- Latest available (Revised)
- Original (As made)
There are currently no known outstanding effects for the The Competition Appeal Tribunal Rules 2015, Section 42.
Revised legislation carried on this site may not be fully up to date. At the current time any known changes or effects made by subsequent legislation have been applied to the text of the legislation you are viewing by the editorial team. Please see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ for details regarding the timescales for which new effects are identified and recorded on this site.
42.—(1) The Tribunal may of its own initiative or on the application of a party give default judgment without a hearing of the claim where—
(a)the defendant has not filed an acknowledgment of service;
(b)the defendant has not filed a defence to the claim or any part of the claim; or
(c)a counterclaim has been made under rule 39 and a defence to the counterclaim has not been filed,
and, in any of those cases, the relevant time for filing has expired.
(2) A default judgment may not be given if the defendant has made an application—
(a)disputing the Tribunal's jurisdiction under rule 34;
(b)to have the claim struck out under rule 41; or
(c)for summary judgment under rule 43,
and that application has not been disposed of.
(3) Where the claim form has been served on the defendant in accordance with the directions of the Registrar, the claimant may not obtain default judgment unless the claimant has complied with any directions concerning proof of service.
(4) A default judgment given under this rule shall be—
(a)such judgment as it appears to the Tribunal that the claimant is entitled to on the claim form;
(b)for an amount to be decided by the Tribunal as to damages, costs and interest or for such other relief to be decided by the Tribunal in accordance with any directions it may give for the determination of those matters.
(5) A default judgment may be given against one of two or more defendants and the claimant may proceed against the other defendants.
(6) The Tribunal may only give a default judgment against one of two or more defendants in accordance with paragraph (5) if it is satisfied that the claim against that defendant can be dealt with separately from the claim against the other defendants.
(7) The Tribunal shall set aside a default judgment if the judgment was wrongly entered because any of the conditions set out in paragraph (1) were not satisfied.
(8) In any other case, the Tribunal may set aside or vary a default judgment (and attach any conditions it may think fit) if—
(a)the defendant has a real prospect of defending the claim; or
(b)it appears to the Tribunal that there is some other good reason why—
(i)the judgment should be set aside or varied; or
(ii)the defendant should be allowed to defend the claim;
(9) In considering whether to set aside or vary a default judgment under paragraph (8)(b), the matters to which the Tribunal shall have regard include whether the person seeking to set aside the judgment made an application to do so promptly.
(10) Where—
(a)the claimant claimed a remedy in addition to damages;
(b)the claimant has abandoned its claim for that remedy in order to apply for default judgment; and
(c)the default judgment is set aside,
the abandoned claim is restored when the default judgment is set aside.
Latest Available (revised):The latest available updated version of the legislation incorporating changes made by subsequent legislation and applied by our editorial team. Changes we have not yet applied to the text, can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area.
Original (As Enacted or Made): The original version of the legislation as it stood when it was enacted or made. No changes have been applied to the text.
Geographical Extent: Indicates the geographical area that this provision applies to. For further information see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’.
Show Timeline of Changes: See how this legislation has or could change over time. Turning this feature on will show extra navigation options to go to these specific points in time. Return to the latest available version by using the controls above in the What Version box.
Explanatory Memorandum sets out a brief statement of the purpose of a Statutory Instrument and provides information about its policy objective and policy implications. They aim to make the Statutory Instrument accessible to readers who are not legally qualified and accompany any Statutory Instrument or Draft Statutory Instrument laid before Parliament from June 2004 onwards.
Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Impact Assessments generally accompany all UK Government interventions of a regulatory nature that affect the private sector, civil society organisations and public services. They apply regardless of whether the regulation originates from a domestic or international source and can accompany primary (Acts etc) and secondary legislation (SIs). An Impact Assessment allows those with an interest in the policy area to understand:
This timeline shows the different points in time where a change occurred. The dates will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. The first date in the timeline will usually be the earliest date when the provision came into force. In some cases the first date is 01/02/1991 (or for Northern Ireland legislation 01/01/2006). This date is our basedate. No versions before this date are available. For further information see the Editorial Practice Guide and Glossary under Help.
Use this menu to access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including: