Modifications in consequence of removal of the gateway conditions: the No. 17 Order10

1

This article applies in the case of a claim in relation to which provisions of the No. 17 Order are modified under article 5(2)(a), (b) or (c).

2

Where this article applies, the No. 17 Order has effect as though—

a

in article 2(1) (interpretation), the definition of “gateway conditions” were omitted;

b

in article 3(2)(b), (d), (f), (h), (j) and (l) (coming into force of the universal credit provisions and incorrect information)33—

i

in paragraph (i), “or meeting the gateway conditions” and “or does not meet the gateway conditions” were omitted;

ii

in paragraph (ii), “or meeting the gateway conditions” and “or does not or do not meet those conditions” were omitted;

iii

in paragraph (iii), “or meeting the gateway conditions” were omitted;

c

in article 3(5) (article 3A of the No. 9 Order and incorrect information)34—

i

for the text from “No. 8” to “No. 13 relevant district” there were substituted “numbered relevant district referred to in paragraph (2)”;

ii

“or meeting the gateway conditions” were omitted in both places it occurs;

d

in article 4(2)(b), (d), (f), (h), (j) and (l) (abolition of income-related employment and support allowance and income-based jobseeker’s allowance and incorrect information)35—

i

in paragraph (i), “or meeting the gateway conditions” and “or does not meet the gateway conditions” were omitted;

ii

in paragraph (ii), “or meeting the gateway conditions” and “or does not or do not meet those conditions” were omitted;

iii

in paragraph (iii), “or meeting the gateway conditions” were omitted; and

e

for article 4(7) (claims by couples)36 there were substituted—

7

Paragraphs (1A) and (1B) of article 5 of the No. 9 Order apply for the purposes of paragraph (2)(a), (c), (e), (g), (i) and (k) as they apply for the purposes of article 4(2)(a) of the No. 9 Order (but as if the references in paragraph (1A) to Schedule 5 to the No. 9 Order were omitted).