Commission Regulation (EC) No 1975/20063.

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1975/2006 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, as regards the implementation of control procedures as well as cross-compliance in respect of rural development support measures6, is amended as follows.

(2)

In Article 12 (on-the-spot checks)—

(a)

omit paragraph 1;

(b)

in paragraph 2, omit the words from “apply to on-the-spot” to “in this Article”;

(c)

omit paragraphs 3 and 4.

(3)

In Article 16 (area-related measures)—

(a)

for paragraph 2 substitute—

“If, in respect of a crop group as referred to in Article 16(1), the area declared for the purposes of any area-related aid schemes or support measures exceeds or is less than the area determined in accordance with Article 50(3) of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004, the aid must be calculated on the basis of the area determined or the area declared, whichever is the lower.”;

(b)

in paragraph 6, omit “in the third subparagraph of paragraph 2 and”.

(4)

In Article 18 (reductions and exclusions in the case of non-respect of eligibility criteria)—

(a)

in paragraph 1, for “shall” substitute “may”;

(b)

for paragraph 2 substitute—

“When deciding on the rate of refusal or withdrawal of support following the non-compliance with the commitments or other obligations referred to in paragraph 1 the relevant authority may take account of—

  • the circumstances that led to the non-compliance and whether it was caused by the intentional actions of the beneficiary or due to that person’s recklessness or negligence;

  • any steps taken by the beneficiary to report a change of circumstance or notify the relevant authority of the non-compliance within a reasonable period;

  • any failure on the part of the beneficiary to co-operate with an on-the-spot check;

  • any past conduct of the beneficiary during the period of the commitment and whether a similar non-compliance has previously occurred;

  • the nature of the non-compliance and whether it has caused widespread or irreparable damage;

  • the extent to which it is desirable, practicable or economic to permit the beneficiary to rectify the non-compliance;

  • the consequences of the non-compliance and whether it renders the purpose of the commitment unachievable within the timescales or finances of the commitment or to the standards agreed when the commitment was undertaken.”;

(c)

in paragraph 3, for “shall” substitute “may”.

(5)

In Article 26 (administrative checks), paragraph 4, omit the second subparagraph.

(6)

In Article 27 (on-the-spot checks)—

(a)

in paragraph 1, in the first place it occurs, for “shall” substitute “may”;

(b)

omit paragraph 2.

(7)

In Article 28 (content of on-the-spot checks), for paragraph 3 substitute—

“The on-the-spot checks may include a visit to the operation or, if the operation is intangible, to the operation promoter”.