The Civil Procedure Rules 1998

Ruling on meaningE+W

Rule 3A—(1) At any time after the service of the particulars of claim either party may apply to [F1the court] for an order determining whether or not the words complained of are capable of bearing a particular meaning or meanings attributed to them in the statements of case.

(2) If it appears to [F2the court] on the hearing of an application under paragraph (1) that none of the words complained of are capable of bearing the meaning or meanings attributed to them in the statements of case, [F3it may] dismiss the claim or make such other order or give such judgment in the proceedings as may be just.

(3) Subject to paragraph (4), each party to the proceedings may make only one application under paragraph (1).

(4) Where a party has made an application under paragraph (1) and the respondent to that application subsequently amends his statements of case to allege a new meaning, the Court may allow the other party to make a further application under paragraph (1) in relation to that new meaning.

(5) This rule shall apply in relation to a counterclaim for libel or slander as if the party making the counterclaim were the claimant and the party against whom it is made the defendant, and as if the counterclaim were the statement of claim.

Textual Amendments