- Latest available (Revised)
- Original (As made)
There are currently no known outstanding effects for the The Ministry of Defence Police (Conduct, Performance and Appeals Tribunals) Regulations 2020, Paragraph 36.
Revised legislation carried on this site may not be fully up to date. At the current time any known changes or effects made by subsequent legislation have been applied to the text of the legislation you are viewing by the editorial team. Please see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ for details regarding the timescales for which new effects are identified and recorded on this site.
36. The Conduct Regulations are to be read as if for regulation 41 there were substituted—
41.—(1) The panel conducting a misconduct hearing may, subject to the provisions of this regulation—
(a)where they find the conduct amounts to gross misconduct, impose disciplinary action for gross misconduct, or
(b)where they find that the conduct amounts to misconduct but not gross misconduct, record a finding of misconduct but take no further action.
(2) Where the question of disciplinary action for gross misconduct is being considered, the persons considering it—
(a)must have regard to the record of service of the officer concerned as shown on the officer’s personal record,
(b)may receive evidence from any witness whose evidence would, in their opinion, assist them in determining the question, including evidence of mitigating circumstances disclosed prior to the hearing to—
(i)the MDP,
(ii)a registered medical practitioner, or
(iii)a staff association,
(c)must give—
(i)the officer concerned,
(ii)if the officer concerned is legally represented, the officer’s relevant lawyer or, if the officer is not legally represented, the officer’s police friend,
(iii)the relevant authority or the person appointed to represent such authority in accordance with regulation 7(5), and
(iv)the Director General or the Director General’s relevant lawyer, where the Director General made a decision under regulation 24(1) to present the case,
an opportunity to make oral or written representations before any such question is determined, and
(d)where representations are received into mitigating circumstances—
(i)must consider whether those circumstances have been mentioned at an earlier stage in the proceedings and, if they have not been so mentioned, whether the officer concerned could reasonably have been expected to so mention them, and
(ii)in the light of their conclusions under paragraph (i), may determine that it is appropriate to place less weight on those circumstances.”.
Commencement Information
I1Sch. 2 para. 36 in force at 2.11.2020, see reg. 1
The Whole Instrument you have selected contains over 200 provisions and might take some time to download. You may also experience some issues with your browser, such as an alert box that a script is taking a long time to run.
Would you like to continue?
The Whole Instrument you have selected contains over 200 provisions and might take some time to download.
Would you like to continue?
The Whole Instrument you have selected contains over 200 provisions and might take some time to download. You may also experience some issues with your browser, such as an alert box that a script is taking a long time to run.
Would you like to continue?
The Schedules you have selected contains over 200 provisions and might take some time to download. You may also experience some issues with your browser, such as an alert box that a script is taking a long time to run.
Would you like to continue?
Latest Available (revised):The latest available updated version of the legislation incorporating changes made by subsequent legislation and applied by our editorial team. Changes we have not yet applied to the text, can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area.
Original (As Enacted or Made): The original version of the legislation as it stood when it was enacted or made. No changes have been applied to the text.
Geographical Extent: Indicates the geographical area that this provision applies to. For further information see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’.
Show Timeline of Changes: See how this legislation has or could change over time. Turning this feature on will show extra navigation options to go to these specific points in time. Return to the latest available version by using the controls above in the What Version box.
Explanatory Memorandum sets out a brief statement of the purpose of a Statutory Instrument and provides information about its policy objective and policy implications. They aim to make the Statutory Instrument accessible to readers who are not legally qualified and accompany any Statutory Instrument or Draft Statutory Instrument laid before Parliament from June 2004 onwards.
Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
This timeline shows the different points in time where a change occurred. The dates will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. The first date in the timeline will usually be the earliest date when the provision came into force. In some cases the first date is 01/02/1991 (or for Northern Ireland legislation 01/01/2006). This date is our basedate. No versions before this date are available. For further information see the Editorial Practice Guide and Glossary under Help.
Use this menu to access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including: