
Print Options
PrintThe Whole
Instrument
PrintThis
Schedule
only
Changes over time for: SCHEDULE 6


Timeline of Changes
This timeline shows the different points in time where a change occurred. The dates will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. The first date in the timeline will usually be the earliest date when the provision came into force. In some cases the first date is 01/02/1991 (or for Northern Ireland legislation 01/01/2006). This date is our basedate. No versions before this date are available. For further information see the Editorial Practice Guide and Glossary under Help.
Version Superseded: 31/12/2020
Status:
Point in time view as at 07/04/2015.
Changes to legislation:
The Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumer Disputes (Competent Authorities and Information) Regulations 2015, SCHEDULE 6 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 06 March 2025. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations.

Changes to Legislation
Changes and effects yet to be applied by the editorial team are only applicable when viewing the latest version or prospective version of legislation. They are therefore not accessible when viewing legislation as at a specific point in time. To view the ‘Changes to Legislation’ information for this provision return to the latest version view using the options provided in the ‘What Version’ box above.
Regulation 11(3)
SCHEDULE 6U.K.Information which an ADR entity must communicate to the relevant competent authority every two years
This schedule has no associated Explanatory Memorandum
a)the number of disputes received by the ADR entity and the types of complaints to which the disputes related;
b)the percentage share of alternative dispute resolution procedures which were discontinued before an outcome was reached;
c)the average time taken to resolve the disputes which the ADR entity has received;
d)the rate of compliance, if known, with the outcomes of its alternative dispute resolution procedures;
e)any recommendations the ADR entity may have as to how any systematic or significant problems that occur frequently and lead to disputes between consumers and traders could be avoided or resolved in future;
f)where the ADR entity is a member of any network of ADR entities which facilitates the resolution of cross-border disputes, an assessment of the effectiveness of its co-operation in that network;
g)where the ADR entity provides training to its ADR officials, details of the training it provides;
h)an assessment of the effectiveness of an alternative dispute resolution procedure offered by the ADR entity and of possible ways of improving its performance.
Back to top