Valid from 01/04/1997
Textual Amendments
F1Crossheading and ss. 52H-52J inserted (1.4.1997 with savings) by 1996 c. 46, s. 5, Sch. 1 Pt. II para. 16; S.I. 1997/304, art. 2 (with art. 3)
Valid from 02/10/2000
(1)Where—
(a)a case has been referred to the prosecuting authority as a result of an election for court-martial trial, and
(b)the prosecuting authority considers that a charge different from, or additional to, the preliminary charge should be preferred,
the prosecuting authority may refer back to the commanding officer of the accused the charge or charges which the prosecuting authority considers should be preferred.
(2)In subsection (1) above—
(a)“the preliminary charge” means the charge which would have been tried summarily had the accused not elected court-martial trial, and
(b)the reference to preferring a charge different from, or additional to, the preliminary charge includes a reference to amending, or substituting another charge for, a charge already preferred.
(3)Where a charge is referred to a commanding officer under subsection (1) above, the commanding officer shall deal with the charge as if it had been reported to him under section 52B(1) of this Act.]
Textual Amendments
F2S. 52II inserted (2.10.2000) by 2000 c. 4, s. 13, Sch. 2 para. 4; S.I. 2000/2366, art. 2
Textual Amendments applied to the whole legislation
F3Act repealed (prosp.) by Armed Forces Act 2006 (c. 52), ss. 378, 383, Sch. 17 and the repeal being partly in force, as to which see individual provisions