There are currently no known outstanding effects for the The Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010, Section 102.
102.—(1) A magistrates’ court must not under this Chapter hear a summons, entertain an application for a warrant or hold an inquiry as to means on such an application except when composed of at least two justices.
(2) Paragraph (1) is subject to any enactment authorising a District Judge (Magistrates’ Courts) or other person to act alone.
F1(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(4) In any proceedings under regulations 97 [F2, 99] or 100, a statement contained in a document constituting or forming part of a record compiled by the applicant authority is admissible as evidence of any fact stated in it of which direct oral evidence would be admissible.
(5) In paragraph (4) “statement” includes any representation of fact, whether made in words or otherwise; and the reference to an application under regulation 100 includes a reference to an application made in the circumstances mentioned in regulation 101(3).
Textual Amendments
F1Reg. 102(3) omitted (6.4.2020) by virtue of The Courts and Tribunals (Judiciary and Functions of Staff) Act 2018 (Consequential, Transitional and Saving Provision) Regulations 2020 (S.I. 2020/100), reg. 1(2), Sch. para. 13 (with reg. 4)
F2Word in reg. 102(4) omitted (E.) (1.9.2019) by virtue of The Community Infrastructure Levy (Amendment) (England) (No. 2) Regulations 2019 (S.I. 2019/1103), regs. 1, 8(6)(b) (with regs. 1(4), 13)
Commencement Information
I1Reg. 102 in force at 6.4.2010, see reg. 1
All content is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. This site additionally contains content derived from EUR-Lex, reused under the terms of the Commission Decision 2011/833/EU on the reuse of documents from the EU institutions. For more information see the EUR-Lex public statement on re-use.
