Words in reg. 3(1) omitted (3.12.2014) by virtue of The Criminal Justice and Data Protection (Protocol No. 36) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 (S.I. 2014/3191), regs. 1(b), 2(2)
Words in reg. 5 inserted (3.12.2014) by The Criminal Justice and Data Protection (Protocol No. 36) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 (S.I. 2014/3191), regs. 1(b), 2(3)
Words in reg. 8(6)(a) substituted (3.12.2014) by The Criminal Justice and Data Protection (Protocol No. 36) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 (S.I. 2014/3191), regs. 1(b), 2(4)
Words in reg. 18(4)(b) substituted (3.12.2014) by The Criminal Justice and Data Protection (Protocol No. 36) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 (S.I. 2014/3191), regs. 1(b), 2(5)(a)
Words in reg. 18(8)(d) substituted (3.12.2014) by The Criminal Justice and Data Protection (Protocol No. 36) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 (S.I. 2014/3191), regs. 1(b), 2(5)(b)
Words in reg. 18(8)(g) substituted (3.12.2014) by The Criminal Justice and Data Protection (Protocol No. 36) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 (S.I. 2014/3191), regs. 1(b), 2(5)(b)
Pt. 4 omitted (25.5.2018) by virtue of Data Protection Act 2018 (c. 12), s. 212(1), Sch. 19 para. 380 (with ss. 117, 209, 210, Sch. 20 paras. 2, 6, 15, 43); S.I. 2018/625, reg. 2(1)(g)
Words in reg. 60(3) substituted (3.12.2014) by The Criminal Justice and Data Protection (Protocol No. 36) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 (S.I. 2014/3191), regs. 1(b), 2(7)(a)
Word in reg. 60(4) inserted (3.12.2014) by The Criminal Justice and Data Protection (Protocol No. 36) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 (S.I. 2014/3191), regs. 1(b), 2(7)(b)
Words in reg. 67(2)(c) substituted (3.12.2014) by The Criminal Justice and Data Protection (Protocol No. 36) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 (S.I. 2014/3191), regs. 1(b), 2(8)
Words in reg. 71(1) substituted (3.12.2014) by The Criminal Justice and Data Protection (Protocol No. 36) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 (S.I. 2014/3191), regs. 1(b), 2(9)(a)
Words in reg. 71(3) substituted (3.12.2014) by The Criminal Justice and Data Protection (Protocol No. 36) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 (S.I. 2014/3191), regs. 1(b), 2(9)(b)
Words in reg. 91(9)(a) inserted (3.12.2014) by The Criminal Justice and Data Protection (Protocol No. 36) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 (S.I. 2014/3191), regs. 1(b), 2(10)
Words in reg. 110(8)(a) inserted (3.12.2014) by The Criminal Justice and Data Protection (Protocol No. 36) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 (S.I. 2014/3191), regs. 1(b), 2(10)
OJ No. L 196, 2.8.2003, p. 45.
OJ No. L 328, 24.11.2006, p. 59.
S.I. 2005/3181, to which there are amendments not relevant to these Regulations.
Section 6 was amended by section 41 of, and paragraph 75 of Schedule 3 to, the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (c. 44), section 74 of, and paragraphs 1 and 2 of Schedule 8 to, the Serious Crime Act 2007 (c. 27), and section 10 of, and paragraphs 11 and 12 of the Schedule to, the Prevention of Social Housing Fraud Act 2013 (c. 3).
Section 41 was amended by section 46 of the Crime and Courts Act 2013 (c. 22) on a day to be appointed.
2000 c. 11; paragraph 11D was inserted by section 90 of, and paragraphs 1 and 3 of Schedule 4 to, the Crime (International Co-operation) Act 2003 (c. 32).
Section 35 was amended by section 74 of, and paragraphs 1 and 19 of Schedule 8 to, the Serious Crime Act 2007. Section 38 was amended by section 304 of, and paragraph 141 of Schedule 32 to, the Criminal Justice Act 2003. Section 39 was amended by section 74 of, and paragraphs 1 and 21 of Schedule 8 to, the Serious Crime Act 2007.
1988 c. 33; section 77 was repealed by sections 456 and 457 of, and paragraphs 1 and 17 of Schedule 11 and Schedule 12 to, the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
1994 c. 37; section 26 was repealed by sections 456 and 457 of, and paragraphs 1 and 25 of Schedule 11 and Schedule 12 to, the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
S.I. 2003/333 (C. 20).
Section 71 was repealed by sections 456 and 457 of, and paragraphs 1 and 17 of Schedule 11 and Schedule 12 to, the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
Section 2 was repealed by sections 456 and 457 of, and paragraphs 1 and 25 of Schedule 11 and Schedule 12 to, the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
Section 28 has been amended by sections 456 and 457 of, and paragraphs 1 and 28 of Schedule 11 and Schedule 12 to, the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
Section 1 was repealed by sections 456 and 457 of, and paragraphs 1 and 28 of Schedule 11 and Schedule 12 to, the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
S.I. 1996/1299 (N.I. 9); Article 31 was revoked by sections 456 and 457 of, and paragraphs 1 and 31 of Schedule 11 and Schedule 12 to, the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
Article 8 was revoked by sections 456 and 457 of, and paragraphs 1 and 31 of Schedule 11 and Schedule 12 to, the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
OJ No. L 386, 29.12.2006, p. 89.
1996 c. 16; section 88(7) was amended by S.I. 2012/1809.
OJ No. L 93, 7.4.2009, p. 23.
1974 c. 53. Relevant amendments have been made by paragraph 1 of Schedule 15 to the Children Act 1989 (c. 41), paragraph 1 of Schedule 13 to, and paragraph 20(c) of Schedule 11 to, the Criminal Justice Act 1991 (c. 53), paragraph 47 of Schedule 9 to the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 (c. 6), paragraph 63 of Schedule 16 to the Armed Forces Act 2006 (c. 52), section 24(1) of, and paragraph 8 of Schedule 7 to, the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010 asp 13 and paragraph 134(3) of Schedule 9 to the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (c. 9).
OJ No. L 93 7.4.2009, p. 33.
OJ No. L 294, 11.11.2009, p. 20.
Section 3(6) was amended by the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (c.33), sections 27(2) and 168(3) and Schedule 11; the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (c.37), section 54(2); the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (c.44), section 13(1) and Part 2 of Schedule 37; and the Legal Services Act 2007 (c.29), section 208(1) and Schedule 21, paragraph 34.
Section 3AA(4) was inserted by the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 (c.4), section 51 and Schedule 11 paragraph 3(4).
Section 3AB(3) was inserted by the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008, section 51 and Schedule 11 paragraph (4).
Section 3AC was inserted by the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008, section 51 and Schedule 11 paragraph (4) and amended by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (c.10) Schedule 11 paragraph 7.
Section 3AA was inserted by the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 (c. 16), section 131(2) and subsequently amended by the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008, Schedule 11 paragraphs 1, 3 and 4.
Section 3AB was inserted by the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008, Schedule 11 paragraphs 1 and 4.
Section 3AC was inserted by the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008, Schedule 11 paragraphs 1 and 4.
1980 c. 43. Section 128 was amended by the Criminal Justice Act 1982 (c. 48), Schedule 9 paragraphs 2, 3 and 4; the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (c. 60), section 48; the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (c. 33), Schedule 15 paragraph 69; the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 (c. 41), Schedule 18 paragraph 25; the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (c. 25), sections 49 and 52 and Schedule 5; the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 (c. 6), section 168; the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (c. 44), Schedule 3 paragraph 51(7) and Schedule 37 Part 4.
OJ No. L 294, 11.11.2009, p. 20.
Section 3A was inserted by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (c. 10), section 130.
Sections 6A to 6D were inserted by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, section 131(1).
Section 8 was amended by section 96 of, and Schedule 26 and Schedule 28 to, the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008; S.I. 1999/1820; and S.I. 2010/976.
Section 9 was amended by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, section 131(2).
These Regulations—
may be cited as the Criminal Justice and Data Protection (Protocol No. 36) Regulations 2014; and
come into force on the day after the day on which they are made.
In this Part—
Chapter 2 and regulations 19 and 20 extend to England and Wales only;
Chapter 3, Schedule 1 and regulations 21 and 22 extend to Scotland only; and
Chapter 4, Schedule 2 and regulations 23 and 24 extend to Northern Ireland only.
In, and for the purposes, of this Part—
“
“
“
“
“
“
A reference in this Part to—
property includes a reference to property of any description, whether corporeal or incorporeal, moveable or immovable, and legal documents and instruments evidencing title to or interest in such property;
property used for the purposes of an offence includes a reference to property part of which has been used for those purposes;
the proceeds of an offence or criminal conduct includes a reference to—
any property which wholly or partly, and directly or indirectly, represents the proceeds of an offence (including payments or other rewards in connection with the commission of an offence); and
any property which is the equivalent to the full value or part of the value of the property specified in paragraph (i).
In the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (External Requests and Orders) Order 2005
In this Chapter—
“
“
“
“
in relation to a certificate under regulation 6, any information required to be given by the form of certificate annexed to the 2003 Framework Decision;
in relation to a certificate under regulation 11, any information required to be given by the form of certificate annexed to the 2006 Framework Decision
“working day” means a day other than a Saturday, Sunday, Christmas Day, Good Friday or a day which is a bank holiday under the Banking and Financial Dealings Act 1971
If any of the property to which an application for a domestic restraint order relates is property in a member State other than the United Kingdom, the prosecutor may ask the Crown Court to make a certificate under this regulation.
The Crown Court may make a certificate under this regulation if—
it makes a domestic restraint order in relation to property in the other member State, and
it is satisfied that there is a good arguable case that the property—
has been or is likely to be used for the purposes of an offence, or
is the proceeds of an offence.
A certificate under this regulation is a certificate which—
is made for the purposes of the 2003 Framework Decision, and
gives the specified information.
If the Crown Court makes a certificate under this regulation, the domestic restraint order must provide for notice of the certificate to be given to the person affected by it.
A court which has relevant powers in respect of a domestic restraint order is to have the same relevant powers in respect of a certificate under this regulation.
For that purpose “
to consider an appeal,
to consider an application for reconsideration, variation or discharge, and
to make an order on any such appeal or application.
If a certificate is made under regulation 6, the domestic restraint order and the certificate are to be forwarded by the prosecutor to—
a court exercising jurisdiction in the other member State where the property is situated, or
any authority recognised by the government of the other member State as the appropriate authority for receiving orders of that kind.
The domestic restraint order and the certificate must be accompanied by a domestic confiscation order, unless the certificate indicates when the Crown Court expects a domestic confiscation order to be sent.
The certificate must include a translation of it into an appropriate language of the other member State (if that language is not English).
The certificate must be signed by or on behalf of the Crown Court and must include a statement as to the accuracy of the information given in it.
The signature may be an electronic signature.
If the domestic restraint order and the certificate are not accompanied by a domestic confiscation order, but a domestic confiscation order is subsequently made, it is to be sent to the prosecutor for forwarding as mentioned in paragraph (1).
In a case where—
a relevant prosecutor receives an overseas restraint order from the court or authority which made or confirmed the order, and
conditions A to C are met,
the relevant prosecutor must send a copy of the order to the Crown Court.
An overseas restraint order is an order made by an appropriate court or authority in a member State which—
relates to—
criminal proceedings instituted in the member State, or
a criminal investigation being carried on there; and
prohibits dealing with property which is in England and Wales and which the appropriate court or authority considers to be property that—
has been or is likely to be used for the purposes of criminal conduct, or
is the proceeds of criminal conduct.
Condition A is that the action which the appropriate court or authority considered would constitute or, as the case may be, constituted the criminal conduct is not action done as an act of terrorism or for the purposes of terrorism (within the meaning of paragraph 11D(3) of Schedule 4 to the Terrorism Act 2000
Condition B is that the order received by the relevant prosecutor is accompanied by a certificate which—
gives the specified information;
is signed by or on behalf of the court or authority which made or confirmed the order;
includes a statement as to the accuracy of the information given in it; and
if it is not in English, includes a translation of it into English (or, if appropriate, Welsh).
For the purposes of Condition B—
the certificate may be treated as giving any specified information which is not given in it if the relevant prosecutor has the information in question;
the signature may be an electronic signature.
Condition C is that—
the order is accompanied by another order made by
such an order for the confiscation of the property may be made and the certificate indicates when that order is expected to be sent.
An appropriate court or authority in a member State in relation to an overseas restraint order is—
a court exercising criminal jurisdiction in the country,
a prosecuting authority in the country, or
any other authority in the country which appears to the relevant prosecutor to have the function of making such orders.
References in this Chapter to an overseas restraint order include its accompanying certificate.
In this regulation “
a listed 2003 Framework Decision offence; or
conduct which—
constitutes an offence in any part of the United Kingdom; or
would constitute an offence in any part of the United Kingdom if it occurred there.
Subject to paragraph (2), where the Crown Court receives a copy of an overseas restraint order sent by the relevant prosecutor in accordance with regulation 8, the Court must consider giving effect to the order no later than the end of the next working day after the relevant day.
In exceptional circumstances, the Crown Court may delay its consideration of the overseas restraint order, provided that it does consider giving effect to the order no later than the end of the fifth working day after the relevant day.
Subject to paragraph (4), the Crown Court may consider giving effect to the overseas restraint order—
at a hearing, which must be in private unless the Court directs otherwise; or
without a hearing.
The Crown Court must not consider giving effect to the overseas restraint order unless the relevant prosecutor—
is present; or
has had a reasonable opportunity to make representations.
The Crown Court may decide not to give effect to the overseas restraint order only if, in its opinion, giving effect to it would be—
impossible as a consequence of an immunity under the law of England and Wales; or
incompatible with any of the Convention rights (within the meaning of the Human Rights Act 1998
The Crown Court may postpone giving effect to an overseas restraint order in respect of any property—
in order to avoid prejudicing a criminal investigation which is taking place in the United Kingdom, or
if, under an order made by a court in criminal proceedings in the United Kingdom, the property may not be dealt with.
In this regulation, “
Where the Crown Court decides to give effect to an overseas restraint order, it must—
direct its registration as an order in that court, and
give directions for notice of the order to be given to any person affected by it.
For the purpose of enforcing an overseas restraint order registered in the Crown Court, the order is to have effect as if it were an order made by that court.
Subject to paragraph (4), the Crown Court may cancel the registration of the order, or vary the property to which the order applies, on an application by a relevant prosecutor, or any other person affected by it, if or to the extent that—
the Crown Court is of the opinion mentioned in regulation 9(5), or
the Crown Court is of the opinion that the order has ceased to have effect in the member State.
To make an application to cancel the registration of the order, or vary the property to which the order applies, the relevant prosecutor or person affected by the order must—
apply in writing as soon as practicable after becoming aware of the grounds for doing so;
serve the application on—
the Crown Court;
the relevant prosecutor (if the applicant is not the relevant prosecutor); and
any person who will or may be affected by the application;
explain why it is appropriate for the registration of the order to be cancelled or varied;
set out the proposed terms of any variation; and
if a hearing is requested in relation to the application, explain why a hearing is necessary.
Subject to paragraph (6), Part 2 of the 2002 Act (confiscation: England and Wales) applies (with the appropriate modifications and subject to the preceding provisions of this Chapter) in relation to an overseas restraint order registered in the Crown Court as it applies in relation to a domestic restraint order.
No challenge to the substantive reasons in relation to which an overseas restraint order has been made by an appropriate court or authority in a member State may be considered by the court.
If any of the property to which an application for a domestic confiscation order relates is property in a member State other than the United Kingdom, the prosecutor may ask the Crown Court to make a certificate under this regulation.
The Crown Court may make a certificate under this regulation if—
it makes a domestic confiscation order in relation to property in the other member State, and
it is satisfied that there is a good arguable case that the property—
was used or was intended to be used for the purposes of an offence, or
is the proceeds of an offence.
A certificate under this regulation is a certificate which—
is made for the purposes of the 2006 Framework Decision, and
gives the specified information.
If the Crown Court makes a certificate under this regulation, the domestic confiscation order must provide for notice of the certificate to be given to the person affected by it.
A court which has relevant powers in respect of a domestic confiscation order is to have the same relevant powers in respect of a certificate under this regulation.
For that purpose “
to consider an appeal,
to consider an application for reconsideration, variation or discharge, and
to make an order on any such appeal or application.
If a certificate is made under regulation 11, the domestic confiscation order and the certificate are to be forwarded by the prosecutor to—
a court exercising jurisdiction in the other member State where the property is situated, or
any authority recognised by the government of the other member State as the appropriate authority for receiving orders of that kind.
The certificate must include a translation of it into an appropriate language of the other member State (if that language is not English).
The certificate must be signed by or on behalf of the Crown Court and must include a statement as to the accuracy of the information given in it.
The signature may be an electronic signature.
In a case where—
a relevant prosecutor receives an overseas confiscation order from the court or authority which made or confirmed the order, and
conditions A to C are met,
the relevant prosecutor must send a copy of the order to the Crown Court.
An overseas confiscation order is an order made by an appropriate court or authority in a member State for the confiscation of property which is in England and Wales, or is the property of a resident of England and Wales, and which the appropriate court or authority considers—
was used or intended to be used for the purposes of criminal conduct, or
is the proceeds of criminal conduct.
Condition A is that a person has been convicted of that criminal conduct in the member State.
Condition B is that the overseas confiscation order was made at the conclusion of the proceedings that gave rise to the conviction.
Condition C is that the order is accompanied by a certificate which—
gives the specified information;
is signed by or on behalf of the court or authority which made or confirmed the order,
includes a statement as to the accuracy of the information given in it, and
if it is not in English, includes a translation of it into English (or, if appropriate, Welsh).
For the purposes of Condition C—
the certificate may be treated as giving any specified information which is not given in it if the relevant prosecutor has the information in question;
the signature may be an electronic signature.
An appropriate court or authority in a member State in relation to an overseas confiscation order is—
a court exercising criminal jurisdiction in the country,
a prosecuting authority in the country, or
any other authority in the country which appears to the relevant prosecutor to have the function of making such orders.
References in this Chapter to an overseas confiscation order include its accompanying certificate.
In this regulation—
“
an individual who is normally resident in England and Wales, or
a body of persons (whether corporate or not) established in England and Wales (including a company registered in England and Wales);
“
a listed 2006 Framework Decision offence; or
conduct which—
constitutes an offence in any part of the United Kingdom; or
would constitute an offence in any part of the United Kingdom if it occurred there.
Where the Crown Court receives a copy of an overseas confiscation order sent by the relevant prosecutor in accordance with regulation 13, the Court must consider giving effect to the order.
Subject to paragraph (3), the Crown Court may consider giving effect to the overseas confiscation order—
at a hearing, which must be in private unless the Court directs otherwise; or
without a hearing.
The Crown Court must not consider giving effect to the overseas confiscation order unless the relevant prosecutor—
is present; or
has had a reasonable opportunity to make representations.
The Crown Court may decide not to give effect to the overseas confiscation order only if, in its opinion, giving effect to it would be—
statute-barred, provided that the criminal conduct that gave rise to the order falls within the jurisdiction of England and Wales;
impossible as a consequence of an immunity under the law of England and Wales; or
incompatible with any of the Convention rights (within the meaning of the Human Rights Act 1998).
The Crown Court may postpone giving effect to an overseas confiscation order in respect of any property—
in order to avoid prejudicing a criminal investigation which is taking place in the United Kingdom;
where it considers that there is a risk that the amount recovered through the execution of the order in England and Wales may exceed the amount specified in the order because of simultaneous execution of the order in more than one member State;
if, under an order made by a court in criminal proceedings in the United Kingdom, the property may not be dealt with, or the property is subject to proceedings for such an order; or
if a person affected by the order has applied to cancel the registration of the order, or vary the property to which the order applies, in accordance with regulation 15.
Where the Crown Court decides to give effect to an overseas confiscation order, it must—
direct its registration as an order in that court, and
give directions for notice of the order to be given to any person affected by it.
For the purpose of enforcing an overseas confiscation order registered in the Crown Court, the order is to have effect as if it were an order made by that court.
Subject to paragraph (4), the Crown Court may cancel the registration of the order, or vary the property to which the order applies, on an application by a relevant prosecutor, or any other person affected by it, if or to the extent that—
the Crown Court is of the opinion mentioned in regulation 14(4), or
the Crown Court is of the opinion that the order has ceased to have effect in the member State.
To make an application to cancel the registration of the order, or vary the property to which the order applies, the relevant prosecutor or person affected by the order must—
apply in writing as soon as practicable after becoming aware of the grounds for doing so;
serve the application on—
the Crown Court;
the relevant prosecutor (if the applicant is not the relevant prosecutor); and
any person who will or may be affected by the application;
explain why it is appropriate for the registration of the order to be cancelled or varied;
set out the proposed terms of any variation; and
if a hearing is requested in relation to the application, explain why a hearing is necessary.
Subject to paragraphs (6) and (7), Part 2 of the 2002 Act (confiscation: England and Wales) applies (with the appropriate modifications and subject to the preceding provisions of this Chapter) in relation to an overseas confiscation order registered in the Crown Court as it applies in relation to a domestic confiscation order.
Sections 12 (interest on unpaid sums), 35 (enforcement as fines), 38 (provisions about imprisonment or detention) and 39 (reconsideration etc: variation of prison term) of the 2002 Act do not apply to an overseas confiscation order registered in the Crown Court
No challenge to the substantive reasons in relation to which an overseas confiscation order has been made by an appropriate court or authority in a member State may be considered by the court.
Schedule 1 (Proceeds of Crime (Foreign Property and Foreign Orders): Scotland) makes provision in relation to the proceeds of crime as respects Scotland.
Schedule 2 (Proceeds of Crime (Foreign Property and Foreign Orders): Northern Ireland) makes provision in relation to the proceeds of crime in relation to Northern Ireland.
Where proceedings are started in relation to an overseas restraint order or an overseas confiscation order—
the relevant court must notify the relevant authority; and
the relevant authority must notify the court or authority which made or confirmed the overseas restraint order or the overseas confiscation order (as the case may be).
Where the relevant court makes a relevant decision, the relevant authority must communicate that decision with reasons to the court or authority which made or confirmed the overseas restraint order or the overseas confiscation order to which the decision relates as soon as reasonably practicable.
Where an overseas confiscation order provides for the confiscation of one or more specified items of property from the subject of the order, the relevant authority must seek the consent of the court or authority which made or confirmed the overseas confiscation order to replace such provision with a requirement that the subject of the order pay a sum of money equivalent to the value of any such specified items of property.
Where an overseas confiscation order provides for the confiscation of a sum of money, the relevant authority must—
seek the consent of the court or authority which made or confirmed the overseas confiscation order to convert the amount provided into the currency of that member State; and
where consent is granted, arrange for such conversion at a rate of exchange that was available on the date that the overseas confiscation order was
Where the amount obtained in relation to an overseas confiscation order is greater than or equal to an amount equivalent to 10,000 Euros, the relevant authority must transfer to the court or authority which made or confirmed the order 50% of the amount obtained, unless otherwise agreed with that court or authority.
Where a domestic confiscation order certified in accordance with regulation 11, paragraph 7 of Schedule 1 or paragraph 7 of Schedule 2 ceases to have effect or has been part satisfied, the relevant authority must notify any court or authority to whom the order has been sent in accordance with regulation 12, paragraph 8 of Schedule 1 or paragraph 8 of Schedule 2 (as the case may be) as soon as reasonably practicable.
Where, in the opinion of the relevant authority, giving effect to a domestic confiscation order certified in accordance with regulation 11, paragraph 7 of Schedule 1 or paragraph 7 of Schedule 2 may lead to more than the amount specified in that order being confiscated, the relevant authority must notify any court or authority to whom the order has been sent in accordance with regulation 12, paragraph 8 of Schedule 1 or paragraph 8 of Schedule 2 (as the case may be) as soon as reasonably practicable.
In this regulation—
“overseas restraint order” and “overseas confiscation order” have the meanings given in regulations 8 and 13, paragraphs 4 and 9 of Schedule 1 or paragraphs 4 and 9 of Schedule 2 (as the case may be);
“
in England and Wales—
for the purposes of paragraphs (1) to (5), the “relevant prosecutor”, as defined in regulation 5; and
for the purposes of paragraphs (6) and (7), the prosecutor;
in Scotland, the Lord Advocate;
in Northern Ireland, the “relevant prosecutor”, as defined in paragraph 1 of Schedule 2;
“
in England and Wales, the Crown Court;
in Scotland, the “court”, as defined in paragraph 1 of Schedule 1;
in Northern Ireland, the “court”, as defined in paragraph 1 of Schedule 2;
“
a decision to give effect to, or to not give effect to, an overseas restraint order,
a decision to postpone giving effect to an overseas restraint order, or to end any such postponement,
a decision to discharge (or in Scotland, to recall) an overseas restraint order,
a decision to consider an appeal against, or an application to
a decision not to recognise or give effect to, or to give limited effect to, an overseas confiscation order,
a decision to postpone giving effect to an overseas confiscation order, or to end any such postponement, or
a decision to consider an appeal against, or an application to
Chapter 2 of this Part applies in relation to a saved order under—
section 77 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988
section 26 of the Drug Trafficking Act 1994
as it applies in relation to a restraint order under section 41 of the 2002 Act (restraint orders).
Accordingly, a reference in Chapter 2 of this Part to a domestic restraint order includes a reference to a saved order of either of those kinds.
A reference in this regulation to a saved order is a reference to an order as it continues to have effect by virtue of articles 5 and 10 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Commencement No 5, Transitional Provisions, Savings and Amendment) Order 2003
Chapter 2 of this Part applies to a saved order under—
section 71 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988
section 2 of the Drug Trafficking Act 1994
as it applies to an order under section 6 of the 2002 Act (making of order).
Accordingly, a reference in Chapter 2 of this Part to a domestic confiscation order includes a reference to a saved order of either of those kinds.
A reference in this regulation to a saved order is a reference to an order as it continues to have effect by virtue of articles 3 and 10 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Commencement No 5, Transitional Provisions, Savings and Amendment) Order 2003 (transitional provision and savings: England and Wales).
Schedule 1 applies in relation to a saved order under section 28 of the 1995 Act
Accordingly, a reference in Schedule 1 to a domestic restraint order includes a reference to a saved order under section 28 of the 1995 Act.
A reference in this regulation to a saved order is a reference to an order as it continues to have effect by virtue of articles 4 and 7 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Commencement No. 6, Transitional Provisions and Savings) (Scotland) Order 2003
Schedule 1 applies to a saved order under section 1 of the 1995 Act
Accordingly, a reference in Schedule 1 to a domestic confiscation order includes a reference to a saved order under section 1 of the 1995 Act.
A reference in this regulation to a saved order is a reference to an order as it continues to have effect by virtue of articles 3 and 7 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Commencement No. 6, Transitional Provisions and Savings) (Scotland) Order 2003 (transitional provision and savings).
Schedule 2 applies in relation to a saved order under article 31 of the Proceeds of Crime (Northern Ireland) Order 1996
Accordingly, a reference in Schedule 2 to a domestic restraint order includes a reference to a saved order under article 31 of the 1996 Order.
A reference in this regulation to a saved order is a reference to an order as it continues to have effect by virtue of articles 6 and 10 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Commencement No 5, Transitional Provisions, Savings and Amendment) Order 2003 (transitional provision and savings: Northern Ireland).
Schedule 2 applies to a saved order under article 8 of the Proceeds of Crime (Northern Ireland) Order 1996
Accordingly, a reference in Schedule 2 to a domestic confiscation order includes a reference to a saved order under article 8 of the 1996 Order.
A reference in this regulation to a saved order is a reference to an order as it continues to have effect by virtue of articles 4 and 10 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Commencement No 5, Transitional Provisions, Savings and Amendment) Order 2003 (transitional provision and savings: Northern Ireland).
Any amendment or repeal made by Schedule 3 (mutual recognition of financial penalties: amendments of Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008) has the same extent as the enactment to which it relates, except that the amendment made by paragraph 9(2) of that Schedule extends to England and Wales and Northern Ireland.
Schedule 3 amends provisions of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
In this Part—
“
“
“
“
“
a member State, other than the United Kingdom;
Norway, Iceland or Liechtenstein; or
Switzerland;
“information” and “intelligence” have the meanings set out in Article 2(d) of the Framework Decision;
“
“
Subject to regulation 55, a UK competent authority which receives a request within its competence in accordance with the Framework Decision must ensure that information or intelligence is provided to the requesting competent authority in accordance with this Part.
A UK competent authority must not apply conditions stricter than those applicable at national level for providing and requesting information or intelligence to a competent authority in accordance with this Part.
Subject to regulation 59—
in an urgent case regarding a serious offence—
a UK competent authority must respond within eight hours of a request when the information or intelligence requested in accordance with the Framework Decision is held in a database directly accessible by the UK competent authority; but
where the provision of the information or intelligence requested in accordance with the Framework Decision within the period of eight hours would put a disproportionate burden on the UK competent authority, the UK competent authority—
may postpone the provision of the information or intelligence for up to three days;
must immediately inform the requesting competent authority of this postponement; and
must provide reasons on the form set out in Annex A;
in a non-urgent case regarding a serious offence—
a UK competent authority must ensure that a request for information or intelligence in accordance with the Framework Decision is responded to within one week if the requested information or intelligence is held in a database directly accessible by the UK competent authority; but
if the UK competent authority is unable to respond within seven days, it must provide reasons for that on the form set out in Annex A; and
in all other cases—
a UK competent authority must ensure that the information requested in accordance with the Framework Decision is communicated to the requesting competent authority within 14 days; but
if the UK competent authority is unable to respond within 14 days, it must provide reasons on the form set out in Annex A.
For the purpose of detection, prevention or investigation of an offence, a UK competent authority—
must use Annex B for the purpose of requesting information and intelligence from a competent authority and such a request must contain at least the information set out in Annex B; and
must not request more information and intelligence or set narrower timeframes than necessary for the purpose of the request.
Subject to regulation 59, a UK competent authority must, without the need for any prior request, provide such relevant information or intelligence to a competent authority where the UK competent authority has reasonable grounds to believe that such information or intelligence could assist in the detection, prevention or investigation of a serious offence.
A UK competent authority must use information or intelligence provided in accordance with the Framework Decision only for the purposes for which, and subject to the conditions on which, it has been supplied unless—
such use may assist in preventing an immediate and serious threat to public security; or
processing for other purposes is authorised by the EEA State which has provided the information or intelligence.
When providing information or intelligence to a competent authority in accordance with the Framework Decision, a UK competent authority may impose conditions—
on the use of the information or intelligence; and
on reporting the result of the criminal investigation or criminal intelligence operation for which the provision of information and intelligence has taken place.
Where—
a receiving competent authority is not bound by the conditions imposed by the UK competent authority under paragraph (2); and
the national law of the competent authority lays down that the restrictions on use are waived for judicial authorities, legislative bodies or any other independent body established by law and made responsible for supervising the competent authority,
the UK competent authority may make representations to the competent authority concerning the use of the information or intelligence.
Where, on receiving information or intelligence, a UK competent authority is not bound by the conditions imposed by a competent authority because the law in the relevant part of the United Kingdom provides that the restrictions on use are waived for judicial authorities, legislative bodies or any other independent body established by law and made responsible for supervising the UK competent authority, the UK competent authority must consult the EEA State from whom it has received the information or intelligence and take into account, so far as possible, its representations before so using the information or intelligence.
A UK competent authority which receives information or intelligence from a competent authority must give the competent authority which provided the information or intelligence information about the use and further processing of the transmitted information or intelligence if requested to do so by the competent authority.
A UK competent authority which provides information or intelligence to a competent authority may request information about the use and further processing of the transmitted information or intelligence.
A UK competent authority may refuse to provide information or intelligence only where it has reasonable grounds to believe that the provision of information or intelligence would—
harm essential national security interests of the United Kingdom;
jeopardise the success of a current investigation or a criminal intelligence operation or the safety of individuals; or
clearly be disproportionate or irrelevant with regard to the purposes for which it has been requested.
Where a request pertains to an offence punishable by a term of imprisonment of one year or less under the law of any part of the United Kingdom, the UK competent authority may refuse to provide the requested information or intelligence.
A UK competent authority may refuse to transmit under the Framework Decision information or intelligence received from an EEA State or third country where it does not have the consent of that EEA State or third country to do so.
A UK competent authority may refuse to transmit under the Framework Decision information or intelligence where otherwise prohibited by law.
The appropriate authority may issue circulars in relation to the implementation of the Framework Decision to which relevant UK competent authorities must have regard insofar as relevant to their functions.
In paragraph (1), the “
in relation to England and Wales, the Secretary of State;
as respects Scotland—
in relation to reserved matters within the meaning of the Scotland Act 1998
for any other matters, the Scottish Ministers;
in relation to Northern Ireland—
for excepted matters within the meaning of the Northern Ireland Act 1998
for reserved matters within the meaning of the Northern Ireland Act 1998—
the Secretary of State; or
the Department of Justice with the consent of the Secretary of State;
for any other matters, the Department of Justice.
In
in relation to England and Wales, the Secretary of State, the chief officer of police for a police area in England and Wales, the National Crime Agency, Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs and the Serious Fraud Office;
as respects Scotland, the Secretary of State, the Chief Constable of the Police Service of Scotland, the National Crime Agency and Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs;
in relation to Northern Ireland, the Secretary of State, the Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland, the National Crime Agency, Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs and the Serious Fraud Office.
Relevant
For the purposes of this regulation—
“
“
“
Information lawfully obtained by a UK member which is not otherwise available to the UK competent authority participating in an international joint investigation team may be used for any of the following purposes—
for the purposes for which the team has been set up;
subject to the lawful prior consent of the member State where the information became available, for detecting, investigating and prosecuting other criminal offences;
for preventing an immediate and serious threat to public security and, subject to the consent condition in sub-paragraph (b), for any criminal investigation arising if subsequently opened;
for other purposes to the extent that this is agreed between the member States setting up the team.
In this Part—
“
“
“conviction”, except where otherwise provided, has the meaning given in Article 2(a) of the Framework Decision (definitions);
“
“
“
“
“
in relation to England and Wales, information in any form relating to convictions on a names database held by the Secretary of State for the use of police forces generally;
in relation to Scotland, the criminal history database of the Police Service of Scotland for the use of the police forces generally;
in relation to Northern Ireland, the Northern Ireland Criminal History Database of the Causeway System.
The Chief Constable of Hampshire Constabulary is designated as the “central authority” for the United Kingdom.
Where a conviction is entered on the UK criminal record, it must be accompanied where available by information on the nationality or nationalities of the convicted person if he or she is a national of another member State.
The UK Central Authority must, as soon as possible, inform the central authorities of the other member States, in accordance with regulation 73, of any convictions against the nationals of those member States within the United Kingdom, as entered in the UK criminal record.
In relation to information contained in the UK criminal record by virtue of paragraph (1), any subsequent alteration or deletion of such information must be immediately transmitted by the UK Central Authority, in accordance with regulation 73, to the central authority of the member State of the person's nationality.
Where the UK Central Authority has provided information to another member State under paragraphs (2) or (3), it must communicate to the central authority of the member State of the person's nationality, on that member State's request, a copy of the conviction and subsequent measures as well as any other relevant information in order to enable it to consider whether it necessitates any measure at national level.
Where the UK Central Authority receives, under Article 4(2) or (3) of the Framework Decision (obligations of the convicting member State), information from another member State, the UK Central Authority—
must store the information listed in regulation 73(1)(a) and (b) for the purpose of retransmission in accordance with regulations 67, 68 or 69; and
may store the information listed in regulation 73(1)(c) and (d) for the purpose of retransmission in accordance with regulations 67, 68 or 69.
Where the UK Central Authority receives information in accordance with Article 4(3) of the Framework Decision, it must make identical alteration or deletion of the relevant information stored in accordance with paragraph (1).
For the purpose of retransmission in accordance with regulations 67, 68 or 69, the UK Central Authority may, where relevant, only use information which has been updated in accordance with paragraph (2).
When information from the UK criminal record is requested for the purposes of criminal proceedings against a person or for any purposes other than criminal proceedings, the UK Central Authority may submit a request to the central authority of another member State for information and related data to be extracted from the criminal record, under Article 6(1) of the Framework Decision (request for information on convictions).
When a person asks for information on their own UK criminal record under Article 6(2) of the Framework Decision, the UK Central Authority may submit a request to the central authority of another member State for information and related data to be extracted from the criminal record of that member State, provided that the person concerned is or was a resident, or a national, of the United Kingdom or that other member State.
The UK Central Authority must submit the request using the form set out in the Annex to the Framework Decision.
When information is requested under Article 6 of the Framework Decision (request for information on convictions) from the UK Central Authority in relation to a national of the United Kingdom for the purposes of criminal proceedings, the UK Central Authority must transmit to the central authority of the requesting member State information on the following—
convictions handed down in the United Kingdom and entered in the UK criminal record;
any convictions handed down in other member States which were transmitted to the UK Central Authority after 27th April 2012, in application of Article 4 of the Framework Decision (obligations of the convicting member State), and stored in accordance with regulation 65;
any convictions handed down in other member States which were transmitted to the UK Central Authority on or before 27th April 2012 and entered in the UK criminal record;
any convictions handed down in a country which is not a member State and subsequently transmitted to the UK Central Authority and entered in the UK criminal record.
When information is requested under Article 6 of the Framework Decision from the UK Central Authority in relation to a national of the United Kingdom for any purposes other than that of criminal proceedings, the UK Central Authority must transmit to the central authority of the requesting member State information on the following—
convictions handed down in the United Kingdom and entered in the UK criminal record;
any convictions handed down in other member States—
which were transmitted to the UK Central Authority after 27th April 2012, in application of Article 4 of the Framework Decision, and stored in accordance with regulation 65; and
in respect of which, the central authority of the member State which transmitted the information has not stated that such information may not be retransmitted for any purposes other than that of criminal proceedings;
any convictions handed down in other member States which were transmitted to the UK Central Authority
any conviction handed down in a country which is not a member State and subsequently transmitted to the UK Central Authority and entered in the UK criminal record.
For the purposes of paragraph (2), “
Where information under paragraph (2)(b) has not been transmitted because the central authority of the member State which transmitted the information has stated that such information may not be retransmitted for any purposes other than that of criminal proceedings, the UK Central Authority must, in respect of such convictions, inform the requesting member State which other member State had transmitted such information so as to enable the requesting member State to submit a request directly to the convicting member State in order to receive information on these convictions.
When information extracted from the UK criminal record is requested from the UK Central Authority in relation to a national of the United Kingdom by a third country, the UK Central Authority may reply in respect of convictions transmitted by another member State as if the request were made by a member State.
When information from the UK criminal record is requested under Article 6 of the Framework Decision (request for information on convictions) from the UK Central Authority in relation to a person who is not a national of the United Kingdom, the UK Central Authority must transmit information on convictions handed down in the United Kingdom and on convictions handed down against third country nationals and against stateless persons contained in its UK criminal record to the same extent as provided for in Article 13 of the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters of 20th April 1959 (judicial records).
The reply to a request for information under regulations 67, 68 or 69 must be made using the form set out in the Annex to the Framework Decision.
Subject to paragraph (2), replies to the requests referred to in
If the UK Central Authority requires further information to identify the person involved in the request, it must immediately consult the requesting member State with a view to providing a reply within ten working days from the date the additional information is received.
Replies to the request referred to in
For the purposes of this Part, “
Subject to paragraph (3), personal data provided to the UK Central Authority under Article 7(1) and (4) of the Framework Decision (reply to a request for information on convictions) for the purposes of criminal proceedings may be used only for the purposes of the criminal proceedings for which it was requested (as specified in the form set out in the Annex to the Framework Decision).
Subject to paragraph (3), personal data provided to the UK Central Authority under Article 7(2) and (4) of the Framework Decision for any purposes other than that of criminal proceedings may be used only for the purposes for which it was requested and within the limits specified by the requested member State in the form set out in the Annex to the Framework Decision.
Personal data provided to the UK Central Authority under Article 7(1), (2) and (4) may be used for preventing an immediate and serious threat to public security.
Where personal data received from another member State under Article 4 of the Framework Decision (obligations of the convicting member State) is transmitted to a third country in accordance with regulation 68, the UK Central Authority must—
take the necessary measures to ensure that such personal data is subject to the same usage limitations as those applicable in a requesting member State in accordance with paragraph (2) of this regulation;
specify that personal data, if transmitted to a third country in accordance with regulation 68 for the purposes of criminal proceedings, may be further used by that third country only for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
This regulation does not apply to personal data obtained by the UK Central Authority under the Framework Decision that originated from the United Kingdom.
When transmitting information in accordance with regulation 64(2) and (3), the UK Central Authority must transmit—
the following information—
the convicted person's—
full name;
date of birth;
town and country of birth;
gender;
nationality;
if applicable, previous names;
the date of conviction;
the name of the convicting court;
the date on which the decision of the convicting court became final;
the date of the offence underlying the conviction;
the name or legal classification of the offence;
reference to the applicable legal provisions relating to the offence;
the sentence imposed in respect of the conviction, as well as any supplementary penalties, security measures and all subsequent decisions modifying the enforcement of the sentence.
if entered on the UK criminal record, the following information—
the convicted person's parents' names;
the reference number of the conviction;
the place of the offence;
any disqualifications arising from the conviction;
if available to the UK Central Authority, the following information—
the convicted person's identity number, or the type and number of the person's identification document;
fingerprints which have been taken from that person;
if applicable, pseudonym and any alias names;
at the discretion of the UK Central Authority, any other information concerning the conviction or convictions entered in the UK criminal record.
The UK Central Authority must store all information listed in sub-paragraphs (a) and (b) of paragraph (1), which it has received in accordance with Article 5(1) of the Framework Decision (obligations of the member State of the person's nationality), for the purpose of retransmission in accordance with regulations 67, 68 or 69; for the same purpose it may store information of the types listed in sub-paragraph (c) of paragraph (1).
For the purposes of Article 4 of Council Decision 2009/316/JHA of 6th April 2009 on the establishment of the European Criminal Records Information System (ECRIS) in application of Article 11 of the Framework Decision 2009/315/JHA
Chapter 2 (European supervision orders: England and Wales) extends to England and Wales only.
Chapter 3 (European supervision orders: Northern Ireland) extends to Northern Ireland only.
Schedule 6 (European supervision orders: grounds for refusal to monitor supervision measures) extends to England and Wales and Northern Ireland.
In this Chapter—
“
“
“
“
“
“
“
A court which makes a decision on supervision measures may request a competent authority of a member State other than the United Kingdom (“the executing State”) to monitor the supervision measures under the Framework Decision where—
the measures are suitable for monitoring in the executing State, and
the executing State is one to which the request may be made.
To make the request, the court must—
issue a certificate requesting monitoring under the Framework Decision in respect of the decision on supervision measures, and
give the following documents to the competent authority or to the central authority of the executing State.
The documents are—
the decision on supervision measures or a certified copy of it,
the certificate, and
a copy of the certificate translated into the official language, or one of the official languages, of the executing State.
But paragraph (3)(c) does not apply if—
English is an official language of the executing State, or
the executing State has declared under Article 24 of the Framework Decision that it will accept a certificate translated into English.
A court makes a “decision on supervision measures” if—
it grants bail in accordance with the Bail Act 1976
requirements are imposed on the person in accordance with section 3(6) of that Act
“
A supervision measure is “suitable for monitoring in the executing State” if it constitutes—
a supervision measure of a kind mentioned in Article 8(1) of the Framework Decision (types of supervision measures), or
a supervision measure of a kind which the executing State has given notice, under Article 8(2) of that Decision, that it is prepared to monitor.
The executing State is “one to which the request may be made” if—
the person is lawfully and ordinarily resident in the executing State and consents to return to that State with a view to the supervision measures being monitored there under the Framework Decision, or
the person is not lawfully and ordinarily resident in the executing State but—
the person asks for the request to be made to a competent authority of the executing State, and
the competent authority consents to the making of the request.
In regulations 78 to 84—
“
“decision on supervision measures” and “supervision measures” are to be read in accordance with this regulation;
“
This regulation applies where a court is considering making a request under regulation 77 for a competent authority of a member State other than the United Kingdom to monitor supervision measures under the Framework Decision in relation to the grant of bail to a person who is charged with an offence.
The requirements that may be imposed on the person under section 3(6) of the Bail Act 1976 (general provisions) include requirements which can only be complied with in the other State.
Where the court is considering imposing requirements on the person which would involve electronic monitoring of the person in a particular area in the other State—
sections 3AA(4)
section 3AC of that Act
A court which has made a decision on supervision measures ceases to be responsible for monitoring the supervision measures if—
the court makes a request under regulation 77 for the competent authority of the executing State to monitor those measures under the Framework Decision, and
the competent authority notifies the court that it has decided to recognise the decision on supervision measures under the Framework Decision.
The fact that the court has ceased to be responsible for monitoring the supervision measures does not affect the court's jurisdiction to take subsequent decisions in relation to the decision on supervision measures, including decisions about—
renewal, review or withdrawal of the decision on supervision measures,
modification of the supervision measures, and
the issue of a warrant for the arrest of the person subject to the decision.
Where the person subject to the decision on supervision measures is in the executing State, the court may permit the person to attend through a live link any hearing as to whether or not to take a subsequent decision in relation to the decision.
The person is to be treated as present in court when attending a hearing through a live link by virtue of paragraph (3).
“
to see and hear the court during the hearing, and
to be seen and heard by the court during the hearing;
(and for this purpose any impairment of eyesight or hearing is to be disregarded).
Where a subsequent decision relating to a person is a decision to withhold bail, the court making the decision must require the person to surrender to custody in England and Wales at a time appointed by the court.
The fact that the court has ceased to be responsible for monitoring the supervision measures does not affect any power conferred on a constable by the Bail Act 1976 to arrest without warrant the person subject to the decision on supervision measures.
A court which has made a request under regulation 77 for the competent authority of the executing State to monitor supervision measures under the Framework Decision must consider whether to withdraw the certificate requesting monitoring under that Decision if the competent authority informs the court that—
the competent authority could refuse to monitor the supervision measures on the ground mentioned in Article 15(1)(h) of that Decision (grounds for non-recognition) but is nevertheless willing to monitor them,
the competent authority has taken a decision, in accordance with Article 13 (adaptation of supervision measures) of that Decision, adapting the supervision measures, or
there is a maximum period during which, under the law of the executing State, the supervision measures may be monitored.
But a decision to withdraw the certificate under paragraph (1)(b) or (c) may be made only if monitoring of the supervision measures in the executing State has not yet started.
If the court withdraws the certificate under this regulation, it must inform the competent authority.
A decision to withdraw the certificate under this regulation must be taken, and the competent authority must be informed under paragraph (3), no later than 10 days after the day on which the competent authority informs the court as mentioned in paragraph (1).
This regulation applies where a court informs the competent authority of the executing State under regulation 81(2)(b) that it has renewed a decision on supervision measures, or modified supervision measures, as it applies where the court makes a request under regulation 77 in relation to the original decision on supervision measures.
This regulation applies in relation to any time when a court which has made a decision on supervision measures—
has ceased under regulation 79 to be responsible for monitoring the supervision measures, and
has not yet become responsible under regulation 83 for monitoring them again.
The court must immediately inform the competent authority of the executing State if—
legal proceedings are brought in relation to the decision on supervision measures, or
the court takes a subsequent decision in relation to the decision on supervision measures, as mentioned in regulation 79(2) (a “supervening decision”).
The court must consider whether to take a supervening decision if the competent authority of the executing State notifies the court, using the form set out in Annex II to the Framework Decision, of—
a breach of the supervision measures, or
any other finding which could result in the court taking a supervening decision.
Where the decision on supervision measures provides for the measures to have effect for a specified period, the court must, before the expiry of that period, inform the competent authority of the executing State—
as to whether the court expects the monitoring of the supervision measures to be necessary for a further period, and
if so, of the expected length of that period.
The court must inform the competent authority under paragraph (4)—
following a request from that authority, or
if no such request is made, on the initiative of the court.
If the competent authority of the executing State requests information from the court as to whether monitoring of the supervision measures is still necessary in the circumstances of the case, the court must respond without delay.
If—
the law of the executing State requires periodic confirmation of the need to prolong the monitoring of the supervision measures, and
the competent authority of the executing State requests that confirmation from the court and sets a reasonable time limit for the request to be complied with,
the court must respond within that time limit.
This regulation applies in relation to any time when a court which has made a decision on supervision measures—
has ceased under regulation 79 to be responsible for monitoring the supervision measures, and
has not yet become responsible under regulation 83 for monitoring them again.
The court may make a request under this regulation if—
under the law of the executing State, there is a maximum period during which the supervision measures may be monitored,
the period is due to expire, and
the court considers that the supervision measures are still needed.
A request under this regulation is a request to the competent authority of the executing State for the period to be extended.
The request must specify the period for which an extension is likely to be needed.
A court which—
has made a decision on supervision measures, and
has ceased under regulation 79 to be responsible for monitoring the supervision measures,
becomes responsible for monitoring them again in any of the following cases.
The first case is where the person subject to the decision on supervision measures becomes lawfully and ordinarily resident in a State other than the executing State.
The second case is where the competent authority of the executing State notifies the court, in accordance with Article 20(2)(c) of the Framework Decision (information from the executing State), that it is not possible, in practice, to monitor the supervision measures.
The third case is where the competent authority of the executing State informs the court that it has decided, in accordance with Article 23 of the Framework Decision (unanswered notices), to stop monitoring the supervision measures.
The fourth case is where—
the court takes a decision modifying the supervision measures, and
the competent authority of the executing State informs the court that it has decided, in accordance with Article 18(4)(b) of the Framework Decision (competence to take all subsequent decisions and governing law), to refuse to monitor the modified supervision measures.
The fifth case is where the court—
withdraws the certificate requesting monitoring under the Framework Decision (whether in accordance with regulation 80 or otherwise), and
informs the competent authority of the executing State of its withdrawal.
The sixth case is where the court—
withdraws the decision on supervision measures, and
informs the competent authority of the executing State of its withdrawal.
The seventh case is where—
under the law of the executing State, there is a maximum period during which the supervision measures may be monitored, and
that period expires.
The court must consult the competent authority of the executing State with a view to avoiding as far as possible any interruption in the monitoring of the supervision measures as a result of this regulation.
A court which is considering making a request under regulation 77 for a competent authority of a member State other than the United Kingdom to monitor supervision measures under the Framework Decision must, unless impracticable, consult the competent authority—
while preparing the documents mentioned in paragraph (3) of that regulation, or
at the latest, before giving those documents to the competent authority or to the central authority of that State.
A court which has made a request under regulation 77 for the competent authority of the executing State to monitor supervision measures under the Framework Decision must, unless impracticable, consult the competent authority—
at such times as it considers necessary, with a view to facilitating the smooth and efficient monitoring of the supervision measures;
if the competent authority notifies it, in accordance with Article 19(3) of the Framework Decision (obligations of the authorities involved), of a serious breach of those measures.
In consulting under this regulation, the court must co-operate with the competent authority with a view to the exchange of any useful information, including—
information for verifying the identity and place of residence of the person concerned, and
relevant information taken from the person's criminal records in accordance with applicable legislation including Part 6 of these Regulations.
The court must take due account of any indications communicated by the competent authority as to the risk the person may pose to victims and the general public.
This regulation applies if a competent authority of a member State other than the United Kingdom (“the issuing State”)—
makes a decision on supervision measures, and
makes a request for monitoring of supervision measures under the Framework Decision.
The competent authority makes a “request for monitoring of supervision measures under the Framework Decision” if it or the central authority of the issuing State gives the central authority for England and Wales—
the decision on supervision measures or a certified copy of it,
a certificate requesting monitoring under the Framework Decision, and
if the certificate is not in English, a copy of the certificate translated into English.
The central authority for England and Wales must give those documents to a magistrates' court.
The magistrates' court must decide whether it is satisfied that any of the grounds for refusal in Schedule 6 apply.
If the magistrates' court decides that none of the grounds for refusal applies, it must notify the competent authority without delay that it has decided to recognise the decision on supervision measures and, accordingly, to take the measures necessary for securing that the supervision measures are monitored.
If the magistrates' court decides that the only ground for refusal which applies is that mentioned in paragraph 8 of Schedule 6, it may inform the competent authority that—
it could refuse to monitor the supervision measures on the ground mentioned in Article 15(1)(h) of the Framework Decision (giving reasons for the possible refusal), but
it is nevertheless willing to monitor them.
If—
the magistrates' court informs the competent authority under paragraph (6), and
the competent authority does not inform the magistrates' court that it has withdrawn the certificate requesting monitoring under the Framework Decision in accordance with Article 15(3) of that Decision,
the magistrates' court must notify the competent authority without delay that it has decided to recognise the decision on supervision measures and, accordingly, to take the measures necessary for securing that the supervision measures are monitored.
If the magistrates' court decides that one or more of the grounds for refusal applies and does not inform the competent authority under paragraph (6), it must notify the competent authority without delay—
that it has decided not to recognise the decision on supervision measures and, accordingly, not to assume responsibility for monitoring the supervision measures, and
of the reasons for its decision.
The magistrates' court must notify the competent authority without delay if, at any time after receiving the documents mentioned in paragraph (2) and before making a notification under paragraph (5), (7) or (8), it becomes aware of any change of residence of the person subject to the decision on supervision measures.
In this regulation, regulations 86 to 94 and Schedule 6 (so far as relating to England and Wales), “decision on supervision measures” and “supervision measures” have the meanings given by Article 4 of the Framework Decision (definitions).
In regulations 86 to 94 and Schedule 6 (so far as relating to England and Wales)—
“
“
“
A magistrates' court must take a decision under regulation 85(4) as soon as possible and, in any event—
within 20 working days of the day on which the central authority for England and Wales receives the documents mentioned in regulation 85(2), or
if legal proceedings in relation to the decision on supervision measures are brought before the end of that period, within 40 working days of that day.
If, in exceptional circumstances, it is not possible to comply with that time limit, the magistrates' court must immediately inform the competent authority of the issuing state of—
that fact,
the reasons for the delay, and
the time by which it expects the decision to be taken.
If the magistrates' court is of the view that one or more of the grounds for refusal mentioned in paragraphs 1 to 4 of Schedule 6 may apply, it must, before taking a decision under regulation 85(4)—
inform the competent authority,
request the competent authority to supply without delay any further information required, and
in the case of the ground for refusal mentioned in paragraph 1 of Schedule 6, specify a reasonable period within which the certificate must be completed or corrected.
Where the magistrates' court specifies under paragraph (3)(c) a period within which the certificate must be completed or corrected, the decision must be taken—
if a completed or corrected certificate is received by the magistrates' court within the specified period, as soon as reasonably practicable after its receipt;
otherwise, as soon as reasonably practicable after the specified period ends.
In this regulation “
a Saturday or Sunday,
Christmas Day or Good Friday, or
a day which is a bank holiday under the Banking and Financial Dealings Act 1971 in England and Wales.
This regulation applies if a magistrates' court, when making a decision under regulation 85(4) in relation to a decision on supervision measures, considers that—
none of the grounds for refusal apply, but
one or more of the supervision measures is not compatible with the law of England and Wales.
