PART 44E+WGENERAL RULES ABOUT COSTS

Modifications etc. (not altering text)

C2Pt. 44 applied (with modifications) (1.4.2001) by The Court of Protection Rules 2001 (S.I. 2001/824), rules 1, 86 (with rule 91)

C4Pt. 44 applied in part (with modifications) (24.2.2003) by S.I. 1987/2024, rule 60(1)(3)–(7) (as substituted by The Non-Contentious Probate (Amendment) Rules 2003 (S.I. 2003/185), rules 1, 5 (with rule 3))

C5Pt. 44 applied in part (with modifications) (24.2.2003) by S.I. 1991/1247, rule 10.27(1) (as inserted by The Family Proceedings (Amendment) Rules 2003 (S.I. 2003/184), rules 1(1), 16)

C6Pt. 44 applied in part (with modifications) (30.12.2005) by The Family Procedure (Adoption) Rules 2005 (S.I. 2005/2795), rule 5(3)

C7Pt. 44 applied in part (with modifications) (1.10.2007) by The Court of Protection Rules 2007 (S.I. 2007/1744), rules 1, 160

[F1Costs capping orders – GeneralE+W

44.18.—(1) A costs capping order is an order limiting the amount of future costs (including disbursements) which a party may recover pursuant to an order for costs subsequently made.

(2) In this rule, “future costs” means costs incurred in respect of work done after the date of the costs capping order but excluding the amount of any additional liability.

(3) This rule does not apply to protective costs orders.

(4) A costs capping order may be in respect of—

(a)the whole litigation; or

(b)any issues which are ordered to be tried separately.

(5) The court may at any stage of proceedings make a costs capping order against all or any of the parties, if—

(a)it is in the interests of justice to do so;

(b)there is a substantial risk that without such an order costs will be disproportionately incurred; and

(c)it is not satisfied that the risk in sub-paragraph (b) can be adequately controlled by—

(i)case management directions or orders made under Part 3; and

(ii)detailed assessment of costs.

(6) In considering whether to exercise its discretion under this rule, the court will consider all the circumstances of the case, including—

(a)whether there is a substantial imbalance between the financial position of the parties;

(b)whether the costs of determining the amount of the cap are likely to be proportionate to the overall costs of the litigation;

(c)the stage which the proceedings have reached; and

(d)the costs which have been incurred to date and the future costs.

(7) A costs capping order, once made, will limit the costs recoverable by the party subject to the order unless a party successfully applies to vary the order. No such variation will be made unless—

(a)there has been a material and substantial change of circumstances since the date when the order was made; or

(b)there is some other compelling reason why a variation should be made.]

Textual Amendments