C1F20PART IVADAPTATION OF PLANNING AND OTHER CONTROLS

Annotations:
Amendments (Textual)
F20

Regulations revoked (E.W.) (1.4.2010 except so far as relating to the revocation in relation to W. of reg. 36 and specified words in reg. 3(3), 12.12.2014 in so far as not already in force) by The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (S.I. 2010/490), regs. 1(2)(4)(b), 133(3) (with regs. 125, 134)

Modifications etc. (not altering text)
C1

Pt. 4 power to disapply or modify conferred (26.12.2023) by Energy Act 2023 (c. 52), ss. 293(4)(5), 334(3)(j) (with s. 293(6))

Environmental controls

Authorisations under Part I of the Environmental Protection Act 1990I2F383

F71

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F72

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3

Regulations 50 and 51 (requirement to review existing decisions and consents, &c.) apply to any F12authorisation under Part I of the Environmental Protection Act 1990.

4

Where on the review of such an authorisation the competent authority consider that any adverse effects on the integrity of a European site of the carrying out or, as the case may be, the continuation of activities authorised by it would be avoided by a variation of the authorisation, they may vary it, or cause it to be varied, accordingly.

5

Where any question arises as to F4... affirming an authorisation on review, under regulation 49 (considerations of overriding public interest), the competent authority shall refer the matter to the Secretary of State who shall determine the matter in accordance with that regulation and give directions to the authority accordingly.

Licences under Part II of the Environmental Protection Act 1990I3F384

1

Regulations 48 and 49 (requirement to consider effect on F15European sites in Great Britain and European offshore marine sites) apply in relation to–

a

the granting of a waste management licence under Part II of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 F16, and

b

the passing of a resolution under section 54 of that Act (provisions as to land occupied by disposal authorities themselves). F9...

F11c

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2

Where in such a case the competent authority consider that any adverse effects of the plan or project on the integrity of a European site F6or European offshore marine site would be avoided by making any licence subject to conditions, they may grant a licence, or cause a licence to be granted, or, as the case may be, pass a resolution, subject to those conditions.

3

Regulations 50 and 51 (requirement to review existing decisions and consents, &c.) apply to any such licence or resolution as is mentioned in paragraph (1).

4

Where on the review of such a licence or resolution the competent authority consider that any adverse effects on the integrity of a European site F14or European offshore marine site of the carrying out or, as the case may be, the continuation of the activities authorised by it would be avoided by a variation of the licence or resolution, they may vary it, or cause it to be varied, accordingly.

F1Permits under F21the Pollution Prevention and Control (Scotland) Regulations 201284A

1

Regulations 48 and 49 (requirement to consider effect on F10European sites in Great Britain and European offshore marine sites) apply in relation to the granting of a permit under F22the Pollution Prevention and Control (Scotland) Regulations 2012.

2

Where in such a case the competent authority consider that any adverse effects of the plan or project on the integrity of a European site F5or European offshore marine site would be avoided if the permit were subject to conditions, they may grant a permit, or cause a permit to be granted, subject to those conditions.

3

Regulations 50 and 51 (requirement to review existing decisions and consents, &c.) apply to any such permit as is mentioned in paragraph (1).

4

Where on the review of such a permit the competent authority consider that any adverse effects on the integrity of a European site F8or European offshore marine site of the carrying out or, as the case may be, the continuation of activities authorised by it would be avoided by a variation of the permit, they may vary it, or cause it to be varied, accordingly.

5

Where any question arises as to agreeing to a plan or project, of affirming a permit on review, under regulation 49 (considerations of overriding public interest), the competent authority shall refer the matter to the Scottish Ministers who shall determine the matter in accordance with that regulation and give directions to the authority accordingly.

F18Abstraction and works authorised under water legislation84B

1

Regulations 48 and 49 apply in relation to—

a

the grant of an authorisation under regulation 8 (registration) or 9 (water use licence);

b

the variation under regulation 19 (variation of authorisation) in accordance with either regulation 20 (procedure for variation) or regulation 21 (request for variation), as the case may be, or the partial variation under regulation 25(4) (determination of application for surrender) of an authorisation; and

c

the determination of an appeal under regulation 47 (determination of appeals) against a decision of the Scottish Environment Protection Agency referred to in regulation 46(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (ee) or (g),

of the Water Environment (Controlled Activities) (Scotland) Regulations 2005 (“the 2005 Regulations”).

2

In a case referred to in paragraph (1), where the competent authority considers that any adverse effects of the plan or project on the integrity of a European site F17or European offshore marine site would be avoided if the grant or variation of the authorisation were subject to conditions or, as the case may be, further conditions, it may grant or vary the authorisation subject to those conditions.

3

Regulations 50 and 51 apply to authorisations under regulation 8 or 9 of the 2005 Regulations.

4

Where on the review of an authorisation under regulation 8 or 9 of the 2005 Regulations, the competent authority considers that any adverse effects on the integrity of a European site F2or European offshore marine site of the carrying out or, as the case may be, the continuation of the activity authorised would be avoided by a variation of the authorisation, it may vary the authorisation, or cause it to be varied, accordingly.

Marine worksF2084C

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F19Derogations under the Nitrate Pollution Prevention Regulations 200884D

1

Regulations 48 (assessment of implications for European site) and 49 (considerations of overriding public interest) apply in relation to the granting of a derogation under Part 3A of the Nitrate Pollution Prevention Regulations 2008.

2

Where regulations 48 and 49 apply, the competent authority may, if they consider any adverse effects of the plan or project on the integrity of a European site or European offshore marine site would be avoided if the derogation were subject to conditions, grant the derogation, subject to those conditions.

Derogations under the Nitrate Pollution Prevention (Wales) Regulations 2008F2084E

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Discharge consents under water pollution legislationI185

1

Regulations 48 and 49 (requirement to consider effect on European site) apply in relation to the giving of consent under—

a

Chapter II of Part III to the Water Resources Act 199190 (control of pollution of water resources), F13...

F13b

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2

Where in such a case the competent authority consider that any adverse effects of the plan or project on the integrity of a European site would be avoided by making any consent subject to conditions, they may give consent, or cause it to be given, subject to those conditions.

3

Regulations 50 and 51 (requirement to review existing decisions and consents, &c.) apply to any such consent as is mentioned in paragraph (1).

4

Where on the review of such a consent the competent authority consider that any adverse effects on the integrity of a European site of the carrying out or, as the case may be, the continuation of the activities authorised by it would be avoided by a variation of the consent, they may vary it, or cause it to be varied, accordingly.