- Latest available (Revised)
- Point in Time (13/11/2023)
- Original (As made)
Point in time view as at 13/11/2023.
There are currently no known outstanding effects for the The Armed Forces (Summary Appeal Court) Rules 2009, CHAPTER 3.
Revised legislation carried on this site may not be fully up to date. At the current time any known changes or effects made by subsequent legislation have been applied to the text of the legislation you are viewing by the editorial team. Please see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ for details regarding the timescales for which new effects are identified and recorded on this site.
67.—(1) Where a party to appeal proceedings proposes to adduce a hearsay statement, or (in the case of an appellant) to cross-examine a witness with a view to eliciting evidence of such a statement, on the basis that the statement is admissible by virtue of—
(a)section 114(1)(d) of the 2003 Act (interests of justice),
(b)section 116 of that Act (maker of statement unavailable to give oral evidence), or
(c)section 117 of that Act (statement contained in a document),
he must serve on the court administration officer and all other parties to the proceedings a notice to that effect.
(2) A notice under this rule—
(a)must give details of the statement that the party serving the notice proposes to tender in evidence;
(b)where the statement is contained in a document which has not already been served on all the other parties, must include a copy of the document;
(c)where the notice is served by the Director and oral evidence of the statement is to be given, must identify any witness who is to give it;
(d)must specify whether the party serving the notice proposes to tender the statement by virtue of section 114(1)(d), 116 or 117 of the 2003 Act;
(e)where he proposes to tender the statement by virtue of section 114(1)(d) of that Act, must specify which of the factors mentioned in section 114(2) of that Act he considers to be relevant, and how they are relevant; and
(f)where the statement is evidence that an earlier hearsay statement was made, must specify whether he proposes to tender it by virtue of section 121(1)(a), (b) or (c) of that Act.
(3) Where a notice under this rule is served by the Director, it must be served not more than 14 days after the Director serves advance information in respect of the appeal to which the evidence relates.
(4) Where a notice under this rule is served by an appellant, it must be served not more than 14 days after the Director complies or purports to comply with article 4 of the CPIA Order.
(5) Where—
(a)a notice has been served under this rule in relation to a hearsay statement, and
(b)no counter-notice has been served in accordance with rule 68 in relation to the statement,
the statement is to be treated as admissible by agreement of the parties.
(6) In this rule “hearsay statement” means a statement which—
(a)is not made in oral evidence in the proceedings; and
(b)is relied on as evidence of a matter stated in it.
68.—(1) Where a party serves a notice under rule 67 in relation to a statement, any other party may serve a counter-notice objecting to the admission of the statement.
(2) A counter-notice served under this rule must state—
(a)the date on which the party serving it was served with the notice under rule 67;
(b)whether he objects to the admission of the whole or only part of the statement, and if only part which part; and
(c)the grounds on which he so objects.
(3) A counter-notice served under this rule must be served on the court administration officer and all other parties to the proceedings not more than 14 days after service of the notice under rule 67.
Latest Available (revised):The latest available updated version of the legislation incorporating changes made by subsequent legislation and applied by our editorial team. Changes we have not yet applied to the text, can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area.
Original (As Enacted or Made): The original version of the legislation as it stood when it was enacted or made. No changes have been applied to the text.
Point in Time: This becomes available after navigating to view revised legislation as it stood at a certain point in time via Advanced Features > Show Timeline of Changes or via a point in time advanced search.
Geographical Extent: Indicates the geographical area that this provision applies to. For further information see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’.
Show Timeline of Changes: See how this legislation has or could change over time. Turning this feature on will show extra navigation options to go to these specific points in time. Return to the latest available version by using the controls above in the What Version box.
Explanatory Memorandum sets out a brief statement of the purpose of a Statutory Instrument and provides information about its policy objective and policy implications. They aim to make the Statutory Instrument accessible to readers who are not legally qualified and accompany any Statutory Instrument or Draft Statutory Instrument laid before Parliament from June 2004 onwards.
Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
This timeline shows the different points in time where a change occurred. The dates will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. The first date in the timeline will usually be the earliest date when the provision came into force. In some cases the first date is 01/02/1991 (or for Northern Ireland legislation 01/01/2006). This date is our basedate. No versions before this date are available. For further information see the Editorial Practice Guide and Glossary under Help.
Use this menu to access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including: