Modifications in consequence of removal of the gateway conditions: the No. 17 Order10
1
This article applies in the case of a claim in relation to which provisions of the No. 17 Order are modified under article 5(2)(a), (b) or (c).
2
Where this article applies, the No. 17 Order has effect as though—
a
in article 2(1) (interpretation), the definition of “gateway conditions” were omitted;
b
in article 3(2)(b), (d), (f), (h), (j) and (l) (coming into force of the universal credit provisions and incorrect information)33—
i
in paragraph (i), “or meeting the gateway conditions” and “or does not meet the gateway conditions” were omitted;
ii
in paragraph (ii), “or meeting the gateway conditions” and “or does not or do not meet those conditions” were omitted;
iii
in paragraph (iii), “or meeting the gateway conditions” were omitted;
c
in article 3(5) (article 3A of the No. 9 Order and incorrect information)34—
i
for the text from “No. 8” to “No. 13 relevant district” there were substituted “numbered relevant district referred to in paragraph (2)”;
ii
“or meeting the gateway conditions” were omitted in both places it occurs;
d
in article 4(2)(b), (d), (f), (h), (j) and (l) (abolition of income-related employment and support allowance and income-based jobseeker’s allowance and incorrect information)35—
i
in paragraph (i), “or meeting the gateway conditions” and “or does not meet the gateway conditions” were omitted;
ii
in paragraph (ii), “or meeting the gateway conditions” and “or does not or do not meet those conditions” were omitted;
iii
in paragraph (iii), “or meeting the gateway conditions” were omitted; and
e
for article 4(7) (claims by couples)36 there were substituted—
7
Paragraphs (1A) and (1B) of article 5 of the No. 9 Order apply for the purposes of paragraph (2)(a), (c), (e), (g), (i) and (k) as they apply for the purposes of article 4(2)(a) of the No. 9 Order (but as if the references in paragraph (1A) to Schedule 5 to the No. 9 Order were omitted).