11.—(1) The duty in section 57C(2) of the Act to take reasonable steps to give a written summary to the person who is the subject of an allegation does not arise at the time the standards committee receives the allegation, if the standards committee determines that to do so would be contrary to the public interest or would prejudice any person’s ability to investigate the allegation.
(2) In reaching a determination whether it is contrary to the public interest or would prejudice any person’s ability to investigate the allegation, the standards committee must take account of any guidance issued by the Standards Board and may take account of any advice received from the monitoring officer or any ethical standards officer concerned.
(3) Where the duty in section 57C(2) of the Act does not arise at the time the standards committee receives an allegation, by virtue of paragraph (1), the standards committee must take reasonable steps to give a written summary of the allegation to the person who is the subject of that allegation—
(a)when the monitoring officer or ethical standards officer has advised the standards committee that it would no longer be contrary to the public interest or prejudicial to any investigation; and in any event
(b)before any consideration of any report or recommendation from a monitoring officer or ethical standards officer relating to that allegation.
(4) Nothing in this regulation prevents—
(a)a monitoring officer from notifying the subject of an allegation that an allegation has been made; or
(b)the standards committee from giving the subject of an allegation some details of the allegation if the standards committee is of the opinion that disclosure of those details would not be contrary to the public interest and would not prejudice any investigation.