The magistrates' court must take a decision adapting the supervision measures to bring them into line with the kind of supervision measures that are available under the law of England and Wales in relation to alleged offences corresponding to the alleged offences to which the decision on supervision measures relates.
For this purpose, the adapted measures—
must correspond as far as possible to the original measures, but
must not be more severe than the original measures.
The magistrates' court must, in its notification under regulation 85(5) or (7), notify the competent authority of the issuing State of the decision adapting the supervision measures.
Where a decision to adapt supervision measures is taken under this regulation, references in regulations 88 to 94 to monitoring or breach of supervision measures are to be read as references to monitoring or breach of the adapted measures.
If a magistrates' court notifies the competent authority of the issuing State under regulation 85(5) or (7) that it has decided to recognise the decision on supervision measures—
it becomes responsible for monitoring the supervision measures, and
it must without delay take the measures it considers necessary for securing that the supervision measures are monitored.
But the magistrates' court must notify the competent authority without delay if it is not possible, in practice, to monitor the supervision measures because the person subject to the decision on supervision measures cannot be found in England and Wales.
The law of England and Wales which applies in relation to the monitoring of requirements imposed on a person as a condition of bail also applies, with any necessary modifications, in relation to the monitoring of the supervision measures by virtue of paragraph (1).
In particular—
a magistrates' court may, if it considers it necessary to do so for the purpose of any supervision measure, impose electronic monitoring requirements on a person,
sections 3AA
section 3AC(2) of that Act, and orders and rules under section 3AC(2) and (3) of that Act, apply to electronic monitoring relating to supervision measures.
This regulation applies in relation to any time when a magistrates' court which has decided to recognise a decision on supervision measures—
has become responsible under regulation 88 for monitoring the supervision measures, and
has not yet ceased under regulation 93 to be responsible for monitoring them.
The magistrates' court must immediately notify the competent authority of the issuing State, using the form set out in Annex II to the Framework Decision, if it becomes aware of—
a breach of the supervision measures, or
any other finding which could result in the competent authority taking a subsequent decision in relation to the decision on supervision measures, as mentioned in Article 18(1) of the Framework Decision (competence to take all subsequent decisions and governing law).
The magistrates' court must notify the competent authority of the issuing State without delay if—
legal proceedings are brought in relation to the decision to recognise the decision on supervision measures, or
it becomes aware of any change of residence of the person subject to the decision on supervision measures.
This regulation applies if—
a magistrates' court makes several notifications to the competent authority of the issuing State under regulation 89(2) in relation to a particular breach or other finding, and
the competent authority does not take a supervening decision in response to the breach or other finding.
The magistrates' court may—
make a further notification in relation to the breach or other finding,
invite the competent authority to take a supervening decision in response to the breach or other finding, and
give the competent authority a reasonable period in which to do so.
If the competent authority does not take a supervening decision within that period, the magistrates' court may decide to stop monitoring the supervision measures.
If the magistrates' court decides to stop monitoring the supervision measures under this regulation, it must inform the competent authority of its decision.
In this regulation a “
Paragraph (2) applies in relation to any time when a magistrates' court which has decided to recognise a decision on supervision measures—
has become responsible under regulation 88 for monitoring the supervision measures, and
has not yet ceased under regulation 93 to be responsible for monitoring them.
The person subject to the decision on supervision measures may be arrested without warrant by a constable if—
the constable has reasonable grounds for believing that the person is likely to breach any of the supervision measures or has reasonable grounds for suspecting that the person has breached any of those measures, and
the constable considers the arrest necessary for the protection of victims or the general public or for the safeguarding of internal security.
A person arrested under paragraph (2) must be brought before a magistrates' court—
as soon as possible, and
in any event, within 24 hours after the person's arrest (not counting Sundays, Christmas Day, or Good Friday).
The magistrates' court may require the person to be detained if it is of the opinion that—
the person has breached or is likely to breach any of the supervision measures, and
the detention is necessary for the protection of victims or the general public or for the safeguarding of internal security.
A magistrates' court must give its reasons for requiring a person to be detained under paragraph (4).
If the magistrates' court does not require the person to be detained, the person must be released.
A person's detention under paragraph (4) must be brought to an end if—
having been notified under regulation 89(2) of the matter that resulted in the person's detention, the competent authority of the issuing State informs the magistrates' court that it has taken a subsequent decision in relation to the decision on supervision measures, as mentioned in Article 18(1) of the Framework Decision, or
the magistrates' court ceases under regulation 93 to be responsible for monitoring the supervision measures.
A person may not be detained under paragraph (4) for more than 28 days or, in the case of a person under the age of 18, 21 days beginning with the day of the person's first appearance before the court under paragraph (3).
Section 128 of the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980
in subsections (1A), (3A), (3C) and (3E) references to adjournment of a case under section 10(1), 17C, 18(4) or 24C of that Act were to adjournment pending a decision by the
the following provisions were omitted—
in subsection (1), paragraphs (b) and (c) and the words following paragraph (c);
subsection (2);
subsections (4) and (5).
In the case of a person under the age of 18, the court's power to require the person to be detained under paragraph (4) is subject to section 91 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012
Nothing in this regulation affects any other power of arrest conferred on a constable.
This regulation applies in relation to any time when a magistrates' court which has decided to recognise a decision on supervision measures—
has become responsible under regulation 88 for monitoring the supervision measures, and
has not yet ceased under regulation 93 to be responsible for monitoring them.
If the competent authority of the issuing State informs the magistrates' court that it has taken a decision renewing the decision on supervision measures, or modifying the supervision measures—
that decision does not (subject as follows) affect the court's responsibility for monitoring the renewed or modified supervision measures, and
references in regulations 88 to 94 to monitoring or breach of the supervision measures are to be read as references to monitoring or breach of the renewed or modified measures.
If the magistrates' court had adapted the supervision measures under regulation 87 and the decision renews the measures—
the adaptations apply to the renewed decision as they applied to the original decision, and
regulation 87(5) applies accordingly.
If the decision modifies the supervision measures and the magistrates' court considers that the modified supervision measures include measures other than those of a kind mentioned in Article 8(1) of the Framework Decision, the magistrates' court must—
decide to refuse to monitor the modified supervision measures, and
inform the competent authority of that decision.
If the decision modifies the supervision measures and the magistrates' court—
does not decide to refuse to monitor the modified supervision measures, but
considers that one or more of those measures is not compatible with the law of England and Wales,
regulation 87(2) to (5) applies in relation to those measures.
A magistrates' court which—
has decided to recognise a decision on supervision measures, and
has become responsible under regulation 88 for monitoring the supervision measures,
ceases to be responsible for monitoring them in any of the following cases.
The first case is where the person subject to the decision on supervision measures becomes lawfully and ordinarily resident in a State other than the United Kingdom.
The second case is where the magistrates' court notifies the competent authority of the issuing State under regulation 88(2) that it is not possible, in practice, to monitor the supervision measures.
The third case is where the magistrates' court informs the competent authority of the issuing State that it has decided, in accordance with regulation 90, to stop monitoring the supervision measures.
The fourth case is where—
the supervision measures have been modified, and
the magistrates' court informs the competent authority of the issuing State that it has decided, in accordance with regulation 92(4), to refuse to monitor the modified supervision measures.
The fifth case is where the competent authority of the issuing State, within the period of 10 days after the day on which the magistrates' court gives notification to the competent authority under regulation 85(5) or (7) (recognition of supervision measures)—
withdraws, subject to paragraph (7), the certificate requesting monitoring under the Framework Decision (whether in response to a decision under regulation 87 adapting the supervision measures or otherwise), and
informs the magistrates' court of its withdrawal.
For the fifth case to apply, where the decision to withdraw the certificate referred to in paragraph (6)(a) is because the competent authority of the issuing State has been informed of —
a decision to adapt under regulation 87, or
a maximum period during which the supervision measures may be monitored,
the decision to withdraw the certificate must also be made before monitoring starts.
The sixth case is where the competent authority of the issuing State—
withdraws the decision on supervision measures, and
informs the magistrates' court of its withdrawal.
The magistrates' court must consult the competent authority with a view to avoiding as far as possible any interruption in the monitoring of the supervision measures as a result of this regulation.
The magistrates' court may at any time ask the competent authority for information as to whether monitoring of the supervision measures is still necessary.
If a competent authority of a member State other than the United Kingdom consults the central authority for England and Wales about a request for monitoring of supervision measures under the Framework Decision which it is considering making, a magistrates' court specified by the central authority must, unless impracticable, co-operate in that consultation.
Where a competent authority has made a request for monitoring of supervision measures under the Framework Decision, the magistrates' court to which the documents mentioned in regulation 85(2) were given must, unless impracticable, consult the competent authority—
at such times as it considers necessary, with a view to facilitating the smooth and efficient monitoring of the supervision measures;
if it notifies the competent authority under regulation 89(2) of a serious breach of those measures.
In consulting or co-operating in consultation under this regulation, the magistrates' court must co-operate with the competent authority with a view to the exchange of any useful information, including—
information for verifying the identity and place of residence of the person concerned, and
relevant information taken from the person's criminal records in accordance with applicable legislation including Part 6 of these Regulations.
In this Chapter—
“
“
“
“
“
“
“
A court which makes a decision on supervision measures may request a competent authority of a member State other than the United Kingdom (“the executing State”) to monitor the supervision measures under the Framework Decision where—
the measures are suitable for monitoring in the executing State, and
the executing State is one to which the request may be made.
To make the request, the court must—
issue a certificate requesting monitoring under the Framework Decision in respect of the decision on supervision measures, and
give the following documents to the competent authority or to the central authority of the executing State.
The documents are—
the decision on supervision measures or a certified copy of it,
the certificate, and
a copy of the certificate translated into the official language, or one of the official languages, of the executing State.
But paragraph (3)(c) does not apply if—
English is an official language of the executing State, or
the executing State has declared under Article 24 of the Framework Decision that it will accept a certificate translated into English.
A court makes a “decision on supervision measures” if—
it grants bail under the law for the time being in force to a person who is charged with an offence, and
requirements are imposed on the person as a condition of bail (as to which, see regulation 97).
“
A supervision measure is “suitable for monitoring in the executing State” if it constitutes—
a supervision measure of a kind mentioned in Article 8(1) of the Framework Decision (types of supervision measures), or
a supervision measure of a kind which the executing State has given notice, under Article 8(2) of that Decision, that it is prepared to monitor.
The executing State is “one to which the request may be made” if—
the person is lawfully and ordinarily resident in the executing State and consents to return to that State with a view to the supervision measures being monitored there under the Framework Decision, or
the person is not lawfully and ordinarily resident in the executing State but—
the person asks for the request to be made to a competent authority of the executing State, and
the competent authority consents to the making of the request.
In regulations 97 to 103—
“
“decision on supervision measures” and “supervision measures” are to be read in accordance with this regulation;
“
This regulation applies where a court is considering making a request under regulation 96 for a competent authority of a member State other than the United Kingdom to monitor supervision measures under the Framework Decision in relation to the grant of bail to a person who is charged with an offence.
The requirements that may be imposed on the person as a condition of bail include requirements which can only be complied with in the other State.
