet.

(7)

In this Part—

“enforcement officer” means—

(a)

a constable, or

(b)

a counter-terrorism financial investigator;

“relevant court” means—

(a)

in England and Wales and Northern Ireland, a magistrates’ court, and

(b)

in Scotland, the sheriff;

“senior officer” means a police officer of at least the rank of superintendent;

“UK-connected cryptoasset service provider” means a cryptoasset service provider which—

(a)

is acting in the course of business carried on by it in the United Kingdom,

(b)

has terms and conditions with the persons to whom it provides services which provide for a legal dispute to be litigated in the courts of a part of the United Kingdom,

(c)

holds, in the United Kingdom, any data relating to the persons to whom it provides services, or

(d)

meets the condition in sub-paragraph (8).

(8)

The condition in this sub-paragraph is that—

(a)

the cryptoasset service provider has its registered office, or if it does not have one, its head office in the United Kingdom, and

(b)

the day-to-day management of the provider’s business is the responsibility of that office or another establishment maintained by it in the United Kingdom.

Application for crypto wallet freezing order

10Z7BA

(1)

This paragraph applies if an enforcement officer has reasonable grounds for suspecting that cryptoassets held in a crypto wallet administered by a UK-connected cryptoasset service provider are terrorist cryptoassets.

(2)

Where this paragraph applies the enforcement officer may apply to the relevant court for a crypto wallet freezing order in relation to the crypto wallet in which the cryptoassets are held.

(3)

But—

(a)

an enforcement officer may not apply for a crypto wallet freezing order unless the officer is a senior officer or is authorised to do so by a senior officer, and

(b)

the senior officer must consult the Treasury before making the application for the order or (as the case may be) authorising the application to be made, unless in the circumstances it is not reasonably practicable to do so.

(4)

An application for a crypto wallet freezing order may be made without notice if the circumstances of the case are such that notice of the application would prejudice the taking of any steps under this Schedule to forfeit cryptoassets that are terrorist cryptoassets.

(5)

An application for a crypto wallet freezing order under this paragraph may be combined with an application for an account freezing order under paragraph 10Q where a single entity—

(a)

is both a relevant financial institution for the purposes of paragraph 10Q and a cryptoasset service provider for the purposes of this Part, and

(b)

operates or administers, for the same person, both an account holding money and a crypto wallet.

Making of crypto wallet freezing order

10Z7BB

(1)

This paragraph applies where an application for a crypto wallet freezing order is made under paragraph 10Z7BA in relation to a crypto wallet.

(2)

The relevant court may make the order if satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that some or all of the cryptoassets held in the crypto wallet are terrorist cryptoassets.

(3)

A crypto wallet freezing order ceases to have effect at the end of the period specified in the order (which may be varied under paragraph 10Z7BC) unless it ceases to have effect at an earlier or later time in accordance with this Part or Part 4BC or 4BD.

(4)

The period specified by the relevant court for the purposes of sub-paragraph (3) (whether when the order is first made or on a variation under paragraph 10Z7BC) may not exceed the period of 2 years, beginning with the day on which the crypto wallet freezing order is (or was) made; but this is subject to sub-paragraph (5).

(5)

The relevant court may make an order for the period of 2 years in sub-paragraph (4) to be extended to a period of up to 3 years beginning with the day on which the crypto wallet freezing order is (or was) made.

(6)

The relevant court may make an order under sub-paragraph (5) if satisfied that a request for assistance is outstanding in relation to some or all of the cryptoassets held in the crypto wallet.

(7)

A “request for assistance” in sub-paragraph (6) means a request for assistance in obtaining evidence (including information in any form or article) in connection with some or all of the cryptoassets held in the crypto wallet, made—

(a)

by a judicial authority in the United Kingdom under section 7 of the Crime (International Co-operation) Act 2003,

(b)

by an enforcement officer, to an authority exercising equivalent functions in a foreign country,

(c)

by the Scottish Ministers in connection with their functions under this Schedule, to an authority exercising equivalent functions in a foreign country, or

(d)

by a person under section 375A or 408A of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (evidence overseas).

(8)

A crypto wallet freezing order must provide for notice to be given to persons affected by the order.

Variation and setting aside of crypto wallet freezing order

10Z7BC

(1)

The relevant court may at any time vary or set aside a crypto wallet freezing order on an application made by—

(a)

an enforcement officer, or

(b)

any person affected by the order.

(2)

But an enforcement officer may not make an application under sub-paragraph (1) unless the officer is a senior officer or is authorised to do so by a senior officer.

(3)

Before varying or setting aside a crypto wallet freezing order the court must (as well as giving the parties to the proceedings an opportunity to be heard) give such an opportunity to any person who may be affected by its decision.

(4)

In relation to Scotland, the references in this paragraph to setting aside an order are to be read as references to recalling it.

Exclusions

10Z7BD

(1)

The power to vary a crypto wallet freezing order includes (amongst other things) power to make exclusions from the prohibition on making withdrawals or payments from the crypto wallet to which the order applies.

(2)

Exclusions from the prohibition may also be made when the order is made.

(3)

An exclusion may (amongst other things) make provision for the purpose of enabling a person by or for whom the crypto wallet is administered—

(a)

to meet the person’s reasonable living expenses, or

(b)

to carry on any trade, business, profession or occupation.

(4)

An exclusion may be made subject to conditions.

(5)

Where a magistrates’ court exercises the power to make an exclusion for the purpose of enabling a person to meet legal expenses that the person has incurred, or may incur, in respect of proceedings under this Schedule, it must ensure that the exclusion—

(a)

is limited to reasonable legal expenses that the person has reasonably incurred or that the person reasonably incurs,

(b)

specifies the total amount that may be released for legal expenses in pursuance of the exclusion, and

(c)

is made subject to the same conditions as would be the required conditions (see section 286A of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002) if the order had been made under section 245A of that Act (in addition to any conditions imposed under sub-paragraph (4)).

(6)

A magistrates’ court, in deciding whether to make an exclusion for the purpose of enabling a person to meet legal expenses in respect of proceedings under this Schedule—

(a)

must have regard to the desirability of the person being represented in any proceedings under this Schedule in which the person is a participant, and

(b)

must disregard the possibility that legal representation of the person in any such proceedings might, were an exclusion not made—

(i)

be made available under arrangements made for the purposes of Part 1 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, or

(ii)

be funded by the Department of Justice in Northern Ireland.

(7)

The sheriff’s power to make exclusions may not be exercised for the purpose of enabling any person to meet any legal expenses in respect of proceedings under this Schedule.

(8)

The power to make exclusions must, subject to sub-paragraph (6), be exercised with a view to ensuring, so far as practicable, that there is not undue prejudice to the taking of any steps under this Schedule to forfeit cryptoassets that are terrorist cryptoassets.

Restriction on proceedings and remedies

10Z7BE

(1)

If a court in which proceedings are pending in respect of a crypto wallet administered by a UK-connected cryptoasset service provider is satisfied that a crypto wallet freezing order has been applied for or made in respect of the crypto wallet, it may either stay the proceedings or allow them to continue on any terms it thinks fit.

(2)

Before exercising the power conferred by sub-paragraph (1), the court must (as well as giving the parties to any of the proceedings concerned an opportunity to be heard) give such an opportunity to any person who may be affected by the court’s decision.

(3)

In relation to Scotland, the reference in sub-paragraph (1) to staying the proceedings is to be read as a reference to sisting the proceedings.

PART 4BCForfeiture of terrorist cryptoassets

Interpretation

10Z7C

(1)

In this Part—

“cryptoasset service provider” has the same meaning as in Part 4BB (see paragraph 10Z7B(1));

“crypto wallet freezing order” has the same meaning as in Part 4BB (see paragraph 10Z7B(6));

“senior officer” means—

(a)

a senior police officer;

(b)

an officer of Revenue and Customs of a rank designated by the Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs as equivalent to that of a senior police officer;

(c)

an immigration officer of a rank designated by the Secretary of State as equivalent to that of a senior police officer;

“senior police officer” means a police officer of at least the rank of superintendent.

(2)

Paragraph 10Z7B(6)(b) (administration of crypto wallets) applies in relation to this Part as it applies in relation to Part 4BB.

Forfeiture

10Z7CA

(1)

This paragraph applies—

(a)

while any cryptoassets are detained under Part 4BA, or

(b)

while a crypto wallet freezing order made under paragraph 10Z7BB has effect.

(2)

An application for the forfeiture of some or all of the cryptoassets that are detained or held in the crypto wallet that is subject to the crypto wallet freezing order may be made—

(a)

to a magistrates’ court by the Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs or an authorised officer, or

(b)

to the sheriff by the Scottish Ministers.

(3)

The court or sheriff may order the forfeiture of some or all of the cryptoassets if satisfied that the cryptoassets are terrorist cryptoassets.

(4)

An order under sub-paragraph (3) made by a magistrates’ court may provide for payment under paragraph 10Z7CJ of reasonable legal expenses that a person has reasonably incurred, or may reasonably incur, in respect of—

(a)

the proceedings in which the order is made, or

(b)

any related proceedings under this Part.

(5)

A sum in respect of a relevant item of expenditure is not payable under paragraph 10Z7CJ in pursuance of provision under sub-paragraph (4) unless—

(a)

the person who applied for the order under sub-paragraph (3) agrees to its payment, or

(b)

the court has assessed the amount allowed in respect of that item and the sum is paid in respect of the assessed amount.

(6)

For the purposes of sub-paragraph (5)—

(a)

a “relevant item of expenditure” is an item of expenditure to which regulations under section 286B of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 would apply if the order under sub-paragraph (3) had instead been a recovery order made under section 266 of that Act;

(b)

an amount is “allowed” in respect of a relevant item of expenditure if it would have been allowed by those regulations;

(c)

if the person who applied for the order under sub-paragraph (3) was an authorised officer, that person may not agree to the payment of a sum unless the person is a senior officer or is authorised to do so by a senior officer.

(7)

Sub-paragraph (3) ceases to apply on the transfer of an application made under this paragraph in accordance with paragraph 10Z7CE.

Forfeiture: supplementary

10Z7CB

(1)

Sub-paragraph (2) applies where an application is made under paragraph 10Z7CA for the forfeiture of any cryptoassets detained under Part 4BA.

(2)

The cryptoassets are to continue to be detained under Part 4BA (and may not be released under any power conferred by this Schedule) until any proceedings in pursuance of the application (including any proceedings on appeal) are concluded.

This is subject to Part 4BD (conversion to money).

(3)

Where an application is made under paragraph 10Z7CA in relation to cryptoassets held in a crypto wallet that is subject to a crypto wallet freezing order—

(a)

sub-paragraphs (4) and (5) apply, and

(b)

the crypto wallet freezing order is to continue to have effect until the time referred to in sub-paragraph (4)(b) or (5).

(4)

Where the cryptoassets are ordered to be forfeited under paragraph 10Z7CA(3) or 10Z7CE(3)—

(a)

the cryptoasset service provider that administers the crypto wallet must transfer the cryptoassets into a crypto wallet nominated by an authorised officer, and

(b)

immediately after the transfer has been made, the freezing order ceases to have effect.

(5)

Where the application is determined or otherwise disposed of other than by the making of an order under paragraph 10Z7CA(3) or 10Z7CE(3), the crypto wallet freezing order ceases to have effect immediately after that determination or other disposal.

(6)

Sub-paragraphs (4)(b) and (5) are subject to paragraph 10Z7CF and Part 4BD.

(7)

The Secretary of State may by regulations made by statutory instrument amend this paragraph to make provision about the forfeiture of cryptoassets held in a crypto wallet that is subject to a crypto wallet freezing order.

(8)

Regulations under sub-paragraph (7) may in particular make provision about—

(a)

the process for the forfeiture of cryptoassets;

(b)

the realisation of forfeited cryptoassets;

(c)

the application of the proceeds of such realisation.

(9)

Regulations under sub-paragraph (7) may—

(a)

make different provision for different purposes;

(b)

make consequential, supplementary, incidental, transitional, transitory or saving provision, including provision which makes consequential amendments to this Part.

(10)

A statutory instrument containing regulations under sub-paragraph (7) may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.

Associated and joint property

10Z7CC

(1)

Paragraphs 10Z7CD and 10Z7CE apply if—

(a)

an application is made under paragraph 10Z7CA in respect of cryptoassets,

(b)

the court or sheriff is satisfied that some or all of the cryptoassets are terrorist cryptoassets, and

(c)

there exists property that is associated with the cryptoassets in relation to which the court or sheriff is satisfied as mentioned in paragraph (b).

(2)

Paragraphs 10Z7CD and 10Z7CE also apply in England and Wales and Northern Ireland if—

(a)

an application is made under paragraph 10Z7CA in respect of cryptoassets,

(b)

the court is satisfied that some or all of the cryptoassets are earmarked as terrorist property, and

(c)

the cryptoassets in relation to which the court is satisfied as mentioned in paragraph (b) belong to joint tenants and one of the tenants is an excepted joint owner.

(3)

In this paragraph and paragraphs 10Z7CD and 10Z7CE, “associated property” means property of any of the following descriptions that is not itself the forfeitable property—

(a)

any interest in the forfeitable property;

(b)

any other interest in the property in which the forfeitable property subsists;

(c)

if the forfeitable property is part of a larger property, but not a separate part, the remainder of that property.

References to property being associated with forfeitable property are to be read accordingly.

(4)

In this paragraph and paragraphs 10Z7CD and 10Z7CE, the “forfeitable property” means the cryptoassets in relation to which the court or sheriff is satisfied as mentioned in sub-paragraph (1)(b) or (2)(b) (as the case may be).

(5)

For the purposes of this paragraph and paragraphs 10Z7CD and 10Z7CE—

(a)

an excepted joint owner is a joint tenant who obtained the property in circumstances in which it would not (as against them) be earmarked, and

(b)

references to the excepted joint owner’s share of property are to so much of the property as would have been theirs if the joint tenancy had been severed.

Agreements about associated and joint property

10Z7CD

(1)

Where—

(a)

this paragraph applies, and

(b)

the person who applied for the order under paragraph 10Z7CA (on the one hand) and the person who holds the associated property or who is the excepted joint owner (on the other hand) agree,

the magistrates’ court or sheriff may, instead of making an order under paragraph 10Z7CA(3), make an order requiring the person who holds the associated property or who is the excepted joint owner to make a payment to a person identified in the order.

(2)

The amount of the payment is (subject to sub-paragraph (3)) to be the amount which the persons referred to in sub-paragraph (1)(b) agree represents—

(a)

in a case where this paragraph applies by virtue of paragraph 10Z7CC(1), the value of the forfeitable property;

(b)

in a case where this paragraph applies by virtue of paragraph 10Z7CC(2), the value of the forfeitable property less the value of the excepted joint owner’s share.

(3)

The amount of the payment may be reduced if the person who applied for the order under paragraph 10Z7CA agrees that the other party to the agreement has suffered loss as a result of—

(a)

the seizure of the forfeitable property under paragraph 10Z7AD and its subsequent detention, or

(b)

the making of a crypto wallet freezing order under paragraph 10Z7BB.

(4)

The reduction that is permissible by virtue of sub-paragraph (3) is such amount as the parties to the agreement agree is reasonable, having regard to the loss suffered and any other relevant circumstances.

(5)

An order under sub-paragraph (1) may, so far as required for giving effect to the agreement, include provision for vesting, creating or extinguishing any interest in property.

(6)

An order under sub-paragraph (1) made by a magistrates’ court may provide for payment under sub-paragraph (11) of reasonable legal expenses that a person has reasonably incurred, or may reasonably incur, in respect of—

(a)

the proceedings in which the order is made, or

(b)

any related proceedings under this Part.

(7)

A sum in respect of a relevant item of expenditure is not payable under sub-paragraph (11) in pursuance of provision under sub-paragraph (6) unless—

(a)

the person who applied for the order under paragraph 10Z7CA agrees to its payment, or

(b)

the court has assessed the amount allowed in respect of that item and the sum is paid in respect of the assessed amount.

(8)

For the purposes of sub-paragraph (7)—

(a)

a “relevant item of expenditure” is an item of expenditure to which regulations under section 286B of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 would apply if the order under sub-paragraph (1) had instead been a recovery order made under section 266 of that Act;

(b)

an amount is “allowed” in respect of a relevant item of expenditure if it would have been allowed by those regulations.

(9)

If there is more than one item of associated property or more than one excepted joint owner, the total amount to be paid under sub-paragraph (1), and the part of that amount which is to be provided by each person who holds any such associated property or who is an excepted joint owner, is to be agreed between both (or all) of them and the person who applied for the order under paragraph 10Z7CA.

(10)

If the person who applied for the order under paragraph 10Z7CA was an authorised officer, that person may enter into an agreement for the purposes of any provision of this paragraph only if the person is a senior officer or is authorised to do so by a senior officer.

(11)

An amount received under an order under sub-paragraph (1) must be applied as follows—

(a)

first, it must be applied in making any payment of legal expenses which, after giving effect to sub-paragraph (7), are payable under this sub-paragraph in pursuance of provision under sub-paragraph (6);

(b)

second, it must be applied in payment or reimbursement of any reasonable costs incurred in storing or insuring the forfeitable property and any associated property whilst detained under this Schedule;

(c)

third, it must be paid—

(i)

if the order was made by a magistrates’ court, into the Consolidated Fund;

(ii)

if the order was made by the sheriff, into the Scottish Consolidated Fund.

Associated and joint property: default of agreement

10Z7CE

(1)

Where this paragraph applies and there is no agreement under paragraph 10Z7CD, the magistrates’ court or sheriff may transfer the application made under paragraph 10Z7CA to the appropriate court.

(2)

The “appropriate court” is—

(a)

the High Court, where the application under paragraph 10Z7CA was made to a magistrates’ court;

(b)

the Court of Session, where the application under paragraph 10Z7CA was made to the sheriff.

(3)

Where (under sub-paragraph (1)) an application made under paragraph 10Z7CA is transferred to the appropriate court, the appropriate court may order the forfeiture of the property to which the application relates, or any part of that property, if satisfied that what is to be forfeited—

(a)

is within subsection (1)(a) or (b) of section 1, or

(b)

is property earmarked as terrorist property.

(4)

An order under sub-paragraph (3) made by the High Court may include provision of the type that may be included in an order under paragraph 10Z7CA(3) made by a magistrates’ court by virtue of paragraph 10Z7CA(4).

(5)

If provision is included in an order of the High Court by virtue of sub-paragraph (4) of this paragraph, paragraph 10Z7CA(5) and (6) apply with the necessary modifications.

(6)

The appropriate court may, as well as making an order under sub-paragraph (3), make an order—

(a)

providing for the forfeiture of the associated property or (as the case may be) for the excepted joint owner‘s interest to be extinguished, or

(b)

providing for the excepted joint owner‘s interest to be severed.

(7)

Where (under sub-paragraph (1)) the magistrates’ court or sheriff decides not to transfer an application made under paragraph 10Z7CA to the appropriate court, the magistrates’ court or sheriff may, as well as making an order under paragraph 10Z7CA(3), make an order—

(a)

providing for the forfeiture of the associated property or (as the case may be) for the excepted joint owner‘s interest to be extinguished, or

(b)

providing for the excepted joint owner‘s interest to be severed.

(8)

An order under sub-paragraph (6) or (7) may be made only if the appropriate court, the magistrates’ court or the sheriff (as the case may be) thinks it just and equitable to do so.

(9)

An order under sub-paragraph (6) or (7) must provide for the payment of an amount to the person who holds the associated property or who is an excepted joint owner.

(10)

In making an order under sub-paragraph (6) or (7), and including provision in it by virtue of sub-paragraph (9), the appropriate court, the magistrates’ court or the sheriff (as the case may be) must have regard to—

(a)

the rights of any person who holds the associated property or who is an excepted joint owner and the value to that person of that property or (as the case may be) of that person’s share (including any value that cannot be assessed in terms of money), and

(b)

the interest of the person who applied for the order under paragraph 10Z7CA in realising the value of the forfeitable property.

(11)

If the appropriate court, the magistrates’ court or the sheriff (as the case may be) is satisfied that—

(a)

the person who holds the associated property or who is an excepted joint owner has suffered loss as a result of—

(i)

the seizure of the forfeitable property under paragraph 10Z7AD and its subsequent detention, or

(ii)

the making of the crypto wallet freezing order under paragraph 10Z7BB, and

(b)

the circumstances are exceptional,

an order under sub-paragraph (6) or (7) may require the payment of compensation to that person.

(12)

The amount of compensation to be paid by virtue of sub-paragraph (11) is the amount the appropriate court, the magistrates’ court or the sheriff (as the case may be) thinks reasonable, having regard to the loss suffered and any other relevant circumstances.

(13)

Compensation to be paid by virtue of sub-paragraph (11) is to be paid in the same way that compensation is to be paid under paragraph 10Z7CM.

Continuation of crypto wallet freezing order pending appeal

10Z7CF

(1)

This paragraph applies where, on an application under paragraph 10Z7CA in relation to a crypto wallet to which a crypto wallet freezing order applies—

(a)

the magistrates’ court or sheriff decides—

(i)

to make an order under paragraph 10Z7CA(3) in relation to some but not all of the cryptoassets to which the application related, or

(ii)

not to make an order under paragraph 10Z7CA(3), or

(b)

if the application is transferred in accordance with paragraph 10Z7CE(1), the High Court or Court of Session decides—

(i)

to make an order under paragraph 10Z7CE(3) in relation to some but not all of the cryptoassets to which the application related, or

(ii)

not to make an order under paragraph 10Z7CE(3).

(2)

The person who made the application under paragraph 10Z7CA may apply without notice to the court or sheriff that made the decision referred to in sub-paragraph (1) for an order that the crypto wallet freezing order is to continue to have effect.

(3)

Where the court or sheriff makes an order under sub-paragraph (2) the crypto wallet freezing order is to continue to have effect until—

(a)

the end of the period of 48 hours starting with the making of the order under sub-paragraph (2), or

(b)

if within that period of 48 hours an appeal is brought (whether under paragraph 10Z7CG or otherwise) against the decision referred to in sub-paragraph (1), the time when the appeal is determined or otherwise disposed of.

(4)

Sub-paragraph (3) of paragraph 10Z7AF applies for the purposes of sub-paragraph (3) as it applies for the purposes of that paragraph.

Paragraphs 10Z7CA to 10Z7CE: appeals

10Z7CG

(1)

Any party to proceedings for an order for the forfeiture of cryptoassets under paragraph 10Z7CA may appeal against—

(a)

the making of an order under paragraph 10Z7CA;

(b)

the making of an order under paragraph 10Z7CE(7);

(c)

a decision not to make an order under paragraph 10Z7CA unless the reason that no order was made is that an order was instead made under paragraph 10Z7CD;

(d)

a decision not to make an order under paragraph 10Z7CE(7).

Paragraphs (c) and (d) do not apply if the application for the order under paragraph 10Z7CA was transferred in accordance with paragraph 10Z7CE(1).

(2)

Where an order under paragraph 10Z7CD is made by a magistrates’ court, any party to the proceedings for the order (including any party to the proceedings under paragraph 10Z7CA that preceded the making of the order) may appeal against a decision to include, or not to include, provision in the order under paragraph 10Z7CD(6).

(3)

An appeal under this paragraph lies—

(a)

in relation to England and Wales, to the Crown Court;

(b)

in relation to Scotland, to the Sheriff Appeal Court;

(c)

in relation to Northern Ireland, to a county court.

(4)

An appeal under this paragraph must be made before the end of the period of 30 days starting with the day on which the court or sheriff makes the order or decision.

(5)

Sub-paragraph (4) is subject to paragraph 10Z7CH.

(6)

The court hearing the appeal may make any order it thinks appropriate.

(7)

If the court upholds an appeal against an order forfeiting any cryptoasset or other item of property, it may, subject to sub-paragraph (8), order the release of the whole or any part of the property.

(8)

If (in the United Kingdom or elsewhere) proceedings are started against any person for an offence with which the property is connected, the property is not to be released under this paragraph (and so is to continue to be detained) until the proceedings are concluded.

Extended time for appealing in certain cases where deproscription order made

10Z7CH

(1)

This paragraph applies where—

(a)

a successful application for an order under paragraph 10Z7CA relies (wholly or partly) on the fact that an organisation is proscribed,

(b)

an application under section 4 of the Terrorism Act 2000 for a deproscription order in respect of the organisation is refused by the Secretary of State,

(c)

the property forfeited by the order under paragraph 10Z7CA was seized under this Schedule on or after the date of the refusal of that application,

(d)

an appeal against that refusal is allowed under section 5 of the Terrorism Act 2000,

(e)

a deproscription order is made accordingly, and

(f)

if the order is made in reliance on section 123(5) of the Terrorism Act 2000, a resolution is passed by each House of Parliament under section 123(5)(b) of that Act.

(2)

Where this paragraph applies, an appeal under paragraph 10Z7CG against the making of an order under paragraph 10Z7CA, and against the making (in addition) of any order under paragraph 10Z7CE(7), may be brought at any time before the end of the period of 30 days beginning with the date on which the deproscription order comes into force.

(3)

In this paragraph a “deproscription order” means an order under section 3(3)(b) or (8) of the Terrorism Act 2000.

Realisation or destruction of forfeited cryptoassets etc

10Z7CI

(1)

This paragraph applies where any cryptoasset or other item of property is forfeited under this Part.

(2)

An authorised officer must—

(a)

realise the property, or

(b)

make arrangements for its realisation.

This is subject to sub-paragraphs (3) to (5).

(3)

The property is not to be realised—

(a)

before the end of the period within which an appeal may be made (whether under paragraph 10Z7CG or otherwise), or

(b)

if an appeal is made within that period, before the appeal is determined or otherwise disposed of.

(4)

The realisation of property under sub-paragraph (2) must be carried out, so far as practicable, in the manner best calculated to maximise the amount obtained for the property.

(5)

Where an authorised officer is satisfied that—

(a)

it is not reasonably practicable to realise any cryptoasset, or

(b)

there are reasonable grounds to believe that the realisation of any cryptoasset would be contrary to the public interest,

the authorised officer may destroy the cryptoasset.

(6)

But—

(a)

the authorised officer may destroy the cryptoasset only if the officer is a senior officer or is authorised to do so by a senior officer, and

(b)

the cryptoasset is not to be destroyed—

(i)

before the end of the period within which an appeal may be made (whether under paragraph 10Z7CG or otherwise), or

(ii)

if an appeal is made within that period, before the appeal is determined or otherwise disposed of.

(7)

The question of whether the realisation of the cryptoasset would be contrary to the public interest is to be determined with particular reference to how likely it is that the entry of the cryptoasset into general circulation would facilitate criminal conduct by any person.

Proceeds of realisation

10Z7CJ

(1)

This paragraph applies where any cryptoasset or other item of property is realised under paragraph 10Z7CI.

(2)

The proceeds of the realisation must be applied as follows—

(a)

first, they must be applied in making any payment required to be made by virtue of paragraph 10Z7CE(9);

(b)

second, they must be applied in making any payment of legal expenses which, after giving effect to paragraph 10Z7CA(5) (including as applied by paragraph 10Z7CE(5)), are payable under this sub-paragraph in pursuance of provision under paragraph 10Z7CA(4) or, as the case may be, 10Z7CE(4);

(c)

third, they must be applied in payment or reimbursement of any reasonable costs incurred in storing or insuring the property whilst detained under this Schedule and in realising the property;

(d)

fourth, they must be paid—

(i)

if the property was forfeited by a magistrates’ court or the High Court, into the Consolidated Fund;

(ii)

if the property was forfeited by the sheriff or the Court of Session, into the Scottish Consolidated Fund.

(3)

If what is realised under paragraph 10Z7CI represents part only of an item of property, the reference in sub-paragraph (2)(c) to costs incurred in storing or insuring the property is to be read as a reference to costs incurred in storing or insuring the whole of the property.

Victims etc: detained cryptoassets

10Z7CK

(1)

A person who claims that any cryptoassets detained under this Schedule belong to the person may apply for some or all of the cryptoassets to be released.

(2)

An application under sub-paragraph (1) is to be made—

(a)

in England and Wales or Northern Ireland, to a magistrates’ court;

(b)

in Scotland, to the sheriff.

(3)

The application may be made in the course of proceedings under paragraph 10Z7AG or 10Z7CA or at any other time.

(4)

The court or sheriff may, subject to sub-paragraph (8), order the cryptoassets to which the application relates to be released to the applicant if it appears to the court or sheriff that—

(a)

the applicant was deprived of the cryptoassets to which the application relates, or of property which they represent, by criminal conduct,

(b)

the cryptoassets the applicant was deprived of were not, immediately before the applicant was deprived of them, property obtained by or in return for criminal conduct and nor did they then represent such property, and

(c)

the cryptoassets belong to the applicant.

(5)

If sub-paragraph (6) applies, the court or sheriff may, subject to sub-paragraph (8), order the cryptoassets to which the application relates to be released to the applicant or to the person from whom they were seized.

(6)

This sub-paragraph applies where—

(a)

the applicant is not the person from whom the cryptoassets to which the application relates were seized,

(b)

it appears to the court or sheriff that those cryptoassets belong to the applicant,

(c)

the court or sheriff is satisfied that the release condition is met in relation to those cryptoassets, and

(d)

no objection to the making of an order under sub-paragraph (5) has been made by the person from whom those cryptoassets were seized.

(7)

The release condition is met—

(a)

if the conditions in Part 4BA for the detention of the cryptoassets are no longer met, or

(b)

in relation to cryptoassets which are subject to an application for forfeiture under paragraph 10Z7CA, if the court or sheriff decides not to make an order under that paragraph in relation to the cryptoassets.

(8)

If (in the United Kingdom or elsewhere) proceedings are started against any person for an offence with which the cryptoassets are connected, the cryptoassets are not to be released under this paragraph (and so are to continue to be detained) until the proceedings are concluded.

Victims etc: crypto wallet freezing orders

10Z7CL

(1)

A person who claims that any cryptoassets held in a crypto wallet in respect of which a crypto wallet freezing order has effect belong to the person may apply for some or all of the cryptoassets to be released.

(2)

An application under sub-paragraph (1) is to be made—

(a)

in England and Wales or Northern Ireland, to a magistrates’ court;

(b)

in Scotland, to the sheriff.

(3)

The application may be made in the course of proceedings under paragraph 10Z7BB or 10Z7CA or at any other time.

(4)

The court or sheriff may, subject to sub-paragraph (8), order the cryptoassets to which the application relates to be released to the applicant if it appears to the court or sheriff that—

(a)

the applicant was deprived of the cryptoassets to which the application relates, or of property which they represent, by criminal conduct,

(b)

the cryptoassets the applicant was deprived of were not, immediately before the applicant was deprived of them, property obtained by or in return for criminal conduct and nor did they then represent such property, and

(c)

the cryptoassets belong to the applicant.

(5)

If sub-paragraph (6) applies, the court or sheriff may, subject to sub-paragraph (8), order the cryptoassets to which the application relates to be released to the applicant.

(6)

This sub-paragraph applies where—

(a)

the applicant is not the person from whom the cryptoassets to which the application relates were seized,

(b)

it appears to the court or sheriff that those cryptoassets belong to the applicant,

(c)

the court or sheriff is satisfied that the release condition is met in relation to those cryptoassets, and

(d)

no objection to the making of an order under sub-paragraph (5) has been made by the person from whom those cryptoassets were seized.

(7)

The release condition is met—

(a)

if the conditions for the making of the crypto wallet freezing order are no longer met in relation to the cryptoassets to which the application relates, or

(b)

in relation to cryptoassets held in a crypto wallet subject to a crypto wallet freezing order which are subject to an application for forfeiture under paragraph 10Z7CA, if the court or sheriff decides not to make an order under that paragraph in relation to the cryptoassets.

(8)

Cryptoassets are not to be released under this paragraph—

(a)

if an application for their forfeiture under paragraph 10Z7CA is made, until any proceedings in pursuance of the application (including any proceedings on appeal) are concluded;

(b)

if (in the United Kingdom or elsewhere) proceedings are started against any person for an offence with which the cryptoassets are connected, until the proceedings are concluded.

(9)

In relation to cryptoassets held in a crypto wallet that is subject to a crypto wallet freezing order, references in this paragraph to a person from whom cryptoassets were seized include a reference to a person by or for whom the crypto wallet was administered immediately before the crypto wallet freezing order was made.

Compensation

10Z7CM

(1)

This paragraph applies if no order is made under paragraph 10Z7CA, 10Z7CD or 10Z7CE in respect of cryptoassets detained under this Schedule or held in a crypto wallet that is subject to a crypto wallet freezing order under paragraph 10Z7BB.

(2)

Where this paragraph applies, the following may make an application to the relevant court for compensation—

(a)

a person to whom the cryptoassets belong or from whom they were seized;

(b)

a person by or for whom a crypto wallet to which the crypto wallet freezing order applies is administered.

(3)

If the relevant court is satisfied that the applicant has suffered loss as a result of the detention of the cryptoassets or the making of the crypto wallet freezing order and that the circumstances are exceptional, the relevant court may order compensation to be paid to the applicant.

(4)

The amount of compensation to be paid is the amount the relevant court thinks reasonable, having regard to the loss suffered and any other relevant circumstances.

(5)

If the cryptoassets were seized, or the crypto wallet freezing order was applied for, by an officer of Revenue and Customs, the compensation is to be paid by the Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs.

(6)

If the cryptoassets were seized, or the crypto wallet freezing order was applied for, by a constable, the compensation is to be paid as follows—

(a)

in the case of a constable of a police force in England and Wales, it is to be paid out of the police fund from which the expenses of the police force are met;

(b)

in the case of a constable of the Police Service of Scotland, it is to be paid by the Scottish Police Authority;

(c)

in the case of a police officer within the meaning of the Police (Northern Ireland) Act 2000, it is to be paid out of money provided by the Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland.

(7)

If the cryptoassets were seized, or the crypto wallet freezing order was applied for, by a counter-terrorism financial investigator, the compensation is to be paid as follows—

(a)

in the case of a counter-terrorism financial investigator who was—

(i)

a member of the civilian staff of a police force (including the metropolitan police force), within the meaning of Part 1 of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011, or

(ii)

a member of staff of the City of London police force,

it is to be paid out of the police fund from which the expenses of the police force are met;

(b)

in the case of a counter-terrorism financial investigator who was a member of staff of the Police Service of Northern Ireland, it is to be paid out of money provided by the Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland.

(8)

If the cryptoassets were seized, or the crypto wallet freezing order was applied for, by an immigration officer, the compensation is to be paid by the Secretary of State.

(9)

If an order under paragraph 10Z7BB, 10Z7CA, 10Z7CD or 10Z7CE is made in respect of some of the cryptoassets detained or held, this paragraph has effect in relation to the remainder.

(10)

This paragraph does not apply if the relevant court makes an order under paragraph 10Z7CK or 10Z7CL.

(11)

In this paragraph “relevant court” means—

(a)

in England and Wales and Northern Ireland, a magistrates’ court;

(b)

in Scotland, the sheriff.

PART 4BDConversion of cryptoassets

Interpretation

10Z7D

(1)

In this Part—

“converted cryptoassets” is to be read in accordance with paragraphs 10Z7DD and 10Z7DE;

“crypto wallet freezing order” has the same meaning as in Part 4BB (see paragraph 10Z7B(6));

“relevant court” means—

(a)

in England and Wales and Northern Ireland, a magistrates’ court;

(b)

in Scotland, the sheriff;

“relevant financial institution” has the same meaning as in Part 4B (see paragraph 10Q);

“UK-connected cryptoasset service provider” has the same meaning as in Part 4BB (see paragraph 10Z7B(7)).

(2)

Paragraph 10Z7B(6)(b) (administration of crypto wallets) applies in relation to this Part as it applies in relation to Part 4BB.

(3)

In this Part references to the conversion of cryptoassets into money are references to the conversion of cryptoassets into—

(a)

cash, or

(b)

money held in an account maintained with a relevant financial institution.

(4)

For the purposes of Parts 2 to 4, converted cryptoassets detained under this Part are not to be treated as cash detained under this Schedule.

Detained cryptoassets: conversion

10Z7DA

(1)

Sub-paragraph (2) applies while any cryptoassets are detained in pursuance of an order under paragraph 10Z7AE or 10Z7AG (including where cryptoassets are subject to forfeiture proceedings).

(2)

A person within sub-paragraph (3) may apply to the relevant court for an order requiring all of the cryptoassets detained pursuant to the order to be converted into money.

(3)

The following persons are within this sub-paragraph—

(a)

an authorised officer;

(b)

a person from whom the cryptoassets were seized.

(4)

In deciding whether to make an order under this paragraph, the court must have regard to whether the cryptoassets (as a whole) are likely to suffer a significant loss in value during the period before they are released or forfeited (including the period during which an appeal against an order for forfeiture may be made).

(5)

Before making an order under this paragraph the court must give an opportunity to be heard to—

(a)

the parties to the proceedings, and

(b)

any other person who may be affected by its decision.

(6)

As soon as practicable after an order is made under this paragraph, an authorised officer must convert the cryptoassets, or arrange for the cryptoassets to be converted, into money.

(7)

The conversion of cryptoassets under sub-paragraph (6) must be carried out, so far as practicable, in the manner best calculated to maximise the amount of money obtained for the cryptoassets.

(8)

At the first opportunity after the cryptoassets are converted, the authorised officer must arrange for the amount of money obtained for the cryptoassets to be paid into an interest-bearing account and held there.

(9)

Interest accruing on the amount is to be added to it on its forfeiture or release.

(10)

Where cryptoassets are converted into money in accordance with an order made under this paragraph—

(a)

the cryptoassets are no longer to be treated as being detained in pursuance of an order under paragraph 10Z7AE or 10Z7AG, and

(b)

any application made under paragraph 10Z7CA(2) in relation to the cryptoassets which has not yet been determined or otherwise disposed of (including under paragraph 10Z7CD or 10Z7CE) is to be treated as if it were an application made under paragraph 10Z7DG(2) in relation to the converted cryptoassets.

(11)

An order made under this paragraph must provide for notice to be given to persons affected by the order.

(12)

No appeal may be made against an order made under this paragraph.

Frozen crypto wallet: conversion

10Z7DB

(1)

This paragraph applies while a crypto wallet freezing order under paragraph 10Z7BB has effect (including where cryptoassets held in a crypto wallet that is subject to a crypto wallet freezing order are subject to forfeiture proceedings).

(2)

A person within sub-paragraph (3) may apply to the relevant court for an order requiring all of the cryptoassets held in the crypto wallet to be converted into money.

(3)

The following persons are within this sub-paragraph—

(a)

an authorised officer;

(b)

a person by or for whom the crypto wallet is administered.

(4)

In deciding whether to make an order under this paragraph, the court must have regard to whether the cryptoassets (as a whole) are likely to suffer a significant loss in value during the period before—

(a)

the crypto wallet freezing order ceases to have effect, or

(b)

the cryptoassets are forfeited (including the period during which an appeal against an order for forfeiture may be made).

(5)

Before making an order under this paragraph the court must give an opportunity to be heard to—

(a)

the parties to the proceedings, and

(b)

any other person who may be affected by its decision.

