- Latest available (Revised)
- Point in Time (28/05/2012)
- Original (As adopted by EU)
Commission Regulation (EC) No 318/2007 of 23 March 2007 laying down animal health conditions for imports of certain birds into the Community and the quarantine conditions thereof (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)
When the UK left the EU, legislation.gov.uk published EU legislation that had been published by the EU up to IP completion day (31 December 2020 11.00 p.m.). On legislation.gov.uk, these items of legislation are kept up-to-date with any amendments made by the UK since then.
Legislation.gov.uk publishes the UK version. EUR-Lex publishes the EU version. The EU Exit Web Archive holds a snapshot of EUR-Lex’s version from IP completion day (31 December 2020 11.00 p.m.).
Version Superseded: 12/03/2013
Point in time view as at 28/05/2012.
There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Commission Regulation (EC) No 318/2007 (repealed).
Revised legislation carried on this site may not be fully up to date. At the current time any known changes or effects made by subsequent legislation have been applied to the text of the legislation you are viewing by the editorial team. Please see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ for details regarding the timescales for which new effects are identified and recorded on this site.
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC(1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 10(3) and the first subparagraph of Article 10(4) thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive 92/65/EEC of 13 July 1992 laying down animal health requirements governing trade and imports into the Community of animals, semen, ova and embryos not subject to animal health requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A(I) to Directive 90/425/EEC(2) and in particular Article 17(2)(b) and Article 17(3) and the first and fourth indents of Article 18(1),
Whereas:
(1) Commission Decision 2000/666/EC of 16 October 2000 laying down the animal health requirements and the veterinary certification for the import of birds, other than poultry and the conditions for quarantine(3) lays down the animal health requirements relating to imports of certain birds, other than poultry, as specified in that Decision, and the quarantine requirements for such birds.
(2) Following the outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza of the Asian lineage in South-East Asia in 2004, the Commission adopted several Decisions banning amongst other commodities the import of birds, other than poultry, from affected third countries.
(3) Following the spread of avian influenza of the Asian lineage to Europe by migratory birds and the case of avian influenza of the Asian lineage detected in a quarantine facility in the United Kingdom, Commission Decision 2005/760/EC of 27 October 2005 concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain third countries for the import of captive birds(4) was adopted. That Decision suspends imports of birds, other than poultry, from all third countries because of the risks posed by affected wild birds.
(4) In order to draw up an inventory of the risks posed by the import of captive birds, the Commission on 13 April 2005 requested the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) to provide a scientific opinion on the risks posed by imports of birds caught in the wild and captive bred birds from third countries.
(5) Following that request, the EFSA Panel on animal health and welfare adopted, during their meeting of 26 and 27 October 2006, a Scientific Opinion on the Animal health and welfare risks associated with the import of wild birds, other than poultry, into the Community. That Scientific Opinion identifies possible tools and options which can reduce any identified animal health risk related to imports of birds other than poultry.
(6) Taking account of the conclusions and recommendations laid down in the EFSA Scientific Opinion, the requirements laid down in Decision 2000/666/EC should be revised.
(7) The EFSA Scientific Opinion identifies, in particular, the fact that data relating to imports of such birds is sparse. Further data collection on these imports should therefore be considered.
(8) One of the recommendations of the EFSA Scientific Opinion relates to controls carried out in the third countries exporting birds, other than poultry, to the Community. Improvements at the point of export should have most impact in reducing the probability that infected birds are presented for entry into the Community. For that reason, import conditions should be laid down in this Regulation in such a way that only imports from third countries authorised for imports into the Community of such birds are allowed.
(9) Another EFSA recommendation relates to imports of birds caught in the wild. The Scientific Opinion identifies the risk caused by those birds that may be infected due to lateral spread from other infected wild birds and from the contaminated environment, as well as overspill from infected poultry. Taking into account the role played by wild migratory birds in the spread of avian influenza from Asia to Europe in 2005 and 2006, it is appropriate to limit imports of birds, other than poultry, only to birds bred in captivity.
(10) It is seldom possible to distinguish with certainty between birds that have been caught in the wild and captive bred birds. Methods of marking can be applied to both types of birds without it being possible to distinguish between them. It is therefore appropriate to limit imports of birds, other than poultry, to breeding establishments that are approved by the competent authority of the third country of export, and to lay down certain minimum conditions for such approval.
(11) Certain imports of birds are covered by other Community legislation. Therefore, they should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
(12) The animal health risk posed by racing pigeons that are brought into the Community to be released again so that they may fly back to their origin is such that they should be excluded form the scope of this Regulation.
(13) In addition, certain third countries have animal health conditions that are equivalent to those provided for in Community legislation. Therefore, imports of birds from those countries should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
(14) Member States should communicate to the Commission certain information concerning approved quarantine facilities and centres in order that the Commission is in a position to publish a list of approved quarantine facilities and centres and keep that list up to date. It is appropriate that that list be inserted in an Annex to this Regulation.
(15) It is appropriate to lay down further import procedures relating to the transfer from the border inspection post to the approved quarantine facilities or centres upon entry into the Community in order to ensure that imported birds arrive at the designated approved quarantine facility or centre within a reasonable time period.
(16) Council Directive 2005/94/EC of 20 December 2005 on Community measures for the control of avian influenza and repealing Directive 92/40/EEC(5) was adopted to take account of the experienced gained in the control of avian influenza in recent years. Based on that Directive, Commission Decision 2006/437/EC of 4 August 2006 approving a Diagnostic Manual for avian influenza as provided for in Council Directive 2005/94/EC(6) (the diagnostic manual) was adopted laying down at Community level diagnostic procedures, sampling methods and criteria for the evaluation of the results of laboratory tests for the confirmation of an outbreak of avian influenza. Account should be taken of that Decision when laying down the testing regimes for avian influenza in approved quarantine facilities and centres in this Regulation.
(17) Certain derogations should also be considered for those birds found to be infected with low pathogenic avian influenza and Newcastle disease in an approved quarantine facility or centre, in those cases where the occurrence of disease does not pose a risk to the animal health status of the Community.
(18) For the sake of clarity of Community legislation, Decision 2000/666/EC should be repealed and replaced by this Regulation.
(19) As a result of the more stringent animal health conditions laid down in this Regulation, Decision 2005/760/EC should be repealed.
(20) Transitional measures should be laid down for those quarantine facilities or centres that are approved under Decision 2000/666/EC, in order that imports via such facilities and centres may continue while approval is granted under this Regulation.
(21) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
This Regulation lays down the animal health conditions for imports of certain birds into the Community, from the third countries and parts thereof referred to in Annex I, and the quarantine conditions for such imports.
This Regulation shall apply to animals of the avian species.
However, it shall not apply to:
fowl, turkeys, guinea fowl, ducks, geese, quails, pigeons, pheasants, partridges and ratites (Ratitae) reared or kept in captivity for breeding, the production of meat or eggs for consumption, or for re-stocking supplies of game (poultry);
birds imported for conservation programmes approved by the competent authority in the Member State of destination;
pet animals referred to in the third paragraph of Article 1 of Directive 92/65/EEC, accompanying their owner;
birds intended for zoos, circuses, amusement parks or experiments;
birds destined for bodies, institutes or centres approved according to Article 13 of Directive 92/65/EEC;
racing pigeons which are introduced to the territory of the Community from a neighbouring third country where they are normally resident and then immediately released with the expectation that they will fly back to that third country;
birds imported from Andorra, Liechtenstein, Monaco, Norway, San Marino, Switzerland, and the Vatican City State.
For the purposes of this Regulation, the definitions of Directive 2005/94/EC shall apply.
The following definitions shall also apply:
‘birds’ means animals of avian species other than those referred to in points (a) to (g) of Article 2;
‘approved breeding establishment’ means:
an establishment used exclusively for the breeding of birds; and
that has been inspected and approved by the competent authority of the exporting third country for compliance with the conditions provided for Article 4 and Annex II;
‘captive bred birds’ means birds that have not been caught in the wild but have been born and bred in captivity from parents that mated or had gametes otherwise transferred in captivity;
‘seamlessly closed leg-ring’ means a ring or band in a continuous circle, without any break or join, which has not been tampered with in any way, of a size which cannot be removed from the bird when its leg is fully grown after having been applied in the first days of the bird's life and which has been commercially manufactured for that purpose;
‘approved quarantine facility’ means premises, other than quarantine centres:
in which quarantine of imported birds is carried out;
which has been inspected and approved by the competent authority for compliance with the minimum conditions provided for in Article 6 and Annex IV;
‘approved quarantine centre’ means premises:
in which quarantine of imported birds is carried out;
containing a number of units, which are operationally and physically separated from each other and in which each unit contains only birds of the same consignment, with the same health status, and therefore comprises a single epidemiological unit;
which has been inspected and approved by the competent authority for compliance with the minimum conditions provided for in Article 6 and Annex IV;
‘sentinel birds’ means poultry which are to be used as a diagnostic aid during quarantine;
‘diagnostic manual’ means the Diagnostic Manual for avian influenza set out in the Annex to Decision 2006/437/EC;
‘Local Veterinary Unit (LVU)’ means any local authority of a Member State designated as such.
[F1Approved breeding establishments shall comply with the following conditions:]
the breeding establishment must be approved by the competent authority in accordance with the conditions set out in Annex II, and assigned an approval number;
that approval number must have been communicated to the Commission by that authority;
the name and approval number of the breeding establishment must appear on a list of breeding establishments drawn up by the Commission;
the approval of the breeding establishment must be immediately withdrawn or suspended by the competent authority where it no longer complies with the conditions set out in Annex II and the Commission must be immediately informed thereof.
Textual Amendments
[F1Imports of birds shall be authorised only if the birds comply with the following conditions:]
the birds are captive bred birds;
the birds must originate from third countries or parts thereof referred to Annex I;
[F2the birds come from approved breeding establishments that comply with the conditions laid down in Article 4;]
the birds were subjected to a laboratory virus detection test 7 to 14 days prior to shipment with negative results for any avian influenza and Newcastle disease virus;
the birds have not been vaccinated against avian influenza;
the birds are accompanied by an animal health certificate in accordance with the model set out in Annex III (the animal health certificate);
the birds are identified with an individual identification number by means of a uniquely marked seamlessly closed leg-ring or a microchip in accordance with Article 66(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 865/2006(7);
the individual identification number of leg-rings or microchips provided for in point (f) must bear at least the following information;
the ISO code of the exporting third country performing the identification,
a unique serial number;
the individual identification number provided for in point (f) must be registered on the animal health certificate;
the birds are transported in new containers which are individually identified externally with an identification number that must correspond with the identification number indicated on the animal health certificate.
Textual Amendments
Approved quarantine facilities and centres shall comply with the minimum conditions set out in Annex IV.
Each Member State shall draw up and keep up to date a list of approved quarantine facilities and centres and their approval numbers and make it available to the Commission, to the other Member States and to the public.]
Textual Amendments
Birds shall be transported directly from the border inspection post to an approved quarantine facility or centre in cages or crates.
The total journey time from that post to that quarantine facility or centre must not normally exceed nine hours.
When vehicles are used for this journey they shall be sealed by the competent authorities with a tamper proof seal.
Importers or their agents shall provide a written attestation, in an official language of the Member State of entry, and signed by the person responsible for the quarantine facility or centre certifying that the birds will be accepted for quarantine.
That attestation shall:
clearly indicate the name and address and approval number of the quarantine facility or centre;
reach the border inspection post via e-mail or fax prior to time of arrival of the consignment at that post or shall be presented by the importer or his agent before the birds are released from the border inspection post.
Where birds are introduced into the Community via a Member State other than that of destination, all measures shall be taken to ensure that the consignment reaches the intended Member State of destination.
1.Where Community legislation provides for the monitoring of birds from the border inspection post to the approved quarantine facility or centre at the place of destination, the following exchanges of information shall be provided:
(a)the official veterinarian responsible for the border inspection post shall notify the competent authority responsible for the approved quarantine facility or centre at the place of destination of the consignment, of the place of origin and the place of destination of the birds via the Traces network;
(b)the person responsible for the approved quarantine facility or centre of destination shall notify by email or fax, within one working day of the date of arrival of the consignment at the quarantine facility or centre, the official veterinarian responsible for the approved quarantine facility or centre at the place of destination of the arrival of the consignment at its destination;
(c)the official veterinarian responsible for the approved quarantine facility or centre at the place of destination of the consignment shall notify via the Traces network, within three working days of the date of arrival of the consignment at the quarantine facility or centre, the official veterinarian responsible for the border inspection post who notified him of the shipment of the consignment of the arrival of the consignment at its destination.
2.If confirmation is provided to the competent authority responsible for the border inspection post, that the birds declared as being intended for an approved quarantine facility or centre have not arrived at their destination within three working days of the estimated date of arrival of the consignment at the quarantine facility or centre, the competent authority shall take appropriate measures vis-à-vis the person responsible for the consignment.
1.The birds shall be quarantined for at least 30 days in an approved quarantine facility or centre (the quarantine).
2.At least at the beginning and the end of quarantine of each consignment, the official veterinarian shall inspect the conditions of quarantine, including an examination of the mortality records and a clinical inspection of the birds in the approved quarantine facility or in each unit of the approved quarantine centre.
However, the official veterinarian shall carry out inspections more frequently if required by the disease situation.
1.The examination, sampling and testing procedures for avian influenza and Newcastle disease, set out in Annex VI, shall be carried out following the arrival of the birds in quarantine.
2.When sentinel birds are used a minimum of 10 sentinel birds shall be used in the approved quarantine facility or in each unit of the approved quarantine centre.
3.Sentinel birds used for examination, sampling and testing procedures shall be:
(a)at least three weeks old and used only once for those purposes;
(b)leg-banded for identification purposes or identified with another non-removable identification;
(c)unvaccinated and have been found sero-negative for avian influenza and Newcastle Disease within a period of 14 days before the date of commencement of quarantine;
(d)placed in the approved quarantine facility or in a unit of the approved quarantine centre before the arrival of the birds in the common airspace and as close as possible to the birds in such a way that close contact between the sentinel birds and the excrements of the birds in quarantine is ensured.
1. If during quarantine in an approved quarantine facility, it is suspected that one or more birds and/or sentinel birds are infected with avian influenza or Newcastle disease, the following measures shall be taken:
(a) the competent authority shall place the approved quarantine facility under official supervision;
(b) samples for virological examination as set out in point 2 of Annex VI shall be taken from those birds and sentinel birds and shall be analysed accordingly;
(c) no birds shall enter or leave the approved quarantine facility until the suspicion is ruled out.
2. If the suspicion of avian influenza or Newcastle disease in the affected approved quarantine facility as referred to in paragraph 1 is confirmed, the following measures shall be taken:
(a) all birds and sentinel birds in the approved quarantine facility shall be killed and destroyed;
(b) the approved quarantine facility shall be cleaned and disinfected;
(c) no birds shall enter the approved quarantine facility until 21 days following the final cleaning and disinfection.
3. If during quarantine in an approved quarantine centre, it is suspected that one or more birds and/or sentinel birds in a unit of the quarantine centre are infected with avian influenza or Newcastle disease, the following measures shall be taken:
(a) the competent authority shall place the approved quarantine centre under official supervision;
(b) samples for virological examination as set out in point 2 of Annex VI shall be taken from those birds and sentinel birds and shall be analysed accordingly;
(c) no birds shall enter or leave the approved quarantine centre until the suspicion is ruled out.
4. If the suspicion of avian influenza or Newcastle disease in the affected unit of the approved quarantine centre as referred to in paragraph 3 is confirmed, the following measures shall be taken:
(a) all birds and sentinel birds in the affected unit of the approved quarantine centre shall be killed and destroyed;
(b) the unit concerned shall be cleaned and disinfected;
(c) the following samples shall be taken:
where sentinel birds are used, not earlier than 21 days following the final cleaning and disinfection of the unit concerned, samples for serological examination, as set out in Annex VI must be taken from sentinel birds in the other quarantine units; or
where no sentinel birds are used, during 7 to 15 days following the final cleaning and disinfection, samples for virological examination, as set out in point 2 of Annex VI, must be taken from birds in the other quarantine units;
(d) no birds shall leave the approved quarantine centre until the results of the sampling provided for in point (c) have been confirmed as negative.
5. Member States shall inform the Commission of any measures taken under this Article.]
Textual Amendments
1.[F1Where during quarantine one or more birds and/or sentinel birds are found to be infected with low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) or Newcastle disease, the competent authority may, based on a risk assessment, grant derogations from the measures provided for in Article 13(2)(a) and (4)(a), provided that such derogations do not endanger disease control (the derogation).]
Member States shall immediately inform the Commission of any such derogations.
2.When an official veterinarian inspects an approved quarantine facility or centre that has been granted a derogation, and one or more of the birds and/or sentinel birds are found to be infected with LPAI or Newcastle disease, the measures set out in paragraphs 3 to 7 shall be complied with.
Member States shall immediately inform the Commission of any such measures.
3.In the case of a positive finding of LPAI, instead of the standard samples as provided for in the diagnostic manual, the following samples must be taken for laboratory testing, 21 days following the date of the last positive finding of LPAI in the approved quarantine facility or from each unit in the approved quarantine centre and at intervals of 21 days:
(a)samples of any dead sentinel birds or other birds present at the time of sampling;
(b)tracheal/oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs from at least 60 birds or from all birds where there are less than 60 present at the approved quarantine facility or the unit concerned of the approved quarantine centre; or if the birds are small, exotic and not used to being handled or handling them would be dangerous for people, samples of fresh faeces must be collected; the sampling and laboratory testing of such samples must continue until two consecutive negative laboratory results are obtained which must be at least at an interval of 21 days.
However, the competent authority may grant derogations from the sample size provided for in this paragraph, based on the outcome of a risk assessment.
4.In the case of a positive finding of Newcastle disease, the competent authority may only grant a derogation provided that in the 30 days following the death or clinical recovery of the last case of that disease, sampling in accordance with points 1 and 2 of Annex VI, not taking account of the reference to the time period specified, has been carried out with negative results.
5.Birds shall not be released from quarantine until at least the laboratory testing period provided for in paragraph 3 has elapsed.
6.The approved quarantine facility or the unit concerned of the approved quarantine centre shall be cleaned and disinfected after it has been emptied. Any matter or waste likely to have been contaminated shall be removed in such a way that ensures that the pathogen is not spread, and destroyed in such a way that guarantees the destruction of the virus of LPAI or Newcastle disease present, as well as all the waste that has accumulated during the laboratory testing period provided for in paragraph 3 has elapsed.
7.The re-population of the approved quarantine facility or centre shall not take place for a period of 21 days following the date of completion of the final cleansing and disinfection as provided for in paragraph 6.
Textual Amendments
If during quarantine in an approved quarantine facility or centre, as it is suspected or confirmed that psittaciformes are infected with Chlamydophyla psittaci all birds of the consignment shall be treated by a method approved by the competent authority and the quarantine shall be prolonged for at least two months following the date of the last recorded case.
Birds shall only be released from quarantine in an approved quarantine facility or centre on written authorisation by an official veterinarian.
1.Member States shall communicate to the Commission within 24 hours any case of avian influenza or Newcastle disease detected in an approved quarantine facility or centre.
2.Member States shall communicate to the Commission the following information on an annual basis:
(a)the number of birds imported via approved quarantine facilities and centres per species and per approved breeding establishment of origin;
(b)information regarding the mortality rate for imported birds from the animal health certification procedure in the country of origin to the end of the quarantine period;
(c)the number of cases of positive findings of avian influenza, Newcastle disease and Chlamydophyla psittaci in approved quarantine facilities or centres.
All quarantine costs incurred by the application of this Regulation shall be borne by the importer.
Decisions 2000/666/EC and 2005/760/EC are repealed.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
It shall apply from 1 July 2007.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirely and directly applicable in all Member States.
Textual Amendments
Third countries or parts thereof listed in columns 1 and 3 of the table in Part 1 of Annex I to Commission Regulation (EC) No 798/2008 (8) , where column 4 of that table provides for a model veterinary certificate for breeding or productive poultry other than ratites (BPP);
Argentina [F5;]
[F6Philippines: National Capital Region of Manila.] ]
Textual Amendments
In order to be granted approval as provided for in Article 4, a breeding establishment shall comply with the conditions set out in this Chapter:
The breeding establishment must be clearly demarcated and separated from its surroundings or the animals confined and located so as not to pose a health risk to animal holdings whose health status might be jeopardised.
It must have adequate means for catching, confining and isolating animals and have available adequate approved quarantine facilities and approved procedures for animals coming from establishments that have not been approved.
The person responsible for the breeding establishment must have adequate experience in the breeding of birds.
The breeding establishment must be free of avian influenza, Newcastle disease and Chlamydophyla psittaci; in order for it to be declared free from those diseases, the competent authority shall assess the records on the animal health status kept for at least the previous three years before the date of the application for approval and the results of the clinical and laboratory tests carried out on the animals therein. However, new breeding establishments shall only be approved on the results of the clinical and laboratory tests carried out on the animals in such establishments.
It must keep up-to-date records indicating:
the number and identity (age, sex, species and individual identification number where practical) of the animals of each species present in the breeding establishment;
the number and identity (age, sex, species and individual identification number where practical) of animals arriving in the breeding establishment or leaving it, together with information on their origin or destination, the transport from or to the breeding establishment and the animals health status;
the results of blood tests or any other diagnostic procedures;
cases of disease and, where appropriate, the treatment administered;
the results of the post-mortem examinations on animals that have died in the breeding establishment, including still-born animals;
observations made during any isolation or quarantine period.
The breeding establishment must either have an arrangement with a competent laboratory to perform post-mortem examinations, or have one or more appropriate premises where such examinations may be performed by a competent person under the authority of the approved veterinarian.
The breeding establishment must either have suitable arrangements or on-site facilities for the appropriate disposal of the bodies of animals which die of a disease or are euthanised.
The breeding establishment must secure, by contract or legal instrument, the services of a veterinarian approved by and under the control of the competent authority of the exporting third country, who:
shall ensure that appropriate disease surveillance and control measures in relation to the disease situation of the country concerned are approved by the competent authority and applied in the breeding establishment. Such measures shall include:
an annual disease surveillance plan including appropriate zoonoses control of the animals;
clinical, laboratory and post-mortem testing of animals suspected to be affected by transmissible diseases;
vaccination of susceptible animals against infectious diseases as appropriate, in conformity with the Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals of the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE);
shall ensure that any suspect deaths or the presence of any other symptoms suggesting that animals have contracted avian influenza, Newcastle disease or Chlamydophyla psittaci is notified without delay to the competent authority of the third country;
shall ensure that animals entering the breeding establishment have been isolated as necessary, and in accordance with the requirements of this Regulation and the instructions, if any, given by the competent authority;
shall be responsible for the day to day compliance with the animal health requirements of this Regulation and of Community legislation on welfare of animals during transport.
If the breeding establishment breeds animals intended for laboratories carrying out experiments, the general care and accommodation of such animals must be in conformity with the requirements of Article 5 of Council Directive 86/609/EEC(9).
Breeding establishment shall only remain approved as such if they comply with the conditions set out in this Chapter:
The premises are under the control of an official veterinarian from the competent authority, who shall:
ensure that the conditions set out in this Regulation are met;
visit the premises of the breeding establishment at least once per year;
audit the activity of the approved veterinarian and the implementation of the annual disease surveillance plan;
verify that the results of the clinical, post-mortem and laboratory tests on the animals have revealed no occurrence of avian influenza, Newcastle disease or Chlamydophyla psittaci.
Only animals coming from another approved breeding establishment are introduced into the breeding establishment, in accordance with the conditions set out in this Regulation.
The breeding establishment shall keep the records referred to in point 5 of Chapter 1 following the date of approval, for a period of at least 10 years.
By way of derogation from point 2 of Chapter 2, birds introduced from sources other than approved breeding establishments, may be introduced in a breeding establishment after approval for such an introduction is given by the competent authority, provided that such animals undergo quarantine in accordance with the instructions given by the competent authority before being added to the collection. The quarantine period must be at least 30 days.
The procedures for partly or completely suspending, withdrawing or re-granting approval of breeding establishments shall comply with the conditions set out in this Chapter:
Where the competent authority finds that a breeding establishment no longer complies with the conditions set out in Chapters 1 and 2, or there has been a change of use so that it is no longer used exclusively for the breeding of birds, it shall suspend or withdraw the approval of such establishment.
Where the competent authority has received notification of the suspicion of avian influenza, Newcastle disease or Chlamydophyla psittaci, it shall suspend the approval of the breeding establishment, until the suspicion has been officially ruled out. It shall ensure that the measures necessary to confirm or rule out the suspicion and to avoid any spread of disease are taken, in accordance with the requirements of Community legislation governing measures to be taken against the disease in question and on trade in animals.
Where the suspected disease is confirmed, the competent authority may only approve the breeding establishment again in accordance with Chapter 1 following:
the eradication of the disease and the source of infection in the breeding establishment;
the suitable cleaning and disinfection of the breeding establishment;
the fulfilling of the conditions laid down in Chapter 1 of this Annex, with the exception of point 4.
The competent authority shall immediately inform the Commission of the suspension, withdrawal or re-granting of approval of any breeding establishment.
Approved quarantine facilities and centres shall comply with the conditions set out in Chapters 1 and 2.
have an efficient control system so as to ensure adequate surveillance of the animals;
be under the control and responsibility of the official veterinarian;
be cleaned and disinfected in accordance with a programme approved by the competent authority after which there shall be an appropriate resting period; the disinfectants used must be approved for that purpose by the competent authority.
the approved quarantine facility or unit of an approved quarantine centre must be cleaned and disinfected and then be kept free of birds for at least seven days before the imported birds are introduced;
the consignment of birds must come from a single approved breeding establishment in the third country of origin and be introduced over a period of not more than 48 hours;
the quarantine period must start when the last bird is introduced;
the approved quarantine facility or unit of an approved quarantine centre must be emptied of birds, cleaned and disinfected at the end of the quarantine period.
the date, number and species of birds entering and leaving for each consignment;
copies of the animal health certificates and the Common Veterinary Entry Documents accompanying the imported birds;
individual identification numbers of the imported birds, and in case of identification by microchip the details of the type of microchip and the reader used shall be recorded;
if in the quarantine facility or centre sentinal birds are used, the number and placing of the sentinel birds in the quarantine facility or centre;
any significant observation: cases of illness and number of deaths on a daily basis;
dates and results of testing;
types and dates of treatment;
persons entering and leaving the quarantine facility or centre.
The procedures for partly or completely suspending, withdrawing or re-granting approval of quarantine facilities and centres shall comply with the conditions set out in this Chapter:
Where the competent authority finds that a quarantine facility or centre no longer complies with the conditions set out in Chapters 1 and 2, or there has been a change of use which is no longer covered by Articles 3(e) and (f), it shall inform the Commission of this fact. Such quarantine facilities or centres shall not be used for imports in accordance with this act.
Approval shall only be re-granted to a quarantine facility or centre when the conditions laid down in Chapters 1 and 2 are again fulfilled.
Textual Amendments
[ F7 ] |
With use of sentinel birds:
blood samples for serological examination must be taken from all sentinel birds not less then 21 days following their entry into the quarantine and at least three days before the end of the quarantine;
if sentinel birds show positive or inconclusive serological results for the samples referred to in (i), the imported birds must be subjected to virological examination; cloacal swabs (or faeces) and tracheal/oropharyngeal swabs must be taken from at least 60 birds or from all birds if the consignment is less than 60 birds;
Without use of sentinel birds, imported birds must be examined virologically (serological testing not being appropriate). Tracheal/oropharyngeal and/or cloacal swabs (or faeces) must be taken from at least 60 birds or from all birds if the consignment is less than 60 birds, during the first 7 to 15 days of the quarantine.
cloacal swabs (or faeces) and tracheal/oropharyngeal swabs, if possible, from clinically ill birds or ill sentinel birds;
from the intestinal contents, brain, trachea, lungs, liver, spleen, kidneys and other obviously affected organs as soon as possible following the death from either:
dead sentinel birds and all birds dead on arrival and those which die during quarantine; or
in the case of high mortality in small birds of large consignments from at least 10 % of the dead birds.
OJ L 268, 24.9.1991, p. 56. Directive as last amended by Directive 2006/104/EC (OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p. 352).
OJ L 268, 14.9.1992, p. 54. Directive as last amended by Directive 2004/68/EC (OJ L 139, 30.4.2004, p. 321) corrected by (OJ L 226, 25.6.2006, p. 128).
OJ L 278, 31.10.2000, p. 26. Decision as last amended by Decision 2002/279/EC (OJ L 99, 16.4.2002, p. 17).
OJ L 285, 28.10.2005, p. 60. Decision as last amended by Decision 2007/183/EC (see page 44 of this Official Journal).
OJ L 358, 18.12.1986, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Directive 2003/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 230, 16.9.2003, p. 32).
Latest Available (revised):The latest available updated version of the legislation incorporating changes made by subsequent legislation and applied by our editorial team. Changes we have not yet applied to the text, can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area.
Original (As adopted by EU): The original version of the legislation as it stood when it was first adopted in the EU. No changes have been applied to the text.
Point in Time: This becomes available after navigating to view revised legislation as it stood at a certain point in time via Advanced Features > Show Timeline of Changes or via a point in time advanced search.
Geographical Extent: Indicates the geographical area that this provision applies to. For further information see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’.
Show Timeline of Changes: See how this legislation has or could change over time. Turning this feature on will show extra navigation options to go to these specific points in time. Return to the latest available version by using the controls above in the What Version box.
Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
This timeline shows the different versions taken from EUR-Lex before exit day and during the implementation period as well as any subsequent versions created after the implementation period as a result of changes made by UK legislation.
The dates for the EU versions are taken from the document dates on EUR-Lex and may not always coincide with when the changes came into force for the document.
For any versions created after the implementation period as a result of changes made by UK legislation the date will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. For further information see our guide to revised legislation on Understanding Legislation.
Use this menu to access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including:
The data on this page is available in the alternative data formats listed: