F3PART IIIPROTECTION OF SPECIES

Annotations:
Amendments (Textual)
F3

Regulations revoked (E.W.) (1.4.2010 except so far as relating to the revocation in relation to W. of reg. 36 and specified words in reg. 3(3), 12.12.2014 in so far as not already in force) by The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (S.I. 2010/490), regs. 1(2)(4)(b), 133(3) (with regs. 125, 134)

Protection of animals

F1Exceptions from regulation 3940

1

A person shall not be guilty of an offence under regulation 39(1)(a) or (b), (2), or (3)(a) or (b), if that person shows that what was done—

a

was in relation to an animal that had been seriously disabled otherwise than by that person's unlawful act and there was no reasonable chance of its recovering; and

b

was done solely for one or more of the purposes of—

i

ending the animal's life in a humane manner; or

ii

where the animal's life had been so ended, disposing of it (otherwise than by sale or exchange) as soon as practicable after it was dead.

2

A person shall not be guilty of the offence under regulation 39(1)(a) of deliberately or recklessly capturing a wild animal of a European protected species, or an offence under regulation 39(3)(a) or (b), if that person shows that what was done–

a

was in relation to an animal that had been disabled otherwise than by that person's unlawful act; and

b

was done solely for one or more of the purposes of—

i

tending it and releasing it when no longer disabled; or

ii

releasing it after it had been tended,

and was done in a manner or in circumstances unlikely to cause the animal unnecessary suffering.

3

A person shall not be guilty of an offence by reason of any act made unlawful by regulation 39 if that person shows that the act was carried out in relation to an animal bred and, at the time the act was carried out, lawfully held in captivity.

F24

The exceptions to regulation 39 in paragraphs (1) and (2) shall not apply where it is shown that–

a

there was a satisfactory alternative to what was done; or

b

what was done was detrimental to the maintenance of the populations of the species concerned at a favourable conservation status in their natural range.