(6)

As soon as practicable after an order is made under this paragraph, the UK-connected cryptoasset service provider that administers the crypto wallet must convert the cryptoassets, or arrange for the cryptoassets to be converted, into money.

(7)

The conversion of cryptoassets under sub-paragraph (6) must be carried out, so far as practicable, in the manner best calculated to maximise the amount of money obtained for the cryptoassets.

(8)

At the first opportunity after the cryptoassets are converted, the UK-connected cryptoasset service provider must arrange for the amount of money obtained for the cryptoassets to be paid into an interest-bearing account nominated by an authorised officer and held there.

(9)

But—

(a)

the UK-connected cryptoasset service provider may deduct any reasonable expenses incurred by the provider in connection with the conversion of the cryptoassets, and

(b)

the amount to be treated as the proceeds of the conversion of the cryptoassets is to be reduced accordingly.

(10)

Interest accruing on the amount obtained for the cryptoassets is to be added to it on its forfeiture or release.

(11)

Where cryptoassets are converted in accordance with an order made under this paragraph—

(a)

the crypto wallet freezing order ceases to have effect,

(b)

any application made under paragraph 10Z7CA(2) in relation to the cryptoassets which has not yet been determined or otherwise disposed of (including under paragraph 10Z7CD or 10Z7CE) is to be treated as if it were an application made under paragraph 10Z7DG(2) in relation to the converted cryptoassets, and

(c)

any application made under paragraph 10Z7CF(2) in relation to the crypto wallet which has not yet been determined or otherwise disposed of may not be proceeded with.

(12)

An order made under this paragraph must provide for notice to be given to persons affected by the order.

(13)

No appeal may be made against an order made under this paragraph.

Conversion: existing forfeiture proceedings

10Z7DC

(1)

Where—

(a)

cryptoassets are forfeited under paragraph 10Z7CA or 10Z7CE, and

(b)

before the cryptoassets are realised or destroyed in accordance with paragraph 10Z7CI, an order is made under paragraph 10Z7DA requiring the cryptoassets to be converted into money,

paragraph 10Z7DJ(1) applies in relation to the converted cryptoassets as if they had been detained under paragraph 10Z7DD and forfeited under paragraph 10Z7DG (and accordingly paragraph 10Z7CI ceases to apply).

(2)

Where—

(a)

cryptoassets are forfeited under paragraph 10Z7CA or 10Z7CE, and

(b)

before the cryptoassets are realised or destroyed in accordance with paragraph 10Z7CI, an order is made under paragraph 10Z7DB requiring the cryptoassets to be converted into money,

paragraph 10Z7DJ(2) applies in relation to the converted cryptoassets as if they had been detained under paragraph 10Z7DE and forfeited under paragraph 10Z7DG (and accordingly paragraph 10Z7CI ceases to apply).

(3)

Where—

(a)

an appeal may be made under paragraph 10Z7CG(1) or (2) in relation to the determination of an application under paragraph 10Z7CA(2) for the forfeiture of cryptoassets (including where paragraph 10Z7CD or 10Z7CE applies), and

(b)

an order is made under paragraph 10Z7DA or 10Z7DB requiring the cryptoassets to be converted into money,

the appeal may instead be made under paragraph 10Z7DH (within the time allowed by paragraph 10Z7CG(4)) as if it were an appeal against the determination of an application under paragraph 10Z7DG.

(4)

Where—

(a)

an appeal is made under paragraph 10Z7CG(1) or (2) in relation to the determination of an application under paragraph 10Z7CA(2) for the forfeiture of cryptoassets (including where paragraph 10Z7CD or 10Z7CE applies), and

(b)

before the appeal is determined or otherwise disposed of, an order is made under paragraph 10Z7DA or 10Z7DB requiring the cryptoassets to be converted into money,

the appeal is to be treated as if it had been made under paragraph 10Z7DH(1) in relation to the determination of an application under paragraph 10Z7DG for the forfeiture of the converted cryptoassets.

Detained cryptoassets: detention of proceeds of conversion

10Z7DD

(1)

This paragraph applies where cryptoassets are converted into money in accordance with an order under paragraph 10Z7DA.

(2)

The proceeds of the conversion (the “converted cryptoassets”) may be detained initially until the end of the period that the cryptoassets could, immediately before the conversion, have been detained under Part 4BA (ignoring the possibility of any extension of that period).

(3)

The period for which the converted cryptoassets may be detained may be extended by an order made by the relevant court.

(4)

An order under sub-paragraph (3) may not authorise the detention of the converted cryptoassets beyond the end of the period of 2 years beginning with the relevant date; but this is subject to sub-paragraph (5).

(5)

The relevant court may make an order for the period of 2 years in sub-paragraph (4) to be extended to a period of up to 3 years beginning with the relevant date.

(6)

In sub-paragraphs (4) and (5) “the relevant date” means the date on which the first order under paragraph 10Z7AE or 10Z7AG (as the case may be) was made in relation to the cryptoassets.

(7)

An application for an order under sub-paragraph (3) or (5) may be made—

(a)

in relation to England and Wales and Northern Ireland, by the Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs or an authorised officer;

(b)

in relation to Scotland, by a procurator fiscal.

(8)

The relevant court may make an order under sub-paragraph (3) only if satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the converted cryptoassets to be further detained—

(a)

are within subsection (1)(a) or (b) of section 1, or

(b)

are property earmarked as terrorist property.

(9)

The relevant court may make an order under sub-paragraph (5) only if satisfied that a request for assistance is outstanding in relation to the cryptoassets mentioned in sub-paragraph (1).

(10)

A “request for assistance” in sub-paragraph (9) means a request for assistance in obtaining evidence (including information in any form or article) in connection with the cryptoassets, made—

(a)

by a judicial authority in the United Kingdom under section 7 of the Crime (International Co-operation) Act 2003,

(b)

by an authorised officer, to an authority exercising equivalent functions in a foreign country,

(c)

by the Scottish Ministers in connection with their functions under this Schedule, to an authority exercising equivalent functions in a foreign country, or

(d)

by a person under section 375A or 408A of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (evidence overseas).

Frozen crypto wallets: detention of proceeds of conversion

10Z7DE

(1)

This paragraph applies where cryptoassets held in a crypto wallet subject to a crypto wallet freezing order are converted into money in accordance with an order under paragraph 10Z7DB.

(2)

The proceeds of the conversion (the “converted cryptoassets”) may be detained initially until the end of the period that the crypto wallet freezing order was, immediately before the conversion, due to have effect under Part 4BB (ignoring the possibility of any extension of that period).

(3)

The period for which the converted cryptoassets may be detained may be extended by an order made by the relevant court.

(4)

An order under sub-paragraph (3) may not authorise the detention of the converted cryptoassets beyond the end of the period of 2 years beginning with the day on which the crypto wallet freezing order was made; but this is subject to sub-paragraph (5).

(5)

The relevant court may make an order for the period of 2 years in sub-paragraph (4) to be extended to a period of up to 3 years beginning with the day on which the crypto wallet freezing order was made.

(6)

An application for an order under sub-paragraph (3) or (5) may be made—

(a)

in relation to England and Wales and Northern Ireland, by the Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs or an authorised officer;

(b)

in relation to Scotland, by a procurator fiscal.

(7)

The relevant court may make an order under sub-paragraph (3) only if satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the converted cryptoassets to be further detained—

(a)

are within subsection (1)(a) or (b) of section 1, or

(b)

are property earmarked as terrorist property.

(8)

The relevant court may make an order under sub-paragraph (5) only if satisfied that a request for assistance is outstanding in relation to the cryptoassets mentioned in sub-paragraph (1).

(9)

A “request for assistance” in sub-paragraph (8) means a request for assistance in obtaining evidence (including information in any form or article) in connection with the cryptoassets, made—

(a)

by a judicial authority in the United Kingdom under section 7 of the Crime (International Co-operation) Act 2003,

(b)

by an authorised officer, to an authority exercising equivalent functions in a foreign country,

(c)

by the Scottish Ministers in connection with their functions under this Schedule, to an authority exercising equivalent functions in a foreign country, or

(d)

by a person under section 375A or 408A of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (evidence overseas).

Release of detained converted cryptoassets

10Z7DF

(1)

This paragraph applies while any converted cryptoassets are detained under paragraph 10Z7DD or 10Z7DE.

(2)

The relevant court may, subject to sub-paragraph (7), direct the release of the whole or any part of the converted cryptoassets if the following condition is met.

(3)

The condition is that, on an application by the relevant person, the court is not satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the converted cryptoassets to be released—

(a)

are within subsection (1)(a) or (b) of section 1, or

(b)

are property earmarked as terrorist property.

(4)

In sub-paragraph (3) “the relevant person” means—

(a)

in the case of converted cryptoassets detained under paragraph 10Z7DD, the person from whom the cryptoassets mentioned in sub-paragraph (1) of that paragraph were seized, and

(b)

in the case of converted cryptoassets detained under paragraph 10Z7DE, any person affected by the crypto wallet freezing order mentioned in sub-paragraph (1) of that paragraph.

(5)

A person within sub-paragraph (6) may, subject to sub-paragraph (7) and after notifying the magistrates’ court or sheriff under whose order converted cryptoassets are being detained, release the whole or any part of the converted cryptoassets if satisfied that the detention is no longer justified.

(6)

The following persons are within this sub-paragraph—

(a)

in relation to England and Wales or Northern Ireland, an authorised officer;

(b)

in relation to Scotland, a procurator fiscal.

(7)

Converted cryptoassets are not to be released under this paragraph (and so are to continue to be detained)—

(a)

if an application for their forfeiture under paragraph 10Z7DG is made, until any proceedings in pursuance of the application (including any proceedings on appeal) are concluded;

(b)

if (in the United Kingdom or elsewhere) proceedings are started against any person for an offence with which the converted cryptoassets are connected, until the proceedings are concluded.

Forfeiture

10Z7DG

(1)

This paragraph applies while any converted cryptoassets are detained under paragraph 10Z7DD or 10Z7DE.

(2)

An application for the forfeiture of some or all of the converted cryptoassets may be made—

(a)

to a magistrates’ court, by the Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs or an authorised officer;

(b)

to the sheriff, by the Scottish Ministers.

(3)

The court or sheriff may order the forfeiture of some or all of the converted cryptoassets if satisfied that the converted cryptoassets to be forfeited—

(a)

are within subsection (1)(a) or (b) of section 1, or

(b)

are property earmarked as terrorist property.

(4)

But in the case of property which belongs to joint tenants, one of whom is an excepted joint owner, the order may not apply to so much of it as the court thinks is attributable to the excepted joint owner’s share.

(5)

Where an application for forfeiture is made under this paragraph, the converted cryptoassets are to continue to be detained under paragraph 10Z7DD or 10Z7DE (and may not be released under any power conferred by this Part) until any proceedings in pursuance of the application (including any proceedings on appeal) are concluded.

(6)

For the purposes of this paragraph—

(a)

an excepted joint owner is a joint tenant who obtained the property in circumstances in which it would not (as against them) be earmarked, and

(b)

references to the excepted joint owner’s share of property are to so much of the property as would have been theirs if the joint tenancy had been severed.

Forfeiture: appeals

10Z7DH

(1)

Any party to proceedings for an order for the forfeiture of converted cryptoassets under paragraph 10Z7DG who is aggrieved by an order under that paragraph or by the decision of the court not to make such an order may appeal—

(a)

from an order or decision of a magistrates’ court in England and Wales, to the Crown Court;

(b)

from an order or decision of the sheriff, to the Sheriff Appeal Court;

(c)

from an order or decision of a magistrates’ court in Northern Ireland, to a county court.

(2)

An appeal under sub-paragraph (1) must be made before the end of the period of 30 days starting with the day on which the court makes the order or decision.

(3)

The court hearing the appeal may make any order it thinks appropriate.

(4)

If the court upholds an appeal against an order forfeiting the converted cryptoassets, it may, subject to sub-paragraph (5), order the release of some or all of the converted cryptoassets.

(5)

If (in the United Kingdom or elsewhere) proceedings are started against any person for an offence with which the converted cryptoassets are connected, the converted cryptoassets are not to be released under this paragraph (and so are to continue to be detained) until the proceedings are concluded.

Extended time for appealing in certain cases where deproscription order made

10Z7DI

(1)

This paragraph applies where—

(a)

a successful application for an order under paragraph 10Z7DG relies (wholly or partly) on the fact that an organisation is proscribed,

(b)

an application under section 4 of the Terrorism Act 2000 for a deproscription order in respect of the organisation is refused by the Secretary of State,

(c)

the converted cryptoassets forfeited by the order under paragraph 10Z7DG were converted from cryptoassets which were seized under this Schedule on or after the date of the refusal of that application,

(d)

an appeal against that refusal is allowed under section 5 of the Terrorism Act 2000,

(e)

a deproscription order is made accordingly, and

(f)

if the order is made in reliance on section 123(5) of the Terrorism Act 2000, a resolution is passed by each House of Parliament under section 123(5)(b) of that Act.

(2)

Where this paragraph applies, an appeal under paragraph 10Z7DH against the making of an order under paragraph 10Z7DG may be brought at any time before the end of the period of 30 days beginning with the date on which the deproscription order comes into force.

(3)

In this paragraph a “deproscription order” means an order under section 3(3)(b) or (8) of the Terrorism Act 2000.

Application of forfeited converted cryptoassets

10Z7DJ

(1)

Converted cryptoassets detained under paragraph 10Z7DD and forfeited under paragraph 10Z7DG, and any accrued interest on them, must be applied as follows—

(a)

first, they must be applied in making any payment of reasonable expenses incurred by an authorised officer in connection with the safe storage of the cryptoassets mentioned in paragraph 10Z7DD(1) during the period the cryptoassets were detained under Part 4BA;

(b)

second, they must be applied in making any payment of reasonable expenses incurred by an authorised officer in connection with the conversion of those cryptoassets under paragraph 10Z7DA(6);

(c)

third, they must be applied in making any payment of reasonable expenses incurred by an authorised officer in connection with the detention of the converted cryptoassets under this Part;

(d)

fourth, they must be paid—

(i)

if forfeited by a magistrates’ court in England and Wales or Northern Ireland, into the Consolidated Fund, and

(ii)

if forfeited by the sheriff, into the Scottish Consolidated Fund.

(2)

Converted cryptoassets detained under paragraph 10Z7DE and forfeited under paragraph 10Z7DG, and any accrued interest on them, must be applied as follows—

(a)

first, they must be applied in making any payment of reasonable expenses incurred by an authorised officer in connection with the detention of the converted cryptoassets under this Part;

(b)

second, they must be paid—

(i)

if forfeited by a magistrates’ court in England and Wales or Northern Ireland, into the Consolidated Fund, and

(ii)

if forfeited by the sheriff, into the Scottish Consolidated Fund.

(3)

But converted cryptoassets are not to be applied or paid under sub-paragraph (1) or (2)—

(a)

before the end of the period within which an appeal under paragraph 10Z7DH may be made, or

(b)

if a person appeals under that paragraph, before the appeal is determined or otherwise disposed of.

Victims etc

10Z7DK

(1)

This paragraph applies where converted cryptoassets are detained under this Part.

(2)

Where this paragraph applies, a person (“P”) who claims that the relevant cryptoassets belonged to P immediately before—

(a)

the relevant cryptoassets were seized, or

(b)

the crypto wallet freezing order was made in relation to the crypto wallet in which the relevant cryptoassets were held,

may apply to the relevant court for some or all of the converted cryptoassets to be released to P.

(3)

The application may be made in the course of proceedings under paragraph 10Z7DD, 10Z7DE or 10Z7DG or at any other time.

(4)

The relevant court may, subject to sub-paragraph (9), order the converted cryptoassets to which the application relates to be released to the applicant if it appears to the relevant court that the condition in sub-paragraph (5) is met.

(5)

The condition in this sub-paragraph is that—

(a)

the applicant was deprived of the relevant cryptoassets, or of property which they represent, by criminal conduct,

(b)

the relevant cryptoassets the applicant was deprived of were not, immediately before the applicant was deprived of them, property obtained by or in return for criminal conduct and nor did they then represent such property, and

(c)

the relevant cryptoassets belonged to the applicant immediately before—

(i)

the relevant cryptoassets were seized, or

(ii)

the crypto wallet freezing order was made in relation to the crypto wallet in which the relevant cryptoassets were held.

(6)

If sub-paragraph (7) applies, the relevant court may, subject to sub-paragraph (9), order the converted cryptoassets to which the application relates to be released to the applicant or to the person from whom the relevant cryptoassets were seized.

(7)

This sub-paragraph applies where—

(a)

the applicant is not the person from whom the relevant cryptoassets were seized,

(b)

it appears to the relevant court that the relevant cryptoassets belonged to the applicant immediately before—

(i)

the relevant cryptoassets were seized, or

(ii)

the crypto wallet freezing order was made in relation to the crypto wallet in which the relevant cryptoassets were held,

(c)

the relevant court is satisfied that the release condition is met in relation to the converted cryptoassets, and

(d)

no objection to the making of an order under sub-paragraph (6) has been made by the person from whom the relevant cryptoassets were seized.

(8)

The release condition is met—

(a)

if the conditions in this Part for the detention of the converted cryptoassets are no longer met, or

(b)

in relation to converted cryptoassets which are subject to an application for forfeiture under paragraph 10Z7DG, if the court or sheriff decides not to make an order under that paragraph in relation to the converted cryptoassets.

(9)

If (in the United Kingdom or elsewhere) proceedings are started against any person for an offence with which the converted cryptoassets are connected, the converted cryptoassets are not to be released under this paragraph (and so are to continue to be detained) until the proceedings are concluded

(10)

Where sub-paragraph (2)(b) applies, references in this paragraph to a person from whom relevant cryptoassets were seized include a reference to a person by or for whom the crypto wallet mentioned in that provision was administered immediately before the crypto wallet freezing order was made in relation to the crypto wallet.

(11)

In this paragraph “the relevant cryptoassets” means—

(a)

in relation to converted cryptoassets detained under paragraph 10Z7DD, some or all of the cryptoassets mentioned in sub-paragraph (1) of that paragraph, and

(b)

in relation to converted cryptoassets detained under paragraph 10Z7DE, some or all of the cryptoassets mentioned in sub-paragraph (1) of that paragraph.

Compensation

10Z7DL

(1)

This paragraph applies if no order is made under paragraph 10Z7DG in respect of converted cryptoassets detained under this Part.

(2)

Where this paragraph applies, the following may make an application to the relevant court for compensation—

(a)

a person to whom the relevant cryptoassets belonged immediately before they were seized;

(b)

a person from whom the relevant cryptoassets were seized;

(c)

a person by or for whom the crypto wallet mentioned in paragraph 10Z7DE(1) was administered immediately before the crypto wallet freezing order was made in relation to the crypto wallet.

(3)

If the relevant court is satisfied that—

(a)

the applicant has suffered loss as a result of—

(i)

the conversion of the relevant cryptoassets into money, or

(ii)

the detention of the converted cryptoassets, and

(b)

the circumstances are exceptional,

the relevant court may order compensation to be paid to the applicant.

(4)

The amount of compensation to be paid is the amount the relevant court thinks reasonable, having regard to the loss suffered and any other relevant circumstances.

(5)

If the relevant cryptoassets were seized, or the relevant crypto wallet freezing order was applied for, by an officer of Revenue and Customs, the compensation is to be paid by the Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs.

(6)

If the relevant cryptoassets were seized, or the relevant crypto wallet freezing order was applied for, by a constable, the compensation is to be paid as follows—

(a)

in the case of a constable of a police force in England and Wales, it is to be paid out of the police fund from which the expenses of the police force are met;

(b)

in the case of a constable of the Police Service of Scotland, it is to be paid by the Scottish Police Authority;

(c)

in the case of a police officer within the meaning of the Police (Northern Ireland) Act 2000, it is to be paid out of money provided by the Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland.

(7)

If the relevant cryptoassets were seized, or the relevant crypto wallet freezing order was applied for, by a counter-terrorism financial investigator, the compensation is to be paid as follows—

(a)

in the case of a counter-terrorism financial investigator who was—

(i)

a member of the civilian staff of a police force (including the metropolitan police force), within the meaning of Part 1 of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011, or

(ii)

a member of staff of the City of London police force,

it is to be paid out of the police fund from which the expenses of the police force are met;

(b)

in the case of a counter-terrorism financial investigator who was a member of staff of the Police Service of Northern Ireland, it is to be paid out of money provided by the Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland.

(8)

If the relevant cryptoassets were seized, or the relevant crypto wallet freezing order was applied for, by an immigration officer, the compensation is to be paid by the Secretary of State.

(9)

This paragraph does not apply if the relevant court makes an order under paragraph 10Z7DK.

(10)

In this paragraph—

“the relevant cryptoassets” means—

(a)

in relation to converted cryptoassets detained under paragraph 10Z7DD, the cryptoassets mentioned in sub-paragraph (1) of that paragraph;

(b)

in relation to converted cryptoassets detained under paragraph 10Z7DE, the cryptoassets mentioned in sub-paragraph (1) of that paragraph;

“the relevant crypto wallet freezing order”, in relation to converted cryptoassets detained under paragraph 10Z7DE, means the crypto wallet freezing order mentioned in sub-paragraph (1) of that paragraph.”

“Victims etc

10Z6A

(1)

A person who claims that money in respect of which an account freezing order has effect belongs to them may apply to the relevant court for the money to be released.

(2)

The application may be made in the course of proceedings under paragraph 10S or 10Z2 or at any other time.

(3)

The court may, subject to sub-paragraph (7), order the money to which the application relates to be released to the applicant if it appears to the court that—

(a)

the applicant was deprived of the money to which the application relates, or of property which it represents, by criminal conduct,

(b)

the money the applicant was deprived of was not, immediately before the applicant was deprived of it, property obtained by or in return for criminal conduct and nor did it then represent such property, and

(c)

the money belongs to the applicant.

(4)

If sub-paragraph (5) applies, the court may, subject to sub-paragraph (7), order the money to which the application relates to be released to the applicant.

(5)

This sub-paragraph applies where—

(a)

the applicant is not the person from whom the money to which the application relates was seized,

(b)

it appears to the court that the money belongs to the applicant,

(c)

the court is satisfied that the release condition is met in relation to the money, and

(d)

no objection to the making of an order under sub-paragraph (4) has been made by the person from whom the money was seized.

(6)

The release condition is met—

(a)

in relation to money held in a frozen account, if the conditions for making an order under paragraph 10S in relation to the money are no longer met, or

(b)

in relation to money held in a frozen account which is subject to an application for forfeiture under paragraph 10Z2, if the court or sheriff decides not to make an order under that paragraph in relation to the money.

(7)

Money is not to be released under this paragraph—

(a)

if an account forfeiture notice under paragraph 10W is given in respect of the money, until any proceedings in pursuance of the notice (including any proceedings on appeal) are concluded;

(b)

if an application for its forfeiture under paragraph 10Z2, is made, until any proceedings in pursuance of the application (including any proceedings on appeal) are concluded;

(c)

if (in the United Kingdom or elsewhere) proceedings are started against any person for an offence with which the cash is connected, until the proceedings are concluded.

(8)

In relation to money held in an account that is subject to an account freezing order, references in this paragraph to a person from whom money was seized include a reference to a person by or for whom the account was operated immediately before the account freezing order was made.”

““cryptoasset” has the meaning given by paragraph 10Z7A(1);”;

““crypto wallet” has the meaning given by paragraph 10Z7A(1);”;

““justice of the peace”, in relation to Northern Ireland, means lay magistrate;”;

““terrorist cryptoasset” has the meaning given by paragraph 10Z7A(1);”.

“(6ZF)

Regulations under paragraph 6(1AF) of Schedule 6 may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.”