
Print Options
PrintThe Whole
Instrument
PrintThe Whole
Part
PrintThis
Section
only
Changes over time for: Section 17


Timeline of Changes
This timeline shows the different points in time where a change occurred. The dates will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. The first date in the timeline will usually be the earliest date when the provision came into force. In some cases the first date is 01/02/1991 (or for Northern Ireland legislation 01/01/2006). This date is our basedate. No versions before this date are available. For further information see the Editorial Practice Guide and Glossary under Help.
Status:
Point in time view as at 31/05/2022.
Changes to legislation:
There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to The Civil Enforcement of Road Traffic Contraventions (Approved Devices, Charging Guidelines and General Provisions) (England) Regulations 2022. Any changes that have already been made by the team appear in the content and are referenced with annotations.

Changes to Legislation
Changes and effects yet to be applied by the editorial team are only applicable when viewing the latest version or prospective version of legislation. They are therefore not accessible when viewing legislation as at a specific point in time. To view the ‘Changes to Legislation’ information for this provision return to the latest version view using the options provided in the ‘What Version’ box above.
Adjudication process and remuneration of adjudicators: expenses of the relevant enforcement authoritiesE+W
This section has no associated Explanatory Memorandum
17.—(1) In default of a decision by the relevant enforcement authorities under subsection (9)(a) of section 81 of the TMA 2004 as to the proportions in which their expenses under that section are to be defrayed, the authorities must refer the issue to be determined by an arbitrator nominated by the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators for the arbitrator to determine.
(2) Where the Secretary of State is satisfied that there has been a failure by the relevant enforcement authorities to agree those proportions, the Secretary of State may give to the relevant joint committee such directions as are, in the Secretary of State’s opinion, necessary to secure that the issue is referred to arbitration in accordance with paragraph (1).
(3) In this regulation “the relevant joint committee” means the joint committee constituted, or treated as constituted, under regulation 18 or 19 of which the enforcement authorities in default are constituent authorities.
Back to top