Textual Amendments
F1Pt. 63 substituted (1.10.2009) by The Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2009 (S.I. 2009/2092), rule 1(2), Sch. 1
Textual Amendments
F2Pt. 63 Section 5 inserted (1.10.2010) by The Civil Procedure (Amendment No.2) Rules 2010 (S.I. 2010/1953), rule 1(2), Sch. 2
F3Words in Pt. 63 heading substituted (1.10.2013) by The Civil Procedure (Amendment No.7) Rules 2013 (S.I. 2013/1974), rules 2, 26(h)
63.19.—(1) Subject to paragraph (2), proceedings in [F5the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court will be dealt with by an enterprise judge.]
[F6(1A) For the purposes of the Practice Direction 52A – Appeals: General Provisions, a decision of the enterprise judge shall be treated as a decision by a circuit judge hearing a specialist claim in the County Court.]
[F7(2) Unless the court otherwise orders, the following matters will be dealt with by a district judge—
(a)allocation of claims to the small claims track or multi-track in accordance with rule 63.27(3);
(b)claims allocated to the small claims track; and
(c)all proceedings for the enforcement of any financial element of an Intellectual Property Enterprise Court judgment.
(3) For the purposes of the Practice Direction 52A – Appeals: General Provisions, a decision of a district judge shall be treated as a decision by a district judge hearing a specialist claim in the County Court. An appeal from such a decision shall be heard by an enterprise judge.]]]
Textual Amendments
F4Rule 63.19 heading substituted (1.10.2013) by The Civil Procedure (Amendment No.7) Rules 2013 (S.I. 2013/1974), rules 2, 26(l)(i)
F5Words in rule 63.19(1) substituted (1.10.2013) by The Civil Procedure (Amendment No.7) Rules 2013 (S.I. 2013/1974), rules 2, 26(l)(ii)
F6Rule 63.19(1A) inserted (1.10.2013) by The Civil Procedure (Amendment No.7) Rules 2013 (S.I. 2013/1974), rules 2, 26(l)(iii)
F7Rule 63.19(2)(3) substituted for rule 63.19(2) (1.10.2013) by The Civil Procedure (Amendment No.7) Rules 2013 (S.I. 2013/1974), rules 2, 26(l)(iv)