Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 679/2011 (repealed)Dangos y teitl llawn

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 679/2011

of 14 July 2011

amending Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (repealed)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)(1), and in particular Article 91 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 established a single legal framework for the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) support for rural development throughout the Union. That legal framework has been complemented by implementing rules laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006(2). In the light of experience gained and problems that have arisen in the implementation of Rural Development Programmes it is necessary to amend certain provisions of that Regulation and to introduce certain additional implementing rules.

(2) Operations concerning the production of renewable energy on agricultural holdings pursuant to Article 26 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 may fall outside the scope of Article 42 of the Treaty. In order to ensure compliance with agricultural State aid rules, a specific provision should be laid down for investments in the production of renewable energy on agricultural holdings.

(3) Article 27(12) of Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 provides that adjustment of agri-environment or animal welfare commitments may take the form of an extension of the duration of the commitment. In order to avoid overlapping with the following programming period, such adjustment should be limited to the end of the premium period to which the 2013 payment claim refers.

(4) Article 47 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 provides that forest-environmental commitments are to be undertaken as a general rule for a period between 5 and 7 years. In order to avoid a situation in which renewed commitments overlap with the following programming period, it should be provided that Member States may allow such commitments to be extended to the end of the premium period to which the 2013 payment claim refers.

(5) Article 62(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 provides that, at the decision-making level of the local action group, economic and social partners, as well as other representatives of civil society, are to make up at least 50 % of the local partnership. Member States should ensure that local action groups comply with this minimum percentage with respect to voting, too, in order to prevent the public sector from dominating decision-making. Furthermore, it should be ensured that project promoters are not able to influence the project selection decision. Effective safeguards should therefore be established to avoid any conflict of interests with regard to the appraisal and vote on project proposals. The transparency of the decision making should also be guaranteed with the appropriate visibility.

(6) Article 38(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 provides for the possibility of paying advances for the running costs of local action groups. It has been proven that in order to ensure the cash flow needs of local action groups it is necessary to extend the possibility to pay advances to cover the costs related to acquiring skills and animating the territory as referred to in Article 63(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005.

(7) Article 44(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 allows Member States to take specific measures to ensure that minor changes to the situation of a holding do not lead to inappropriate results in relation to commitments entered into, in terms of the obligation of the beneficiary to repay the assistance where a commitment is not taken over by the transferee of a part of the holding. In order to ensure legal certainty, a definition should be provided of what constitutes a minor change in cases where the area of the holding is reduced.

(8) Article 46 of Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 provides for a revision clause in case of amendments to the baseline for certain measures. A revision clause should also be provided in case the duration of new agri-environment, animal welfare or forest-environmental commitments undertaken for a period between 5 and 7 years extends beyond the end of the current programming period, in order to avoid inconsistencies with the legal and policy framework to be laid down for the period following the current programming period.

(9) In order to clarify the application of Article 52(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006, the basis on which the co-financing rate is applied in the case of financial engineering should be set out.

(10) As regards guarantee funds in the context of financial engineering under subsection 3 of Section 1 of Chapter IV of Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006, additional details on the method of calculating the eligible expenses of the operation related to such interventions should be provided to ensure the most efficient use of Union resources.

(11) While acknowledging the specificities of rural development, relating essentially to the small scale of supported operations, it is necessary, in order to maximise the leverage effect of the financial engineering tool, to clarify the reuse of the resources returned to the financial engineering operation during the programming period as well as to make a distinction between it and the reuse after the final date of eligibility of the rural development programme.

(12) Taking into account the nature of some investments in forestry and the fact that payments could in certain cases be area-related, it should be possible to use standard costs calculations as an alternative to the invoice-based system used to determine the level of support for the measure referred to in Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005. Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 should therefore be adapted accordingly.

(13) Article 54(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 provides for the conditions under which contributions in kind may be considered as eligible expenditure. In its present form, Article 54(1) considers contributions in kind to be eligible only for investment operations. Experience has shown that this condition is too restrictive for the efficient implementation of measures. Therefore, it should be provided that contributions in kind may be eligible for all types of operation.

(14) Article 55 of Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 lays down a set of rules for the definition of eligible expenditure for investment operations. In order to bring additional clarity to the implementation of this Article, the acquisition of payment entitlements should be explicitly excluded from eligibility. It should also be clarified that, given their nature, investments replacing agricultural production potential after natural disasters constitute eligible expenditure.

(15) In order to increase the impact of advances in the context of the ongoing financial crisis, taking due account of the specific role of regional governments in implementing rural development policy, the possibility for advance payments provided for in Article 56 of Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 should be opened up to regional authorities as well.

(16) To facilitate the implementation of investment projects in the context of the ongoing economic and financial crisis, the maximum ceiling for advance payments was raised to 50 % for investments in 2009 and 2010. In order to take account of the continuing negative effects of the economic and financial crisis, this higher ceiling should be maintained until the end of the programming period. In order to ensure continuity in the implementation of Rural Development Programmes between the end of 2010 and the entry into force of this Regulation, the relevant provision should be applied retroactively from 1 January 2011.

(17) To take account of the relatively small size of rural development projects and the difficulty such projects have in obtaining bank guarantees for advance payments, measures should be taken allowing those guarantees to be replaced by written guarantees from public authorities.

(18) To make the best use of advances, it should be left to the competent paying agency to define when guarantees are released.

(19) Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 should therefore be amended accordingly.

(20) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Rural Development Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

(1)

OJ L 277, 21.10.2005, p. 1.

(2)

OJ L 368, 23.12.2006, p. 15.