- Latest available (Revised)
- Point in Time (22/04/2014)
- Original (As made)
Version Superseded: 01/04/2017
Point in time view as at 22/04/2014.
There are currently no known outstanding effects for the The Family Court (Composition and Distribution of Business) Rules 2014,
PART 4
.
Revised legislation carried on this site may not be fully up to date. At the current time any known changes or effects made by subsequent legislation have been applied to the text of the legislation you are viewing by the editorial team. Please see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ for details regarding the timescales for which new effects are identified and recorded on this site.
10. In this Part—
“2007 Rules” means the Justices of the Peace (Training and Development Committee) Rules 2007 M1;
“BTDC” means the Bench Training and Development Committee established in accordance with the 2007 Rules; and
“FTDC” means the Family Training and Development Committee established in accordance with the 2007 Rules.
Marginal Citations
M1S.I. 2007/1609. Relevant amending instrument is S.I. 2011/1493.
11.—(1) When the family court is composed of two or three lay justices, it shall sit under the chairmanship of a lay justice who is on a list of approved family court chairmen.
(2) A lay justice may preside before being included on a list of approved family court chairmen only if that lay justice is—
(a)under the supervision of another authorised lay justice who is on the list of approved family court chairmen; and
(b)has completed the training course required by rule 31 of the 2007 Rules.
(3) In this rule “list of approved family court chairmen” means a list kept by a FTDC or, where there is no FTDC, a BTDC in accordance with rules 32 and 35 of the 2007 Rules.
(4) This rule and rule 12 are subject to sections 18(1) and (2) of the Courts Act 2003 M2.
Marginal Citations
M2Section 18 was amended by paragraph 85 of Schedule 10 to the Crime and Courts Act 2013.
12.—(1) The lay justices present may appoint one of their number to preside in the family court to deal with any case in the absence of a lay justice entitled to preside under rule 11 if—
(a)before making such appointment the lay justices present are satisfied as to the suitability for this purpose of the lay justice proposed; and
(b)expect as mentioned in paragraph (2), the lay justice proposed has completed or is undergoing a chairman training course in accordance with rule 31(d) of the 2007 Rules.
(2) The condition in paragraph (1)(b) does not apply if by reason of illness, circumstances unforeseen when the lay justices to sit were chosen, or other emergency, no lay justice who complies with that condition is present.
Latest Available (revised):The latest available updated version of the legislation incorporating changes made by subsequent legislation and applied by our editorial team. Changes we have not yet applied to the text, can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area.
Original (As Enacted or Made): The original version of the legislation as it stood when it was enacted or made. No changes have been applied to the text.
Point in Time: This becomes available after navigating to view revised legislation as it stood at a certain point in time via Advanced Features > Show Timeline of Changes or via a point in time advanced search.
Geographical Extent: Indicates the geographical area that this provision applies to. For further information see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’.
Show Timeline of Changes: See how this legislation has or could change over time. Turning this feature on will show extra navigation options to go to these specific points in time. Return to the latest available version by using the controls above in the What Version box.
Explanatory Memorandum sets out a brief statement of the purpose of a Statutory Instrument and provides information about its policy objective and policy implications. They aim to make the Statutory Instrument accessible to readers who are not legally qualified and accompany any Statutory Instrument or Draft Statutory Instrument laid before Parliament from June 2004 onwards.
Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Impact Assessments generally accompany all UK Government interventions of a regulatory nature that affect the private sector, civil society organisations and public services. They apply regardless of whether the regulation originates from a domestic or international source and can accompany primary (Acts etc) and secondary legislation (SIs). An Impact Assessment allows those with an interest in the policy area to understand:
This timeline shows the different points in time where a change occurred. The dates will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. The first date in the timeline will usually be the earliest date when the provision came into force. In some cases the first date is 01/02/1991 (or for Northern Ireland legislation 01/01/2006). This date is our basedate. No versions before this date are available. For further information see the Editorial Practice Guide and Glossary under Help.
Use this menu to access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including: