- Latest available (Revised)
- Original (As made)
This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. The electronic version of this UK Statutory Instrument has been contributed by Westlaw and is taken from the printed publication. Read more
Statutory Instruments
JUDICIAL COMMITTEE
Made
30th October 1985
Coming into Operation
1st December 1985
At the Court of Saint James, the 30th day of October 1985
Present,
The Counsellors of State in Council
Whereas Her Majesty, in pursuance of the Regency Acts 1937 to 1953, was pleased, by Letters Patent dated the 27th day of September 1985, to delegate to the six Counsellors of State therein named or any two or more of them full power and authority during the period of Her Majesty's absence from the United Kingdom to summon and hold on Her Majesty's behalf Her Privy Council and to signify thereat Her Majesty's approval for anything for which Her Majesty's approval in Council is required:
Now, therefore, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother and His Royal Highness The Prince Edward, being authorised thereto by the said Letters Patent, and in pursuance of the powers conferred by section 24 of the Judicial Committee Act 1833, and all other powers enabling Her Majesty, and by and with the advice of Her Majesty's Privy Council, do on Her Majesty's behalf order, and it is hereby ordered, as follows:—
1.—(1)
(2) This Order, the Hong Kong (Appeal to Privy Council) Order in Council 1909, the Hong Kong (Appeal to Privy Council) (Amendment) Order in Council 1957, the Hong Kong (Appeal to Privy Council) (Amendment) Order 1971 and the Hong Kong (Appeal to Privy Council) (Amendment) Order 1980 may be cited together as the Hong Kong (Appeal to Privy Council) Orders 1909 to 1985.
(3) This Order shall come into operation on 1st December 1985.
2. Paragraph (a) of Rule 2 of the Rules contained in the principal Order is amended by deleting “$200,000”, in both cases where it occurs, and substituting in each case “$500,000”.
3. Paragraph (a) of Rule 4 of the Rules contained in the principal Order is amended by deleting “$100,000” and substituting “$200,000 in respect of each respondent”.
G.I. de Deney
Clerk of the Privy Council
This Order raises the value of the matter in dispute required to confer a right of appeal from Hong Kong to the Privy Council from $200,000 to $500,000; and raises the maximum security for costs from $100,000 to $200,000 in respect of each respondent.
S.R. & O. (Rev. XI p.374).
Latest Available (revised):The latest available updated version of the legislation incorporating changes made by subsequent legislation and applied by our editorial team. Changes we have not yet applied to the text, can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area.
Original (As Enacted or Made): The original version of the legislation as it stood when it was enacted or made. No changes have been applied to the text.
Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Use this menu to access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including: