The Intellectual Property (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020

PART 1 Introduction

Citation, commencement and interpretation

1.—(1) These Regulations may be cited as the Intellectual Property (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020.

(2) These Regulations come into force immediately before IP completion day except Parts 7 and 8 which come into force on IP completion day.

(3) In these Regulations—

“1949 Act” means the Registered Designs Act 1949;

“1994 Act” means the Trade Marks Act 1994;

“2005 Regulations” means the Community Design Regulations 2005(1);

“Design Regulation” means Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12th December 2001 on Community Designs(2) as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1891/2006 of 18th December 2006 to give effect to the accession of the European Community to the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement concerning the international registration of industrial designs and by the Decision of the European Union of 5th December 2011 on the admission of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union(3); and

“Registered Designs Rules” means the Registered Designs Rules 2006(4).

PART 2 Amendments to the Intellectual Property (Copyright and Related Rights) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019

2.  The Intellectual Property (Copyright and Related Rights) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019(5) are amended in accordance with this Part.

3.  For regulation 31(a) substitute—

“(a) in paragraph (3)—

(i) in sub-paragraph (a) omit “and the relevant database maintained by the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market; and”;

(ii) omit sub-paragraph (b);”.

4.  In regulation 38, for “exit day” substitute “IP completion day”.

PART 3 Amendments to the Intellectual Property (Exhaustion of Rights) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019

5.  The Intellectual Property (Exhaustion of Rights) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019(6) are amended in accordance with this Part.

6.  In regulation 2(1) for “exit day”, in each place it occurs, substitute “IP completion day”.

PART 4 Amendments to the Trade Marks (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019

7.  The Trade Marks (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019(7) are amended in accordance with this Part.

8.  In regulation 2, for “exit day”, in both places it occurs, substitute “IP completion day”.

9.  Schedule 1 (Amendments to the 1994 Act to make provision for certain trade marks registered as European Union trade marks to be treated as registered trade marks and about certain applications for such marks) is amended as follows—

(a) in section 52A of the 1994 Act(8) (to be inserted by paragraph 2), for “exit day”, in both places it occurs, substitute “IP completion day”;

(b) in Schedule 2A to the 1994 Act (to be inserted by paragraph 3)—

(i) for “exit day”, in each place it occurs, substitute “IP completion day”;

(ii) after paragraph 21, insert—

“Existing EUTM: effect of invalidity or revocation

21A.— (1) This paragraph applies where, on IP completion day, an existing EUTM is the subject of proceedings under Article 58 (Grounds for revocation), 59 (Absolute grounds for invalidity) or 60 (Relative grounds for invalidity) which have been instituted but not finally determined before IP completion day (“cancellation proceedings”).

(2) Subject to sub-paragraph (4), where—

(a) the existing EUTM is revoked or declared invalid (whether wholly or partially) pursuant to a decision in the cancellation proceedings which is finally determined, and

(b) the registrar has—

(i) received notice of the situation referred to in paragraph (a) (“a cancellation notice”), or

(ii) otherwise become aware of the situation referred to in paragraph (a),

the registration of the comparable trade mark (EU) which derives from the existing EUTM must be revoked or declared invalid to the same extent as the existing EUTM.

(3) Where (by virtue of sub-paragraph (2)) the registration of a comparable trade mark (EU) is revoked or declared invalid to any extent, the registrar must—

(a) remove the comparable trade mark (EU) from the register (where the revocation or declaration of invalidity relates to all the goods or services for which the existing EUTM was registered); or

(b) amend the entry in the register listing the goods or services for which the comparable trade mark (EU) is registered (where the revocation or declaration of invalidity relates to only some of the goods or services for which the existing EUTM was registered).

(4) The registration of a comparable trade mark (EU) must not be revoked or declared invalid under sub-paragraph (2) where the grounds on which the existing EUTM was revoked or declared invalid (whether wholly or partially) would not apply or would not have been satisfied in relation to the comparable trade mark (EU)—

(a) if the comparable trade mark (EU) had existed as at the date the cancellation proceedings were instituted, and

(b) an application for the revocation or a declaration of invalidity of the comparable trade mark (EU) based on those grounds had been made on that date under section 46 or 47 (as the case may be).

(5) Where a comparable trade mark (EU) is revoked or declared invalid to any extent pursuant to this paragraph—

(a) the rights of the proprietor are deemed to have ceased to that extent as from the date on which the rights of the proprietor of the existing EUTM are deemed to have ceased under the EUTM Regulation;

(b) subject to any claim for compensation for damage caused by negligence or lack of good faith on the part of the proprietor or a claim for restitution based upon the unjust enrichment of the proprietor, the revocation or invalidity of the comparable trade mark (EU) does not affect—

(i) a decision arising from infringement proceedings which has been finally determined and which has been enforced prior to the date on which the entry in the register of the comparable trade mark (EU) has been removed or amended pursuant to sub-paragraph (3) (“the decision date”);

(ii) any contract entered into prior to the decision date to the extent that it has been performed prior to the decision date, subject to the right of a party to the contract to claim the repayment of any consideration paid under the contract where, having regard to the circumstances, it is fair and equitable for such repayment to be made.

(6) A cancellation notice may be submitted to the registrar by any person.

(7) For the purposes of this paragraph—

(a) proceedings are instituted if an application or counterclaim for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity—

(i) has been filed (and not subsequently withdrawn) with the European Union Intellectual Property Office or a court designated for the purposes of Article 123, and

(ii) meets the requirements for being accorded a filing date under the European Union Trade Mark Regulation and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 of 5th March 2018;

(b) a decision is finally determined when—

(i) it has been determined, and

(ii) there is no further possibility of the determination being varied or set aside (disregarding any power to grant permission to appeal out of time).”.

10.  Schedule 3 (Other amendments to the 1994 Act) is amended as follows—

(a) for paragraph 2(4) substitute—

“(4) In subsection (4B)—

(a) in paragraph (a) for “provision of EU law” substitute “enactment or rule of law”;

(b) in paragraph (b) for “EU” substitute “United Kingdom”.”;

(b) in paragraph 4(5)(a), for “exit day” substitute “IP completion day”;

(c) in paragraph 10, for “exit day” substitute “IP completion day”.

11.  Schedule 4 (Amendments to the Rules) is amended as follows—

(a) for paragraph 6 substitute—

“6.— (1) Rule 11 is amended as follows.

(2) At the end of paragraph (1)(d), omit “.” and substitute “;”.

(3) After paragraph (1)(d) insert—

“(e) a proprietor of a comparable trade mark (EU) who sends a derogation notice to the registrar under rule 43A.”.

(4) In paragraph (4), for “another EEA state” substitute “an EEA state”.”.

(b) after paragraph 6 insert—

“6A.— (1) Rule 12 is amended as follows.

(2) At the end of paragraph (4)(d), omit “.” and substitute “;”.

(3) After paragraph (4)(d), insert—

“(e) in the case of the proprietor who sends a derogation notice to the registrar, the registrar must proceed as if the proprietor had not sent a derogation notice.”.”.

(c) after paragraph 10 insert—

“10A.— (1) Rule 43 is amended as follows.

(2) At the end of paragraph (1)(b), omit “, or” and substitute “;”.

(3) At the end of paragraph (1)(c), omit “,” and substitute “; or”.

(4) After paragraph (1)(c), insert—

“(d) the registration of a comparable trade mark (EU) is revoked or declared invalid to any extent under rule 43A(6),”.

(5) In paragraph (2), after “application and shall” insert “, in the cases referred to in paragraph (1)(a) to (c),”.

(6) In paragraph (3)—

(a) after “TM8” insert “or the derogation notice”;

(b) after “TM26(O)” omit “or” and substitute “,”;

(c) after “TM 26(I)” insert “or notification from the registrar under rule 43(4)(b) that the comparable trade mark (EU) will be revoked or declared invalid to the same extent as the corresponding EUTM”.

10B.   After rule 43 insert—

“Invalidation or revocation of Existing EUTM: Cancellation notice and procedure on application for derogation; Schedule 2A paragraph 21A

43A.— (1) A cancellation notice under paragraph 21A of Schedule 2A must—

(a) identify the existing EUTM by the number under which the existing EUTM was registered in the EUTM Register immediately before IP completion day, together with a representation of the mark,

(b) include the following details with regard to the decision pursuant to which the existing EUTM was revoked or declared invalid (whether wholly or partially)—

(i) the date of the decision (including any decision determined on appeal),

(ii) whether the revocation or declaration of invalidity related to all or part of the goods or services for which the existing EUTM was registered,

(iii) where the existing EUTM was revoked (whether wholly or partially) the date on which the revocation took effect,

(c) be accompanied by a copy of the decision (including any decision determined on appeal) pursuant to which the existing EUTM was revoked or declared to be invalid, and

(d) include a statement confirming that the decision pursuant to which the existing EUTM was revoked or declared invalid (whether wholly or partially) has been finally determined.

(2) Where a cancellation notice is submitted to the registrar by the proprietor of the comparable trade mark (EU) which derives from the existing EUTM, the cancellation notice must be accompanied by—

(a) a notice (a “derogation notice”) in writing to the registrar that, based upon the provisions in paragraph 21A(4) of Schedule 2A, the comparable trade mark (EU) should not be revoked or declared invalid (whether wholly or partially), and

(b) a statement of the reasons why paragraph 21A(4) of Schedule 2A applies (a “statement”) together with relevant supporting evidence (“supporting evidence”).

(3) Where the proprietor of a comparable trade mark (EU) submits a cancellation notice to the registrar but fails to send a derogation notice, a statement or supporting evidence, the registration of the comparable trade mark (EU) which derives from the existing EUTM identified in the cancellation notice must be revoked or declared invalid to the same extent as the existing EUTM, unless the registrar directs otherwise.

(4) Where the registrar receives a cancellation notice submitted by a person other than the proprietor of the comparable trade mark (EU) which derives from the existing EUTM, the registrar must as soon as reasonably practicable after receipt of the cancellation notice—

(a) send a copy of the cancellation notice to the proprietor of the comparable trade mark (EU) which derives from the existing EUTM identified in the cancellation notice, and

(b) notify the proprietor of the comparable trade mark (EU) which derives from the existing EUTM that based upon the revocation or declaration of invalidity of the existing EUTM, the comparable trade mark (EU) will be revoked or declared invalid to the same extent as the corresponding EUTM.

(5) Where the registrar has become aware of the situation referred to in paragraph 21A(2)(a) of Schedule 2A otherwise than by a cancellation notice, the registrar must as soon as reasonably practicable after becoming aware of that situation, notify the proprietor of the comparable trade mark (EU) which derives from the existing EUTM in the terms provided in paragraph (4)(b).

(6) The proprietor of a comparable trade mark (EU) referred to in paragraph (4) and (5) must, within such period of not less than one month as may be specified in the notice referred to in paragraph (4)(b) and (5), send to the registrar a derogation notice accompanied by a statement and supporting evidence as referred to in paragraph (2), failing which the registration of the comparable trade mark (EU) must be revoked or declared invalid to the same extent as the corresponding EUTM, unless the registrar directs otherwise.

(7) The registrar must, in reaching a decision as to whether paragraph 21A(4) of Schedule 2A applies to a comparable trade mark (EU), have regard to the statement and supporting evidence filed by the proprietor of the comparable trade mark (EU) and must send written notice of the decision to the proprietor, stating the reasons for that decision.

(8) For the purposes of any appeal against a decision referred to in sub-paragraph (7), the date on which the notice is sent must be taken to be the date of the decision. ” .”.

(d) in rule 47(n) (to be inserted by paragraph 11(6)), after “corresponding EUTM” insert “, and where the corresponding EUTM is subject to cancellation proceedings, that cancellation is pending”.

12.  In Schedule 5 (Consequential amendments, repeals, revocations, transitional and saving provisions), in paragraph 6, in column 2 of the first entry in the Table, for “Schedule 12” substitute “Schedule 21”.

PART 5 Amendments to the Designs and International Trade Marks (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019

13.  The Designs and International Trade Marks (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019(9) are amended in accordance with this Part.

14.  In the heading to regulation 4 and in regulation 4(1), for “exit day”, in each place it occurs, substitute “IP completion day”.

15.  In regulation 5, for “exit day”, in each place it occurs, substitute “IP completion day”.

16.  In regulation 6, for “exit day”, in both places it occurs, substitute “IP completion day”.

17.  Schedule 1, Part 1 (Design Regulation and supplementary unregistered designs) is amended as follows—

(a) in Article 1(3) of the Design Regulation (as substituted by paragraph 2), for “exit day” substitute “IP completion day”;

(b) in Article 7 of the Design Regulation (as substituted by paragraph 8), for “exit day”, in both places it occurs, substitute “IP completion day”;

(c) for paragraph 19(b) substitute—

“(b) for “Community”, in the third place it appears, substitute “United Kingdom or the European Economic Area”.”;

(d) in paragraph 27(b), for “placee” substitute “place”;

(e) in Article 81(2)(d) (as substituted by paragraph 29), omit “a continuing”.

18.  In Schedule 1, Part 2 (2005 Regulations and the supplementary unregistered design right), in regulation 4(3) of the 2005 Regulations (as substituted by paragraph 63(b)), for “exit day” substitute “IP completion day”.

19.  Schedule 2, Part 1 (Design Regulation and continuing unregistered Community designs) is amended as follows—

(a) in paragraph 5, for “exit day” substitute “IP completion day”;

(b) in Article 81(2) of the Design Regulation (as substituted by paragraph 29)—

(i) in sub-paragraphs (a) to (c)—

(aa) for “supplementary”, in each place it occurs, substitute “continuing”;

(bb) after “unregistered”, insert “Community”;

(ii) in sub-paragraph (d)—

(aa) omit “a supplementary”;

(bb) after “unregistered”, insert “Community”;

(c) in Articles 82 and 83 of the Design Regulation (as substituted by paragraph 30), for “exit day”, in each place it occurs, substitute “IP completion day”.

20.  In Schedule 2, Part 2 (2005 Regulations and continuing unregistered Community designs), in regulation 4(3)(a) of the 2005 Regulations (as substituted by paragraph 58(b)), for “exit day” substitute “IP completion day”.

21.  Schedule 3 (Amendments to the 1949 Act to make provision for certain registered Community designs and International designs to be treated as registered under the 1949 Act from exit day and about certain applications for registered Community designs made before exit day) is amended as follows—

(a) in the heading, for “exit day”, in both places it occurs, substitute “IP completion day”;

(b) in sections 12A and 12B of the 1949 Act (as prospectively inserted by paragraph 2), for “exit day”, in each place it occurs, substitute “IP completion day”;

(c) in Schedule 1A to the 1949 Act (as prospectively inserted by paragraph 3)—

(i) for “exit day”, in each place it occurs, substitute “IP completion day”;

(ii) after paragraph 9 insert—

“Existing registered Community design: effect of invalidity

9A.— (1) This paragraph applies where, on IP completion day, an existing registered Community design is the subject of proceedings under Article 25 (Grounds for invalidity) which have been instituted but not finally determined before IP completion day (“invalidation proceedings”).

(2) Subject to sub-paragraph (4) where—

(a) the existing registered Community design is declared invalid (whether wholly or partly) pursuant to a decision which is finally determined, and

(b) the registrar has either—

(i) received notice of the situation referred to in paragraph (a) (“an invalidation notice”), or

(ii) otherwise become aware of the situation referred to in paragraph (a),

the registration of the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design must be declared invalid to the same extent as the existing registered Community design.

(3) Where (by virtue of sub-paragraph (2)) the registration of a re-registered design is declared invalid, the registrar must—

(a) where there is a partial declaration of invalidity, amend the entry in the register of designs;

(b) otherwise, remove the re-registered design from the register.

(4) The registration of a re-registered design must not be declared invalid under sub-paragraph (2) where the grounds on which the existing registered Community design was declared invalid (whether wholly or partly) would not apply or would not have been satisfied in relation to the re-registered Community design if—

(a) the re-registered design had been the subject of an entry on the register as at the date the invalidation proceedings were instituted, and

(b) an application for a declaration of invalidity of the re-registered design based on those grounds had been made on that date under section 11ZA.

(5) Where the registration of a re-registered design is declared invalid to any extent pursuant to this paragraph—

(a) it shall to that extent be treated as having been invalid from the date on which the rights of the proprietor of the existing registered Community design from which it derives are deemed to have ceased under the Community Design Regulation;

(b) subject to any claim for compensation for damage caused by negligence or lack of good faith on the part of the proprietor or a claim for restitution based upon the unjust enrichment of the proprietor, the invalidity of the registration of the re-registered design does not affect—

(i) a decision arising from infringement proceedings which has been finally determined and which has been enforced prior to the date of the declaration of invalidity made pursuant to sub-paragraph (2) (“the invalidity declaration date”);

(ii) any contract entered into prior to the invalidity declaration date to the extent that it has been performed prior to that date, subject to the right of a party to the contract to claim the repayment of any consideration paid under the contract where, having regard to the circumstances, it is fair and equitable for such repayment to be made.

(6) Where a declaration is made under sub-paragraph (2), section 11ZE(2) does not apply.

(7) An invalidation notice may be sent by any person.

(8) For the purposes of this paragraph—

(a) proceedings are instituted if an application or counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity—

(i) has been filed (and not subsequently withdrawn) with the European Union Intellectual Property Office or a court designated for the purposes of Article 80, and

(ii) meets the requirements for being accorded a filing date under the Community Design Regulation and Commision Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 of 21 October 2002;

(b) a decision is finally determined when—

(i) it has been determined; and

(ii) there is no further possibility of the determination being varied or set aside (disregarding any power to grant permission to appeal out of time).

(9) An appeal lies from a declaration of invalidity under sub-paragraph (2).”;

(d) in Schedule 1B to the 1949 Act (as prospectively inserted by paragraph 3)—

(i) for “exit day”, in each place it occurs, substitute “IP completion day”;

(ii) in the heading to paragraph 7, omit “registered” the first time it occurs.

22.  Schedule 4 (Amendments to the 1994 Act to make provision for certain international trade marks protected in the European Union to be treated as registered trade marks and about certain applications for such marks and transformation applications) is amended as follows—

(a) in section 54A of the 1994 Act (as prospectively inserted by paragraph 2), for “exit day”, in each place it occurs, substitute “IP completion day”;

(b) in Schedule 2B to the 1994 Act (as prospectively inserted by paragraph 3), for “exit day”, in each place it occurs, substitute “IP completion day”.

23.  Schedule 5, Part 1 (Fees payable in respect of a re-registered design or a re-registered international design) is amended as follows—

(a) in paragraph 1(2)—

(i) omit “of six months”;

(ii) for “exit day” substitute “IP completion day”;

(b) in paragraph 1(3)—

(i) for “ending” substitute “beginning”;

(ii) for “exit day” substitute “IP completion day”.

24.  Schedule 6 (Amendments to the Registered Designs Rules) is amended as follows—

(a) in paragraph 3(a), for “exit day”, in both places it occurs, substitute “IP completion day”;

(b) after paragraph 3 insert—

“3A.   After rule 15 insert—

“Invalidation of existing registered Community design: invalidation notice and procedure on application for derogation; Schedule 1A paragraph 9A

15A.— (1) An invalidation notice under paragraph 9A of Schedule 1A must—

(a) identify the existing registered Community design by the number under which it was registered in the RCD register immediately before IP completion day, together with a representation of the design,

(b) be accompanied by a copy of the decision (including any decision determined on appeal) pursuant to which the existing registered Community design was declared to be invalid, and

(c) include a statement confirming that the decision pursuant to which the registered Community design was declared invalid (whether wholly or partly) has been finally determined.

(2) Where an invalidation notice is sent to the registrar by the proprietor of the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design, the invalidation notice must be accompanied by—

(a) a notice (a “derogation notice”) in writing to the registrar that, based upon the provisions in paragraph 9A(4) of Schedule 1A, the re-registered design should not be declared invalid (whether wholly or partly), and

(b) a statement of the reasons why paragraph 9A of Schedule 1A applies (a “statement”) together with relevant supporting evidence (“supporting evidence”).

(3) Where the proprietor of a re-registered design submits an invalidation notice to the registrar but fails to send a derogation notice, a statement, or supporting evidence, the registration of the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design identified in the invalidation notice must be declared invalid to the same extent as the existing registered Community design, unless the registrar directs otherwise.

(4) Where the registrar has received an invalidation notice from a person other than the proprietor of the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design, the registrar must as soon as reasonably practicable after receipt of the invalidation notice—

(a) send a copy of the invalidation notice to the proprietor of the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design identified in the invalidation notice, and

(b) notify the proprietor of the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design that based upon the declaration of invalidity of the existing registered Community design, the re-registered design will be declared invalid to the same extent as the existing registered Community design from which it derives.

(5) Where the registrar has become aware of the situation referred to in paragraph 9A of Schedule 1A otherwise than by an invalidation notice, the registrar must as soon as reasonably practicable after becoming aware of that situation notify the proprietor of the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design in the terms provided in paragraph (4)(b).

(6) The proprietor of the re-registered design referred to in paragraphs (4) and (5) must, within such period of not less than one month as may be specified in the notice referred to in paragraphs (4)(b) and 5, send to the registrar a derogation notice accompanied by a statement and supporting evidence as referred to in paragraph (2), failing which the registration of the re-registered design must be declared invalid to the same extent as the registered Community design from which the re-registered design derives, unless the registrar directs otherwise.

(7) The registrar must, in reaching a decision as to whether paragraph 9A of Schedule 1A applies to a re-registered design, have regard to the statement and supporting evidence filed by the proprietor of the re-registered design and must send written notice of the decision to the proprietor, stating the reasons for that decision.

(8) For the purposes of any appeal against a decision referred to in sub-paragraph (7), the date on which the notice is sent must be taken to be the date of the decision. ” .”;

(c) in rule 27(e) of the Registered Designs Rules (as prospectively inserted by paragraph 6(b)), for “exit day” substitute “IP completion day”;

(d) for paragraph 8 substitute—

“8.— (1) Rule 42 (address for service) is amended as follows.

(2) At the end of sub-paragraph (c) omit “, or” and substitute “;”.

(3) After sub-paragraph (1)(c) insert—

“(d) a proprietor of a re-registered design who sends a derogation notice to the registrar under rule 15A.”.

(4) In paragraph (4), for “another EEA state” substitute “an EEA state”. ”;

(e) after paragraph 8 insert—

“9.— (1) Rule 43 (failure to furnish an address for service) is amended as follows.

(2) At the end of sub-paragraph 4(c) omit “, or” and substitute “;”.

(3) After sub-paragraph (4)(c) insert—

“(d) in the case of a proprietor who sends a derogation notice to the registrar, the registrar must proceed as if the proprietor had not sent a derogation notice. ” .”.

25.  In Schedule 8, Part 1 (Further amendments to the 1949 Act), omit paragraph 7.

PART 6 Amendments to the Patents (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019

26.  The Patents (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019(10) are amended in accordance with this Part.

27.  For regulation 3(a) and (b), substitute—

“(a) in the heading for “EU compulsory”, substitute “Compulsory pharmaceutical”;

(b) in subsection (1), for “an “EU compulsory”, substitute “a “compulsory pharmaceutical”;”.

28.  Omit regulation 4.

29.  For the definition of “plant breeders’ right” substituted by regulation 7(2)(c), substitute—

““plant breeders’ right” means—

(a)

any right granted under, or having effect as if granted under, section 3 of the 1997 Act (including existing rights as defined by section 40(4) of that Act); and

(b)

any right which by virtue of regulation 3 of the Plant Breeders’ Rights (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019(11) is treated as if it were a plant breeders’ right granted in accordance with the 1997 Act and as if the variety were registered in accordance with regulations under section 18(1)(c) of the 1997 Act;”.

30.  Omit regulation 17.

31.  In the insertion after paragraph 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1610/96 made by regulation 20(3), for paragraph 12 substitute—

“12.   ‘court’ means—

(a) as respects England and Wales, the High Court;

(b) as respects Scotland, the Court of Session;

(c) as respects Northern Ireland, the High Court in Northern Ireland.”.

32.  Omit regulation 21.

33.  In regulation 24(3), in the insertion of paragraph 8(1)(b), for “Part A section 1, points 1 to 7 or Part B, Section 1 points 1 to 5”, substitute “Part A section 1, points 1.1 to 1.7 or Part B, Section 1 points 1.1 to 1.4.3”.

34.  In Regulation 52(3) in the insertion after Article 1(e) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009—

(a) for paragraph (g), substitute—

“(g) ‘court’ means—

(i) as respects England and Wales, the High Court;

(ii) as respects Scotland, the Court of Session;

(iii) as respects Northern Ireland, the High Court in Northern Ireland;” and

(b) in paragraph (j), after “granted” insert “or having effect as if granted”.

35.  Omit regulation 53.

36.  In regulation 62, omit “before”.

37.  In regulation 69, for “exit day” in each place it occurs, substitute “IP completion day”.

PART 7 Amendments to the Patents Act 1977

38.  The Patents Act 1977(12) is amended as follows.

39.  In Schedule A1—

(a) in paragraph 1, omit the definition of “Council Regulation”;

(b) in paragraph 3(3), for “Article 14(3) fourth indent of the Council Regulation”, substitute “regulation 20A of the Plant Breeders’ Rights Regulations 1998(13)”;

(c) in paragraph 4, for “Article 14(3) third indent of the Council Regulation”, substitute “section 9(10) of the Plant Varieties Act 1997(14)”.

PART 8 Amendments to Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 and related amendments

Amendments to Regulation (EC) No 469/2009

40.  Regulation (EC) No 469/2009(15) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6th May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products is amended as set out in the Schedule.

Amendment to Regulation (EU) No 2019/933

41.—(1) Regulation (EU) 2019/933 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20th May 2019 amending Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products is amended as follows.

(2) After Article 2 (entry into force), omit “This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.”.

Amendment to the Patents Rules 2007

42.  In the Patents Rules 2007(16), after rule 116, insert—

“Notifications relating to supplementary protection certificates

116A.   Notifications under Article 5(2)(b) and (c) of the Medicinal Products Regulation must be made on Patents Form SP5.”.

Transitional provisions

43.—(1) Paragraph (2) applies where, before IP completion day, a product or a medicinal product containing that product, as defined in Article 1 of Regulation EC (No) 469/2009, is marked in accordance with that Regulation with the logo set out in Annex -I of that Regulation.

(2) That product or medicinal product containing that product so marked is not required, after these Regulations come into force, to have the words “UK export” affixed to it.

(3) Paragraph (4) applies where, before IP completion day, a notification is made to the Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks in the form set out in Annex -Ia of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009.

(4) That notification is to be treated, on and after IP completion day, as a notification made—

(a) on Patents Form SP5; and

(b) on the same date as the notification made on the form set out in that Annex -Ia.

Amanda Solloway

Parliamentary Under Secretary

Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy

22nd September 2020

We consent to the making of these Regulations

Maggie Throup

Rebecca Harris

Two of the Lords Commissioners of Her Majesty’s Treasury

28th September 2020