6. Where a person is aggrieved at a decision taken by [F2an approved] body in relation to the conformity assessment of a measuring instrument, the [F3approved] body must have appropriate arrangements for the review of that decision by a person who was not involved in the taking of that decision.E+W+S
Extent Information
E1This version of this provision extends to England and Wales and Scotland only; a separate version has been created for Northern Ireland only
Textual Amendments
F2Words in Sch. 4 para. 6 substituted (E.W.S.) (31.12.2020) by The Product Safety and Metrology etc. (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (S.I. 2019/696), reg. 1, Sch. 27 para. 51(a) (with Sch. 27 para. 50(a)) (as amended by S.I. 2020/676, regs. 1(1), 2); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
F3Word in Sch. 4 substituted (E.W.S.) (31.12.2020) by The Product Safety and Metrology etc. (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (S.I. 2019/696), reg. 1, Sch. 27 para. 51(b) (with Sch. 27 para. 50(a)) (as amended by S.I. 2020/676, regs. 1(1), 2); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
6. Where a person is aggrieved at a decision taken by a notified body in relation to the conformity assessment of a measuring instrument, the notified body must have appropriate arrangements for the review of that decision by a person who was not involved in the taking of that decision.N.I.
Extent Information
E2This version of this provision extends to Northern Ireland only; a separate version has been created for England and Wales and Scotland only