Where the court is considering imposing requirements on the person which would involve electronic monitoring of the person in a particular area in the other State, article 40 of the Criminal Justice (Northern Ireland) Order 2008
A court which has made a decision on supervision measures ceases to be responsible for monitoring the supervision measures if—
the court makes a request under regulation 96 for the competent authority of the executing State to monitor those measures under the Framework Decision, and
the competent authority notifies the court that it has decided to recognise the decision on supervision measures under the Framework Decision.
The fact that the court has ceased to be responsible for monitoring the supervision measures does not affect the court's jurisdiction to take subsequent decisions in relation to the decision on supervision measures, including decisions about—
renewal, review or withdrawal of the decision on supervision measures,
modification of the supervision measures, and
the issue of a warrant for the arrest of the person subject to the decision.
Where the person subject to the decision on supervision measures is in the executing State, the court may permit the person to attend through a live link any hearing as to whether or not to take a subsequent decision in relation to the decision.
The person is to be treated as present in court when attending a hearing through a live link by virtue of paragraph (3).
“
to see and hear the court during the hearing, and
to be seen and heard by the court during the hearing;
(and for this purpose any impairment of eyesight or hearing is to be disregarded).
Where a subsequent decision relating to a person is a decision to withhold bail, the court making the decision must require the person to surrender to custody in Northern Ireland at a time appointed by the court.
The fact that the court has ceased to be responsible for monitoring the supervision measures does not affect any power conferred on a constable by the Criminal Justice (Northern Ireland) Order 2003
Where the court has ceased to be responsible for monitoring the supervision measures, the Extradition Act 2003 has effect in relation to the person subject to the decision on supervision measures as if the provisions listed in section 142(8A) of that Act included article 6 of the Criminal Justice (Northern Ireland) Order 2003 (even if the court subsequently becomes responsible for monitoring the supervision measures again).
A court which has made a request under regulation 96 for the competent authority of the executing State to monitor supervision measures under the Framework Decision must consider whether to withdraw the certificate requesting monitoring under that Decision if the competent authority informs the court that—
the competent authority could refuse to monitor the supervision measures on the ground mentioned in Article 15(1)(h) of that Decision (grounds for non-recognition) but is nevertheless willing to monitor them,
the competent authority has taken a decision, in accordance with Article 13 (adaptation of supervision measures) of that Decision, adapting the supervision measures, or
there is a maximum period during which, under the law of the executing State, the supervision measures may be monitored.
But a decision to withdraw the certificate under paragraph (1)(b) or (c) may be made only if monitoring of the supervision measures in the executing State has not yet started.
If the court withdraws the certificate under this regulation, it must inform the competent authority.
A decision to withdraw the certificate under this regulation must be taken, and the competent authority must be informed under paragraph (3), no later than 10 days after the day on which the competent authority informs the court as mentioned in paragraph (1).
This regulation applies where a court informs the competent authority of the executing State under regulation 100(2)(b) that it has renewed a decision on supervision measures, or modified supervision measures, as it applies where the court makes a request under regulation 96 in relation to the original decision on supervision measures.
This regulation applies in relation to any time when a court which has made a decision on supervision measures—
has ceased under regulation 98 to be responsible for monitoring the supervision measures, and
has not yet become responsible under regulation 102 for monitoring them again.
The court must immediately inform the competent authority of the executing State if—
legal proceedings are brought in relation to the decision on supervision measures, or
the court takes a subsequent decision in relation to the decision on supervision measures, as mentioned in regulation 98(2) (a “supervening decision”).
The court must consider whether to take a supervening decision if the competent authority of the executing State notifies the court, using the form set out in Annex II to the Framework Decision, of—
a breach of the supervision measures, or
any other finding which could result in the court taking a supervening decision.
Where the decision on supervision measures provides for the measures to have effect for a specified period, the court must, before the expiry of that period, inform the competent authority of the executing State—
as to whether the court expects the monitoring of the supervision measures to be necessary for a further period, and
if so, of the expected length of that period.
The court must inform the competent authority under paragraph (4)—
following a request from that authority, or
if no such request is made, on the initiative of the court.
If the competent authority of the executing State requests information from the court as to whether monitoring of the supervision measures is still necessary in the circumstances of the case, the court must respond without delay.
If—
the law of the executing State requires periodic confirmation of the need to prolong the monitoring of the supervision measures, and
the competent authority of the executing State requests that confirmation from the court and sets a reasonable time limit for the request to be complied with,
the court must respond within that time limit.
This regulation applies in relation to any time when a court which has made a decision on supervision measures—
has ceased under regulation 98 to be responsible for monitoring the supervision measures, and
has not yet become responsible under regulation 102 for monitoring them again.
The court may make a request under this regulation if—
under the law of the executing State, there is a maximum period during which the supervision measures may be monitored,
the period is due to expire, and
the court considers that the supervision measures are still needed.
A request under this regulation is a request to the competent authority of the executing State for the period to be extended.
The request must specify the period for which an extension is likely to be needed.
A court which—
has made a decision on supervision measures, and
has ceased under regulation 98 to be responsible for monitoring the supervision measures,
becomes responsible for monitoring them again in any of the following cases.
The first case is where the person subject to the decision on supervision measures becomes lawfully and ordinarily resident in a State other than the executing State.
The second case is where the competent authority of the executing State notifies the court, in accordance with Article 20(2)(c) of the Framework Decision (information from the executing State), that it is not possible, in practice, to monitor the supervision measures.
The third case is where the competent authority of the executing State informs the court that it has decided, in accordance with Article 23 of the Framework Decision (unanswered notices), to stop monitoring the supervision measures.
The fourth case is where—
the court takes a decision modifying the supervision measures, and
the competent authority of the executing State informs the court that it has decided, in accordance with Article 18(4)(b) of the Framework Decision (competence to take all subsequent decisions and governing law), to refuse to monitor the modified supervision measures.
The fifth case is where the court—
withdraws the certificate requesting monitoring under the Framework Decision (whether in accordance with regulation 99 or otherwise), and
informs the competent authority of the executing State of its withdrawal.
The sixth case is where the court—
has withdrawn the decision on supervision measures, and
informs the competent authority of the executing State of its withdrawal.
The seventh case is where—
under the law of the executing State, there is a maximum period during which the supervision measures may be monitored, and
that period expires.
The court must consult the competent authority of the executing State with a view to avoiding as far as possible any interruption in the monitoring of the supervision measures as a result of this regulation.
A court which is considering making a request under regulation 96 for a competent authority of a member State other than the United Kingdom to monitor supervision measures under the Framework Decision must, unless impracticable, consult the competent authority—
while preparing the documents mentioned in paragraph (3) of that regulation, or
at the latest, before giving those documents to the competent authority or to the central authority of that State.
A court which has made a request under regulation 96 for the competent authority of the executing State to monitor supervision measures under the Framework Decision must, unless impracticable, consult the competent authority—
at such times as it considers necessary, with a view to facilitating the smooth and efficient monitoring of the supervision measures;
if the competent authority notifies it, in accordance with Article 19(3) of the Framework Decision (obligations of the authorities involved), of a serious breach of those measures.
In consulting under this regulation, the court must co-operate with the competent authority with a view to the exchange of any useful information, including—
information for verifying the identity and place of residence of the person concerned, and
relevant information taken from the person's criminal records in accordance with applicable legislation including Part 6 of these Regulations.
The court must take due account of any indications communicated by the competent authority as to the risk the person may pose to victims and the general public.
This regulation applies if a competent authority of a member State other than the United Kingdom (“the issuing State”)—
makes a decision on supervision measures, and
makes a request for monitoring of supervision measures under the Framework Decision.
The competent authority makes a “request for monitoring of supervision measures under the Framework Decision” if it or the central authority of the issuing State gives the central authority for Northern Ireland—
the decision on supervision measures or a certified copy of it,
a certificate requesting monitoring under the Framework Decision, and
if the certificate is not in English, a copy of the certificate translated into English.
The central authority for Northern Ireland must give those documents to a magistrates' court acting for the petty sessions district in which it appears that the person subject to the supervision measures is normally resident.
The magistrates' court must decide whether it is satisfied that any of the grounds for refusal in Schedule 6 apply.
If the magistrates' court decides that none of the grounds for refusal applies, it must notify the competent authority without delay that it has decided to recognise the decision on supervision measures and, accordingly, to take the measures necessary for securing that the supervision measures are monitored.
If the magistrates' court decides that the only ground for refusal which applies is that mentioned in paragraph 8 of Schedule 6, it may inform the competent authority that—
it could refuse to monitor the supervision measures on the ground mentioned in Article 15(1)(h) of the Framework Decision (giving reasons for the possible refusal), but
it is nevertheless willing to monitor them.
If—
the magistrates' court informs the competent authority under paragraph (6), and
the competent authority does not inform the magistrates' court that it has withdrawn the certificate requesting monitoring under the Framework Decision in accordance with Article 15(3) of that Decision,
the magistrates' court must notify the competent authority without delay that it has decided to recognise the decision on supervision measures and, accordingly, to take the measures necessary for securing that the supervision measures are monitored.
If the magistrates' court decides that one or more of the grounds for refusal applies and does not inform the competent authority under paragraph (6), it must notify the competent authority without delay—
that it has decided not to recognise the decision on supervision measures and, accordingly, not to assume responsibility for monitoring the supervision measures, and
of the reasons for its decision.
The magistrates' court must notify the competent authority without delay if, at any time after receiving the documents mentioned in paragraph (2) and before making a notification under paragraph (5), (7) or (8), it becomes aware of any change of residence of the person subject to the decision on supervision measures.
In this regulation, regulations 105 to 113 and Schedule 6 “decision on supervision measures” and “supervision measures” have the meanings given by Article 4 of the Framework Decision (definitions).
In regulations 105 to 113 and Schedule 6 (so far as relating to Northern Ireland)—
“
“
“
A magistrates' court must take a decision under regulation 104(4) as soon as possible and, in any event—
within 20 working days of the day on which the central authority for Northern Ireland receives the documents mentioned in regulation 104(2), or
if legal proceedings in relation to the decision on supervision measures are brought before the end of that period, within 40 working days of that day.
If, in exceptional circumstances, it is not possible to comply with that time limit, the magistrates' court must immediately inform the competent authority of the issuing state of—
that fact,
the reasons for the delay, and
the time by which it expects the decision to be taken.
If the magistrates' court is of the view that one or more of the grounds for refusal mentioned in paragraphs 1 to 4 of Schedule 6 may apply, it must, before taking a decision under regulation 104(4)—
inform the competent authority,
request the competent authority to supply without delay any further information required, and
in the case of the ground for refusal mentioned in paragraph 1 of Schedule 6, specify a reasonable period within which the certificate must be completed or corrected.
Where the magistrates' court specifies under paragraph (3)(c) a period within which the certificate must be completed or corrected, the decision must be taken—
if a completed or corrected certificate is received by the magistrates' court within the specified period, as soon as reasonably practicable after its receipt;
otherwise, as soon as reasonably practicable after the specified period ends.
In this regulation “
a Saturday or Sunday,
Christmas Day or Good Friday, or
a day which is a bank holiday under the Banking and Financial Dealings Act 1971 in Northern Ireland.
This regulation applies if a magistrates' court, when making a decision under regulation 104(4) in relation to a decision on supervision measures, considers that—
none of the grounds for refusal apply, but
one or more of the supervision measures is not compatible with the law of Northern Ireland.
The magistrates' court must take a decision adapting the supervision measures to bring them into line with the kind of supervision measures that are available under the law of Northern Ireland in relation to alleged offences corresponding to the alleged offences to which the decision on supervision measures relates.
For this purpose, the adapted measures—
must correspond as far as possible to the original measures, but
must not be more severe than the original measures.
The magistrates' court must, in its notification under regulation 104(5) or (7), notify the competent authority of the issuing State without delay of the decision adapting the supervision measures.
Where a decision to adapt supervision measures is taken under this regulation, references in regulations 107 to 113 to monitoring or breach of supervision measures are to be read as references to monitoring or breach of the adapted measures.
If a magistrates' court notifies the competent authority of the issuing State under regulation 104(5) or (7) that it has decided to recognise the decision on supervision measures—
it becomes responsible for monitoring the supervision measures, and
it must without delay take the measures it considers necessary for securing that the supervision measures are monitored.
But the magistrates' court must notify the competent authority without delay if it is not possible, in practice, to monitor the supervision measures because the person subject to the decision on supervision measures cannot be found in Northern Ireland.
The law of Northern Ireland which applies in relation to the monitoring of requirements imposed on a person as a condition of bail also applies, with any necessary modifications, in relation to the monitoring of the supervision measures by virtue of paragraph (1).
In particular—
a magistrates' court may, if it considers it necessary to do so for the purpose of any supervision measure, impose electronic monitoring requirements on a person,
articles 40 to 43 of the 2008 Order apply to electronic monitoring requirements relating to supervision measures, and
orders under article 40(3) of the 2008 Order, and rules under article 44 of the 2008 Order, apply to electronic monitoring relating to supervision measures.
In this regulation—
“
“
This regulation applies in relation to any time when a magistrates' court which has decided to recognise a decision on supervision measures—
has become responsible under regulation 107 for monitoring the supervision measures, and
has not yet ceased under regulation 112 to be responsible for monitoring them.
The magistrates' court must immediately notify the competent authority of the issuing State, using the form set out in Annex II to the Framework Decision, if it becomes aware of—
a breach of the supervision measures, or
any other finding which could result in the competent authority taking a subsequent decision in relation to the decision on supervision measures, as mentioned in Article 18(1) of the Framework Decision (competence to take all subsequent decisions and governing law).
The magistrates' court must notify the competent authority of the issuing State without delay if—
legal proceedings are brought in relation to the decision to recognise the decision on supervision measures, or
it becomes aware of any change of residence of the person subject to the decision on supervision measures.
This regulation applies if—
a magistrates' court makes several notifications to the competent authority of the issuing State under regulation 108(2) in relation to a particular breach or other finding, and
the competent authority does not take a supervening decision in response to the breach or other finding.
The magistrates' court may—
make a further notification in relation to the breach or other finding,
invite the competent authority to take a supervening decision in response to the breach or other finding, and
give the competent authority a reasonable period in which to do so.
If the competent authority does not take a supervening decision within that period, the magistrates' court may decide to stop monitoring the supervision measures.
If the magistrates' court decides to stop monitoring the supervision measures under this regulation, it must inform the competent authority of its decision.
In this regulation a “
Paragraph (2) applies in relation to any time when a magistrates' court which has decided to recognise a decision on supervision measures—
has become responsible under regulation 107 for monitoring the supervision measures, and
has not yet ceased under regulation 112 to be responsible for monitoring them.
The person subject to the decision on supervision measures may be arrested without warrant by a constable if—
the constable has reasonable grounds for believing that the person is likely to breach any of the supervision measures or has reasonable grounds for suspecting that the person has breached any of those measures, and
the constable considers the arrest necessary for the protection of victims or the general public or for the safeguarding of internal security.
A person arrested under paragraph (2) must be brought before a magistrates' court—
as soon as possible, and
in any event, within 24 hours after the person's arrest (not counting Sundays, Christmas Day or Good Friday).
The magistrates' court may require the person to be detained if it is of the opinion that—
the person has breached or is likely to breach any of the supervision measures, and
the detention is necessary for the protection of victims or the general public or for the safeguarding of internal security.
A magistrates' court must give its reasons for requiring a person to be detained under paragraph (4).
If the magistrates' court does not require the person to be detained, the person must be released.
A person's detention under paragraph (4) must be brought to an end if—
having been notified under regulation 108(2) of the matter that resulted in the person's detention, the competent authority of the issuing State informs the magistrates' court that it has taken a subsequent decision in relation to the decision on supervision measures, as mentioned in Article 18(1) of the Framework Decision, or
the magistrates' court ceases under regulation 112 to be responsible for monitoring the supervision measures.
Article 47 of the Magistrates' Courts (Northern Ireland) Order 1981
in paragraph (1) of that article, the reference to adjourning proceedings for an offence were to adjournment pending a decision by the
the following provisions of that article were omitted—
in paragraph (1), paragraph (b) and the words following it;
paragraph (4).
Article 49 of that Order (remand in case of illness or accident) applies in relation to a person required to be detained under paragraph (4).
Articles 79 and 80 of the Criminal Justice (Northern Ireland) Order 2008 (live links) apply in relation to proceedings relating to a person who has been required to be detained under paragraph (4) as in relation to a “preliminary hearing” within the meaning of those articles.
In the case of a person under the age of 18, the court's power to require the person to be detained under paragraph (4) is subject to articles 12 and 13 of the Criminal Justice (Children) (Northern Ireland) Order 1998
Nothing in this regulation affects any other power of arrest conferred on a constable.
This regulation applies in relation to any time when a magistrates' court which has decided to recognise a decision on supervision measures—
has become responsible under regulation 107 for monitoring the supervision measures, and
has not yet ceased under regulation 112 to be responsible for monitoring them.
If the competent authority of the issuing State informs the magistrates' court that it has taken a decision renewing the decision on supervision measures, or modifying the supervision measures—
that decision does not (subject as follows) affect the court's responsibility for monitoring the renewed or modified supervision measures, and
references in regulations 107 to 113 to monitoring or breach of the supervision measures are to be read as references to monitoring or breach of the renewed or modified measures.
If the magistrates' court had adapted the supervision measures under regulation 106 and the decision renews the measures—
the adaptations apply to the renewed decision as they applied to the original decision, and
regulation 106(5) applies accordingly.
If the decision modifies the supervision measures and the magistrates' court considers that the modified supervision measures include measures other than those of a kind mentioned in Article 8(1) of the Framework Decision, the magistrates' court must—
decide to refuse to monitor the modified supervision measures, and
inform the competent authority of that decision.
If the decision modifies the supervision measures and the magistrates' court—
does not decide to refuse to monitor the modified supervision measures, but
considers that one or more of those measures is not compatible with the law of Northern Ireland,
regulation 106(2) to (5) applies in relation to those measures.
A magistrates' court which—
has decided to recognise a decision on supervision measures, and
has become responsible under regulation 107 for monitoring the supervision measures,
ceases to be responsible for monitoring them in any of the following cases.
The first case is where the person subject to the decision on supervision measures becomes lawfully and ordinarily resident in a State other than the United Kingdom.
The second case is where the magistrates' court notifies the competent authority of the issuing State under regulation 107(2) that it is not possible, in practice, to monitor the supervision measures.
The third case is where the magistrates' court informs the competent authority of the issuing State that it has decided, in accordance with regulation 109, to stop monitoring the supervision measures.
The fourth case is where—
the supervision measures have been modified, and
the magistrates' court informs the competent authority of the issuing State that it has decided, in accordance with regulation 111(4), to refuse to monitor the modified supervision measures.
The fifth case is where the competent authority of the issuing State, within the period of 10 days after the day on which the magistrates' court gives notification to the competent authority under regulation 104(5) or (7) (recognition of supervision measures)—
withdraws, subject to paragraph (7), the certificate requesting monitoring under the Framework Decision (whether in response to a decision under regulation 106 adapting the supervision measures or otherwise), and
informs the magistrates' court of its withdrawal.
For the fifth case to apply, where the decision to withdraw the certificate referred to in paragraph (6)(a) is because the competent authority of the issuing State has been informed of —
a decision to adapt under regulation 106, or
a maximum period during which the supervision measures may be monitored,
the decision to withdraw the certificate must also be made before monitoring starts.
The sixth case is where the competent authority of the issuing State—
withdraws the decision on supervision measures, and
informs the magistrates' court of its withdrawal.
The magistrates' court must consult the competent authority with a view to avoiding as far as possible any interruption in the monitoring of the supervision measures as a result of this regulation.
The magistrates' court may at any time ask the competent authority for information as to whether monitoring of the supervision measures is still necessary.
If a competent authority of a member State other than the United Kingdom consults the central authority for Northern Ireland about a request for monitoring of supervision measures under the Framework Decision which it is considering making, a magistrates' court specified by the central authority must, unless impracticable, co-operate in that consultation.
Where a competent authority has made a request for monitoring of supervision measures under the Framework Decision, the magistrates' court to which the documents mentioned in regulation 104(2) were given must, unless impracticable, consult the competent authority—
at such times as it considers necessary, with a view to facilitating the smooth and efficient monitoring of the supervision measures;
if it notifies the competent authority under regulation 108(2) of a serious breach of those measures.
In consulting or co-operating in consultation under this regulation, the magistrates' court must co-operate with the competent authority with a view to the exchange of any useful information, including—
information for verifying the identity and place of residence of the person concerned, and
relevant information taken from the person's criminal records in accordance with applicable legislation including Part 6 of these Regulations.
The Repatriation of Prisoners Act 1984
In section 6A
in subsection (9)—
the Department of Justice in Northern Ireland, in a case where it is proposed that the person who is the subject of a request under subsection (1)(b) or (3)(b) will, whilst in transit— be present only in Northern Ireland, or arrive in Northern Ireland before being taken to another part of the United Kingdom;
Where— a transit order is issued by the Minister for one part of the United Kingdom (“jurisdiction A”), and it is proposed that the person who is the subject of the order will whilst in transit be taken to another part of the United Kingdom (“jurisdiction B”), the Minister for jurisdiction A must notify the Minister for jurisdiction B. Notification need not be given where the Minister for jurisdiction B has agreed in writing to the transit order. Unless the Minister for jurisdiction B agrees in writing to the transit order, the order authorises the detention of the person subject to it in jurisdiction A only. But where the person escapes or is unlawfully at large, the order also authorises— the arrest of the person under section 6B(5) in a part of the United Kingdom other than jurisdiction A, and the detention of the person in that part by a constable (within the meaning of that section) for the purpose of taking the person to jurisdiction A. For the purposes of this section— the Minister for England and Wales, is the Secretary of State, the Minister for Scotland is the Scottish Ministers, and the Minister for Northern Ireland is the Department of Justice in Northern Ireland.
In section 8 (interpretation and certificates)
in subsection (1), omit the definition of “international arrangements”, and
In this Act— “ references to a country or territory being a party to international arrangements include references to the country or territory being required to comply with provisions of a Framework Decision of the Council of the European Union (and references to international arrangements are to be construed accordingly).
In section 9
in subsection (3), omit “Subject to subsection (3A)”;
omit subsection (3A).