SCHEDULE 1The Conduct Regulations
PART 2General
Police friend6
1
The officer concerned may choose any of the following persons, provided the person is not otherwise involved in the matter, to act as a police friend—
a
an MDP officer,
b
an officer from a relevant force,
c
a staff member, or
d
a person nominated by a staff association.
2
Subject to regulation 66(1), the police friend may—
a
advise the officer concerned throughout the proceedings under these Regulations,
b
represent the officer at the misconduct proceedings or accelerated misconduct hearing or appeal meeting, unless the officer has the right to be legally represented and chooses to be so represented,
c
make representations to the relevant authority concerning any aspect of the proceedings under these Regulations, and
d
accompany the officer to any interview, meeting or hearing which forms part of any proceedings under these Regulations.
3
Where the police friend is an MDP officer, the chief constable must permit the police friend to use a reasonable amount of duty time for the purposes referred to in paragraph (2).
4
Where the police friend is a staff member, the Secretary of State for Defence must permit that person to use a reasonable amount of duty time for the purposes referred to in paragraph (2).
Legal and other representation7
1
Subject to paragraph (2), the officer concerned has the right to be legally represented, by a relevant lawyer of the officer’s choice (the “preferred lawyer”), at a misconduct hearing or an accelerated misconduct hearing.
2
The unavailability of one or more preferred lawyers is not a valid ground for delaying a misconduct hearing or an accelerated misconduct hearing where an alternative relevant lawyer can be found.
3
4
Except in a case where the officer concerned has the right to be legally represented and chooses to be so represented, the officer may only be represented at misconduct proceedings, an accelerated misconduct hearing or an appeal meeting by a police friend.
5
The relevant authority may be represented at misconduct proceedings or an accelerated misconduct hearing or an appeal meeting by—
a
an MDP officer or a staff member, or
b
at a misconduct hearing or an accelerated misconduct hearing only, a relevant lawyer (whether or not the officer concerned chooses to be legally represented).
6
Subject to paragraph (7), the relevant authority may appoint a person to advise the person conducting or chairing the misconduct proceedings or accelerated misconduct hearing or appeal meeting.
7
At a misconduct meeting or an appeal meeting, the person appointed under paragraph (6) must not be a relevant lawyer.
8
The circumstances in which the Independent Office for Police Conduct or the Ombudsman, as the case may be, is a relevant authority for the purpose of section 4(5) of the 1987 Act (representation etc. at disciplinary proceedings)28 are prescribed as being where—
a
the Director General has made a decision under regulation 24(1) to present the case, and
b
the Ombudsman is required to present the case under regulation 24(6).
9
Where the circumstances prescribed in paragraph (8) apply, the Director General or the Ombudsman, as the case may be, may be represented by a relevant lawyer.
Provision of notices or documents8
1
Where any written notice or document is to be given or supplied to the officer concerned under these Regulations, it must be—
a
given to the officer in person,
b
left with a person at, or sent by recorded delivery to, the officer’s last known address,
c
given to the officer in person by the officer’s police friend where the police friend has agreed with the relevant authority to deliver the notice or document, or
d
given to the officer in any other manner agreed between the person who is required to give the notice or document and the officer.
2
Where any written notice or document is given or supplied under paragraph (1), delivery is effective on the date on which—
a
it is given to the officer under paragraph (1)(a), (c) or (d);
b
it is left with any person at the officer’s last known address, under paragraph (1)(b);
c
receipt was recorded, if sent by recorded delivery to the officer’s last known address under paragraph (1)(b).
Outstanding or possible criminal proceedings9
1
Subject to the provisions of this regulation, proceedings under these Regulations must proceed without delay.
2
Before referring a case to misconduct proceedings or an accelerated misconduct hearing, the relevant authority must decide whether misconduct proceedings or an accelerated misconduct hearing would prejudice any criminal proceedings.
3
For any period during which the relevant authority considers any misconduct proceedings or accelerated misconduct hearing would prejudice any criminal proceedings—
a
no such misconduct proceedings or accelerated misconduct hearing may take place, and
b
the relevant authority must preserve any relevant evidence in its possession.
4
Where a witness who is or may be a witness in any criminal proceedings is to be or may be asked to attend misconduct proceedings, the relevant authority must consult the relevant prosecutor (and when doing so must inform the prosecutor of the names and addresses of all such witnesses) before making its decision under paragraph (2).
5
For the purposes of this regulation “relevant prosecutor” means—
a
in relation to England and Wales, the Director of Public Prosecutions or any other person who has or is likely to have responsibility for the criminal proceedings,
b
in relation to Scotland, the Lord Advocate or any other person who has or is likely to have responsibility for the criminal proceedings, or
c
in relation to Northern Ireland, the Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland or any other person who has or is likely to have responsibility for the criminal proceedings.
Suspension10
1
The relevant authority may, subject to the provisions of this regulation, suspend the officer concerned from membership of the MDP.
2
An officer who is suspended under this regulation remains an MDP officer for the purposes of these Regulations.
3
The relevant authority may not suspend an MDP officer under this regulation unless the following conditions (“the suspension conditions”) are satisfied—
a
having considered temporary redeployment to alternative duties or an alternative location as an alternative to suspension, the relevant authority has determined that such redeployment is not appropriate in all the circumstances of the case, and
b
it appears to the relevant authority that either—
i
the effective investigation of the case may be prejudiced unless the officer concerned is so suspended, or
ii
having regard to the nature of the allegation and any other relevant considerations, the public interest requires that the officer should be so suspended.
4
The relevant authority may exercise the power to suspend the officer concerned under this regulation at any time beginning with the day on which these Regulations first apply in respect of the officer in accordance with regulation 3 and ending with the date on which—
a
it is decided that the conduct of the officer should not be referred to misconduct proceedings or an accelerated misconduct hearing, or
b
such proceedings have concluded.
5
The relevant authority may suspend the officer concerned with effect from the date and time of notification which must be given either—
a
in writing with a summary of the reasons, or
b
orally, in which case the relevant authority must confirm the suspension in writing with a summary of the reasons before the end of 3 working days beginning with the first working day after the suspension.
6
The officer concerned (or the officer’s police friend) may make representations against suspension to the relevant authority—
a
before the end of 7 working days beginning with the first working day after being suspended;
b
at any time during the suspension if the officer reasonably believes that circumstances relevant to the suspension conditions have changed.
7
The relevant authority must review the suspension conditions—
a
on receipt of any representations under paragraph (6);
b
if there has been no previous review, before the end of 4 weeks beginning with the first working day after the suspension;
c
in any other case—
i
when it becomes aware that circumstances relevant to the suspension conditions may have changed (whether by means of representations made under paragraph (6)(b) or otherwise), or
ii
before the end of 4 weeks beginning with the first working day after the previous review.
8
Where, following a review under paragraph (7), the suspension conditions remain satisfied and the relevant authority decides the suspension should continue, it must, before the end of 3 working days beginning with the day after the review, so notify the officer concerned in writing with a summary of the reasons.
9
Where the officer concerned is suspended under this regulation, the officer must remain so suspended until whichever of the following occurs first—
a
the relevant authority decides, following a review, that the suspension conditions are no longer satisfied, or
b
either of the events mentioned in paragraph (4)(a) and (b).
10
In a case investigated under paragraph 18 or 19 of Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act29 or section 54(2), (3)(a) or section 55(3), (5) or (6) of the 1998 Act30, the relevant authority must consult with the Director General or, as the case may be, the Ombudsman—
a
in deciding whether or not to suspend the officer concerned under this regulation, and
b
in deciding, following a review, whether or not to end a suspension under this regulation.
Record of disciplinary proceedings11
The relevant authority must cause a record to be kept of disciplinary proceedings brought against every officer concerned, together with the finding and decision on disciplinary action and the decision in any appeal by the officer.