Print Options
PrintThe Whole
Act
PrintThis
Schedule
only
Changes over time for: SECOND SCHEDULE
Timeline of Changes
This timeline shows the different points in time where a change occurred. The dates will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. The first date in the timeline will usually be the earliest date when the provision came into force. In some cases the first date is 01/02/1991 (or for Northern Ireland legislation 01/01/2006). This date is our basedate. No versions before this date are available. For further information see the Editorial Practice Guide and Glossary under Help.
Version Superseded: 27/08/1993
Status:
Point in time view as at 01/02/1991.
Changes to legislation:
There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Clean Air Act 1956 (repealed 27.8.1993), SECOND SCHEDULE.
Changes to Legislation
Revised legislation carried on this site may not be fully up to date. At the current time any known changes or effects made by subsequent legislation have been applied to the text of the legislation you are viewing by the editorial team. Please see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ for details regarding the timescales for which new effects are identified and recorded on this site.
Section 17.]
[SECOND SCHEDULEE+W+S AMENDMENTS OF ALKALI &C. WORKS REGULATION ACT, 1906
Textual Amendments
Modifications etc. (not altering text)
For subsection (2) of section one, there shall be substituted the following subsection—
“(2)The owner of any alkali work which is carried on in contravention of this section shall be guilty of an offence.”
For subsection (2) of section two, there shall be substituted the following subsection—
“(2)If the owner of any alkali work fails, in theopinion of thecourt having cognizance of the matter, to use such means, he shall be guilty of an offence.”
For subsection (3) of section six there shall be substituted the following subsection—
“(3)The owner of any sulphuric acid work or any muriatic acid work which is carried on in contravention of this section shall be guilty of an offence.”
For subsection (2) of section seven there shall be substituted the following subsection—
“(2)If the owner of any such work fails, in the opinion of the court having cognizance of the matter, to use such means, he shall be guilty of an offence.”
For subsection (8) of section nine there shall be substituted the following subsection—
“(8)The owner of a work which has been carried on in contravention of this section shall be guilty of an offence.”
. . .
Back to top