. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

“the judicial review procedure” means the Part 8 procedure as modified by F9this Section;

“interested party” means any person (other than the claimant and defendant) who is directly affected by the claim; and

“court” means the High Court, unless otherwise stated.

a declaration; or

an injunction^(gl).

promptly; and

in any event not later than 3 months after the grounds to make the claim first arose.

the name and address of any person he considers to be an interested party;

that he is requesting permission to proceed with a claim for judicial review; and

any remedy (including any interim remedy) he is claiming.

filed not more than 21 days after service of the claim form; and

may include or be accompanied by an application for directions.

may not take part in a hearing to decide whether permission should be given unless the court allows him to do so; but

refuses permission to proceed; or

detailed grounds for contesting the claim or supporting it on additional grounds; and

any written evidence,

rule 8.5(3) and 8.5(4) (defendant to file and serve written evidence at the same time as acknowledgment of service); and

rule 8.5(5) and 8.5(6) (claimant to file and serve any reply within 14 days).

the court gives permission.

to file evidence; or

make representations at the hearing of the judicial review.

remit the matter to the decision-maker; and

direct it to reconsider the matter and reach a decision in accordance with the judgment of the court.

“the Act” means the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002;

“adjudicator” means an adjudicator appointed for the purposes of Part 5 of the Act;

“applicant” means a person applying to the High Court under section 101(2) of the Act;

“other party” means the other party to the proceedings before the Tribunal; and

“Tribunal” means the Immigration Appeal Tribunal.

the immigration or asylum decision to which the proceedings relate, and any document giving reasons for that decision;

the grounds of appeal to the adjudicator;

the adjudicator’s determination;

the grounds of appeal to the Tribunal together with any documents sent with them;

the Tribunal’s determination on the application for permission to appeal; and

any other documents material to the application which were before the adjudicator.

the grounds upon which it is contended that the Tribunal made an error of law; and

reasons in support of those grounds.

the application notice;

the written submissions; and

all the documents filed in support of the application, except for documents which come from or have already been served on that party.

affirm the Tribunal’s decision to refuse permission to appeal;

reverse the Tribunal’s decision to grant permission to appeal; or

order the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal to reconsider the adjudicator’s decision on the appeal.

the Tribunal may have made an error of law; and

there is a real possibility that the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal would make a different decision from the adjudicator on reconsidering the appeal (which may include making a different direction under section 87 of the 2002 Act).

the applicant, except where paragraph (2) applies;

the other party; and

the F27Asylum and Immigration Tribunal.

the application relates, in whole or in part, to a claim for asylum;

the Tribunal refused permission to appeal; and

the court affirms the Tribunal’s decision,

the persons to whom it sends the order under paragraphs (1) and (2); and

if the applicant is in receipt of public funding, the Legal Services Commission.

“the 2002 Act” means the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002;

“the 2004 Act” means the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, etc.) Act 2004;

“appellant” means the appellant in the proceedings before the Tribunal;

“applicant” means a person applying to the High Court under section 103A;

“asylum claim” has the meaning given in section 113(1) of the 2002 Act;

“fast track case” means any case in relation to which an order made under section 26(8) of the 2004 Act provides that the time period for making an application under section 103A(1) of the 2002 Act or giving notification under paragraph 30(5) of Schedule 2 to the 2004 Act is less than 5 days;

“filter provision” means paragraph 30 of Schedule 2 to the 2004 Act;

“order for reconsideration” means an order under section 103A(1) requiring the Tribunal to reconsider its decision on an appeal;

“section 103A” means section 103A of the 2002 Act;

“Tribunal” means the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal.

section 103A(3) for making an application for an order under section 103A(1); or

paragraph 30(5)(b) of Schedule 2 to the 2004 Act for giving notice under that paragraph,

section 103A(3); and

paragraph 30(5)(b) of Schedule 2 to the 2004 Act.

serving it on his representative; or

serving it on the appellant personally or sending it to his address by first class post F41(or an alternative service which provides for delivery on the next working day),

during a period in which the filter provision has effect, with the Tribunal at the address specified in the relevant practice direction; and

at any other time, at the Administrative Court Office.

the notice of the immigration, asylum or nationality decision to which the appeal related;

any other document which was served on the appellant giving reasons for that decision;

the grounds of appeal to the Tribunal;

the Tribunal’s determination on the appeal; and

any other documents material to the application which were before the Tribunal.

the grounds upon which it is contended that the Tribunal made an error of law which may have affected its decision; and

reasons in support of those grounds.

was the respondent to the appeal; and

was required to serve the Tribunal’s determination on the appellant,

in accordance with paragraphs (1) to (3); or

by serving the documents specified in paragraphs (1) to (3) on the person having custody of him.

endorse on the notice the date that it is served on him;

give the applicant an acknowledgment in writing of receipt of the notice; and

does not propose to make an order for reconsideration; or

does not propose to grant permission for the application to be made outside the relevant time limit,

a copy of the Tribunal’s notification that it does not propose to make an order for reconsideration or does not propose to grant permission for the application to be made outside the relevant time limit (referred to in CPR rule 54.31(2));

any other document which was served on the applicant by the Tribunal giving reasons for its decision in paragraph (a);

written evidence in support of any application by the applicant seeking permission to make the application outside the relevant time limit, if applicable;

a copy of the application for reconsideration under section 103A of the 2002 Act (Form AIT/103A), as submitted to the Tribunal (referred to in Rule 54.29(1)(a).

was the respondent to the appeal; and

was required to serve the notice from the Tribunal mentioned in paragraph (2) on the appellant,

set out the grounds on which it is contended that the notice could not reasonably practicably have been filed within that period; and

be supported by written evidence verified by a statement of truth.

does not propose to make an order for reconsideration; or

does not propose to grant permission for the application to be made outside the relevant time limit,

the court will serve copies of the application notice and written submissions on the other party to the appeal; and

the other party to the appeal may file submissions in response to the application not later than 2 days after being served with the application.

dismiss the application;

make an order requiring the Tribunal to reconsider its decision on the appeal under section 103A(1) of the 2002 Act; or

refer the appeal to the Court of Appeal under section 103C of the 2002 Act.

the Tribunal may have made an error of law; and

there is a real possibility that the Tribunal would make a different decision on reconsidering the appeal (which may include making a different direction under section 87 of the 2002 Act).

the applicant and the other party to the appeal, except where paragraph (2) applies; and

the Tribunal.

serve the order on the appellant; and

the appellant’s legal representative; and

the Legal Services Commission.

the Secretary of State has provided the notification required by paragraph (3)(b); or

28 days after the date on which the court sent a copy of its order to the Secretary of State,

would otherwise be treated as abandoned under section 104(4A) of the 2002 Act; but

meets the conditions set out in section 104(4B) or section 104(4C) of the 2002 Act.

where section 104(4B) of the 2002 Act applies, within 28 days of the date on which the applicant received notice of the grant of leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom for a period exceeding 12 months; or

where section 104(4C) of the 2002 Act applies, within 28 days of the date on which the applicant received notice of the grant of leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom.

the applicant’s full name and date of birth;

the Administrative Court reference number;

the Home Office reference number, if applicable;

the date on which the applicant was granted leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom for a period exceeding 12 months; and

that the applicant wishes to pursue the application insofar as it is brought on grounds relating to the Refugee Convention specified in section 84(1)(g) of the 2002 Act.

the applicant’s full name and date of birth;

the Administrative Court reference number;

the Home Office reference number, if applicable;

the date on which the applicant was granted leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom; and

that the applicant wishes to pursue the application insofar as it is brought on grounds relating to section 19B of the Race Relations Act 1976 specified in section 84(1)(b) of the 2002 Act.