These Regulations are to be read as if for regulation 62, there were substituted—

“Outcome of accelerated misconduct hearing62.

(1)

Subject to the provisions of this regulation, the person or persons conducting the accelerated misconduct hearing may—

(a)

where the person or persons find the conduct amounts to gross misconduct, impose disciplinary action for gross misconduct, or

(b)

where the person or persons find the conduct amounts to misconduct but not gross misconduct, record a finding of misconduct but take no further action.

(2)

Where the question of disciplinary action for gross misconduct is being considered, the person or persons considering it—

(a)

must have regard to the record of police service of the officer concerned as shown on the officer's personal record;

(b)

may consider such documentary evidence as would, in their opinion, assist them in determining the question;

(c)

must give—

(i)

the officer concerned;

(ii)

if the officer concerned is legally represented, the officer's relevant lawyer or, if the officer is not legally represented, the officer's police friend;

(iii)

the appropriate authority or the person appointed to represent such authority in accordance with regulation 8(5); and

(iv)

the Director General or the Director General's relevant lawyer, where the Director General made a decision under regulation 24(1) to present the case,

an opportunity to make oral or written representations, and

(d)

where representations are received in relation to mitigating circumstances—

(i)

must consider whether those circumstances have been mentioned at an earlier stage in the proceedings and, if they have not been so mentioned, whether the officer concerned could reasonably have been expected to so mention them, and

(ii)

in the light of their conclusions under paragraph (i), may determine that it is appropriate to place less weight on those circumstances.

(3)

Paragraph (4) applies where disciplinary action for gross misconduct is imposed.

(4)

The person chairing a misconduct hearing must provide any information to the appropriate authority that the person considers ought to be included by virtue of regulation 3(2)(l) of the Police Barred List and Police Advisory List Regulations 2017 M1 in the barred list report relating to the officer concerned (information relating to whether exemptions to requirement to publish the barred list entry apply).”.