- Latest available (Revised)
- Point in Time (07/05/2024)
- Original (As made)
Point in time view as at 07/05/2024.
There are currently no known outstanding effects for the The Police (Conduct) Regulations 2020, Section 2.
Revised legislation carried on this site may not be fully up to date. At the current time any known changes or effects made by subsequent legislation have been applied to the text of the legislation you are viewing by the editorial team. Please see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ for details regarding the timescales for which new effects are identified and recorded on this site.
2.—(1) In these Regulations—
“the 1996 Act” means the Police Act 1996;
“the 2002 Act” means the Police Reform Act 2002;
“the Complaints and Misconduct Regulations” means the Police (Complaints and Misconduct Regulations) 2020 M1;
“the Performance Regulations” means the Police (Performance) Regulations 2020 M2;
“the Police Regulations” means the Police Regulations 2003 M3;
“accelerated misconduct hearing” means a hearing to which the officer concerned is referred under regulation 49 after the case has been certified as one where the special conditions are satisfied;
“acting chief officer” means—
a person exercising or performing functions of a chief constable in accordance with section 41 of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 M4 (power of deputy to exercise functions of chief constable);
a person exercising powers or duties of the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis in accordance with section 44 (functions of Deputy Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis) or 45(4) (Assistant Commissioners of Police of the Metropolis) of that Act, or
a person exercising duties of the Commissioner of Police for the City of London in accordance with section 25 of the City of London Police Act 1839 M5;
“allegation” means an allegation relating to a complaint, conduct matter or practice requiring improvement;
“appeal meeting” means a meeting held in accordance with regulation 46;
“appropriate authority” means, subject to regulation 26(3)—
where the officer concerned is the chief officer or acting chief officer of any police force, the local policing body M6 for the force's area;
in any other case, the chief officer of police of the police force concerned;
“complainant” has the meaning given to it by section 29(2) of the 2002 Act (interpretation of Part 2) M7;
“complaint” has the meaning given to it by section 12 of the 2002 Act (complaints, matters and persons to which Part 2 applies) M8;
“conduct” includes acts, omissions, statements and decisions (whether actual, alleged or inferred);
“conduct matter” has the meaning given to it by section 12 of the 2002 Act (complaints, matters and persons to which Part 2 applies) M9;
“criminal proceedings” means—
any prospective criminal proceedings, or
all criminal proceedings brought which have not been brought to a conclusion (apart from the bringing and determination of any appeal other than an appeal against conviction to the Crown Court);
“Director General” means the Director General of the Independent Office for Police Conduct, established under section 9 of the 2002 Act (the Independent Office for Police Conduct) M10;
“disciplinary action” means, in order of seriousness starting with the least serious action—
a written warning;
a final written warning;
reduction in rank, or
dismissal without notice;
“disciplinary proceedings” means—
misconduct proceedings under Part 4 of these Regulations;
an accelerated misconduct hearing under Part 5 of these Regulations, or
an appeal from misconduct proceedings or from an accelerated misconduct hearing under the Police Appeals Tribunals Rules 2020 M11, but, for the purposes of the following provisions, “disciplinary proceedings” only includes misconduct proceedings mentioned in paragraph (a) and a hearing mentioned in paragraph (b) of this definition—
paragraph (a) of the definition of “disciplinary proceedings” in section 87(5) of the 1996 Act (guidance concerning disciplinary proceedings etc.) M12;
paragraph (a) of the definition of “disciplinary proceedings” in section 29(1) of the 2002 Act (interpretation of Part 2) M13;
section 36(2) of the 2002 Act (conduct of disciplinary proceedings) M14;
“document” means anything in which information of any description is recorded;
“gross misconduct” means a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour that is so serious as to justify dismissal;
“harm test” has the meaning given to it in regulation 6;
“HMCIC” means Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Constabulary appointed under section 54(1) of the 1996 Act (appointment and functions of inspectors of constabulary);
“human resources professional” means a police officer or police staff member who has specific responsibility for personnel matters relating to members of a police force;
“informant” means a person who provides information to an investigation on the basis that the person's identity is not disclosed during the course of the disciplinary proceedings;
F1...
“interested person” means a person who has an interest in being kept properly informed about the handling of a complaint or conduct matter in accordance with section 21 of the 2002 Act (duty to provide information for other persons) M15;
“investigator” means a person—
appointed under regulation 15, or
appointed or designated under paragraph 16, 18 or 19 of Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act (investigations) M16, as the case may be;
“line manager” means the police officer or the police staff member who has immediate supervisory responsibility for the officer concerned;
“misconduct”, other than in regulation 23(2)(a) and the first reference to “misconduct” in regulation 23(2)(b), means a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour that is so serious as to justify disciplinary action;
“misconduct hearing” means a hearing to which the officer concerned has been referred under regulation 23 to determine whether the conduct of the officer amounts to misconduct or gross misconduct or neither and whether disciplinary action should be imposed;
“misconduct meeting” means a meeting to which the officer concerned has been referred under regulation 23 to determine whether the conduct of the officer amounts to misconduct or not and whether disciplinary action should be imposed;
“misconduct proceedings” means a misconduct meeting or misconduct hearing;
“officer concerned” means the police officer in relation to whose conduct there has been an allegation;
“originating authority” has the meaning given to it in regulation 26(3);
“personal record” means a personal record kept under regulation 15 of the Police Regulations (contents of personal records) M17;
“police barred list” means the list referred to in section 88B(2) of the 1996 Act (duty to maintain police barred list) M18;
“police force concerned” means—
the police force of which the officer concerned is a member, or
where the officer concerned is a special constable, the police force maintained for the police area for which the officer is appointed;
“police friend” means a person chosen by the officer concerned in accordance with regulation 7;
“police officer” means a member of a police force or special constable;
“police staff member” means—
a member of the civilian staff of a police force, within the meaning of section 102(4) and (6) of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 (interpretation of Part 1), or
an employee of the Common Council of the City of London who is under the direction and control of a chief officer;
[F2“practice requiring improvement” has the meaning given in paragraph (7);]
“pre-commencement allegation” means an allegation against a police officer which came to the attention of a local policing body or a chief officer of police before 1st February 2020;
“proposed witness” means a witness whose attendance at the misconduct proceedings the officer concerned or the appropriate authority, as the case may be, wishes to request of the person conducting or chairing those proceedings;
“reflective practice review process” means the process set out in Part 6;
“relevant lawyer” has the meaning given to it by section 84(4) of the 1996 Act (representation etc. at disciplinary and other proceedings) M19;
“senior officer” means a member of a police force holding a rank above that of chief superintendent;
“severity assessment” has the meaning given to it in regulation 14;
“special conditions” has the meaning given to it in regulation 49;
“staff association” means—
in relation to a member of a police force of the rank of chief inspector or below [F3or a special constable], the Police Federation of England and Wales;
in relation to a member of a police force of the rank of superintendent or chief superintendent, the Police Superintendents' Association, and
in relation to a member of a police force who is a senior officer, the Chief Police Officers' Staff Association;
“Standards of Professional Behaviour” has the meaning given in regulation 5 and references in these Regulations to the Standards of Professional Behaviour are to be construed accordingly M20;
“working day” means any day other than—
a Saturday or Sunday;
Christmas Day or Good Friday, or
a day which is a bank holiday under the Banking and Financial Dealings Act 1971 M21 in England and Wales.
(2) In these Regulations—
(a)a reference to an officer other than a senior officer includes a reference to a special constable, regardless of the officer's level of seniority;
(b)a reference to a copy of a statement, where it was not made in writing, is to be construed as a reference to a copy of an account of that statement.
(3) Where the appropriate authority is a chief officer of police, the chief officer may, subject to [F4paragraphs (4) and (4A)], delegate any functions under these Regulations to a—
(a)member of a police force of at least the rank of inspector, or
(b)police staff member who, in the opinion of the chief officer, is of at least a similar level of seniority to an inspector.
(4) Where the appropriate authority delegates its functions under regulation 11 or 49, the following decisions must be authorised by a senior officer—
(a)a decision under regulation 11 to suspend an officer or to continue or end such a suspension;
(b)a decision under regulation 49 as to whether to certify a case as one where the special conditions are satisfied.
[F5(4A) Where a chief officer of police is required to—
(a)chair misconduct proceedings under regulation 28(4)(a); or
(b)conduct an accelerated misconduct hearing under regulation 55,
the chief officer of police may delegate the responsibility for chairing or conducting the disciplinary proceedings in accordance with paragraphs (4B) and (4C).
(4B) Where the chief officer of police delegates under paragraph (4A) the responsibility for chairing or conducting disciplinary proceedings, the person to whom that responsibility is delegated must be—
(a)a senior officer;
(b)a former senior officer, who last served as a senior officer no more than five years before the date on which the responsibility for chairing or conducting the disciplinary proceedings is to be delegated to them; or
(c)unless the case to which the disciplinary proceedings relate substantially involves operational policing matters, a police staff member who, in the opinion of the chief officer of police, is of at least a similar level of seniority to a senior officer.
(4C) But where the chief officer of police delegates, under paragraph (3), their functions under regulation 49, the person to whom the responsibility has been delegated under paragraph (4A) must not be the same senior officer who—
(a)certified the case under regulation 49 as being one where the special conditions are satisfied; or
(b)authorised the decision to certify under paragraph (4)(b).]
(5) For the purposes of these Regulations, the making of a protected disclosure by a police officer is not a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour.
(6) In paragraph (5), “protected disclosure” has the meaning given by section 43A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (meaning of protected disclosure) M22.
[F6(7) In these Regulations, “practice requiring improvement” means underperformance or conduct not amounting to misconduct or gross misconduct, which falls short of the expectations of the public and the police service.
(8) When a person assesses whether an officer’s performance or conduct amounts to “practice requiring improvement”, they must have regard to the Code of Ethics, published by the College of Policing, as amended from time to time.]
Textual Amendments
F1Words in reg. 2(1) omitted (7.5.2024) by virtue of The Police (Conduct) (Amendment) Regulations 2024 (S.I. 2024/521), regs. 1(2), 4(1) (with reg. 7)
F2Words in reg. 2(1) substituted (7.5.2024) by The Police (Conduct) (Amendment) Regulations 2024 (S.I. 2024/521), regs. 1(2), 6(1) (with reg. 7)
F3Words in reg. 2(1) inserted (28.6.2022) by The Special Constables (Membership of the Police Federation etc.) (England and Wales) Regulations 2022 (S.I. 2022/505), regs. 1(2), 7(2)
F4Words in reg. 2(3) substituted (7.5.2024) by The Police (Conduct) (Amendment) Regulations 2024 (S.I. 2024/521), regs. 1(2), 3(1)(a) (with reg. 7)
F5Reg. 2(4A)-(4C) inserted (7.5.2024) by The Police (Conduct) (Amendment) Regulations 2024 (S.I. 2024/521), regs. 1(2), 3(1)(b) (with reg. 7)
F6Reg. 2(7)(8) inserted (7.5.2024) by The Police (Conduct) (Amendment) Regulations 2024 (S.I. 2024/521), regs. 1(2), 6(2) (with reg. 7)
Commencement Information
I1Reg. 2 in force at 1.2.2020, see reg. 1
Marginal Citations
M3S.I. 2003/527. Amendments are cited elsewhere in these Regulations, where relevant.
M52&3 Vict. c. xciv.
M6See section 101(1) of the Police Act 1996 for the definition of local policing body.
M7Section 29(2) was amended by paragraph 6 of Schedule 4 to the Policing and Crime Act 2017.
M8Section 12(1) to (1B) was substituted for section 12(1) by section 14(2) of the Policing and Crime Act 2017.
M9Section 12(2) was amended by section 2(3)(a) of the Police (Complaints and Conduct) Act 2012 (c.22) and paragraph 8(6)(a) of Schedule 14 to the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011.
M10Section 9 of the 2002 Act established a body corporate known as the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). Section 9 was amended by section 33(2) and (4) of the Policing and Crime Act 2017 to provide that the body corporate known as the IPCC would continue to exist and would be known instead as the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC). There are further amendments to section 9 but none are relevant.
M12Section 87(5) of the 1996 Act provides that for the purposes of section 87 “disciplinary proceedings” in relation to a member (or former member) of a police force or a special constable (or former special constable) means any proceedings under regulations under section 50 or 51 that are identified as disciplinary proceedings by those regulations.
M13Section 29(1) of the 2002 Act provides that for the purposes of Part 2 of that Act “disciplinary proceedings” in relation to a member of a police force or a special constable means proceedings under any regulations made by virtue of section 50 or 51 of the 1996 Act and identified as disciplinary proceedings by those regulations (paragraph (a) of the definition of “disciplinary proceedings”). There are amendments to section 29(1) but none are relevant.
M14Section 36(2) of the 2002 Act provides that in section 36 “disciplinary proceedings” means any proceedings under any regulations made under section 50 or, as the case may be, section 51 of the 1996 Act which are identified as disciplinary proceedings by those regulations.
M15Section 21 was amended by paragraphs 1 and 7 of Schedule 12 to the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (c. 15), section 15 of the Policing and Crime Act 2017 and paragraphs 1 and 4 of Schedule 4 to, paragraph 47(d) of Schedule 5 to, and paragraphs 15 and 27 of Schedule 9 to that Act.
M16Paragraph 16 was amended by paragraphs 11 and 14 of Schedule 12 to the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, paragraphs 1, 11 and 12 of Schedule 14 to the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011, paragraphs 8 and 17 of Schedule 6 to the Crime and Courts Act 2013 (c. 22) and paragraphs 9 and 16 of Schedule 5 to the Policing and Crime Act 2017; paragraph 18 was amended by paragraphs 1, 11 and 16 of Schedule 12 to the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 and by paragraphs 9, 15, 18 and 19 of Schedule 5 to the Policing and Crime Act 2017; paragraph 19 was amended by paragraphs 1, 11 and 17 of Schedule 12 to the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 and paragraphs 9, 15, 20 and 56 of Schedule 9 to the Policing and Crime Act 2017. There are further amendments to paragraphs 16, 18 and 19 but none are relevant.
M17Regulation 15 was amended by S.I. 2005/2834, 2006/3449 and 2008/2865.
M18Section 88B was inserted by Schedule 8 to the Policing and Crime Act 2017.
M19Section 84(4) of the 1996 Act was amended but none of the amendments are relevant.
M20Paragraph 29 of Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act provides that, for the purposes of Part 3 of that Schedule, the Standards of Professional Behaviour are the standards described in and established by regulations made by the Secretary of State.
M221996 c. 18. Section 43A was inserted by section 1 of the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (c. 23).
Latest Available (revised):The latest available updated version of the legislation incorporating changes made by subsequent legislation and applied by our editorial team. Changes we have not yet applied to the text, can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area.
Original (As Enacted or Made): The original version of the legislation as it stood when it was enacted or made. No changes have been applied to the text.
Point in Time: This becomes available after navigating to view revised legislation as it stood at a certain point in time via Advanced Features > Show Timeline of Changes or via a point in time advanced search.
Geographical Extent: Indicates the geographical area that this provision applies to. For further information see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’.
Show Timeline of Changes: See how this legislation has or could change over time. Turning this feature on will show extra navigation options to go to these specific points in time. Return to the latest available version by using the controls above in the What Version box.
Explanatory Memorandum sets out a brief statement of the purpose of a Statutory Instrument and provides information about its policy objective and policy implications. They aim to make the Statutory Instrument accessible to readers who are not legally qualified and accompany any Statutory Instrument or Draft Statutory Instrument laid before Parliament from June 2004 onwards.
Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
This timeline shows the different points in time where a change occurred. The dates will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. The first date in the timeline will usually be the earliest date when the provision came into force. In some cases the first date is 01/02/1991 (or for Northern Ireland legislation 01/01/2006). This date is our basedate. No versions before this date are available. For further information see the Editorial Practice Guide and Glossary under Help.
Use this menu to access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including: