- Latest available (Revised)
- Original (As adopted by EU)
Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/2282 of 27 November 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 as regards the notification forms and information sheets (Text with EEA relevance)
When the UK left the EU, legislation.gov.uk published EU legislation that had been published by the EU up to IP completion day (31 December 2020 11.00 p.m.). On legislation.gov.uk, these items of legislation are kept up-to-date with any amendments made by the UK since then.
Legislation.gov.uk publishes the UK version. EUR-Lex publishes the EU version. The EU Exit Web Archive holds a snapshot of EUR-Lex’s version from IP completion day (31 December 2020 11.00 p.m.).
This is the original version as it was originally adopted in the EU.
This legislation may since have been updated - see the latest available (revised) version
Annex I is amended as follows:
Part I is replaced by the following:
Does the information transmitted on this form concern:
a pre-notification? If so, you may not need to complete the entire form at this stage but to agree with the Commission services which information is required for a preliminary assessment of the proposed measure.
a notification pursuant to Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)?
a simplified notification under Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 794/2004(1)? If so, please complete only the Simplified Notification Form in Annex II.
a measure which does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU but is notified to the Commission for reasons of legal certainty?
If you have selected point (d) above, please indicate below why the notifying Member State considers that the measure does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU. Please provide a full assessment of the measure in light of each of following four criteria, stressing in particular the criteria that you consider not to be met in the planned measure:
Does the notified measure imply a transfer of public resources or is it imputable to the State?
…
Does the notified measure confer an advantage upon undertakings?
…
Is the measure discretionary, available only to a limited number of undertakings, in a limited number of sectors of the economy or does it entail any territorial restrictions?
…
Does the measure affect competition on the internal market or threaten to distort intra-Union trade?
…
Member State concerned:
…
Region(s) of the Member State concerned (at NUTS level 2); include information on their regional aid status:
…
Contact person(s):
Name:…
Address:…
Phone(s):…
E-mail(s):…
Please indicate the name, the address (including web address) and the e-mail contact of the granting authority:
Name:…
Address:…
Web address:…
E-mail:…
Contact person at the Permanent Representation
Name:…
Phone(s):…
E-mail:…
If you would like a copy of the official correspondence sent by the Commission to the Member State to be forwarded to other national authorities, please indicate here their name, address (including their web address) and e-mail contact:
Name:…
Address:…
Web address:…
E-mail:…
in (an) unassisted region(s):…
in region(s) eligible for assistance under Article 107(3)(a) TFEU (specify the region(s) at NUTS level 2):…
in region(s) eligible for assistance under Article 107(3)(c) TFEU (specify the region(s) at NUTS level 3 or lower):…
in (an) unassisted region(s):…
in region(s) eligible for assistance under Article 107(3)(a) TFEU (specify the region(s) at NUTS level 2):…
in region(s) eligible for assistance under Article 107(3)(c) TFEU (specify the region(s) at NUTS level 3 or lower):…
Open to all sectors
Sector specific. If so, please specify the sector(s) at NACE group level(2):…
large enterprises
small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)
medium-sized enterprises
small enterprises
micro enterprises
under 10
from 11 to 50
from 51 to 100
from 101 to 500
from 501 to 1 000
over 1 000
…
…
Number of employees:…
Annual turnover (full amount in national currency, in the last financial year):
…
Annual balance-sheet total (full amount in national currency, in the last financial year):
…
Existence of linked enterprise or partner enterprises (please attach a declaration according to Article 3(5) of the Commission Recommendation on SMEs(3) attesting to either the autonomous, linked or partner status of the beneficiary undertaking(4)):
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
The authorities of the Member State commit to suspend the award and/or payment of the notified aid if the beneficiary still has at its disposal earlier unlawful aid that was declared incompatible by a Commission Decision (either as individual aid or aid under an aid scheme being declared incompatible), until that beneficiary has reimbursed or paid into a blocked account the total amount of unlawful and incompatible aid and the corresponding recovery interest.
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Please provide the reference to the national legal basis concerning this point:
…
The authorities of the Member State commit to suspend the award and/or payment of any aid under the notified aid scheme to any undertaking that has benefited from earlier unlawful aid declared incompatible by a Commission Decision (either as an individual aid or an aid under an aid scheme being declared incompatible), until that undertaking has reimbursed or paid into a blocked account the total amount of unlawful and incompatible aid and the corresponding recovery interest.
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Please provide the reference to the national legal basis concerning this point:
…
National legal basis:…
…
Implementing provisions (where applicable):
…
…
References (where applicable):
…
a copy of the relevant extracts of the final text(s) of the legal basis (together with a web address which provides direct access to it, if available)
a copy of the relevant extracts of the draft text(s) of the legal basis (together with a web address which provides direct access, if available)
Yes
No: has a provision been included to that effect in the draft text?
Yes
No: please explain why such a provision was not included in the text of the legal basis.
…
the date of the approval by the Commission
the date of the commitment of the national authorities to grant the aid, subject to the approval of the Commission
…
…
…
No
Yes: please attach the European Investment Bank application form to the notification form
No
Yes: Does the scheme amend an existing aid scheme?
No
Yes: Are the conditions laid down for the simplified notification procedure pursuant to Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 fulfilled?
Yes: Please use and complete the Simplified Notification Form (see Annex II).
No: Continue with this form, and specify whether the original scheme which is being amended was notified to the Commission
Yes: please specify:
Aid number(7):…
Date of Commission approval (reference of the letter of the Commission) if relevant or exemption number: …/…/…;
…
Duration of the original scheme:…
Please specify which conditions are being amended in relation to the original scheme and why:…
No: please specify when the scheme was implemented:
…
No
Yes: please indicate whether:
the aid is based on an approved/block-exempted scheme which should be individually notified. Please provide the reference to the approved scheme or to the exempted scheme:
Title:…
Aid number(7):…
Letter of Commission approval (where applicable):…
individual aid is not based on a scheme
No
Yes: if yes, the system of financing should be notified as well.
Indicate the planned last date until which individual aid may be granted under the scheme. If the duration exceeds 6 years please indicate why a longer period is indispensable to achieve the objectives of the aid scheme.
…
Indicate the planned date when the aid will be granted(9):…
If the aid will be paid out in instalments, indicate the planned date(s) of each instalment…
a A secondary objective is one for which, in addition to the primary objective, the aid will be exclusively earmarked. For example, a scheme for which the primary objective is research and development may have as a secondary objective small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) if the aid is earmarked exclusively for SMEs. The secondary objective may also be sectorial, in the case for example of a research and development scheme in the steel sector. | ||
Primary objective (please tick only one) | Secondary objective a | |
---|---|---|
Agriculture; Forestry; Rural areas | ☐ | ☐ |
Broadband infrastructures | ☐ | ☐ |
Closure aid | ☐ | ☐ |
Compensation of damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences | ☐ | ☐ |
Culture | ☐ | ☐ |
Aid or disadvantaged workers and/or workers with disabilities | ☐ | ☐ |
Energy infrastructures | ☐ | ☐ |
Energy efficiency | ☐ | ☐ |
Environmental protection | ☐ | ☐ |
Execution of an important project of common European interest | ☐ | ☐ |
Fisheries and aquaculture | ☐ | ☐ |
Heritage conservation | ☐ | ☐ |
Promotion of export and internationalisation | ☐ | ☐ |
Regional development (including territorial cooperation) | ☐ | ☐ |
Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy | ☐ | ☐ |
Renewable energy | ☐ | ☐ |
Rescuing undertakings in difficulty | ☐ | ☐ |
Research, development and innovation | ☐ | ☐ |
Restructuring undertakings in difficulty | ☐ | ☐ |
Risk finance | ☐ | ☐ |
Sectorial development | ☐ | ☐ |
Services of general economic interest (SGEI) | ☐ | ☐ |
SMEs | ☐ | ☐ |
Social support to individual consumers | ☐ | ☐ |
Sport and multifunctional recreational infrastructures | ☐ | ☐ |
Training | ☐ | ☐ |
Airport infrastructure or equipment | ☐ | ☐ |
Airport operation | ☐ | ☐ |
Start-up aid to airlines for the development of new routes | ☐ | ☐ |
Coordination of transport | ☐ | ☐ |
…
…
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Please indicate whether activities which started before the submission of an application for aid are eligible.
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If they are eligible, please explain how the incentive effect requirement is complied with.
…
…
…
…
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
…
…
Specify the form of the aid and the aid amount(14) made available to the beneficiary(ies) (where appropriate, for each measure):
a For information on aid amounts or budget at any chapter of this form and supplementary forms, give the full amount in national currency. | ||
Aid instrument | Aid amount or budget allocationa | |
---|---|---|
Overall | Annual | |
☐ Grants (or similar in effect)(a) ☐ Direct grant (b) ☐ Interest rate subsidy (c) ☐ Debt write-off | ||
☐ Loans (or similar in effect)(a) ☐ Soft loan (including details of how the loan is secured and its duration) (b) ☐ Repayable advances (c) ☐ Tax deferral | ||
☐ GuaranteeWhere appropriate, provide a reference to the Commission decision approving the methodology to calculate the gross grant equivalent and information on the loan or other financial transaction covered by the guarantee, the security required and the premium to be paid, the duration, etc. … | ||
☐Any form of equity or quasi-equity intervention… | ||
☐ Tax advantage or tax exemption(a) ☐ Tax allowance (b) ☐ Tax base reduction (c) ☐ Tax rate reduction (d) ☐ Reduction of social security contributions (e) ☐ Other (please specify)… | ||
☐ Other (please specify)…… Please indicate the instruments to which it would broadly match as regards its effect …… |
For guarantees, please indicate the maximum amount of loans guaranteed:…
For loans, please indicate the maximum (nominal) amount of the loan granted:…
For each aid instrument chosen from the list in point 7.1, please describe the conditions of application of the aid (such as the tax treatment, whether the aid is awarded automatically based on certain objective criteria or whether there is an element of discretion by the awarding authorities):
…
…
General budget of the State/region/local
Through parafiscal charges or taxes affected to a beneficiary. Please provide full details of the charges and the products/activities on which they are levied (specify in particular whether products imported from other Member States are liable to the charges). If applicable, please annex a copy of the legal basis of the financing.
…
…
Accumulated reserves
Public enterprises
Structural fund co-financing
Other (please specify)
…
…
Yes
No. Please specify what period it covers:…
Overall budget…
Annual budget(15)…
Can the aid be cumulated with aid or de minimis aid(16) received from other local, regional or national aid(17) to cover the same eligible costs?
…
…
Please explain the mechanisms put in place in order to insure that the cumulation rules are respected:
…
…
If the scheme is not considered for evaluation, please explain why you consider the criteria for evaluation not to be fulfilled.
…
According to which criteria is the scheme considered for ex post evaluation:
A scheme with large aid budget;
A scheme containing novel characteristics;
A scheme where significant market, technology or regulatory changes can be foreseen;
A scheme that you plan for evaluation even if the other criteria referred to in this point do not apply.
If any of the criteria referred to in this point are fulfilled, please indicate the period of evaluation and complete the supplementary information sheet for the notification of an evaluation plan in Annex 1, Part III.8(19).
…
…
In order to enable the Commission to monitor the aid scheme and individual aid, the notifying Member State undertakes to:
Annually submit to the Commission the reports provided for by Article 26 of Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589(20).
Maintain for at least 10 years from the date of award of the aid (individual aid and aid granted under the scheme) detailed records containing the information and supporting documentation necessary to establish that all compatibility conditions are met, and provide them, on a written request, to the Commission within a period of 20 working days or such longer period as may be fixed in the request.
For fiscal aid schemes:
In case of schemes under which fiscal aid is granted automatically based on tax declarations of the beneficiaries, and where there is no ex ante control that all compatibility conditions are met for each beneficiary, the Member State undertakes to put in place an appropriate control mechanism, by which it regularly verifies (for example once per fiscal year), at least ex post and on a sample basis, that all compatibility conditions are met, and to impose sanctions in case of fraud. In order to enable the Commission to monitor fiscal aid schemes, the notifying Member State undertakes to maintain detailed records of the controls for at least 10 years from the date of the controls, and provide them, on a written request, to the Commission within a period of 20 working days or such longer period as may be fixed in the request.
Does the notification contain confidential information(21) which should not be disclosed to third parties?
…
Where applicable, please indicate any other information relevant for the assessment of the aid.
…
…
Please list all documents which are attached to the notification and provide paper copies or internet addresses which allow access to the documents concerned.
…
…
I certify that to the best of my knowledge the information provided on this form, annexes and attachments is accurate and complete.
Date and place of signature…
Signature:…
Name and position of person signing…
Supplementary information sheets on regional aid
investment aid
operating aid
individual aid
Supplementary information sheet on research, development and innovation aid
Supplementary information sheets on aid for restructuring and rescuing undertakings in difficulty
rescue aid
restructuring aid
aid schemes
Supplementary information sheet on audiovisual production aid
Supplementary information sheet on aid for broadband aid
Supplementary information sheet on environment and energy aid
Supplementary information sheet on risk finance aid
Supplementary information sheet on aid to the transport sector:
investment aid to airports
operating aid to airports
start-up aid to airlines
aid of a social character under Article 107(2)(a) TFEU
aid for maritime transport
Supplementary information sheet for the notification of an evaluation plan
Supplementary information sheets on aid in the agriculture and forestry sectors and in rural areas
Supplementary information sheet on aid to the fishery and aquaculture sector
Short term export credit(22)
Emissions Trading Systems(23)
Banking Communication(24)
Communication on important projects of common European interest(25)
Services of General Economic Interest (Article 106(2) TFEU)(26)
Article 93 TFEU
Article 107(2)(a) TFEU
Article 107(2)(b) TFEU
Article 107(3)(a) TFEU
Article 107(3)(b) TFEU
Article 107(3)(c) TFEU
Article 107(3)(d) TFEU
Other(s), please specify
…
Please provide a justification for the compatibility of the aid falling in the categories selected in this point:
…
…
For practical reasons, it is recommended to number the documents provided as annexes and to refer to those document numbers in the relevant sections of the supplementary information sheets.’
Parts III.1, III.2, III.3, III.4, III.5, III.6, III.7, III.8, III.9, III.10 and III.11 are replaced by the following:
This supplementary information sheet must be used for the notification of any individual investment aid covered by the Guidelines on regional State aid 2014-2020 (27) (the “RAG”). Where several beneficiaries are involved in an individual aid measure, the relevant information must be provided for each of them.
The notification relates to individual aid granted under a scheme and the aid from all sources exceeds the notification threshold. Please provide State aid references of the approved or block-exempted aid schemes concerned.
The notification relates to individual aid granted outside a scheme (ad hoc aid).
The notification relates to aid granted to a beneficiary that has closed down the same or similar activity(28) in the EEA two years preceding the date of applying for aid or at the moment when submitting the aid application the beneficiary has the intention of closing down such an activity within a period of two years after the investment to be subsidised is completed.
The notification relates to an investment by a large undertaking to diversify an existing establishment in a “c” area into new products and/or new process innovation.
Other. Please explain:
…
…
…
aid is granted only to areas where there is no network of the same category (either basic broadband or next generation access networks) and where none is likely to be developed in the near future
the subsidised network operator offers active and passive wholesale access under fair and non-discriminatory conditions with the possibility of effective and full unbundling
aid was or will be allocated on the basis of a competitive selection process in accordance with paragraphs 78(c) and (d) of the EU Guidelines for the application of State aid rules in relation to the rapid deployment of broadband networks(30).
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
Date of application for the aid: | |
(Planned) date of start of works on the investment project: | |
Planned date of the start of production: | |
Planned date on which the full production capacity is reached: | |
Planned end date of the investment project: |
the setting-up of a new establishment
the extension of the capacity of an existing establishment
the diversification of the output of an establishment into products not previously produced in the establishment
a fundamental change in the overall production process of an existing establishment
an acquisition of assets directly linked to an establishment provided the establishment has closed down or would have closed down had it not been purchased, and is bought by an investor unrelated to the seller(33).
the setting-up of a new establishment
the diversification of the activity of an establishment, under the condition that the new activity is not the same or a similar activity(34) to the activity previously performed in the establishment
diversification of an existing establishment into new products
new process innovation at an existing establishment
the acquisition of the assets belonging to an establishment that has closed or would have closed had it not been purchased, and is bought by an investor unrelated to the seller, under the condition that the new activity to be performed using the acquired assets is not the same or a similar activity to the activity performed in the establishment prior to the acquisition.
…
…
a In national currency (see also point 2.5 below) | ||
b In the transport sector, expenditure on the purchase of transport equipment cannot be included in the uniform set of items of expenditure. Such expenditure is not eligible for initial investment. | ||
Total eligible cost (nominal)a | Total eligible cost (discounted)a | |
---|---|---|
Preparatory studies or consultancy costs linked to the investment (SMEs only) | ||
Land | ||
Buildings | ||
Plant/machinery/equipmentb | ||
Intangible assets | ||
Total eligible cost |
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
…
for land and buildings, the lease must continue for at least five years after the expected date of completion of the investment for large companies, and three years for SMEs;
…
for plant or machinery, the lease must take the form of financial leasing and must contain an obligation for the beneficiary of the aid to purchase the asset at the expiry of the term of the lease.
…
If relevant in the notified case, please explain how those conditions have been complied with, providing relevant supporting documentation.
…
…
Please:
explain how eligible costs calculated on the basis of wage costs have been established (paragraph 103 RAG);
explain how the number of jobs created has been calculated with reference to paragraph 20(k) RAG;
explain how the wage costs of the persons hired have been established with reference to paragraph 20(z) RAG; and
provide the relevant calculations and documentation supporting the figures.
…
a In national currency | |||||||
b In the transport sector, expenditure on the purchase of transport equipment cannot be included in the uniform set of items of expenditure. Such expenditure is not eligible for initial investment. | |||||||
Nominal/discounted | N-0a | N+1a | N+2a | N+3a | N+Xa | Totala | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Preparatory studies etc. (SMEs only) | Nominal | ||||||
Discounted | |||||||
Land | Nominal | ||||||
Discounted | |||||||
Buildings | Nominal | ||||||
Discounted | |||||||
Plant/machinery/equipmentb | Nominal | ||||||
Discounted | |||||||
Intangible assets | Nominal | ||||||
Discounted | |||||||
Wage costs | Nominal | ||||||
Discounted | |||||||
Other (please specify) | Nominal | ||||||
Discounted | |||||||
Total | Nominal | ||||||
Discounted |
Please indicate the date to which the amounts were discounted, as well as the discount rate used(37):
…
Please indicate the date to which the amounts were discounted, as well as the discount rate used:
…
For each form of aid mentioned in the table in point 2.5.2 please indicate how the grant equivalent is calculated:
Soft loan:
…
Guarantee:
…
Tax reduction:
…
Other:
…
…
…
…
…
…
indicate the exact location of the aided project (that is to say the locality and the NUTS 2 or 3 region to which the locality belongs);
provide details on its regional aid status in the current regional aid map (that is to say is it in an area eligible for regional aid under Article 107(3)(a) or (c) TFEU?); and
provide the maximum aid intensity applicable to large enterprises.
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If no, please explain why an EIA is not required for this project.
…
…
…
…
…
the calculation of the investment's Internal Rate of Return (“IRR”) with and without the aid(43):
…
information on the relevant benchmarks for the company (e.g. normal rates of return required by the beneficiary to undertake similar projects, cost of capital of the company as a whole, relevant industry benchmarks):
…
an explanation of why, on the basis of the criteria in this point, the aid is the minimum necessary to render the project sufficiently profitable (cf. paragraph 79 RAG):
…
the calculation of the difference of the Net Present Value (“NPV”) of the investment in the target area and the NPV of the investment in the alternative location(44):
…
all the parameters used for the calculation of the NPV of the investment in the target area and the NPV of the investment in the alternative location (among others the time frame concerned, discount rate used, etc.):
…
an explanation of why on the basis of the information referred to in the first two sub-points the aid does not exceed the difference between the NPV of investment in the target area and the NPV in the alternative location (cf. paragraph 80 RAG):
…
What is the standard concerned?
Why is the investment necessary to achieve the standard?
Why it would not be sufficiently profitable for the beneficiary to make the investment in the area concerned which would lead to the closure of an existing establishment in the area in the absence of the aid (paragraph 63 RAG)?
…
Specify all the product(s) that will be produced in the aided facility upon the completion of the investment and indicate, where appropriate, the NACE code or Prodcom code or CPA nomenclature(45) for projects in the service sectors.
…
Will the products envisaged by the project replace any other products produced by the beneficiary (at group level)? What product(s) will it replace? If these replaced products are not produced at the location of the project, indicate where they are currently produced. Please provide a description of the link between the replaced production and the current investment and provide a time schedule for the replacement.
…
What other product(s) can be produced with the same new facilities (through flexibility of the production installations of the beneficiary) at little or no additional cost?
…
Explain whether the project concerns an intermediate product and whether a significant part of the output is sold otherwise than on the market (under market conditions). Based on that explanation, for the purpose of calculating the market share and capacity increase in the remainder of this section, please indicate whether the product concerned is the product envisaged by the project or whether it is a downstream product.
…
Please indicate the relevant product market(s) of the product(s) concerned and, if possible, provide evidence in support, from an independent third party. A relevant product market includes the product concerned and its demand-side substitutes, that is to say products considered to be such by the consumer (by reason of the product's characteristics, prices and intended use) and its supply-side substitutes, that is to say products considered as such by producers (through flexibility of the production installations of the beneficiary and its competitors).
…
…
an estimate of all sales (in value and volume terms) of the beneficiary in the relevant market (at group level).
…
an estimate of the overall sales of all producers in the relevant market (in value and volume terms). If available, include statistics prepared by public and/or independent sources.
…
…
…
From a long-term perspective, is the relevant market structurally in absolute decline (that is to say, showing a negative growth rate)? (paragraph 135 RAG)?
…
Is the relevant market in relative decline (that is to say, showing a positive growth rate, but not exceeding a benchmark growth rate)? (paragraph 135 RAG)
…
In Scenario 2 cases, please indicate whether without aid the investment would have been located in a region with a regional aid intensity which is higher or the same as the target region (paragraph 139 RAG). Please provide supporting evidence.
…
If such a statement was provided, please annex a copy of it to the notification, otherwise, please explain why it was not provided.
…
…
…
Please provide any other relevant information to assess the notified aid measure under the RAG:
…
This supplementary information sheet must be used for the notification of any investment aid schemes covered by the Guidelines on regional State aid 2014-2020 (47) (the “RAG”).
The notification relates to a sectoral scheme. In that case please indicate the sector covered by the scheme (NACE code):
The notification relates to a general scheme also covering the shipbuilding sector.
Other. Please specify:
…
Please provide the reference to the relevant provision of the legal basis:
…
a As defined in the Communication from the Commission on Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty (OJ C 249, 31.7.2014, p. 1). | |
b As defined in Annex IV to Guidelines on regional State aid for 2014–2020. | |
c The Regional Aid Guidelines apply to aid schemes supporting activities outside the scope of Article 42 TFEU but covered by Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 487) and which are either co-financed by the European Agriculture Fund for Rural Development or are granted as additional national financing to such co-financed schemes, unless sectoral rules provide otherwise. | |
d As defined in footnote 12 of the Regional Aid Guidelines. | |
Excluded categories of companies and sectors | Relevant provision in the legal basis of the scheme |
---|---|
Undertakings in difficultya | |
The steel sectorb | |
Synthetic fibres sectorb | |
Production of agricultural products listed in Annex I to the TFEU | |
Processing and/or marketing of agricultural products listed in Annex I to the TFEUc into products listed in that Annex I | |
Production, processing and/or marketing of fishery and aquaculture products listed in Annex I to the TFEU | |
The transport sectord | |
The energy sector |
aid is granted only to areas where there is no network of the same category (either basic broadband or new generation access networks) and where none is likely to be developed in the near future;
the subsidised network operator offers active and passive wholesale access under fair and non-discriminatory conditions with the possibility of effective and full unbundling;
aid should be allocated on the basis of a competitive selection process in accordance with paragraphs 78(c) and (d) of the Broadband guidelines(51);
Please provide the reference to the relevant provision of the legal basis:
…
No
Yes. Please provide the reference to the relevant provision of the legal basis:
…
the setting-up of a new establishment?
the extension of the capacity of an existing establishment
the diversification of the output of an establishment into products not previously produced in the establishment
a fundamental change in the overall production process of an existing establishment
an acquisition of assets directly linked to an establishment provided the establishment has closed or would have closed if it had not been purchased, and is bought by an investor unrelated to the seller(53)
the setting-up of a new establishment
the diversification of the activity of an establishment, under the condition that the new activity is not the same or a similar activity(54) to the activity previously performed in the establishment
diversification of an existing establishment into new products
new process innovation at an existing establishment
the acquisition of the assets belonging to an establishment that has closed or would have closed if it had not been purchased, and is bought by an investor unrelated to the seller, under the condition that the new activity to be performed using the acquired assets is not the same or a similar activity to the activity performed in the establishment prior to the acquisition
diversification of an existing establishment into new products;
new process innovation at an existing establishment.
…
…
land
buildings
plant/machinery/equipment?
Please provide the reference to the relevant parts of the legal basis:
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
for land and buildings, the lease must continue for at least five years after the expected date of completion of the investment for large companies, and three years for SMEs;
…
for plant or machinery, the lease must take the form of financial leasing and must contain an obligation for the beneficiary of the aid to purchase the asset at the expiry of the term of the lease.
…
If relevant for the notified scheme, please provide a reference to the provisions of the legal basis which stipulate that the conditions in this point should be respected.
…
patent rights
licences
know-how
unpatented technical knowledge
Please provide the reference to the relevant parts of the legal basis:
…
…
…
Please provide a reference to the relevant provisions of the legal basis where it is stipulated how the eligible costs calculated on the basis of wage costs should be established (paragraph 103 RAG), how the number of jobs created should be calculated with reference to paragraph 20(k) RAG and how the wage costs of the persons hired should be established with reference to paragraph 20(z) RAG.
…
grants. Please provide the reference to the relevant provisions of the legal basis:
…
soft loans. Please indicate how the grant equivalent will be calculated and provide the reference to the relevant provisions of the legal basis:
…
guarantees. Please indicate how the grant equivalent will be calculated and provide the reference to the relevant provisions of the legal basis:
…
tax measures. Please specify which type of measures and indicate how the grant equivalent will be calculated. Please also provide the reference to the relevant provisions of the legal basis:
…
other. Please specify and indicate how the grant equivalent will be calculated. Please also provide the reference to the relevant provisions of the legal basis:
…
…
…
…
…
…
Is the scheme part of an Operational Programme(59) (paragraph 32 RAG)?
Yes. Please provide the reference(s) to the Operational Programme(s) concerned:
…
No. Please explain how the scheme is consistent and contributes to the development strategy of the area concerned (paragraph 33 RAG):
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
automatically, should the conditions of the scheme be fulfilled or
on a discretionary basis, following a decision of the authorities?
Please provide the reference to the relevant provision of the legal basis:
…
If aid is to be granted on a discretionary basis, please provide a short description of the criteria used and attach a copy of the internal administrative provisions of the granting authority applicable for the awarding of aid:
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
Please provide any other information that is of relevance to assess the notified aid measure under the RAG:
…
This supplementary information sheet must be used for the notification of any operating aid schemes covered by the Guidelines on regional State aid 2014-2020 (66) (the “RAG”).
Please specify what kind of operating aid will be granted:
Operating aid to reduce certain specific difficulties faced by SMEs in “a” areas
Operating aid to compensate additional costs in the outermost regions
Operating aid to reduce depopulation in very sparsely populated areas
Other. Please specify:
…
…
Does the notified aid scheme provide that no operating aid will be granted to the following categories of companies and sectors? In each case, please list the relevant provision in the legal basis of the scheme.
a As defined in the Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty (OJ C 249, 31.7.2014, p. 1). | ||
b As defined in Annex IV to Guidelines on regional State aid for 2014–2020. | ||
c The Regional Aid Guidelines apply to aid schemes supporting activities outside the scope of Article 42 TFEU but covered by the Rural Development Regulation (Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 487)) and which are either co-financed by the European Agriculture Fund for Rural Development or are being granted as additional national financing to such co-financed schemes, unless sectoral rules provide for otherwise. | ||
Excluded categories of companies and sectors | Undertakings in difficultya | Relevant provision in the legal basis of the scheme |
---|---|---|
The steel sectorb | ☐ Yes | |
Synthetic fibres sectorb | ☐ Yes | |
Production of agricultural products listed in Annex I to the TFEU | ☐ Yes | |
Processing and/or marketing of agricultural products listed in Annex I to the TFEUc into products listed in that Annex I | ☐ Yes | |
Production, processing and/or marketing of fishery and aquaculture products listed in Annex I to the TFEU | ☐ Yes | |
The transport sector | ☐ Yes | |
The energy sector | ☐ Yes | |
Section K “Financial and insurance activities” of the NACE Rev.2 statistical classification of economic activities | ☐ Yes | |
NACE 70.10 “Activities of head offices” and NACE 70.22 “Business and other management consultancy activities” | ☐ Yes |
…
Grants. Please provide the reference to the relevant provisions of the legal basis:
…
Soft loans. Please indicate how the grant equivalent will be calculated and provide the reference to the relevant provisions of the legal basis:
…
Guarantees. Please indicate how the grant equivalent will be calculated and provide the reference to the relevant provisions of the legal basis:
…
Tax measures. Please specify which ones and indicate how the grant equivalent will be calculated. Please also provide the reference to the relevant provisions of the legal basis:
…
Other. Please specify and indicate how the grant equivalent will be calculated. Please also provide the reference to the relevant provisions of the legal basis:
…
automatically, should the conditions of the scheme be fulfilled
on a discretionary basis, following a decision of the authorities.
Should the aid be granted on a case by case basis, please provide a short description of the criteria that will be applied. If administrative guidance for the assessment of the aid application exists, please attach a copy:
…
…
…
…
…
…
Please indicate why the aid proposed is considered appropriate to achieve the objective of the scheme. Please explain in particular why other less distortive policy instruments and other less distortive types of aid instrument are not appropriate to achieve the same positive contribution to regional development (paragraphs 50, 56, 57 and 58 RAG):
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
Please explain why it is unlikely that the aid granted under the scheme will create very significant distortions of competition in the market (paragraph 140 RAG):
…
Please provide any other information that is of relevance to assess the notified aid measure under the RAG:
…
This supplementary information sheet must be used for the notification of any aid measures (aid schemes and individual aid) covered by the Framework for state aid for research and development and innovation (“the R & D&I Framework”) (69).
In case there are several beneficiaries involved in an individual aid measure, the relevant information must be provided for each of them.
Reasons for notifying the scheme:
the scheme includes aid that is not transparent in the sense of Article 5 of the General Block Exemption Regulation (“GBER”)(70);
other reasons.
Please specify:
…
…
Sectoral scope of the notified scheme:
…
…
Please tick the box below to confirm that any aid awarded under the notified scheme will be notified individually if it exceeds the thresholds laid down in Article 4 of the GBER:
☐
In case the aid is based on an approved scheme, please provide information concerning that scheme, including its publication reference (internet address) and state aid registration number:
…
…
If applicable, please provide the exchange rate which has been used for the purposes of the notification:
…
…
Please specify the type of aid:
aid for R & D projects;
aid for feasibility studies;
aid for the construction and upgrade of research infrastructures;
innovation aid for SMEs;
aid for process and organisational innovation;
aid for innovation clusters.
Does the notified measure involve Union funding centrally managed by the institutions, agencies, joint undertakings or other bodies of the Union that is not directly or indirectly under the control of Member States?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please specify:
…
…
Does the notified measure involve undertakings in difficulty, as defined by the Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty(71)?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please specify:
…
…
Does the notified measure involve undertakings that are subject to an outstanding recovery order following a previous decision declaring aid illegal and incompatible with the internal market?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please specify and indicate the amounts still to be recovered:
…
…
Does the notified measure involve research and knowledge dissemination organisations (“research organisations”) or research infrastructures, as defined in points 15(ee) and (ff) of the R & D&I Framework?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please specify:
…
…
Does the notified measure involve public procurement of research and development services?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please specify:
…
…
Can the aid awarded under the notified measure be combined with other aid?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please specify:
…
…
If applicable, please tick the box below to confirm that the beneficiaries comply with the SME definition as laid down in Annex I to the GBER and, for individual aid, provide relevant information and evidence:
☐
…
…
Do research organisations or research infrastructures concerned by the notified aid measure carry out any economic activity consisting of offering goods or services on a given market?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Please provide details:
…
…
If the same entity carries out activities of both an economic and a non-economic nature, can the two kinds of activities and their costs, funding and revenues be clearly separated?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please specify:
…
…
If the same entity carries out activities of both an economic and a non-economic nature, is the amount of public funding allocated to it for a specific accounting period limited to the costs of non-economic activities incurred in the same period?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please specify:
…
…
If the same entity carries out activities of both an economic and a non-economic nature, does the economic use remain purely ancillary, that is to say does it correspond to an activity which is directly related to and necessary for the operation of the research organisation or research infrastructure or intrinsically linked to its main non-economic use, and which is limited in scope?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please specify and indicate the proportion of the overall capacity that is used or estimated to be used for such economic activities each year:
…
…
If public funding is provided for non-ancillary economic activities of research organisations or research infrastructures, can it be shown that both the public funding and any advantage acquired through it are fully passed on to the final recipients, for example through reduced prices, and that no further advantage is awarded to the intermediary?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please specify:
…
…
Do research organisations or research infrastructures concerned by the notified aid measure perform contract research or provide research services to undertakings?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please specify:
…
…
If research organisations or research infrastructures perform contract research or provide research services to undertakings, do they provide such services at market price?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please specify:
…
…
If research organisations or research infrastructures perform contract research or provide research services to undertakings and there is no market price, do they provide such services at a price which reflects the full costs of the services and generally includes a margin established by reference to those commonly applied by undertakings active in the sector concerned, or is the result of arm's length negotiations where research organisations or research infrastructures negotiate in order to obtain the maximum economic benefit at the moment when the contract is concluded and cover at least their marginal costs?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please specify:
…
…
Do research organisations or research infrastructures concerned by the notified aid measure effectively collaborate with undertakings with a view to jointly carrying out specific projects?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please specify:
…
…
If research organisations or research infrastructures effectively collaborate with undertakings, please indicate whether any of the following conditions are fulfilled:
the participating undertakings bear the full cost of the projects
☐ yes | ☐ no |
the results of the collaboration which do not give rise to intellectual property rights (IPR) may be widely disseminated and any IPR resulting from the activities of research organisations or research infrastructures are fully allocated to them
☐ yes | ☐ no |
any IPR resulting from the project, as well as related access rights are allocated to the different collaboration partners in a manner which adequately reflects their work packages, contributions and respective interests
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer to any of the above questions is yes, please provide details:
…
…
If research organisations or research infrastructures effectively collaborate with undertakings and none of the answers to question (B) is yes, please indicate whether any of the following conditions are fulfilled:
the research organisations or research infrastructures receive a compensation the amount of which has been established by means of an open, transparent and non-discriminatory competitive sale procedure:
☐ yes | ☐ no |
the research organisations or research infrastructures receive a compensation the amount of which is confirmed to be at least equal to the market price by an independent expert valuation:
☐ yes | ☐ no |
the research organisations or research infrastructures can demonstrate that they effectively negotiated the compensation, at arm's length, in order to obtain the maximum economic benefit at the moment when the contract is concluded:
☐ yes | ☐ no |
in cases where the collaboration agreement provides the collaborating undertakings with a right of first refusal as regards IPR generated by research organisations or research infrastructures, the latter exercise a reciprocal right to solicit more economically advantageous offers from third parties so that the collaborating undertakings will have to match their offer accordingly:
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer to any of the questions in this section is yes, please provide details:
…
…
If the notified measure involves public procurement of research and development services from undertakings, are the providers selected by means of an open tender procedure carried out in accordance with the applicable directives(72)?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If yes, please specify:
…
…
In all other cases where the notified measure involves public procurement of research and development services from undertakings, including pre-commercial procurement, please indicate whether the following conditions are fulfilled:
the selection procedure is open, transparent and non-discriminatory, and based on objective selection and award criteria specified in advance of the bidding procedure
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If no, please provide details indicating whether a competitive, transparent and non-discriminatory procedure in line with the applicable directives was followed (for instance, competitive procedure with negotiations, innovation partnership, or competitive dialogue):
…
the envisaged contractual arrangements describing all rights and obligations of the parties, including with regard to IPR, are made available to all interested bidders prior to the bidding procedure:
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Please provide details:
…
…
the procurement does not give any of the participant providers any preferential treatment in the supply of commercial volumes of the final products or services to a public purchaser in the Member State concerned(73), and one of the following conditions is met:
all results which do not give rise to IPR may be widely disseminated in a way that allows other undertakings to reproduce them, and any IPR are fully allocated to the public purchaser
any service provider to which results giving rise to IPR are allocated is required to grant the public purchaser unlimited access to those results free of charge, and to grant access to third parties under market conditions.
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Please provide details:
…
…
Please indicate which R & D stages are supported under the notified measure:
fundamental research;
industrial research;
experimental development.
For individual aid, if the project encompasses different research categories, please list and qualify the different tasks as falling under the categories of fundamental research, industrial research or experimental development:
…
…
Please specify the eligible costs and, for individual aid, indicate their amount:
Fundamental research | Industrial research | Experimental development | |
---|---|---|---|
Personnel costs | |||
Costs of instruments and equipment | |||
Costs of buildings and land | |||
Cost of contractual research, knowledge and patents bought or licensed from outside sources in arm's length transactions | |||
Additional overheads incurred directly as a result of the project | |||
Other operating expenses |
Please specify the applicable maximum aid intensities:
Small enterprise | Medium-sized enterprise | Large enterprise | |
---|---|---|---|
Fundamental research | |||
Industrial research | |||
| |||
Experimental development | |||
|
Please specify the eligible costs and, for individual aid, indicate their amount:
…
…
Please specify the applicable maximum aid intensities, including any increases for SMEs (“SME bonuses”):
…
…
Please specify the eligible costs and, for individual aid, indicate their amount:
…
…
Please specify the applicable maximum aid intensity:
…
…
If the research infrastructures pursue both economic and non-economic activities, please tick the box below to confirm that the financing costs and revenues of each type of activity are accounted for separately on the basis of consistently applied and objectively justifiable cost accounting principles:
☐
For individual aid, please provide relevant information and evidence:
…
…
If the research infrastructures receive public funding for both economic and non-economic activities, please tick the box below to confirm that a monitoring and claw-back mechanism is in place in order to ensure that the applicable maximum aid intensity is not exceeded:
☐
Please provide relevant information and evidence:
…
…
Does the price charged for the operation or use of the research infrastructures correspond to a market price?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Please specify:
…
…
Is access to the research infrastructures open to several users on a transparent and non-discriminatory basis?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
In case preferential access is granted to some undertakings, please provide details and indicate the share of the investment costs borne by those undertakings:
…
…
Please indicate which activities are supported under the notified measure:
obtaining, validating and defending patents and other intangible assets;
secondment of highly qualified personnel;
acquiring innovation advisory and support services.
Please specify the eligible costs and, for individual aid, indicate their amount:
…
…
Please specify the applicable maximum aid intensities:
…
…
Please indicate which activities are supported under the notified measure:
process innovation;
organisational innovation.
Please specify the eligible costs and, for individual aid, indicate their amount:
Personnel costs | |
Costs of instruments and equipment (to the extent and for the period used for the project) | |
Costs of buildings and land (to the extent and for the period used for the project) | |
Cost of contractual research, knowledge and patents bought or licensed from outside sources in arm's length transactions | |
Additional overheads and other operating costs incurred directly as a result of the research project |
Please specify the applicable maximum aid intensities:
…
…
Where aid is awarded to large enterprises, please tick the box below to confirm that they effectively collaborate with SMEs in the aided activity and the collaborating SMEs incur at least 30 % of the total eligible costs:
☐
For individual aid, please provide relevant information and evidence:
…
…
Please tick the box below to confirm that the aid is awarded exclusively to the legal entity operating the innovation cluster:
☐
For individual aid, please provide details:
…
…
Do the fees charged for using the clusters' facilities and participating in the clusters' activities correspond to the market price or reflect their costs?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Please specify:
…
…
Is access to the clusters' premises, facilities and activities open to several users on a transparent and non-discriminatory basis?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
In case preferential access is granted to some undertakings, please provide details and indicate the share of the investment costs borne by those undertakings:
…
…
For individual aid, please provide information on the planned or expected specialisation of the innovation cluster, existing regional potential and presence of clusters in the Union with similar purposes:
…
…
Please specify the eligible costs and, for individual aid, indicate their amount:
…
…
Please specify the applicable maximum aid intensities, including any increases (“bonuses”) for clusters located in assisted regions fulfilling the conditions of Articles 107(3)(a) or 107(3)(c) TFEU:
…
…
Please indicate which activities are supported under the notified measure:
animation of the cluster;
marketing of the cluster;
management of the cluster's facilities;
organisation of training programmes, workshops and conferences.
Please specify the eligible costs and, for individual aid, indicate their amount:
…
…
Please specify the applicable maximum aid intensity and duration of the aid:
…
…
For individual aid, please provide a comprehensive description of the aided project or activity:
…
…
Please define precisely the objective pursued and explain how the notified measure intends to promote R & D&I activities in the Union:
…
…
In case of an aid scheme, is it part of a comprehensive programme or action plan to stimulate R & D&I activities or smart specialisation strategies?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Please specify, where relevant including reference to evaluations of similar past aid measures:
…
…
Will the project size be increased due to the notified measure?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please specify the type of increase and provide relevant evidence:
increase in the total project costs (without a decrease in spending by the aid beneficiary when compared to the situation without aid);
increase in the number of people assigned to R & D&I activities;
other type of increase.
…
…
Will the project scope be increased due to the notified measure?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please specify the type of increase and provide relevant evidence:
increase in the number of the expected deliverables of the project;
increase in the level of ambition of the project evidenced by a higher number of partners involved, a higher probability of a scientific or technological break-through or a higher risk of failure (notably linked to the long-term nature of the project and uncertainty about its results);
other type of increase.
…
…
Will the project speed be increased due to the notified measure?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please provide relevant evidence:
…
…
Will the total amount spent be increased due to the notified measure?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please specify the type of increase and provide relevant evidence:
increase in total R & D&I spending by the aid beneficiary, in absolute terms or as a proportion of turnover;
changes in the committed budget for the project (without a corresponding decrease in the budget allocated to other projects);
other type of increase.
…
…
Will the notified measure be subject to a publicly available ex post evaluation of its contribution to the common interest?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please specify:
…
…
Please identify the market failures hampering R & D&I activities in the present case and justifying the need for state aid and provide relevant evidence:
positive externalities/knowledge spillovers;
imperfect and asymmetric information;
coordination and network failures.
…
…
Please explain how the notified measure can effectively mitigate the market failures associated with reaching the objective of common interest without aid
…
…
Please explain whether the aid addresses a general market failure regarding R & D&I activities in the Union, or a specific market failure regarding, for example, a particular sector or line of business:
…
…
If available, please provide any sectoral comparisons and other studies that can substantiate the analysis of the alleged market failures:
…
…
If available, please provide any information regarding R & D&I projects or activities undertaken within the Union which, with respect to their technological content, level of risk and size, are similar to those concerned by the notified measure and explain why the aid is needed in the case concerned:
…
…
Please explain how the advantages of using a selective policy instrument such as state aid in order to increase R & D&I activities have been established, and provide any related impact assessment and supporting documents:
…
…
If aid is awarded in forms that provide a direct pecuniary advantage (such as direct grants, exemptions or reductions in taxes or other compulsory charges, or the supply of land, products or services at favourable prices), please provide an analysis of other options and explain why or how other forms of aid are less appropriate to address the identified market failures:
…
…
Please tick the box below to confirm that when awarding the aid under the notified measure, it will be ensured that work on the relevant R & D&I activities has not started before the aid application by the beneficiary to the national authorities(74) and, for individual aid, specify the relevant dates:
☐
…
…
Please tick the box below to confirm that the aid applications include at least the applicant's name and size of the undertaking, a description of the project, including its location and start and end dates, the amount of public support needed to carry it out, and a list of eligible costs:
☐
…
…
If the aid is awarded in the form of a fiscal measure, please provide details and, for non-incremental measures, any evaluation studies establishing its incentive effect:
…
…
Please provide a description, by means of counterfactual analysis, of the behaviour of the beneficiary in the absence of aid and specify the intended change:
…
…
Please specify the elements that are relevant for the notified measure and provide supporting evidence, such as board documents, risk assessments, financial reports, internal business plans, expert opinions and other studies related to the project under assessment:
level of profitability;
amount of investment and the timeframe of cash flows;
level of risk involved.
…
…
If available, please provide industry-specific data demonstrating that the beneficiary's counterfactual scenario, its required level of profitability and its expected cash-flows are reasonable:
…
…
If the aid is awarded in the form of a repayable advance expressed as gross grant equivalent, please provide details on the methodology applied in order to calculate such gross grant equivalent, including underlying verifiable data or, for individual aid, specify on the basis of which approved aid scheme the aid is awarded:
…
…
If the aid is awarded in the form of a repayable advance expressed as a percentage of the eligible costs and exceeds, by up to 10 percentage points, the maximum aid intensities laid down in the R & D&I Framework, please confirm that:
in the case of a successful outcome, the notified measure provides that the advance is to be repaid with an interest rate not less than the discount rate resulting from the application of the Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates(75);
in the case of a success exceeding the outcome defined as successful, the Member State concerned requests payments beyond repayment of the advance amount including interest according to the applicable discount rate;
in the case of failure or partial success, the repayment is proportional to the degree of success achieved.
Please provide details on the repayment of the advance and clearly define what is considered as a successful outcome of the aided activities, on the basis of a reasonable and prudent hypothesis:
…
…
If the aid is awarded in the form of a fiscal measure, please specify how the aid intensities are calculated and provide any relevant details:
on the basis of individual projects;
at the level of the undertaking, as the ratio between the overall tax relief and the sum of all eligible R & D&I costs incurred in a period not exceeding three consecutive fiscal years.
…
…
Please provide a comprehensive business plan for the aided project (with and without aid), including all relevant expected costs and benefits:
…
…
If the aid beneficiary faces a clear choice between carrying out either the aided project or an alternative one without aid, please provide also a comprehensive business plan for the counterfactual project:
…
…
In the absence of an alternative project, please explain why the aid is limited to the minimum necessary for the aided project to be sufficiently profitable, for example by making it possible to achieve an internal rate of return (“IRR”) corresponding to the sector or firm specific benchmark or hurdle rate:
…
…
If the aid beneficiary faces a clear choice between carrying out either the aided project or an alternative one without aid, please explain why the aid is limited to the minimum necessary to cover the net extra costs of the aided project compared to the counterfactual project, if relevant by taking account of the probabilities of different business scenarios occurring:
…
…
Please provide any supporting documents, such as internal company documents, showing that the counterfactual project is a clearly defined and sufficiently predictable alternative project that has been considered by the beneficiary in its internal decision making:
…
…
Please explain how the aid amount has been established and provide any supporting documents:
…
…
If there were multiple potential candidates for carrying out the aided activity, is the aid awarded on the basis of transparent, objective and non-discriminatory criteria?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Please provide details:
…
…
If the aid is meant to address actual or potential direct or indirect distortions of international trade, please provide any available evidence indicating that, directly or indirectly, competitors located outside the Union have received (normally in the last three years) or are going to receive aid of an equivalent intensity for similar projects:
…
…
If available, please provide also sufficient information to assess the need to take account of the competitive advantage enjoyed by a third country competitor:
…
…
Please indicate whether:
the award of aid is subject to the obligation for the beneficiary to have its central seat, or be predominantly established in the relevant Member State:
☐ yes | ☐ no |
the award of aid is subject to the obligation for the beneficiary to use national products or services:
☐ yes | ☐ no |
the aid measure restricts the possibility for the beneficiary to exploit the R & D&I results in other Member States:
☐ yes | ☐ no |
the aid measure imposes any other obligation on the beneficiary:
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer to any of the questions in this section is yes, please provide details:
…
…
For aid schemes, please indicate how it will be ensured that any negative effects will be limited to the minimum (taking account, for example, of the size of the projects concerned, the individual and cumulative aid amounts, the number of expected beneficiaries and the characteristics of the targeted sectors) and provide any impact assessment or ex-post evaluations carried out for similar predecessor schemes:
…
…
If applicable, please describe the likely impact of the aid on competition in the innovation process:
…
…
Please identify the product markets on which the aid is likely to have an impact and provide the current market share of the beneficiary in each of the markets concerned, as well as any changes in those market shares that would result from the aided activities:
…
…
For each of the product markets concerned, please identify the main competitors of the aid beneficiary and provide their market shares:
…
…
If available, please provide the associated Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (“HHI”):
…
…
For each of the product markets concerned, please provide information on the customers or consumers affected by the aided activities:
…
…
Please describe the structure and dynamics of the relevant markets with regard to the following aspects:
recent developments and future growth prospects:
…
…
amount spent by the main players on projects of a similar kind:
…
…
levels of entry and exit barriers:
…
…
existence of countervailing buyer power:
…
…
incentives to compete for future markets:
…
…
product differentiation and intensity of competition:
…
…
other features likely to affect competitors, customers or consumers:
…
…
Has the aid beneficiary any influence in the selection process, for example by having the right to recommend undertakings or influencing the research path?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please provide details:
…
…
Is the aid awarded in markets featuring overcapacity or in declining industries?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please provide details:
…
…
Has the beneficiary considered any alternative locations for the aided activities?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Please provide details:
…
…
Please provide any other information that would be of relevance to assess the notified aid measure under the R & D&I Framework:
…
…
This supplementary information sheet must be filled in for the notification of individual rescue aid covered by the Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty (76) (“Guidelines”).
Is the undertaking a limited liability company(77), where more than half of its subscribed share capital has disappeared as a result of accumulated losses(78)?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Is the undertaking a company where at least some members have unlimited liability for the debt of the company(79), and where more than half of its capital as shown in the company accounts has disappeared as a result of accumulated losses?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Is the undertaking subject to collective insolvency proceedings or does it fulfil the criteria under its domestic law for being placed in collective insolvency proceedings at the request of its creditors?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
In the case of an undertaking that is not an SME:
has the undertaking's book debt to equity ratio been greater than 7,5 for the past two years
and
has the undertaking's EBITDA interest coverage ratio been below 1,0 for the past two years?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If you have answered yes to any of the questions in sections A to D, please substantiate the answer, including references in the answer to the supporting evidence or documents provided in annex (latest profit and loss account statements with balance sheets, or court decision opening collective insolvency proceedings on the company or evidence that the criteria for being placed under insolvency proceedings at the request of creditors under national company law are met, etc.).
If you consider that the beneficiary is eligible for rescue aid even though it does not qualify as an undertaking in difficulty, please explain why you consider that it faces acute liquidity needs due to exceptional and unforeseen circumstances and include reference to the supporting evidence or documents (e.g. cash flow projections).
When was the undertaking created?
…
Since when has the undertaking been operating?
…
Does the company belong to a larger business group?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer to point C is “yes”, please submit full details about the group (organisation chart, showing the links between the group's members with details on capital and voting rights) and demonstrate that the company's difficulties are intrinsic and are not the result of an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group, and that the difficulties are too serious to be dealt with by the group itself.
Is the undertaking active in:
a As defined in Decision 2010/787/EU. | ||
b As defined in Annex IV to the Communication from the Commission: Guidelines on regional state aid for 2014-2020 (OJ C 209, 23.7.2013, p. 1). | ||
c Communication from the Commission on the application, from 1 August 2013, of the State aid rules to support measures in favour of banks in the context of the financial crisis (“Banking Communication”) (OJ C 216, 30.7.2013, p. 1). | ||
A)the coal sectora: | ☐ yes | ☐ no |
B)the steel sectorb: | ☐ yes | ☐ no |
C)sectors covered by specific rules for financial institutionsc: | ☐ yes | ☐ no |
Is the beneficiary located in a region or regions (at NUTS level 2) where the unemployment rate is one of the following:
higher than the Union average, persistent and accompanied by difficulty in creating new employment in the region or regions concerned
higher than the national average, persistent and accompanied by difficulty in creating new employment in the region(s) concerned?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Is there a risk of disruption to an important service which is hard to replicate and where would it be difficult for any competitor simply to step in (for example, a national infrastructure provider)?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Does the undertaking have any important systemic role in a particular region or sector? Would its exit have any potential negative consequences (for example as a supplier of an important input)?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Is there a risk of interruption to the continuity of provision of an SGEI?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Would the failure or adverse incentives of credit markets push an otherwise viable undertaking into bankruptcy?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Would the exit from the market of the undertaking concerned lead to an irremediable loss of important technical knowledge or expertise?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Would the failure of the beneficiary involve any similar situation of severe hardship not listed above?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If you have answered yes to any of the questions in points A to G, please fully substantiate the answer(s), including reference to the further supporting evidence or documents provided in annex.
…
…
Is the aid in the form of loan guarantees or loans?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If you have answered yes, please describe the terms of the loan or the guarantee and attach the relevant documents (e.g. draft loan agreement, draft guarantee).
…
…
Is the interest rate of the loan (or, where relevant, the total financial cost of the guaranteed loan, including the interest rate of the loan and the guarantee premium) set at a rate not lower than the reference rate set out by the Commission in its Reference Rate Communication(80) for weak undertakings offering normal levels of collateralisation?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Please explain the use to which the rescue aid will be put: will the rescue aid be used to finance structural measures, such as acquisition of significant businesses or assets other than those required during the rescue period for the survival of the beneficiary?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please explain.
…
…
Will the loan be reimbursed or will the loan guarantee come to an end within a period of not more than six months after disbursement of the first instalment to the beneficiary?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Do you undertake, not later than six months after the rescue aid measure has been authorised to communicate to the Commission, one of the following:
proof that the loan has been reimbursed in full and/or that the guarantee has been terminated;
a restructuring plan;
a liquidation plan setting out in a substantiated way the steps leading to the liquidation of the beneficiary within a reasonable time frame without further aid?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Is the amount of the rescue aid determined in accordance with the formula set out in Annex I to the Guidelines?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please provide the calculation of the amount of the rescue aid in accordance with the formula.
If the amount of the rescue aid exceeds the result of calculations on the basis of the formula set out in Annex I to the Guidelines, please provide a duly justified liquidity plan setting out the beneficiary's liquidity needs for the coming six months.
…
…
Has the undertaking (or the group to which it belongs) already received in the past any rescue aid, restructuring aid or temporary restructuring support(81) and/or any non-notified aid?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please provide full details (date, amount, reference to previous Commission decision if applicable, etc.)(82).
…
…
Please indicate here any other information you consider relevant for the assessment of the measure(s) concerned under the Guidelines:
…
…
This supplementary information sheet must be filled in for the notification of individual restructuring aid covered by the Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty (83) (“Guidelines”).
Is the undertaking a limited liability company(84), where more than half of its subscribed share capital has disappeared as a result of accumulated losses(85)?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Is the undertaking a company where at least some members have unlimited liability for the debt of the company(86), and where more than half of its capital listed in the company accounts has disappeared as a result of accumulated losses?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Is the undertaking subject to collective insolvency proceedings or does it fulfil the criteria under domestic law for being placed in collective insolvency proceedings at the request of its creditors?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
In the case of an undertaking that is not an SME:
has the undertaking's book debt to equity ratio been greater than 7,5 for the past two years
and
has the undertaking's EBITDA interest coverage ratio been below 1,0 for the past two years?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If you have answered yes to any of the questions in points A to D, please substantiate the answer, including references in the answer to the supporting evidence or documents provided in annex (latest profit and loss account statements with balance sheets, or court decision opening collective insolvency proceedings on the company or evidence that the criteria for being placed under insolvency proceedings at the request of creditors under national company law are met, etc.).
When was the undertaking created?…
Since when has the undertaking been operating?…
Does the company belong to a larger business group?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If yes, please submit full details about the group (organisation chart, showing the links between the group's members with details on capital and voting rights) and evidence that the company's difficulties are intrinsic and are not the result of an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group, and that the difficulties are too serious to be dealt with by the group itself.
Is the undertaking active in:
a As defined in Decision 2010/787/EU. | ||
b As defined in Annex IV to the Communication from the Commission: Guidelines on regional state aid for 2014-2020 (OJ C 209, 23.7.2013, p. 1). | ||
c Communication from the Commission on the application, from 1 August 2013, of the State aid rules to support measures in favour of banks in the context of the financial crisis (“Banking Communication”) (OJ C 216, 30.7.2013, p. 1). | ||
A)the coal sectora: | ☐ yes | ☐ no |
B)the steel sectorb: | ☐ yes | ☐ no |
C)sectors covered by specific rules for financial institutionsc: | ☐ yes | ☐ no |
Is the undertaking providing services of general economic interest?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer to point A is yes, please describe the service(s) of general economic interest and provide a copy of the entrustment act(s).
…
…
If the answer to point A is yes, please indicate the amount of the public service compensation the undertaking is receiving, describe the methodology of calculation of compensation and provide the relevant legal basis establishing the methodology of calculation of the public service compensation.
…
…
Is the beneficiary located in a region or regions (at NUTS level 2) where the unemployment rate is one of the following:
higher than the Union average, persistent and accompanied by difficulty in creating new employment in the region or regions concerned
higher than the national average, persistent and accompanied by difficulty in creating new employment in the region(s) concerned.
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Is there a risk of disruption to an important service which is hard to replicate and it would be difficult for any competitor simply to step in (for example, a national infrastructure provider)?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Does the undertaking have any important systemic role in a particular region or sector? Would its exit have any potential negative consequences (for example as a supplier of an important input)?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Is there a risk of interruption to the continuity of provision of an SGEI?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Would the failure or adverse incentives of credit markets push an otherwise viable undertaking into bankruptcy?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Would the exit from the market of the undertaking concerned lead to an irremediable loss of important technical knowledge or expertise?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Would the failure of the beneficiary involve any similar situation of severe hardship not listed above?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If you have answered yes to any of the questions in points A to G, please fully substantiate the answer(s), including a reference to the further supporting evidence or documents provided in annex.
…
…
Please provide the restructuring plan(87) aiming at restoring the long-term viability(88) of the beneficiary within a reasonable timescale together with a market survey and a sensitivity analysis identifying the driving parameters of the beneficiary's performance and the main risk factors going forward (please follow as much as possible the indicative restructuring plan set out in Annex II to the Guidelines).
…
…
…
…
…
…
Does the own contribution of the beneficiary amount to at least 50 % of the restructuring costs(91)?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Please describe and quantify each category of restructuring costs to be incurred, provide for their total amount and indicate which percentage of the restructuring costs will be covered by the own contribution:
…
…
Please describe and quantify the own contribution to the restructuring costs to be provided from the own resources of the beneficiary, its shareholders or creditors, or the business group to which it belongs, or from new investors:
…
…
Please explain why you consider this own contribution to be real and aid-free:
…
…
Please demonstrate that the own contribution is comparable to the aid granted in terms of effects on the solvency or liquidity position of the beneficiary(92) and, if not, explain why, with reference, if appropriate, to supporting documents (e.g. balance sheet, cash flow statements):
…
…
Have the beneficiary's losses been fully accounted for, attributed to and absorbed by existing shareholders and/or subordinated creditors?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer to point A is yes, please provide evidence, on the basis of an up-to-date analysis of the beneficiary's balance sheet situation.
…
…
Will cash outflows from the beneficiary to holders of equity and/or subordinated debt be prevented during the restructuring period?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer to point C is no, please explain the reason(s).
…
…
Will the State receive a reasonable share of the future gains in value of the beneficiary, in view of the amount of State equity injected in comparison with the remaining equity of the company after losses have been accounted for?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer to point E is yes, please substantiate the answer and provide evidence accordingly.
…
…
If the beneficiary's losses are not absorbed in full (see point A above) and/or cash outflows from the beneficiary to holders of equity and/or subordinated debt are not prevented during the restructuring period (see point C above), please explain the reasons, in particular why full implementation of those conditions would lead to disproportionate results:
…
…
Are senior debt holders contributing to restoring the beneficiary's equity position?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer to point H is yes, please explain in which way senior debt holders will contribute.
…
…
Has the undertaking (or the group to which it belongs) already received any rescue aid, restructuring aid or temporary restructuring support(94) and/or any non-notified aid?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If yes, please provide full details (date, amount, reference to previous Commission decision if applicable, etc.)(95):
…
…
Please describe the divestments of assets, reduction of capacity or market presence committed to be undertaken. Please show that divestments, write-offs and closure of loss-making activities included in the commitments are not necessary to restore long-term viability of the beneficiary. Please indicate in addition the relevant markets in which those divestments will take place and their timing(96). Please indicate as well whether the beneficiary will facilitate divestitures, for example through ring-fencing of activities and by agreeing not to solicit clients of the divested business.
…
…
If structural measures exceptionally take the form of divestment of assets alone and do not involve the creation of a viable entity able to compete in the market, please demonstrate that no other form of structural measures would be feasible or that other structural measures would seriously jeopardise the economic viability of the undertaking:
…
…
Does the beneficiary agree to refrain from acquiring shares in any company during the restructuring period, except where indispensable to ensure its long-term viability and subject, in that case, to notification to and approval by the Commission?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Does the beneficiary agree to refrain from publicising State support as a competitive advantage when marketing its products and services?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Are there any other behavioural measures foreseen?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
Will any measures be adopted by the national authorities or by the beneficiary with the aim of promoting more open, sound and competitive markets, for instance by favouring entry and exit(97)?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer to point F is yes, please describe which measures and in which market, indicating how the measures are directly or indirectly linked to the beneficiary's activities:
…
…
If the answer to point H is yes, please specify:
…
…
…
…
This supplementary information sheet must be filled with regard to rescue aid, restructuring aid and temporary restructuring support schemes covered by the Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty (99) (“Guidelines”).
☐ yes | ☐ no |
In relation to SMEs that are limited liability companies(102): more than half of the subscribed share capital has disappeared as a result of accumulated losses(103)?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
In relation to SMEs which are companies where at least some members have unlimited liability for the debt of the company(104): more than half of the capital shown in the company accounts has disappeared as a result of accumulated losses?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
SMEs that are subject to collective insolvency proceedings or fulfil the criteria under their domestic law for being placed in collective insolvency proceedings at the request of their creditors?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
In relation to smaller State-owned undertakings: the undertaking's book debt to equity ratio has been greater than 7,5 and its EBITDA interest coverage ratio has been below 1,0 for the past two years?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
a As defined in Decision 2010/787/EU. | ||
b As defined in Annex IV to the Communication from the Commission: Guidelines on regional state aid for 2014-2020 (OJ C 209, 23.7.2013, p. 1). | ||
c Communication from the Commission on the application, from 1 August 2013, of the State aid rules to support measures in favour of banks in the context of the financial crisis (“Banking Communication”) (OJ C 216, 30.7.2013, p. 1). | ||
(a)the coal sectora: | ☐ yes | ☐ no |
(b)the steel sectorb: | ☐ yes | ☐ no |
(c)sectors covered by specific rules for financial institutionsc: | ☐ yes | ☐ no |
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
Does the scheme apply only in cases where the failure of the beneficiary would be likely to involve social hardship or a market failure, in particular:
the exit of an innovative SME or an SME with high growth potential would have potential negative consequences:
☐ yes | ☐ no |
the exit of an SME with extensive links to other local or regional SMEs would have potential negative consequences:
☐ yes | ☐ no |
the failure or adverse incentives of credit markets would push an otherwise viable SME into bankruptcy:
☐ yes | ☐ no |
similar situations of hardship duly substantiated by the beneficiary:
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer to any of the questions in point (a) is yes, please fully substantiate the answer(s) and explain the criteria on the basis of which the national authorities are going to assess the contribution to the objectives of common interest.
…
…
In relation to the grant of restructuring aid, does the scheme require the provision of a restructuring plan(105) aiming at restoring the long-term viability(106) of the beneficiary within a reasonable timescale (please see an indicative restructuring plan in Annex II to the Guidelines)?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
☐ yes | ☐ no |
☐ yes | ☐ no |
☐ yes | ☐ no |
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
☐ yes | ☐ no |
☐ yes | ☐ no |
☐ yes | ☐ no |
☐ yes | ☐ no |
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Does the scheme provide that the amount of aid will not exceed the result of the calculation on the basis of the formula set out in Annex I to the Guidelines?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer to point (a) is no, does the scheme require the preparation of a liquidity plan setting out the beneficiary's liquidity needs for the next six months (18 months in the case of temporary restructuring support)?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer to point (b) is yes, please explain on which basis and according to which information the national authorities will examine whether the liquidity plan setting out the beneficiary's liquidity needs for the next six months (18 months in the case of temporary restructuring support) is duly justified:
…
…
Does the scheme require provision of a real and aid-free contribution to the restructuring costs from the own resources of the beneficiary, its shareholders, creditors, the business group to which it belongs or from new investors amounting to at least 40 % of the restructuring costs in the case of medium-sized enterprises or 25 % of the restructuring costs in the case of small enterprises?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer to point (a) is yes, please explain which elements the national authorities will take into account to assess whether the own contribution is real and aid-free:
…
…
Does the scheme require that the own contribution should be comparable to the aid granted in terms of effects on the solvency or liquidity position of the beneficiary(110)?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer to point (c) is yes, please explain how the national authorities will assess it:
…
…
To be completed if the scheme provides that the State aid can be granted in a form enhancing the beneficiary's equity position (111):
Does the scheme provide that State intervention may only take place after losses have been fully accounted for and attributed to the existing shareholders and/or subordinated debt holders?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Will cash outflows from the beneficiary to holders of equity and subordinated debt be prevented during the restructuring period to the extent legally possible?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer to point (b) is no, please explain on the basis of which criteria the national authorities will assess whether such cash outflows would not disproportionately affect those that have injected fresh equity.
…
…
Will the national authorities allow any exceptions from the conditions described in points (a) and (b) above?
no
yes. If so, please explain.
…
Does the scheme provide that the State will receive a reasonable share of the future gains in value of the beneficiary, in view of the amount of State equity injected in comparison with the remaining equity of the company after losses have been accounted for?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Does the scheme exclude(112) the provision of aid to any SME which has received rescue aid, restructuring aid or temporary restructuring support in the past(113) and/or any non-notified aid?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Does the scheme require from beneficiaries divestments of assets, reduction of capacity or market presence(115) together with indication of the relevant markets on which those divestments will take place(116) and their timing(117)?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Does the scheme state that structural measures should normally take the form of divestments on a going-concern basis of viable stand-alone businesses that, if operated by a suitable purchaser, can compete effectively in the long term?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer to point (b) is no, does the scheme provide that, where there is a lack of such entities, the beneficiary might carve out and subsequently divest an existing and appropriately funded activity, creating a new and viable entity that should be able to compete in the market?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the scheme allows for structural measures in the form of divestment of assets alone, without involving the creation of a viable entity able to compete in the market, does it require a demonstration by the beneficiary that no other form of structural measures would be feasible or that other structural measures would seriously jeopardise the economic viability of the undertaking?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Does the scheme require that the beneficiary refrain from acquiring shares in any company during the restructuring period, except where indispensable to ensure the long-term viability?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Does the scheme require that the beneficiary refrain from publicising State support as a competitive advantage when marketing their products and services?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Does the scheme provide for the beneficiary to refrain from engaging in commercial behaviour aimed at a rapid expansion of its market share relating to specific products or geographic markets by offering terms (for example as regards prices and other commercial conditions) which cannot be matched by competitors that are not in receipt of State aid?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer to point (g) is yes, under what circumstances? Please explain.
…
Does the scheme foresee any other behavioural measures?
no
yes. If so, please describe.
…
Does the scheme allow for any measures to be adopted by the national authorities or by the beneficiary that are aimed at promoting more open, sound and competitive markets, for instance by favouring entry and exit(118)?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer to point (j) is yes, please describe:
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
Please provide any other information that would be of relevance to assess the notified aid measure under the Guidelines (e.g. as regards measures to increase employability of redundant workers or assistance with finding new employment):
…
This supplementary information sheet must be used for notifications of aid covered by the Commission Communication on State aid for films and other audiovisual works (119)
…
…
…
…
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
…
…
Does the scheme differentiate on grounds of nationality or place of residence?
…
…
Are beneficiaries obliged to fulfil any conditions other than that of being represented by a permanent agency at the moment of the payment of the aid?
…
…
If the aid has a tax component, must the beneficiary fulfil any obligations or conditions other than that of having taxable revenue in the territory of the Member State?
…
…
Other conditions:
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
Please specify the costs which may be taken into account to determine the amount of aid.
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
If applicable, please provide information on the measures taken with regard to film heritage.
…
…
…
…
…
…
Please indicate here any other information you consider relevant to the assessment of the measure(s) concerned under the Communication on State aid for films and other audiovisual works.
…
This supplementary information sheet should be used for notifications of aid covered by the EU Guidelines for the application of State aid rules in relation to rapid deployment of broadband networks (120) (“Broadband Guidelines”).
…
…
…
…
…
…
backbone networks (or trunk networks);
backhaul networks (or regional, or middle-mile networks);
access networks (or last mile networks).
Passive infrastructure elements;
Active infrastructure equipment.
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
which public authority will undertake the monitoring?
what aspects of the measure will be subject to monitoring?
which performance criteria will be analysed?
what will be the timing of the monitoring?
…
…
…
…
Please explain how the notified aid measure complies with the conditions specified in Section 2.5 of the Broadband Guidelines, in particular with regard to:
…
…
Is the aid measure aimed to address well-defined objectives of common interest?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer to (a) is yes, please give a description of the objectives of common interest pursued by the aid measure:
Does the aid measure address a market failure or important inequalities hampering the availability of broadband services?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer to (c) is yes, please describe this market failure and provide a general overview of the broadband market in the country or region concerned and of the areas targeted by the aid measure.
That overview should contain information on the current level of broadband coverage, internet penetration rate (number of connected households, enterprises), breakdown of services availability by technology, major trends on the (national or regional) broadband market, rural/urban divide in terms of broadband coverage, comparison of retail prices with those charged for the same services offered in more competitive but otherwise comparable areas or regions of the country, available technological solutions for broadband development and provision of connectivity services, competitive situation in the electronic communication markets (structure and dynamics of the markets), overview of the national regulatory framework and of existing regulatory obligations for electronic communication operators:
…
…
Please demonstrate the appropriateness of the aid measure:
…
…
Have any other alternative (less distortive) instruments already been implemented to enable the supply of broadband services and to overcome the lack of broadband connectivity, including ex ante regulation or demand stimulation?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer to (f) is yes, please describe those initiatives and explain why they were deemed insufficient to achieve the desired broadband development objectives:
…
…
Have the existing network operators undertaken any private investment in the target areas over the last three years?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer to (h) is yes, please describe those investments and explain why existing broadband infrastructure is not sufficient to satisfy the needs of citizens and business users and why State aid is necessary:
…
…
Please describe the positive effects that the aid measure is expected to generate:
…
…
Will the aid measure ensure a “step change” in terms of broadband availability?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer to (k) is yes, please demonstrate this by means of comparison to the existing and planned network deployment (that is to say before and after the planned intervention). In particular, please describe in detail whether and to what extent significant new investment in the broadband network will be undertaken and what new capabilities will be brought to the market in terms of broadband service availability and quality:
…
…
Please explain the expected changes in the behaviour of the beneficiary(s) of the aid measure:
…
…
Please demonstrate that similar broadband network investment would not have been undertaken within the same time frame and/or under the same terms and conditions in the absence of State aid:
…
…
Please explain how it is ensured that the aid measure is limited to the minimum necessary:
…
…
Please explain what potential negative effects on competition and trade the aid measure may have (for example: potential to cause crowding out of private investments or reinforcement of a dominant position) and what elements in the design of the measure(126) could minimize those risks:
…
…
Please indicate here any other information you consider relevant to the assessment of the measure concerned under the Broadband Guidelines or any other information that is relevant from the point of view of Union competition and internal market rules(127).
…
This supplementary information sheet must be used for the notification of any aid covered by the Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014–2020 (hereinafter “the EEAG”) (128).
All documents provided by Member States as annexes to the notification form must be numbered and document numbers must be indicated in the relevant sections of this supplementary information sheet.
If there are several beneficiaries involved in an individual aid measure, the relevant information must be provided for each of them.
This supplementary information form is to be filled in in addition to the “Part I. General information” form.
Before completing this notification form you should consider whether this measure could be implemented under Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 (the General Block Exemption Regulation (“the GBER”)(129), and in particular section 7 of chapter III thereof (Aid for environmental protection).
Could the aid be implemented under the GBER?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the aid could be implemented under the GBER, please explain why the measure is notified.
…
…
Before completing this notification form you should consider whether this measure could be implemented under the de minimis Regulation(130):
Could the aid be implemented under the de minimis Regulation?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the aid could be implemented under the de minimis Regulation, please explain why the measure is notified.
…
…
This form should only be completed for notification of State aid which is intended to be implemented under the EEAG. Please fill in the relevant parts of the notification form corresponding to the character of the notified measure.
If the measure is aid in the form of reductions in, or exemptions from, environmental taxes, or from funding the support for energy from renewable energy sources(131), please fill in Section C of the form (“Compatibility assessment for aid in the form of reductions in or exemptions from environmental taxes and in the form of reductions in funding support for energy from renewable sources”).
Aid for undertakings which go beyond Union standards or which increase the level of environmental protection in the absence of Union standards;
Aid for the acquisition of new transport vehicles which go beyond Union standards or which increase the level of environmental protection in the absence of Union standards;
Aid for early adaptation to future Union standards;
Aid for renewable energy sources;
Please confirm that the measure only supports energy from renewable energy sources as defined in point 19(5) and 19(11) of the EEAG.
…
…
For biofuels, please confirm that the measure only supports sustainable biofuels as defined in point 19(9) of the EEAG.
…
…
Aid for energy efficieny measures;
Please confirm that the measure only supports efficiency measures as defined in point 19(2) of the EEAG.
…
…
Aid for energy efficient district heating or cooling measures;
Please confirm that the measure only supports energy efficient district heating or cooling measures as defined in point 19(14) of the EEAG.
…
…
Aid for high efficient cogeneration;
Please confirm that the measure only supports high efficient cogeneration as defined in point 19(13) of the EEAG.
…
…
Aid for waste management;
Aid for environmental studies;
Aid for the remediation of contaminated sites;
Aid for the relocation of undertakings;
Aid involved in tradable permits schemes;
Aid for energy infrastructure;
Aid for CO2 capture, transport and storage (CCS);
Aid for generation adequacy measures;
Aid in the form of reductions in or exemptions from environmental taxes;
Aid in the form of reductions in funding support for energy from renewable sources.
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer is yes, please explain and fill in the section on cumulation in the proportionality section of section B.
…
…
yes
…
…
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer is yes, please explain how compliance with Union law is ensured.
…
…
To answer the questions in this section, please refer to section 3.2.1 of the EEAG and where further specified to sections 3.2 – 3.6 and 3.8 – 3.10 of the EEAG.
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If yes, please indicate its results in terms of environmental protection or energy system improvements, the relevant case number and date of Commission approval and, if possible, attach national evaluation reports on the measure:
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
the waste hierarchy principle is respected (see point 118 of the EEAG)
the investment is aimed at reducing pollution generated by undertakings (“polluters”) and does not extend to pollution generated by the beneficiary of the aid (see point 158(a) of the EEAG)
the aid does not indirectly relieve the polluters from a burden that should be borne by them under Union law, or from a burden that should be considered as a normal company cost for the polluters (see point 158(b) of the EEAG)
the investment goes beyond the “state of the art” (see point 158(c) of the EEAG)
the treated materials would otherwise be disposed of, or be treated in a less environmentally friendly manner (see point 158(d) of the EEAG)
the investment does not merely increase demand for the materials to be recycled without increasing collection of those materials (see point 158 of the EEAG)
Furthermore, please provide details and evidence of compliance with the conditions mentioned in this point:
…
…
…
…
Please explain how:
the tradable permit scheme is set up in such a way as to achieve environmental objectives beyond those intended to be achieved on the basis of Union standards that are mandatory for the undertakings concerned:
…
…
the allocation is carried out in a transparent way and based on objective criteria and on data sources of the highest quality available:
…
…
the total amount of tradable permits or allowances granted to each undertaking for a price below their market value is not higher than its expected needs as estimated for the situation in the absence of the trading scheme:
…
…
the allocation methodology does not favour certain undertakings or certain sectors;
…
…
In case the allocation methodology favours certain undertakings or certain sectors, please explain how that is justified by the environmental logic of the scheme itself or is necessary for consistency with other environmental policies:
…
…
new entrants must not in principle receive permits or allowances on more favourable conditions than existing undertakings operating on the same markets:
…
…
granting higher allocations to existing installations compared to new entrants should not result in creating undue barriers to entry:
…
…
Please provide details and evidence demonstrating compliance with the conditions mentioned in this point:
…
…
…
…
To answer the questions in this section, please refer to section 3.2.2 of the EEAG and where further specified to sections 3.2 – 3.6 and 3.8 – 3.10 of the EEAG.
…
…
…
…
…
…
To what extent does the measure benefit projects of common interest as defined in Regulation (EU) No 347/2013, smart grids or infrastructure in assisted regions?
…
…
To what extent does the market failure lead to a sub-optimal provision of the necessary infrastructure?
…
…
To what extent is the infrastructure accessible to third parties and subject to tariff regulations?
…
…
Assessments of the impact of variable generation, including that originating from neighbouring systems.
…
…
Assessment of the impact of the demand-side participation, including a description of measures to encourage demand-side management.
…
…
Assessment of the actual or potential existence of interconnectors including a description of projects under construction and planned projects.
…
…
Assessment of any other element which might cause or exacerbate the generation adequacy problem, such as regulatory or market failures, including for example caps on wholesale prices.
…
…
…
…
whether the market failure is already sufficiently addressed by other policy measures, in particular the existence of environmental or other Union standards, the Union ETS or environmental taxes:
…
…
whether State intervention is needed, taking into account the cost of implementation of national standards for the aid beneficiary in the absence of aid compared to the costs, or absence thereof, of implementation of those standards for the main competitors of the aid beneficiary:
…
…
in the case of coordination failures, the number of undertakings required to collaborate, diverging interests between collaborating parties and practical problems to coordinate collaboration, such as linguistic issues, sensitivity of information and non-harmonised standards:
…
…
To answer the questions in this section, please refer to section 3.2.3 of the EEAG and where further specified to sections 3.2 – 3.6 and 3.8 – 3.10 of the EEAG.
…
…
…
…
…
…
To answer the questions in this section, please refer to section 3.2.4 of the EEAG and where further specified to sections 3.2 – 3.6 and 3.8 – 3.10 of the EEAG.
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please provide details of the competitive process and attach a copy of the tender notice or its draft.
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
…
…
Was a Union standard adopted?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Please explain by what date the will investment be finalised:
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
To answer the questions in this section, please refer to section 3.2.5 of the EEAG and sections 3.2 – 3.6 and 3.8 – 3.10 of the EEAG.
If the measure concerns investment aid only, please fill in the first part of this section. If the aid is operational aid, please fill in the second part of this section. If the measure consists of both investment and operating aid both sections should be completed.
The aid amount per beneficiary should be limited to the minimum required to achieve the level of environmental protection or energy objective aimed for. As a general principle aid will be deemed limited to the minimum necessary if the aid corresponds to the total net extra cost necessary to meet the objective compared to the counterfactual scenario (see section 3.2.5 of the EEAG, point (70).
For aid to energy efficient district heating and cooling projects, this section is only applicable to the production plant. For the infrastructure part the funding gap approach for energy infrastructure should be used (see section 5.1.2 operating aid schemes) (point 76 of the EEAG).
yes
the precise environmental protection related cost constitutes the eligible costs, if the cost of investing in environmental protection can be easily identified;
or
the extra investment costs are established by comparing the aided investment with the counterfactual situation in the absence of aid, that is to say the reference investment(138)
…
If you propose to use that approach please explain in detail the reason for doing so and provide the details of the calculation, in particular showing how the maximum aid intensities are appropriately adjusted:
…
…
…
…
investments in tangible assets
investments in intangible assets
If the investment relates to tangible assets please complete point 6; if it relates to intangible assets please complete point 7. If the investement relates to both tangible and intetangible assets both points 6 and 7 should be completed.
investments in land which are strictly necessary in order to meet environmental objectives;
investments in buildings intended to reduce or eliminate pollution and nuisances;
investments in plant and equipment intended to reduce or eliminate pollution and nuisances;
investments to adapt production methods with a view to protecting the environment.
it is regarded as a depreciable asset;
it is purchased on market terms, from an undertaking over which the acquirer has no direct or indirect control;
it is included in the assets of the undertaking, and remains in the establishment of the recipient of the aid and is used there for at least five years(139).
Furthermore, please confirm that if the intangible asset is sold during the first five years:
the yield from the sale will be deducted from the eligible costs;
and
all or part of the amount of aid will, where appropriate, be reimbursed.
If the investment relates to Union standards, please fill in point 8.
if the undertaking is adapting to national standards adopted in the absence of Union standards, the eligible costs consist of the additional investment costs necessary to achieve the level of environmental protection required by the national standards;
if the undertaking is adapting to or goes beyond national standards which are more stringent than the relevant Union standards or goes beyond Union standards, the eligible costs consist of the additional investment costs necessary to achieve a level of environmental protection higher than the level required by the Union standards(141);
if no standards exist, the eligible costs consist of the investment costs necessary to achieve a higher level of environmental protection than that which the undertaking or undertakings in question would achieve in the absence of any environmental aid.
The aid intensities which are allowed for the different measures can be found in Annex 1 to the EEAG.
…
…
Is a bonus envisaged due to the investment being located in an assisted area(142)?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please specify the amount of bonus applicable (as percentage of the eligible costs):…
Please confirm that if the aid or bonus for regions covered by Article 107(3)(a) TFEU is granted, only beneficiaries located in the regions referred to in Article 107(3)(a) TFEU as defined in point 19(46) of the EEAG are eligible for such aid/bonus:
yes
Please confirm that if the aid or bonus for regions covered by Article 107(3)(c) TFEU is granted, only beneficiaries located in Article 107(3)(c) regions as defined in point 19(46) of the EEAG are eligible for such aid/bonus:
yes
Is an SME bonus(143) applied under the notified measure?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please specify the amount of bonus applicable (as percentage of the eligible costs):…
Please confirm that if the aid/bonus for small enterprises is granted, the beneficiaries comply with the definition for small enterprises as defined in point 19(17) of the EEAG:
yes
Please confirm that if the aid/bonus for medium enterprises is granted, the beneficiaries comply with the definition for medium enterprises as defined in point 19(17) of the EEAG:
yes
If so, please specify the level of bonus applicable and explain how the specific requirements set out in point 78(c)(i) to (iii) of the EEAG are fulfilled:
…
…
Is the aid granted in a genuinely competitive bidding process(145)?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer is yes, please provide details of the competitive process and evidence of compliance with point 19(43) of the EEAG. Please attach a copy of the tender notice or its draft:
…
…
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
…
…
Please note that the aid for investment or operating aid for the production of biofuels can be allowed only with regard to sustainable biofuels. No investment aid for food based biofuels can be granted, and operating aid can only be granted until 2020 unless the plant is already depreciated. Please confirm that those conditions are being met (see point 113 of the EEAG):
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
The operating aid for food-based biofuels is granted only until 2020:
☐ yes | ☐ no |
The operating aid for food-based biofuels is granted exclusively to plants that started operations before 31 December 2013:
☐ yes | ☐ no |
and
The operating aid for food-based biofuels is limited to plants which are not fully depreciated:
☐ yes | ☐ no |
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please explain and provide evidence to prove that the aided biofuels are subject to the supply or blending obligation. Please explain whether the aided biofuels are more expensive than biofuels that could come on the market with the obligation only (and without aid). For guidance, see point 114 of the EEAG.
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If yes, please explain and provide details of the cooperation agreement (see point 122 of the EEAG):
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
In order to incentivise market integration it is important that beneficiaries sell their electricity in the market and are subject to market obligations (see points 124 and 125 of the EEAG).
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please explain in detail how that condition is implemented in practice:
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please explain in detail the balancing responsibilities applicable for generators of renewable energy and the responsibilities applicable for other generators (see point 124(b) of the EEAG):
…
…
If the answer is no, do you consider that there is no liquid intra-day market in your country?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer is no, please explain in detail and justify why balancing responsibilities are not applicable for generators of renewable energy:
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Please explain in detail how this is ensured in practice:
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please explain whether it applies to all beneficiaries or only to a subgroup of beneficiaries. Please detail whether the conditions of point 124 of the EEAG apply to such installations:
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please detail and provide evidence that such projects meet all the conditions set out in the definition of the EEAG (point 19(45) of the EEAG).
…
…
If so, please explain whether it applies to all beneficiaries or to a subgroup of beneficiaries only. Please detail whether the conditions of point 124 of the EEAG apply to demonstration projects.
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please detail the installations that are covered by this provision:
…
…
If so, please explain whether this applies to all beneficiaries or only a subgroup of beneficiaries. Please detail whether the conditions of point 124 of the EEAG apply to such installations:
…
…
In a transitional phase covering the years 2015 and 2016, aid for at least 5 % of the planned new electricity capacity from renewable energy sources should be granted in a competitive bidding process on the basis of clear, transparent and non-discriminatory criteria (See points 124 and 125 of the EEAG).
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please explain in detail the bidding process:
…
…
If the answer is no, please explain whether one of the following reasons is applicable:
very limited number of eligible projects;
higher support levels would arise in case of a bidding process;
low realisation rates would result (projects that would be constructed);
…
…
If the answer to this point is no, please fill in section 5.1.2.1.2: operating aid for energy from renewable sources other than electricity (until plant depreciation).
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please explain the openness of the bidding process:
…
…
If the answer is no, please explain whether one of the following reasons is applicable:
longer term potential of new innovative technology;
need to achive diversification;
network constraints and grid stability;
system (integration) costs;
biomass: need to avoid distortions on the raw material market;
…
…
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please explain whether it applies to all beneficiaries or to a subgroup of beneficiaries only. Please detail whether such installations will be granted aid in a competitive bidding process:
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please explain whether it applies to all beneficiaries or to a subgroup of beneficiaries only. Please detail whether such installations will be granted aid in a competitive bidding process:
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please provide details of the installations that are covered by this provision:
…
…
If so, please explain whether it applies to all beneficiaries or to a subgroup of beneficiaries only. Please detail whether such installations will be granted aid in a competitive bidding process:
…
…
detailed analysis of the cost of producing energy of the technology concerned in the form of LCOE per units of each of the renewable sources(148):
…
…
detailed analysis of the market price of the form of energy concerned:
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please provide details and information or calculations showing the rate of normal return and give reasons why the chosen rate is appropriate:
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Please provide details and explanations:
…
…
Operating aid for biomass after plant depreciation may be compatible with the internal market if a Member State demonstrates that the operating costs borne by the beneficiary after plant depreciation are still higher than the market price of the energy concerned (point 133 of the EEAG).
…
…
detailed analysis of the operating cost of producing energy from biomass after plant depreciation:
…
…
detailed analysis of the market price of the form of energy concerned:
…
…
detailed analysis of the design of the measure showing that it is meant to compensate only the difference between the operating costs after plant depreciation and the market price of the form of energy concerned:
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Is that monitoring mechanism updated at least on an annual basis?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Please describe in detail the monitoring mechanism:
…
…
Operating aid for biomass after plant depreciation may be compatible with the internal market if a Member State demonstrates that, irrespective of the market price of the energy concerned, the use of fossil fuels as an input is more economically advantageous than the use of biomass (point 134 of the EEAG).
…
…
detailed analysis of the operating costs of producing energy from biomass after plant depreciation:
…
…
detailed analysis of the operating costs of producing energy from the fossil fuel concerned after plant depreciation:
…
…
detailed analysis of the design of the measure showing that it is meant to compensate only the difference between the operating costs after plant depreciation between the use of biomass and the fossil fuel concerned:
…
…
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Please describe in detail the monitoring mechanism:
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
For support to electricity from CHP plants until plant depreciation: section 5.1.2.1.1.
For support to heat from CHP plants until plant depreciation: section 5.1.2.1.2.
For support to heat or electricity from CHP plants after plant depreciation: section 5.1.2.1.3.
For support by way of certificates: section 5.1.2.1.4.
undertakings distributing electric power and heat to the public, where the costs of producing such electric power or heat exceed its market price(150);
for the industrial use of the combined production of electric power and heat where it can be shown that the production cost of one unit of energy using that technique exceeds the market price of one unit of conventional energy(151).
Please provide details and evidence that the relevant condition(s) is/are complied with:
…
…
…
…
…
…
Please provide a detailed cash flow overview over the lifetime of the project.
…
Please provide an explanation of the discount rates and rates of return used.
…
Please provide details about the counterfactual scenario or justify the absence thereof.
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
the choice of beneficiaries is based on objective and transparent criteria and the aid is granted in principle in the same way for all competitors in the same sector or relevant market if they are in a similar factual situation;
full auctioning leads to a substantial increase in production costs for each sector or category of individual beneficiaries;
the cost increase from the tradable permit scheme can not be passed on to customers without leading to important sales reductions;
the best performing technique in the EEA was used as a benchmark for the level of the allowance granted.
Please provide details demonstrating how the criteria in this point are applied:
…
…
…
…
…
…
To answer the questions in this section, please refer to section 3.2.6 of the EEAG and where further specified to sections 3.2 – 3.6 and 3.8 – 3.10 of the EEAG.
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer is no please explain why.
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
To answer the questions in this section, please refer to section 3.2.7 of the EEAG and where further specified to sections 3.2 – 3.6 and 3.8 – 3.10 of the EEAG.
…
…
…
To answer the questions in this section, please refer to section 3.2.7 of the EEAG in particular.
Please complete section C1 for measures concerning reductions from environmental taxes and section C2, posibly combined with section C3, for measures concerning reductions in the funding of support for renewable energy sources.
Please complete the section on Transparency in section B, point 7.
…
…
the aid is granted for a maximum period of 10 years;
and
the aid beneficiaries are selected on objective, transparent and non-discriminatory criteria;
and
the aid is granted in principle in the same way for all competitors in the same sector if they are in a similar factual situation;
and
the beneficiaries pay at least the Union minimum tax level set by the relevant applicable directive(155).
Please provide for each category of beneficiaries evidence regarding the payable minimum tax level (rate actually paid preferably in EUR and in the same units as the applicable Union legislation):
…
…
the reductions or exemptions are compatible with the relevant applicable Union legislation and comply with the limits and conditions set out therein:
Please refer to the relevant provision(s) and provide the relevant evidence:
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Furthermore, please provide the following:
a detailed description of the exempted sector(s):
…
…
a list of the 20 largest beneficiaries covered by the exemptions or reductions as well as a detailed description of their situation, in particular their turnover, their market shares and the size of the tax base:
…
…
the choice of beneficiaries is based on objective and transparent criteria and the aid is granted in principle in the same way to all competitors in the same sector or relevant market which are in a similar factual situation
and
the environmental tax without reduction would lead to a substantial increase in production costs for each sector or category of individual beneficiaries;
and
without the aid the substantial increase in production costs would, if passed to the customers, lead to a substantial reduction in sales(156).
…
…
…
…
Are aid beneficiaries paying at least 20 % of the national tax?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer is no, please demonstrate how a lower rate can be justified in view of a limited distortion of competition:
…
…
Are the reductions or exemptions conditional on the conclusion of agreements between the Member State and the recipient undertakings or associations of undertakings?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please provide details and evidence illustrating that the undertakings or associations of undertakings commit themselves to achieve environmental protection objectives which have the same effect of the application of (i) 20 % of the national tax or (ii) the Union minimum tax level:
…
…
Please also confirm that:
the substance of the agreements has been negotiated by the Member State and specifies the targets and fixes a time schedule for reaching those targets;
the Member State ensures independent and timely monitoring of the commitments concluded in those agreements;
those agreements will be revised periodically in the light of technological and other developments and will stipulate effective penalty arrangements which will apply if the commitments are not met.
Specify per sector the targets and time schedule and describe the monitoring and review mechanisms (for example by whom and at what intervals) as well as the penalty mechanism:
…
…
The direct link to the ETS allowance price:
…
…
The maximum aid intensities over time and how it complies with the intensities set out in the Union ETS State aid Guidelines(157):
…
…
A list of the beneficiaries and whether they are eligible under the Union ETS State aid Guidelines:
…
…
Please give details about the way the lump sum payment is made:
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
Please demonstrate for the undertakings the level of electro intensity. Where available please use standard electricity consumption benchmarks.
…
…
Please demonstrate for the undertakings the level of trade intensity at Union level.
…
…
…
…
…
…
at 4 % Gross value Added (GVA)
at 0,5 % GVA (for undertakings with an electro intensity of at least 20 %)
If so,
Please demonstrate how the maximum levels and GVA are calculated (see Annex 4 to the EEAG):
…
…
Please explain whether any adjustments are made to the calculation in order to cover all labour costs (point 191 of the EEAG):
…
…
Please explain how the cap applies to all eligible undertakings:
…
…
This section only applies if an adjustment plan was submitted to the Commission before 1 July 2015.
…
…
If so, please show whether new beneficiaries have entered the scheme after 1 July 2014.
…
…
…
…
…
…
Please demonstrate how the plan foresees a minimum own contribution of 15 % by 2019 for group 1 referred to in point 3.
…
…
Please demonstrate how the plan foresees a minimum own contribution of 20 % by 2019 for group 2 referred to in point 3.
…
…
Please complete this supplementary information sheet, in addition to the “General information” form, for the notification of any aid scheme covered by the Guidelines on State aid to promote risk finance investments (“RFG”) (159).
Please consult paragraph 52 RFG for definitions.
The scheme does not comply with the General Block Exemption Regulation (“GBER”)(160). Please identify the provisions in the legal basis of the scheme that go beyond the GBER and indicate which GBER provisions they go beyond:
…
The scheme does not comply with the de minimis Regulation(161). Please indicate the reasons why:
…
The scheme does not comply with the market economy operator test at one or more levels (at the level of the investors, the financial intermediary and its manager, and the undertakings in which the investment is made) (See section 2.1 RFG; for loans, reference is made to the Communication on the Reference Rate(162), and for guarantees to the Guarantee Notice(163)). Please specify the reasons why:
…
The scheme does not contain aid and it is notified for legal certainty reasons.
The notified scheme is deployed through financial intermediaries or alternative trading platforms, except for fiscal incentives for direct investments in eligible undertakings (paragraph 20 RFG).
Please provide the reference to the relevant provision of the legal basis:
…
The notified scheme excludes large companies, except for small or innovative mid-caps (paragraph 21 RFG).
Please provide the reference to the relevant provision of the legal basis:
…
The notified scheme excludes risk finance aid to companies listed on the official list of a stock exchange or a regulated market (paragraph 22 RFG).
Please provide the reference to the relevant provision of the legal basis:
…
The risk finance scheme involves private investors (paragraph 23 RFG).
Please provide the reference to the relevant provision of the legal basis:
…
The risk finance scheme provides that as regards asymmetric risk-reward sharing between the State and private investors there is a substantial risk incurred by private investors or the State receives a reward on its investment (paragraph 24 RFG).
Please provide the reference to the relevant provision of the legal basis:
…
The risk finance scheme cannot be used to support buyouts (paragraph 25 RFG).
Please provide the reference to the relevant provision of the legal basis:
…
The risk finance scheme provides that no risk finance aid will be granted to undertakings in difficulty, as defined in the RFG (Please note that under the RFG, SMEs within seven years from their first commercial sale that qualify for risk finance investments following due diligence by the selected financial intermediary will not be considered as undertakings in difficulty, unless they are subject to insolvency proceedings or fulfil the criteria under their domestic law for being placed in collective insolvency proceedings at the request of their creditors).
Please provide the reference to the relevant provision of the legal basis:
…
The risk finance scheme excludes aid to undertakings that have received illegal aid that has not yet been fully recovered (paragraph 26 RFG).
The risk finance scheme does not concern aid to export-related activities towards third countries or Member States, namely aid directly linked to the quantities exported, the establishment and operation of a distribution network or to other current costs linked to the export activity, as well as aid contingent upon the use of domestic over imported goods (paragraph 27 RFG).
The risk finance scheme does not make aid subject to the obligation to use nationally produced goods or national services, and does not violate the freedom of establishment, where the aid is subject to the obligation for financial intermediaries, their managers or final beneficiaries to have or move their headquarters in the territory of the Member State concerned.
What is the total risk finance investment amount (including both the public and private part) per target undertaking over the whole investment cycle for each undertaking benefiting from the scheme (that is to say not per annum)? Please specify:
…
What is the size of the annual budget of the scheme?…
What is the overall size of budget of the measure for its entire duration? Please specify:
…
What is the size of the investment fund(s) set up under the scheme?…
Is the scheme to be co-financed by Union funds (European Social Fund, European Regional Development Fund, other)? Please specify:
…
What is the duration of the scheme? (Please specify the dates of its entry into force and its end date)…
What is the envisaged duration of the investment period?…
What is the envisaged duration of the holding period?…
The ex-ante assessment(164) demonstrates the need for the following undertakings to be targeted by the scheme as final beneficiaries (paragraphs 63 – 79 RFG) (please provide details):
…
…
Small midcaps (an undertaking (i) whose number of employees does not exceed 499, and (ii) whose annual turnover does not exceed EUR 100 million or whose annual balance sheet does not exceed EUR 86 million). With reference to the ex-ante assessment, please provide a summary of its economic evidence and appropriate justification:
…
…
Innovative mid-caps (mid-caps whose number of employees does not exceed 1 500 and whose R & D and innovation costs, as defined by the GBER, represent (a) at least 15 % of its total operating costs in at least one of the three years preceding the first investment under the risk finance measure, or (b) at least 10 % per year of its total operating costs in the three years preceding the first investment under the risk finance measure). With reference to the ex-ante assessment, please provide a summary of its the economic evidence and appropriate justification:
…
…
Undertakings receiving the initial risk finance investment more than seven years after their first commercial sale: With reference to the ex-ante assessment, please provide a summary of its economic evidence and appropriate justification:
…
…
Undertakings requiring an overall risk finance investment (including public and private) of an amount exceeding the EUR 15 million cap fixed in the GBER: With reference to the ex-ante assessment, please provide a summary of its economic evidence and appropriate justification:
…
…
Alternative trading platforms not fulfilling the conditions of Article 23 of the GBER: With reference to the ex-ante assessment, please provide a summary of its economic evidence and appropriate justification:
…
…
Other:
With reference to the ex-ante assessment, please provide a summary of its economic evidence and appropriate justification:
…
…
Independent private investors' participation below the ratios required in Article 21(10) of the GBER (paragraphs 80 to 81 RFG).
With reference to the ex-ante assessment, please provide a summary of its economic evidence and appropriate justification for having ratios below the ratios required in the GBER:
…
Financial instruments with design parameters above the ceilings provided for in the GBER, that is to say where the public investor takes more risk than allowed under the GBER (paragraphs 82 – 83 RFG).
With reference to the ex-ante assessment, please provide a summary of its economic evidence and appropriate justification for having design parameters above the ceilings provided for in the GBER:
…
Financial instruments other than guarantees where investors, financial intermediaries and their managers are selected by giving preference to downside protection over asymmetric profit-sharing.
With reference to the ex-ante assessment, please provide a summary of its economic evidence and appropriate justification:
…
Other:…
With reference to the ex-ante assessment, please provide a summary of its economic evidence and appropriate justification:
…
Fiscal incentives to corporate investors (including financial intermediaries or their managers acting as co-investors).
Please provide a summary of its economic evidence and appropriate justification:
…
Fiscal incentives to corporate investors for investment in SMEs via an alternative trading platform.
Please provide a summary of its economic evidence and appropriate justification:
…
Other:…
Please provide a summary of its economic evidence and appropriate justification:
…
Please provide the characteristics of the private investors participating in the measure (e.g. corporate investors, natural persons, etc.):
…
…
Do the private investors provide equity, loans or guarantees at the level of the financial intermediary (e.g. fund of funds) or at the level of the final beneficiaries? Please specify:
…
…
Do the financial intermediaries implementing the scheme co-invest (and are hence to be considered as private investors)?
Yes. If so, please specify:…
No
(See broad definition in paragraph 52 RFG; it also includes funds with and without legal personality)
Please specify the nature of the financial intermediaries implementing the scheme:
…
Does the implementation of the measure involve an “entrusted entity” (as defined in paragraph 52(v) RFG)?
Yes. If so, please give details:…
No
Does the entrusted entity co-invest with the Member State out of its own resources?
Yes. If so, please provide the reference to the legal basis authorising the entrusted entity to make such co-investment:
…
No. If so, please explain the method for the calculation of its compensation for implementing the measure, to ensure it is not overcompensated:
…
Is the entrusted entity selected through an open, transparent, non-discriminatory and objective selection procedure or is it directly appointed? Please specify:
…
Does the entrusted entity manage the fund(s) through which the funding is provided under the risk finance scheme?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Characteristics of the management company in charge of implementing the measure at the level of the financial intermediary:
…
In the case of several levels of financial intermediaries involved in the scheme (including funds of funds), please provide all relevant information for each level of financial intermediary:
…
Yes. If so, please specify:…
No
Please outline the design parameters that you have retained for the purposes of soliciting potential financial intermediaries to manifest their interest in participating in the risk finance scheme, by replying to the detailed questions in this section.
Risk finance aid measures in the form of financial instruments have to be deployed through financial intermediaries (paragraph 20 RFG). Hence, those measures are composed of, at least, a State intervention for financial intermediaries, and risk finance investments by financial intermediaries into final beneficiary undertakings.
The State provides the following to financial intermediaries (Please tick and complete as applicable):
Terms of the equity injection (please include also a comparison with the market terms for such equity injection):
…
Type of financial intermediary:…
Type of funding structure of the financial intermediary (e.g. investment fund with a percentage of private and public participation; fund of funds multi-stage structure with specialised sub-funds, public fund co-investing with private investors on a deal-by-deal basis) Please explain in detail:
…
…
…
Please indicate the participation ratios of the public and private investors:
…
Please indicate the type of preferential treatment envisaged for the benefit of participating private investors, as described in the call for expression of interest (please give details):
…
Upside incentives:…
Downside protection:…
If non-pari passu loss-sharing features go beyond the limits set out in the GBER, please provide economic evidence and justification, with reference to the ex-ante assessment (paragraph 110 RFG):
…
If relevant, please indicate whether the first loss piece borne by the public investor is capped (RFG paragraph 110):
Yes; Please specify how that cap has been fixed:
…
No; Please explain:
…
…
Please explain how the chosen instrument supports the public policy objectives pursued by the public investor:
…
…
…
…
Type of loans (e.g. subordinated, portfolio risk-sharing) please provide details:…
Terms of the loans under the measure (please include also a comparison with the market terms for such loans):
…
Maximum size of the loan:…
Maximum duration of the loan:…
Collateral or other requirements:…
Other relevant information:…
…
…
Please indicate the participation ratios of the public and private investors/lenders:
…
…
In particular, in case of portfolio risk-sharing loans, what is the co-investment rate by the selected financial intermediary? Please note that it should not be lower than 30 % of the value of the underlying loan portfolio (paragraph 114 RFG) … %
Please describe the risk and reward sharing between the public and private investors or lenders:
…
In particular, if the public investor assumes the first loss, at what level is it capped? Please note that it is recommendable that such cap does not exceed 35 % (RFG paragraph 113): Capped at … %
Where the public investor/lender assumes a first loss position exceeding the cap set out in the GBER (25 %), it needs to be justified by reference to a severe market failure identified in the ex-ante assessment (RFG paragraph 113). Please provide a summary of such justification:
…
…
If there are other risk-mitigation mechanisms for the benefit of the private investors/lenders, please explain:
…
…
…
…
…
…
Please explain how the chosen instrument supports the public policy objectives pursued by the public investor:
…
…
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Capped: guarantee cap is … %
(Please note that this cap applies to portfolios held by financial intermediaries and it is recommended that the cap rate does not exceed 35 % (paragraph 118 RFG); Please provide reasons for that rate:
…
Moreover, tick to specify whether:
The cap rate only covers expected losses; or
The cap rate covers also unexpected losses; In this case, please show how the pricing of the guarantee reflects this additional risk coverage:…
Uncapped; in that case, please justify the need and how the pricing of the guarantee reflects this additional risk coverage by the guarantee:
…
Counterguarantee (guarantee to guarantee institutions)
Other: please specify:…
Please give the reason for this level of coverage:
…
…
Nature of the underlying transactions:…
Total nominal size of the underlying transactions (in EUR):…
Maximum nominal amount of the underlying transaction per final beneficiary:…
Duration of the underlying transactions:…
Other relevant characteristics of the underlying transactions (risk rating, other):…
Maximum duration of the guarantee: …(Please note that this should normally not exceed 10 years (paragraph 119 RFG))
Please provide reference to the relevant provision in the legal basis that stipulates that the guarantee must be reduced if the financial intermediary does not include a minimum amount of investment in the portfolio during a specific period, and that commitment fees are required for unused amounts:…
Is a guarantee fee envisaged?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Please specify which party will have to pay the guarantee fee:
…
Please describe in detail the pricing:
…
Other:…
…
…
…
…
Please explain how the chosen instrument supports the public policy objectives pursued by the public investor:
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
Please describe the financial instrument to be implemented with the measure and provide a detailed description of all elements contained in section 2.9.1.1 above in so far as they are applicable to the chosen financial instrument:
…
There may be situations (including fund of funds structures), whereby, for instance, the State provides equity, loans or guarantees to a financial intermediary, which, in turn, provides equity, loans or guarantees to a further financial intermediary, which eventually provides risk finance investments to final beneficiaries. In such cases where there is a second, or further levels of financial intermediaries involved in the scheme, please provide all relevant information required in section 2.9.1.1.A on Equity/Loans/Guarantees/Other financial instruments, as applicable, for each additional level of financial intermediary:
…
The risk finance investment in the final beneficiaries takes the following form (Please tick and complete as applicable):
In case of quasi-equity, please describe in detail the nature of the envisaged instrument:
…
Please provide the terms of the equity investment in detail (please include also a comparison with the market terms for that equity investment):
…
Please describe all features of the investments to be made by the financial intermediary in detail, including the requirements that the investment strategy of the eligible financial intermediaries should comply with:
…
Please provide a detailed explanation of the duration of the instrument or of the exit strategy underpinning the investment in equity:
…
If private participation takes place (e.g. private investors also provide equity to the final beneficiaries):
Please indicate the private participation ratio:…
Please indicate the type of preferential treatment envisaged for the benefit of participating private investors, as described in the call for manifestation of interest (please give details):
…
Upside incentives:…
Downside protection:…
If non-pari passu loss-sharing features go beyond the limits set out in the GBER, please provide economic evidence and justification, with reference to the ex-ante assessment (paragraph 110 RFG):…
…
If relevant, please indicate whether the first loss piece borne by the public investor is capped (paragraph 110 RFG):
Yes; Please specify how the cap has been fixed:
…
No; Please explain:
…
Type of loans: please provide details:
…
Terms of the loans under the measure (please include also a comparison with the market terms for such loans):
…
Maximum size of the loan per beneficiary:…
…
Maximum duration of the loans:…
…
Please provide a detailed explanation of the duration of the instrument or of the exit strategy underpinning the investment in debt instruments:
…
Risk rating of the final beneficiaries:…
…
Collateral or other requirements:…
…
Other relevant information:…
…
If private participation takes place at this level (e.g. private investors also provide loans to the final beneficiaries):
Please indicate the private participation ratio:…
Please describe the risk and reward sharing between the public and the private investors:
…
In particular, if the public investor assumes the first loss, at what level is it capped? Capped at … %. (Please note that it is recommendable that such cap does not exceed 35 % (paragraph 113 RFG))
Where the public investor or lender assumes a first loss position exceeding the cap set out in the GBER (25 %), please justify this by reference to a severe market failure identified in the ex-ante assessment (paragraph 113 RFG) and please provide a summary for such justification:…
If there are other risk-mitigation mechanisms for the benefit of the private investors/lenders, please explain:…
…
…
…
…
…
…
Please describe the financial instrument which the measure seeks to implement and provide a detailed description of all elements contained in section 2.9.1.2 above in so far as they are applicable to the chosen financial instrument:
…
…
Tax incentive granted for:
Direct investments into undertakings
Indirect investments into undertakings (that is to say via financial intermediaries)
Indirect investments into undertakings made through an alternative trading platform
Tax incentive granted to:
corporate investors
investors who are natural persons, for investments falling outside the scope of the GBER:
…
Form of tax incentive:
income tax relief applicable on the taxable base
income tax break applicable on the tax liability payable
capital gains tax relief
dividend tax relief
other:
…
Please describe in detail the conditions that the investment must fulfil in order to be able to benefit from the fiscal incentive:
…
…
Please describe in detail the calculation of the tax incentive (including maximum percentage of the invested amount that the investor can claim for the purposes of the tax relief, maximum tax break amount which can be deducted from the investor's tax liabilities, etc.):
…
…
With reference to the ex-ante assessment, please provide economic evidence and justification for the category of eligible undertakings (paragraph 121 RFG):
…
…
Please provide evidence that the selection of the eligible undertakings is based on a well-structured set of investment requirements, made public through appropriate publicity, and setting out the characteristics of the eligible undertakings which are subject to a demonstrated market failure (paragraph 123 RFG):
…
…
Maximum duration of the tax incentive foreseen: …(Please note that fiscal schemes should have a maximum duration of 10 years (paragraph 124 RFG)).
Please explain the specific characteristics of the national fiscal system that are relevant for a full understanding of the tax incentive:
…
…
Please describe any related/similar/relevant fiscal incentives that already exist in the Member State as well as the interplay between them and the notified tax incentive:
…
…
Is the tax incentive open to all investors fulfilling the required criteria, without discrimination as to their place of establishment (paragraph 126 RFG)?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Please provide proof of the adequate publicity regarding the scope and the technical parameters (incl. ceilings and caps, maximum investment amount) of the tax incentive (paragraph 126 RFG):…
Does the total investment for each beneficiary undertaking exceed the maximum amount fixed by the risk finance provision in the GBER (paragraph 149 RFG)?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Are eligible shares full-risk ordinary shares which are newly-issued by an eligible undertaking as defined in the ex-ante assessment, and must they be held for at least three years (paragraph 150 RFG)?
Yes
No. If so, please provide details:
…
…
Is the relief available to investors who are not independent from the company invested in (paragraph 150 RFG)?
No
Yes. If so, please provide details:
…
…
In the case of income tax relief, what is the maximum percentage of the amount invested in eligible undertakings to which the relief can amount (paragraph 151 RFG)? Please note that capping the tax relief at 30 % of the invested amount is considered reasonable: … %
Can the relief exceed the maximum income tax liability of the investor, as established prior to the fiscal measure?
No
Yes. If so, please provide details:…
If the measure provides for multiple forms of tax incentive, please fill in the set of questions in section 2.9.2 above for each form of aid.
Existing platform:
Yes
No, to be newly established
Is or will the platform be a sub-platform or subsidiary of an existing stock exchange?
Yes. If so, please identify:
…
No
Are there already existing alternative trading platforms in the Member State (paragraph 129 RFG)?
Yes. If so, please identify:
…
No
Is the platform set up by and operating across several Member States (paragraph 128 RFG)?
Yes. If so, please specify
…
No
Type of undertakings traded on the platform:
…
Evidence that the majority of the financial instruments admitted to trading on the alternative trading platforms are or will be issued by SMEs.
A copy of the business plan of the platform operator demonstrating that the platform can become self-sustainable in less than 10 years (paragraph 127 RFG).
Plausible counterfactual scenarios comparing the situations with which the tradable undertakings would be confronted in the absence of the platform in terms of access to the necessary finance (paragraph 127 RFG).
For existing platforms, a copy of the business strategy of the platform that shows that, due to a persistent shortage of listings, and therefore a shortage of liquidity, the platform needs to be supported in the short-term, despite its long-term viability (paragraph 129 RFG).
Fiscal incentives to corporate investors in respect of their risk finance investments made through an alternative trading platform in eligible undertakings: Please complete section 2.9.2 on Fiscal instruments above.
Support to platform operators:
Platform operator is: a small enterprise or larger than a small enterprise
Maximum amount of the measure: … EUR.
Is the maximum amount more than the start-up aid allowed under the GBER?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Investment costs incurred for the establishment of the platform: … EUR
Does the aid to the operator exceed 50 % of those investment costs (paragraph 153 RFG)?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Aid is allowed up to how many years of start-up of the platform?
…
For platforms that are or will be a sub-platform or subsidiary of an existing stock exchange, please provide evidence for the lack of finance that such a sub-platform would face:
…
Other relevant information:
…
A risk finance aid scheme can only be justified if it is targeted at addressing a specific market failure, in the form of the existence of a funding gap affecting specific undertakings in a specific development stage, geographic area and, if applicable, economic sector.
Please submit the in-depth ex-ante assessment that proves the specific market failure, together with this notification.
Date of the ex-ante assessment:…
The assessment has been carried out by:
an independent entity
an entity linked to the following public authority:
…
Data on which the assessment is based:
…
Please tick to confirm that the ex-ante assessment is based on data covering 5 years preceding the notification: ☐
The risk finance scheme is financed partially from the European Stuctural and Investment Funds and the assessment was prepared in accordance with Article 37(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 (the Common Provisions Regulation)(165): ☐
Please list the identified specific policy objectives and make reference to the relevant section in the ex-ante assessment:
…
…
Please list the defined performance indicators (see examples in paragraph 58 RFG) and make reference to the relevant section in the ex-ante assessment:
…
…
By reference to the ex-ante assessment, please explain why the existing and envisaged national and Union policy actions targeting the same identified market failures cannot adequately address the identified market failures (paragraphs 90–91 RFG):
…
…
Please explain why the proposed State aid instrument has the most appropriate design to ensure an efficient funding structure (paragraphs 92–93 RFG):
…
…
Minimum private investment ratios (paragraphs 95–97 RFG):
What is the minimum aggregate (that is to say total, including all levels) independent private participation rate in the risk finance investment in the final beneficiary?: … % of the risk finance (public and private) provided to the final beneficiary.
In case of independent private investors' participation below the ratios required in GBER, please summarize the economic evidence and provide detailed justification for this ratio (as per paragraph 95 RFG), with reference to the ex-ante assessment:
…
…
Does the ex-ante assessment demonstrate that the scheme leverages additional private funding that would not have been provided otherwise, or in different forms or amounts or on different terms? Please explain:
…
…
Is private participation in the risk finance scheme of a non-independent nature acceptable (paragraph 96 RFG)?
Yes. If so, please provide economic evidence and justification:
…
…
No
In the case of undertakings receiving the initial risk finance investment more than seven years after their first commercial sale, what adequate restrictions does the scheme contain? …Does the private participation ratio amount to minimum 60 %?
Yes
No (paragraph 97 RFG)
Balance of risks and rewards between public and private investors (paragraphs 98 to 100 RFG):
Please explain why the allocation of risks and rewards between public and private investors as described above in the sections on the relevant financial instruments can be considered as balanced (paragraph 98 RFG):
…
…
Nature of incentives to be determined via selection of financial intermediaries, as well as fund managers or investors (paragraphs 101-102 RFG)
Please confirm by ticking as appropriate:
Selection of financial intermediaries implementing the scheme:
The financial intermediaries are selected via an open and non-discriminatory process, through which the exact nature of incentives is determined.
If not, please state the reason (explaining the selection of investors):…
Please describe the competitive process and describe how the process of selection complies with the requirements:
…
…
Please provide the reference to the relevant provision of the legal basis containing the requirements in the RFG that the selection process must be open and non-discriminatory:
…
…
Please list the selection criteria for financial intermediaries, as listed in the call for interest:
…
…
Please provide, together with this notification, the evaluation grid used for the screening of the financial intermediaries during the selection process.
Please describe the due diligence process on the selected financial intermediaries:
…
…
Please describe how compliance with the conditions of commercial management and profit-oriented decision-making set out in the GBER (Article 21(14) and (15)) is ensured (paragraph 160 RFG):
…
…
Please provide evidence, and reference to the legal basis:
…
…
As part of this selection process, financial intermediaries must demonstrate how their proposed investment strategy contributes to the achievement of the policy objectives and targets (based on the performance indicators identified in the ex-ante assessment).
For each of the selected financial intermediaries, please submit, together with this notification, the documents from the financial intermediary detailing its investment strategy, including pricing policy, and how it contributes to each of the policy objectives and targets.
Please provide a detailed description of the mechanism foreseen in the risk finance scheme, by which the Member State will ensure that the investment strategy of the intermediaries remains at all times aligned with the agreed policy targets (e.g. via monitoring, reporting, participation in the representation bodies), and that material changes to the investment strategy require the prior consent of the Member State.
Please also provide the reference to the relevant provision of the legal basis:
…
…
Each of the selected financial intermediaries has been selected in a competitive process taking into account its pricing policy on the instruments deployed in the risk finance scheme (including cost of funding, credit risk premiums, administrative and all other fees). Please provide evidence to that effect for each of the selected financial intermediaries.
The manager of the financial intermediary or the management company (“the manager”) is chosen through an open, transparent, non-discriminatory and objective selection procedure or the manager's remuneration fully reflects market levels.
If not, please state the reason (including an explanation on the selection of investors):
…
…
Please describe the competitive process and describe how the selection process complies with the requirements of this point:…
Please provide the reference to the relevant provision of the legal basis containing those requirements:
…
…
The managers of the fund of funds are required to legally commit as part of their investment mandate to determine via a competitive process the preferential conditions which could apply at the level of the sub-funds (paragraph 101 RFG).
Selection of private investors
The private investors are selected via an open and non-discriminatory process through which the exact nature of incentives is determined (paragraph 101 RFG). Please describe the modalities for identification and selection of private investors:
…
…
Co-investing financial intermediary or fund manager taking at least 10 % of first loss piece (paragraph 103 RFG)
Where the financial intermediary or fund manager co-invest alongside the Member State, any potential conflict of interest should be avoided and they must take at least 10 % of the first loss piece (paragraph 103 RFG). Please confirm that this is the case (if applicable):
…
…
Pass-on mechanism in the case of debt instruments (loans or guarantees) (paragraph 104 RFG):
The risk finance scheme provides for a pass-on mechanism (as described in section 2.9.1.1.A.) ensuring that the financial intermediary passes on the advantage it receives from the State to the final beneficiary undertakings. Please indicate the relevant provisions in the legal basis:
…
…
The pass-on mechanism includes monitoring arrangements and a claw-back mechanism. Please describe and indicate the relevant provisions in the legal basis:
…
…
For the purposes of these requirements, the information you have provided under section 2.9.2 will be considered.
Please indicate any further information you consider relevant with regard to the appropriateness conditions:
…
…
For the purposes of these requirements, the information you have provided under section 2.9.3 will be considered.
Please indicate any further information you consider relevant with regard to the appropriateness conditions:
…
…
Please describe and quantify the sources of financing available to the targeted undertakings, as analysed in the ex-ante assessment (cf. paragraph 65 RFG):
…
…
With reference to the ex-ante assessment, please provide a summary description of the nature and size of the funding gap faced by each category of targeted undertaking as demonstrated by the ex-ante assessment (that is to say the level of demand for finance from the targeted undertakings that is not met by the sources of financing described in point 3.3.1; please specify how the funding gap is calculated):
…
…
Please describe how the total amount of syndicated funding (public and private) provided under the risk finance measure is limited to the size of the funding gap (paragraph 134 RFG):
…
…
Please explain, by reference to the ex-ante assessment, how the preferential treatment of private investors is limited to the minimum necessary to achieve the minimum ratios of private capital participation required by the scheme (paragraph 134 RFG):
…
…
Duration of the funding gap faced by each category of targeted undertaking as estimated by the ex-ante assessment:
…
…
Please provide a summary of the economic evidence:…
The ex-ante assessment provides evidence of the above market failure referred to in point 3.3.1 in the following sector(s): …and in the following geographic area:
…
…
Please provide a summary of the economic evidence:…
In relation to the financial intermediaries/fund managers:
Is the exact value of incentives determined in the selection process of the financial intermediaries or fund managers (paragraph 136 RFG)?
☐ Yes | ☐ No |
Please provide the following information on the remuneration of the financial intermediaries or fund managers (paragraph 143 RFG):
Does it include an annual management fee in accordance with the RFG (paragraph 143 RFG)?
☐ Yes | ☐ No; please provide details: |
…… | |
…… |
Does it include performance-based incentives, including financial performance incentives and policy-related incentives, in accordance with the RFG (paragraph 144 RFG)?
☐ Yes | ☐ No; please provide details: |
…… | |
…… |
Please specify what penalties are provided for in case the policy targets are not met:
…
…
Please specify the performance-based remuneration and provide a comparison with market practice (paragraph 145 RFG):
…
…
Please specify the total management fees and provide a comparison with market practice (paragraph 146 RFG):
…
…
Is the overall fee structure evaluated as part of the scoring of the selection process and the maximum remuneration established as a result of that selection (paragraph 147 RFG)?
☐ Yes | ☐ No; please explain why not:… |
If the financial intermediary and its manager are public entities and were not selected through an open, transparent, non-discriminatory and objective selection procedure, please tick to confirm and provide evidence of the following (paragraph 41 RFG):
Their management fee is capped, their overall remuneration reflects normal market conditions and is linked to performance:
…
…
The public financial intermediaries are managed commercially and their managers take investment decisions in a profit-oriented manner at arm's length from the State. Please explain in particular the mechanisms established to exclude any possible interference by the State in the day-to-day management of the public fund:
…
…
The private investors are selected through an open, transparent, non-discriminatory and objective selection process, on a deal-by-deal basis.
In the case of direct appointment of an entrusted entity, what is its annual management fee, excluding performance-based incentives?: … % of the capital to be contributed to the entity. Please note that it should not exceed 3 % (paragraph 148 RFG).
In relation to the private investors:
In the case of co-investment by a public fund with private investors participating on a deal by deal basis, are the private investors selected through a separate competitive process in respect of each transaction, so as to establish the fair rate of return (paragraph 137 RFG)?
Yes. If so, please provide supporting evidence.
No
Where private investors are not selected through such a process, is the fair rate of return established by an independent expert on the basis of an analysis of market benchmarks and market risk using the discounted cash flow valuation methodology, and detailing the calculation of a minimum level of fair rate of return and an appropriate margin to reflect the risks (paragraph 138 RFG), and are all conditions of paragraph 139 RFG fulfilled?
No
Yes. If so, please provide the report in which the evaluation is contained, identify the expert, describe the existing rules for its appointment, and provide the relevant evidence:
…
…
Please tick to confirm that the same independent expert cannot be used twice within the same 3-year period ☐
Please explain how the risk adjusted returns for the private investors are limited to the fair rate of return (paragraph 140 RFG):
…
…
Please explain, on the basis of the ex-ante assessment, the economic justification for the specific financial parameters underpinning the measure:
…
…
For the purposes of these requirements, the information provided under section 2.9.2 will be considered.
Please indicate any further information you consider relevant with regard to the proportionality conditions:…
For the purposes of these requirements, the information provided under section 2.9.3 will be considered.
Please indicate any further information you consider relevant with regard to the proportionality conditions:…
Please provide, as part of the ex-ante assessment, information on the potential negative effects of the risk finance scheme. It should include the potential negative effects at all three levels, that is to say in the market for the provision of risk finance (e.g. the risk of crowding out of private investors), at the level of financial intermediaries and their managers, and at the level of final beneficiaries (including in the markets in which the beneficiaries are active).
Does the risk finance scheme ensure that the only undertakings targeted with risk finance State aid are those that are potentially viable?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If the answer to the above is yes, please describe how this is ensured and indicate the relevant provisions in the legal basis:
…
Is the risk finance scheme geographically or regionally limited?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please specify:…
Is the risk finance scheme limited in the legal basis (de iure) to specific sectors?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please specify:…
Is the risk finance scheme in practice targeted at certain sectors?
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If so, please specify:…
How are the negative effects minimised as much as possible?
…
…
Risk finance aid may be cumulated with other State aid measures without identifiable eligible costs, or with de minimis aid, up to the highest relevant total financing ceiling fixed in the specific circumstances of each case by a block exemption regulation or a decision adopted by the Commission (paragraph 168 RFG).
Please tick to confirm compliance with this rule: ☐
Please provide reference to the legal basis:
…
Please explain in what way is conformity with the cumulation rules achieved:
…
Please indicate here any other information you consider relevant to the assessment of the measure(s) concerned under the RFG:
…
…
Member States must use this sheet for the notification of an evaluation plan pursuant to Article 1(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 (166) and in the case of a notified aid scheme subject to an evaluation as provided in the relevant Commission guidelines.
Please refer to the Commission Staff Working Document “Common methodology for State aid evaluation” (167) for guidance on the drafting of an evaluation plan.
Title of the aid scheme:
…
Does the evaluation plan concern:
a scheme subject to evaluation pursuant to Article 1(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 651/2014?
a scheme notified to the Commission pursuant to Article 108(3) TFEU?
Reference of the scheme (to be completed by the Commission):
…
Please list any existing ex-ante evaluations or impact assessments for the aid scheme and ex-post evaluations or studies conducted in the past on predecessors of the aid scheme or on similar schemes. For each of those studies, please provide the following information: (a) a brief description of the study's objectives, methodologies used, results and conclusions, and (b) specific challenges that the evaluations and studies might have faced from a methodological point of view, for example data availability that are relevant for the assessment of the current evaluation plan. If appropriate, please identify relevant areas or topics not covered by previous evaluation plans that should be the subject of the current evaluation. Please provide the summaries of such evaluations and studies in annex and, when available, the internet links to the documents concerned:
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
Evaluation question | Indicator | Source | Frequency | Level | Population |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Please explain why the chosen indicators are the most relevant for measuring the expected impact of the scheme:
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…’
Part III.13 is replaced by the following:
It is recommended that this supplementary information sheet be completed in addition to the “General information” form, for the notification of any investment aid covered by the Guidelines on State aid to airports and airlines (173).
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
…
…
In the case of aid schemes, please describe the method by which the aid granting authority will assess the legal, organisational and financial relations enumerated above:
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
…
…
Airports with a commercial passenger traffic history of more than two financial years: Average annual passenger traffic during the two financial years preceding the year in which the aid is notified or actually granted.
Airports with a commercial passenger traffic history of less than two financial years: Forecasted average annual passenger traffic during the two financial years after the beginning of the operation of commercial passenger air traffic.
For all airports, forecasted average annual passenger traffic during the projected economic lifetime of the subsidised infrastructure.
Please provide the data in the form of a table, as follow:
Year | Total number of passengers |
---|---|
Passenger numbers must be counted “one-way” and for each individual route; e.g. a passenger flying to the airport and back would be counted twice. If the airport is part of a group of airports, passenger traffic data must be established on the basis of each individual airport.
…
…
Date of application for the aid: | |
Date of start of works on the investment project: | |
Planned end of works on the investment project: | |
Planned date of the start of operation of the investment: | |
Planned date on which the full capacity is reached: |
Please indicate for each cost item whether and why it should be regarded as an investment cost (i) directly related to infrastructure of a non-economic nature within the public policy remit (e.g. for safety, air traffic control and any other activities for which a Member State is responsible as part of its official powers as a public authority), or (ii) related to aeronautical airport infrastructure of an economic nature (e.g. runway, ground handling infrastructure), or (iii) related to non-aeronautical infrastructure of an economic nature (e.g. parking, hotels):
Type of works | Financing | Cost structure | Timing |
---|---|---|---|
Please indicate in that overview which part of the notified aid will support investments belonging to category (i) and which to category (ii):
…
…
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If no, please explain why an EIA is not required for this project:
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
Increase the mobility of Union citizens and the connectivity of the regions by establishing access points for intra-Union flights?
…
…
Combat air traffic congestion at major Union hub airports?
…
…
Facilitate regional development?
…
…
Please specify how the investment aid contributes to each of the objective chosen.
☐ yes | ☐ no |
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If yes, please provide the following information: (a) size and shape of the catchment area; (b) the travelling distance and time between the beneficiary airport and airports in the same catchment area; (c) passenger traffic of other airports in the same catchment area over the 5 years preceding the year of notification; (d) the expected total demand and total capacity in the catchment area of the aided airport in at least the next 10 years, according to the business plan in the worst, base and best case scenarios:
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
In the case of individual investment aid: In the absence of a counterfactual scenario with alternative activities, please specify the capital cost funding gap established on the basis of the beneficiary airport's ex-ante business plan. The capital cost funding gap is the difference between the positive and negative cash flows, including investment costs into fixed capital assets over the lifetime of the investment in net present value terms:
…
…
…
…
The business plans should cover the period of the economic lifetime of the investments:
…
…
…
…
Please describe all underlying input data, parameters and assumptions that the aid granting authority will assess for the purposes of the investigations and analysis:
…
…
Please indicate the maximum percentage of the eligible costs to be covered by investment aid (“aid intensity”); including any top-ups on the basic aid intensity:
…
…
Where an aid scheme applies to airports of various sizes, please indicate the maximum aid intensity applicable to the following groups of airports:
Size of airport based on average passenger traffic (passengers per annum) | Maximum investment aid intensity |
---|---|
> 3-5 million | |
1-3 million | |
< 1 million |
…
…
…
…
investment aid to airports with average annual traffic above 3 million passengers;
investment aid with an aid intensity exceeding 75 % to an airport with average annual traffic below 1 million passengers, with the exception of airports located in remote regions;
investment aid granted for the relocation of airports;
investment aid financing a mixed passenger and freight airport handling more than 200 000 tonnes of freight during the two financial years preceding that in which the aid is notified;
investment aid aimed at the creation of a new passenger airport (including the conversion of an existing airfield into a passenger airport);
investment aid aimed at the creation or development of an airport located within 100 kilometres distance or 60 minutes travelling time by car, bus, train or high-speed train from an existing airport.
It is recommended that this supplementary information sheet is completed, in addition to the “General information” form, for the notification of any individual operating aid covered by the Guidelines on State aid to airports and airlines (180).
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
In the case of aid schemes, please describe the method by which the aid granting authority will assess the legal, organisational and financial relationships referred to in points 1.1.1 to 1.1.5 above.
…
…
…
…
Airports with a commercial passenger traffic history of more than two financial years: average annual passenger traffic during the two financial years preceding the year in which the aid is notified or actually granted.
Airports with a commercial passenger traffic history of less than two financial years: forecasted average annual passenger traffic during the two financial years after the beginning of the operation of commercial passenger air traffic flows.
Please provide the data in the form of a table, as follows: [copied from page 188, point 2.2.3]
Year | Total number of passengers |
---|---|
Passenger numbers must be counted “one-way” and for each individual route. For example: a passenger flying to the airport and back would be counted twice. If the airport is part of a group of airports, passenger traffic data must be established on the basis of each individual airport.
The business plan must contain information on traffic and traffic forecasts; costs and cost forecasts; financial data and financial forecasts as regards the level of profitability and cash-flows (by reference to methodologies which are demonstrably used by the airport, e.g. using methods for evaluating the net present value of an investment (NPV), the internal rate of return (IRR), and the average return on capital employed (ROCE). The business plan must be provided in an excel format including explanations of all underlying formulas.
In the case of aid schemes, please specify in detail (a) the formal and material criteria to which business plans of eligible airports must conform; (b) the method the national authorities will use to assess the business plans.
…
…
Revenue | ||||
… | ||||
… | ||||
Operating costs | ||||
… | ||||
… | ||||
Other | ||||
… | ||||
Operating results |
In the case of aid schemes, please specify the method the authorities will use to establish the operating losses of eligible airports.
In the case of aid schemes, please commit to include the above described financial reports in the assessment of individual aid.
…
…
…
…
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
Increase the mobility of Union citizens and the connectivity of the regions by establishing access points for intra-Union flights?
Combat air traffic congestion at major Union hub airports?
Facilitate regional development?
Please specify how the operating aid contributes to the objective(s) chosen.
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
☐ yes | ☐ no |
In the case of aid schemes: Please (a) confirm that the authorities are committed to assess the likely effect on the traffic of any other airport(s) located in the same catchment area as an eligible airport on the basis of information that is part of the beneficiary airport's business plan and is based on sound passenger and freight traffic forecasts; (b) explain the method and the criteria the national authorities will use to assess the likely effect on the traffic of that other airport or those other airports.
…
…
…
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If yes, please provide relevant information in the business plan.
☐ yes | ☐ no |
If yes, the beneficiary should provide relevant information in the business plan.
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
In the case of aid schemes, please describe the method applied by the aid granting authority in order to assess the business plans as well as the likelihood that in the absence of aid the level of economic activity of the airport concerned would be significantly reduced, taking into account the possible presence of investment aid and level of traffic.
…
…
In the case of aid schemes, please confirm that the aid granting authority will grant individual operating aid only if it has concluded that the business plan of the beneficiary airport will result in full operating cost coverage by 4 April 2024. Please specify which key parameters of the business plan the aid granting authorities will assess in order to reach that conclusion in each case.
…
…
In the case of individual operating aid: The beneficiary airport's initial funding gap over 10 years, starting with the operating cost coverage on 4 April 2014 at the beginning of the transition period and reaching full operating cost coverage achievement by 4 April 2024, at the end of the transition period.
In the case of aid schemes: please commit (a) that the funding gap of eligible airports will be established using the method referred to in point 2.5.2; (b) that eligible airports must demonstrate that they will achieve full operating cost coverage by 4 April 2024.
…
…
The maximum permissible aid amount:
…
…
The percentage of the funding gap to be covered by the operating aid:
…
…
The period during which operating aid will be granted:
…
…
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
It is recommended that this supplementary information sheet is completed, in addition to the “General information” form in Part I, for the notification of any start-up aid covered by the Guidelines on State aid to airports and airlines (189).
This form applies both to the notification of aid schemes and individual aid.
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
…
…
In the case of aid schemes, please describe the method by which the aid granting authority will assess those legal, organisational and financial relationships:
…
…
…
…
Increase the mobility of Union citizens and the connectivity of the regions by opening new routes?
Facilitate regional development of remote regions?
Please explain how the aid contributes to the objective chosen.
…
…
In the case of aid schemes, please explain how the aid granting authority will ensure that the condition in this point is met in each individual case of start-up aid.
…
Routes linking an airport with less than 3 million passengers per annum (192) to another airport within the Common European Aviation Area(193);
Routes linking an airport located in a remote region to another airport (within or outside the Common European Aviation Area) irrespective of the size of the airports concerned;
Routes linking an airport with more than 3 million passengers per annum and less than 5 million passengers per annum, not located in remote regions. Please duly substantiate the specific circumstances in this case;
Other (Please specify).
…
…
…
…
concerning airports with a commercial passenger traffic history of more than 2 financial years: the average annual passenger traffic during the two financial years preceding the year in which the aid is notified or granted;
concerning airports with a commercial passenger traffic history of less than two financial years: the forecasted average annual passenger traffic during the two financial years after the beginning of the operation of commercial passenger air traffic;
Please provide the data in the form of a table, as follows:
Year | Airport | Airport |
---|---|---|
Year | Passenger number | Passenger number |
Year | Passenger number | Passenger number |
Passenger numbers must be counted “one-way” and for each individual route; e.g. passengers flying to the airport and back have to be counted twice. If an airport is part of a group of airports, passenger traffic data must be established on the basis of the individual airport.
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
In the case of aid schemes, please describe the method applied by the aid granting authority in order to assess the likelihood that in the absence of aid the level of economic activity of the airline at the airport concerned would not be expanded.
…
…
In the case of aid schemes, please confirm that eligible new routes will start operating only after the application for aid was submitted to the granting authority.
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
In the case of aid schemes: Please explain how the aid granting authority will ensure that the condition in this point is satisfied in each individual case of start-up aid.
…
…
…
…
…
…
It is recommended that this supplementary information sheet is completed, in addition to the “General information” form in Part I, for the notification of any social aid provision covered by the Guidelines on State aid to airports and airlines (196).
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
☐ yes | ☐ no |
…
…
…
…
☐
…
…
☐
…
…
It is recommended that this supplementary information sheet is completed, in addition to the “General information” form in Part I, for the notification of any measure covered by the the Community guidelines on State aid to maritime transport (199) (“the Guidelines”).
Does the scheme constitute or include:
Tonnage Tax
a reduction in social contributions
a reduction in local taxes
a reduction in registration fees
aids for training
aids for transferring lorries from roads to sea ways
a public service contract or award procedure thereof
aids of social character
other, please describe:
…
For categories (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) under point 1, please reply to 2.2 to 2.7:
What are the eligibility criteria for companies?
…
…
What are the eligibility criteria for boats? In particular, is there an obligation in relation to the flag? What are the flag-related obligations for the fleet of companies entering tonnage taxation scheme after 17 January 2004? Do flag-related obligations apply to the entire fleet of the beneficiary company or only owned fleet and fleet chartered in on bare-boat terms?
…
…
What are the eligibility conditions for the fleet chartered out on bare-boat terms?
…
…
What are the eligibility conditions for time- or voyage-chartered fleet?
…
…
Where appropriate, what are the eligibility criteria for seafarers?
…
…
Describe the list of eligible activities. In particular, does the regime concern:
☐ tug activities? | ☐ dredging activities? |
More generally, are shipping activities other than maritime transport of goods and passengers covered by the aid scheme?
…
…
What are the ring-fence measures to avoid spill-over into other activities of the same company?
…
…
For category (g) under point 1:
What are the public services obligations, the method for calculating the compensations, the different offers submitted in the tender and the reasons for the choice of the designated company?
…
…
For category (h) under point 1:
What are the routes concerned, the populations of users concerned and the conditions attached to the award of individual grants?
…
…
…
…
For category (a) under point 1, please reply to 3.2 to 3.7:
What are the rates used to calculate the taxable income per 100 NT?
Up to 1 000 NT…
Between 1 001 and 10 000 NT…
Between 10 001 and 20 000 NT…
More than 20 001 NT…
Are companies obliged to set up separate accounts when operating both eligible and non-eligible activities?
…
…
What treatment is applied to groups of companies and intra-group transactions?
…
…
To what extent are the revenues from ancillary activities covered by tonnage tax scheme?
…
…
Are there special taxation rules for ships entering tonnage taxation in a situation when their market value exceeds their tax value?
…
…
Is the normal tax level under Member States' general tax rules applied to remuneration of directors and shareholders of the shipping companies?
…
…
For categories (b) (c) and (d) under point 1, please reply to 3.8 to 3.10:
What is the aid intensity in terms of percentage of the social/fiscal contributions or of the tax or fees that the seafarer or the shipowner should have normally been subject to?
…
…
Or to what level in absolute terms have the contributions, fees or taxes referred to in point 3.8 been limited?
…
…
In case of dredgers and tugboats, is the aid strictly limited to maritime transport part of activities?
…
…
For category (e) under point 1: What is the aid intensity in terms of the cost of the training or the salary of the trainee?
…
…
For category (f) under point 1: What is the amount of aid per tonne kilometre transferred?
…
…
For category (h) under point 1: What is the amount of individual grants?
…
…’
Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1).
NACE Rev. 2, or subsequent legislation amending or replacing it; NACE is the statistical classification of economic activities in the European Union as laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 establishing the statistical classification of economic activities NACE Revision 2 and amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 3037/90 as well as certain EC Regulations on specific statistical domains (OJ L 393, 30.12.2006, p. 1).
Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36).
In the case of partner and linked enterprises, please note that the amounts reported for the aid beneficiary should take into account the number of employees and the financial data of the linked enterprises and/or partner enterprises.
As defined in the Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty (OJ C 249, 31.7.2014, p. 1).
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2015 on the European Fund for Strategic Investments, the European Investment Advisory Hub and the European Investment Project Portal and amending Regulations (EU) No 1291/2013 and (EU) No 1316/2013 — the European Fund for Strategic Investments (OJ L 169, 1.7.2015, p. 1).
Commission's registration number of the authorised or block-exempted scheme.
According to Article 1(e) of Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ L 248, 24.9.2015, p. 9), individual aid means aid that is not awarded on the basis of an aid scheme and notifiable award of aid on the basis of a scheme.
The date of the legally binding commitment to award the aid.
In the case of aid to the agriculture sector or fishery and aquaculture sector information on compliance with the common assessment principles is requested in Parts III.12 (Supplementary information sheet for aid to the agriculture and forestry sectors and in rural areas sector) and III.14 (Supplementary information sheet for aid to the fishery and aquaculture sector).
Communication from the Commission amending the Communications from the Commission on EU Guidelines for the application of State aid rules in relation to the rapid deployment of broadband networks, on Guidelines on regional State aid for 2014–2020, on State aid for films and other audiovisual works, on Guidelines on State aid to promote risk finance investments and on Guidelines on State aid to airports and airlines (OJ C 198, 27.6.2014, p. 30).
Grant/Interest rate subsidy, Loan/Repayable advances/Reimbursable grant, Guarantee, Tax advantage or tax exemption, Risk finance, Other (please specify). If the aid is granted through multiple aid instruments, the aid amount must be provided by instrument.
Such a requirement can be waived with respect to individual aid awards below EUR 500 000. For schemes in the form of tax advantages, the information on individual aid can be provided in the following ranges (in EUR million): [0.5-1]; [1-2];[2-5]; [5-10]; [10-30]; [30 and more].
Overall amount of aid planned, expressed in full national currency amounts. For tax measures, estimated overall revenue loss due to tax concessions. If the average annual State aid budget of the scheme exceeds EUR 150 million, please fill in the section on evaluation.
In case of an average annual State aid budget of the scheme above EUR 150 million, please fill in the section on Evaluation of this notification form. The Evaluation requirement does not apply to aid schemes covered by the Supplementary information sheet on Agriculture aid.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1407/2013 of 18 December 2013 on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to de minimis aid (OJ L 352, 24.12.2013, p. 1) and Commission Regulation (EU) No 717/2014 of 27 June 2014 on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to de minimis aid in the fishery and aquaculture sector (OJ L 190, 28.6.2014, p. 45).
Union funding centrally managed by the Commission that is not directly or indirectly under the control of the Member State does not constitute State aid. Where such Union funding is combined with other public funding, only the latter will be considered for determining whether notification thresholds and maximum aid intensities are respected, provided that the total amount of public funding granted in relation to the same eligible costs does not exceed the maximum funding rates laid down in the applicable Union legislation.
The Evaluation requirement does not apply to aid schemes covered by the Supplementary information sheet on Agriculture aid.
For guidance, see the Commission Staff Working Document “Common methodology for State aid evaluation”, SWD(2014)179 final of 28.5.2014 under http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/modernisation/state_aid_evaluation_methodology_en.pdf.
Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ L 248, 24.9.2015, p. 9).
For guidance see Article 339 TFEU that refers to “information about undertakings, their business relations or their cost components”. The Union courts have generally defined “business secrets” as information “of which not only disclosure to the public but also mere transmission to a person other than the one that provided the information may seriously harm the latter's interest” in Case T-353/94 Postbank v Commission ECLI:EU:T:1996:119, paragraph 87'.
Communication from the Commission to the Member States on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to short-term export-credit insurance (OJ C 392, 19.12.2012, p. 1).
Guidelines on certain State aid measures in the context of the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme post 2012 (OJ C 158, 5.6.2012, p. 4).
Communication from the Commission on the application, from 1 August 2013, of State aid rules to support measures in favour of banks in the context of the financial crisis (OJ C 216, 30.7.2013, p. 1).
Communication from the Commission — Criteria for the analysis of the compatibility with the internal market of State aid to promote the execution of important projects of common European interest (OJ C 188, 20.6.2014, p. 4).
Communication from the Commission on the application of the European Union State aid rules to compensation granted for the provision of services of general economic interest (OJ C 8, 11.1.2012, p. 4).
Guidelines on regional State aid for 2014-2020 (OJ C 209, 23.7.2013, p. 1).
“The same or a similar activity” means an activity falling under the same class (four-digit numerical code) of the NACE Rev. 2 statistical classification of economic activities.
As defined in the Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty, (OJ C 249, 31.7.2014, p. 1).
As defined in Council Regulation (EC) No 723/2009 of 25 June 2009 on the Community legal framework for a European Research Infrastructure Consortium (ERIC) (OJ L 206, 8.8.2009, p. 1).
“SMEs” means undertakings that fulfil the conditions laid down in the Commission recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36).
The sole acquisition of the shares of an undertaking does not qualify as initial investment.
“The same or a similar activity” means an activity falling under the same class (four-digit numerical code) of the NACE Rev. 2 statistical classification of economic activities.
Paragraph 94 RAG does not apply to SMEs or in the case of the acquisition of an establishment.
Paragraph 101 RAG provides that intangible assets which are eligible for the calculation of the investments costs must remain associated with the assisted area concerned and must not be transferred to other regions. To that end, the intangible assets must fulfil the following conditions:
they must be used exclusively in the establishment receiving the aid:
they must be amortisable;
they must be purchased under market conditions from third parties unrelated to the buyer.
Paragraph 102 RAG provides that the intangible assets must be included in the assets of the undertaking receiving the aid and must remain associated with the project for which the aid is awarded for at least five years (three years for small and medium enterprises).
For the methodology, refer to Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 25 Member States applicable as from 1 January 2007 (OJ C 317, 23.12.2006, p. 2) and the Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6).
The aid amount(s) and eligible costs should be provided both in nominal and discounted values.
In order to do so, you could, for example, refer to the criteria enumerated in paragraph 40 RAG and/or to the business plan of the beneficiary.
This question does not apply to subsidised loans, public equity-capital loans or public participations which do not meet the market investor principle, State guarantees containing elements of aid, or public support granted within the scope of de minimis rule.
For example, direct grants, exemptions or reductions in taxes, social security or other compulsory charges, or the supply of land, goods or services at favourable prices, etc.
For example, low-interest loans or interest rebates, state guarantees, the purchase of a shareholding or an alternative provision of capital on favourable terms.
The time period considered for the calculation of the IRR should correspond to timeframes usually considered by the industry for similar projects.
All relevant costs and benefits must be taken into account, including for example administrative costs, transport costs, training costs not covered by training aid and also wage differences. However, where the alternative location is in the EEA, subsidies granted in that other location are not to be taken into account.
Details of all classifications are available in the Eurostat classifications database, currently under the link http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/classifications.
Underperformance of the market will normally be measured compared to the EEA GDP over the last three years before the start of the project (benchmark rate); it can also be established on the basis of projected growth rates in the coming three to five years. Indicators may include the foreseeable future growth of the market concerned and the resulting expected capacity utilisation rates, as well as the likely impact of the capacity increase on competitors through its effects on prices and profit margins.
Guidelines on regional State aid for 2014-2020 (OJ C 209, 23.7.2013, p. 1).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 of 17 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty (OJ L 187, 26.6.2014, p. 1).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1407/2013 of 18 December 2013 on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to de minimis aid (OJ L 352, 24.12.2013, p. 1).
“The same or a similar activity” means an activity falling under the same class (four-digit numerical code) of the NACE Rev. 2 statistical classification of economic activities.
Communication from the Commission, EU Guidelines for the application of State aid rules in relation to the rapid deployment of broadband networks (OJ C 25, 26.1.2013, p. 1).
“SMEs” means undertakings that fulfil the conditions laid down in Commission recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36).
The sole acquisition of the shares of an undertaking does not qualify as initial investment.
“The same or a similar activity” means an activity falling under the same class (four-digit numerical code) of the NACE Rev. 2 statistical classification of economic activities.
The notification threshold is defined in paragraph 20(n) RAG.
In the transport sector, expenditure on the purchase of transport equipment cannot be included in the uniform set of items of expenditure. Such expenditure is not eligible for initial investment.
That provision does not have to apply for SMEs or in case of acquisition of an establishment.
Paragraph 101 RAG provides that intangible assets which are eligible for the calculation of the investments costs must remain associated with the assisted area concerned and must not be transferred to other regions. To this end, the intangible assets must fulfil the following conditions:
they must be used exclusively in the establishment receiving the aid:
they must be amortisable;
they must be purchased under market conditions from third parties unrelated to the buyer.
Paragraph 102 RAG provides that the intangible assets must be included in the assets of the undertaking receiving the aid and must remain associated with the project for which the aid is awarded for at least five years (three years for SMEs).
Operating Programme or development programme defined in the context of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development or the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF).
This question does not apply to subsidised loans, public equity-capital loans or public participations which do not meet the market investor principle, State guarantees containing elements of aid, or public support granted within the scope of de minimis rule.
For that purpose reference can be made, among others, to impact assessments of the proposed scheme or ex post evaluations of similar schemes.
For example, direct grants, exemptions or reductions in taxes, social security or other compulsory charges, or the supply of land, goods or services at favourable prices, etc.
For example, low-interest loans or interest rebates, State guarantees, the purchase of a shareholding or an alternative provision of capital on favourable terms.
A counterfactual is credible if it is genuine and relates to the decision-making factors prevalent at the time of the decision by the beneficiary regarding the investment.
In order to enable the Commission to assess the likely negative effects the Member State could submit any impact assessment at its disposal as well as ex-post evaluations carried out for similar predecessor schemes (as specified in paragraph 125 RAG).
Guidelines on regional State aid for 2014-2020 (OJ C 209, 23.7.2013, p. 1).
“SMEs” means undertakings that fulfil the conditions laid down in Commission recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36).
In that respect please note that operating aid to compensate for additional transport costs of goods which have been produced in areas eligible for operating aid can only be granted in compliance with the General Block Exemption Regulation (“GBER”) in force at the moment of the granting.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 of 17 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty (OJ L 187, 26.6.2014, p. 1).
Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 65), and Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243).
Without prejudice to procedures that cover both the development and the subsequent purchase of unique or specialised products or services.
If the aid application is for an R & D project, it is not excluded that the potential beneficiary would have already carried out feasibility studies which are not covered by the request for aid.
This refers in particular to the types of company mentioned in Annex I to Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings, amending Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC (OJ L 182, 29.6.2013, p. 19).
This is the case when deduction of accumulated losses from reserves (and all other elements generally considered as part of the own funds of the company) leads to a negative cumulative amount that exceeds half of the subscribed share capital.
This refers in particular to the types of company mentioned in Annex II to Directive 2013/34/EU.
Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6) or any future communication which might replace it.
Including any such aid granted before the date on which the Commission began to apply the Guidelines, i.e. before 1.8.2014.
Please note that where less than 10 years have elapsed since the rescue aid or temporary restructuring support was granted or the restructuring period came to an end or implementation of the restructuring plan was halted (whichever occurred the latest), further rescue aid, restructuring aid or temporary restructuring support can be only granted: (a) where temporary restructuring support follows the granting of rescue aid as part of a single restructuring operation; (b) where restructuring aid follows the granting of rescue aid or temporary restructuring support as part of a single restructuring operation; (c) where rescue aid or temporary restructuring support has been granted in accordance with these guidelines and that aid was not followed by restructuring aid, if: (i) it could reasonably have been believed that the beneficiary would be viable in the long term when the aid pursuant to these guidelines was granted, and (ii) new rescue or restructuring aid or temporary restructuring support becomes necessary after at least five years due to unforeseeable circumstances for which the beneficiary is not responsible; (d) in exceptional and unforeseeable circumstances for which the beneficiary is not responsible.
This refers in particular to the types of company mentioned in Annex I to Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings, amending Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC (OJ L 182, 29.6.2013, p. 19).
This is the case when deduction of accumulated losses from reserves (and all other elements generally considered as part of the own funds of the company) leads to a negative cumulative amount that exceeds half of the subscribed share capital.
This refers in particular to the types of company mentioned in Annex II to Directive 2013/34/EU.
Restructuring may involve one or more of the following elements: the reorganisation and rationalisation of the beneficiary's activities to a more efficient basis, typically involving withdrawal from loss-making activities, restructuring of those existing activities that can be made competitive again and, possibly, diversification towards new and viable activities. It typically also involves financial restructuring in the form of capital injections by new or existing shareholders and debt reduction by existing creditors.
Long-term viability is achieved when an undertaking is able to provide an appropriate projected return on capital after having covered all its costs including depreciation and financial charges. The restructured undertaking should be able to compete in the marketplace on its own merits.
The alternative scenario may concern, for example: debt reorganisation, asset disposal, private capital raising, sale to a competitor or break-up, in each case either through entry into an insolvency or reorganisation procedure or otherwise.
Please also see point 56 of the Guidelines.
Please also see point 64 of the Guidelines.
For example, where the aid to be granted enhances the beneficiary's equity position, the own contribution should similarly include measures that are equity-enhancing, such as raising fresh equity from incumbent shareholders, the write-down of existing debt and capital notes or the conversion of existing debt to equity, or the raising of new external equity on market terms.
For example where the State provides grants, injects capital or writes off debt.
Including any such aid granted before the date on which the Commission began to apply the Guidelines, i.e. before 1.8.2014.
Please note that where less than 10 years have elapsed since the rescue aid or temporary restructuring support was granted or the restructuring period came to an end or implementation of the restructuring plan was halted (whichever occurred the latest), further rescue aid, restructuring aid or temporary restructuring support can only be granted: (a) where temporary restructuring support follows the granting of rescue aid as part of a single restructuring operation; (b) where restructuring aid follows the granting of rescue aid or temporary restructuring support as part of a single restructuring operation; (c) where rescue aid or temporary restructuring support has been granted in accordance with these guidelines and that aid was not followed by restructuring aid, if: (i) it could reasonably have been believed that the beneficiary would be viable in the long term when the aid pursuant to these guidelines was granted, and (ii) new rescue or restructuring aid or temporary restructuring support becomes necessary after at least five years due to unforeseeable circumstances for which the beneficiary is not responsible; (d) in exceptional and unforeseeable circumstances for which the beneficiary is not responsible.
Divestments to limit distortions of competition should take place without undue delay, taking into account the type of asset being divested and any obstacles to its disposal, and in any case within the duration of the restructuring plan.
This could in particular include measures to open up certain markets directly or indirectly linked to the beneficiary's activities to other Union operators, in compliance with Union law. Such initiatives may replace other measures to limit distortions of competition that would normally be required of the beneficiary.
Please see points 32 to 35 of the Guidelines for the types of measures covered by the notion of “aid to cover the social costs of restructuring”.
As defined in Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36).
“Smaller State-owned undertakings” are economic units with an independent power of decision that would qualify as small or medium-sized enterprises under Recommendation 2003/361/EC but for the fact that 25 % or more of the capital or voting rights are directly or indirectly controlled, jointly or individually, by one or more public bodies.
This refers in particular to the types of company mentioned in Annex I to Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings, amending Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC (OJ L 182, 29.6.2013, p. 19).
This is the case when deduction of accumulated losses from reserves (and all other elements generally considered as part of the own funds of the company) leads to a negative cumulative amount that exceeds half of the subscribed share capital.
This refers in particular to the types of company mentioned in Annex II to Directive 2013/34/EU.
Restructuring may involve one or more of the following elements: the reorganisation and rationalisation of the beneficiary's activities to a more efficient basis, typically involving withdrawal from loss-making activities, restructuring of those existing activities that can be made competitive again and, possibly, diversification towards new and viable activities. It typically also involves financial restructuring in the form of capital injections by new or existing shareholders and debt reduction by existing creditors.
Long-term viability is achieved when an undertaking is able to provide an appropriate projected return on capital after having covered all its costs including depreciation and financial charges. The restructured undertaking should be able to compete in the marketplace on its own merits.
The alternative scenario should not involve State aid. It may concern, for example: debt reorganisation, asset disposal, private capital raising, sale to a competitor or break-up, in each case either through entry into an insolvency or reorganisation procedure or otherwise.
Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6) or any future communication which might replace it.
In line with point 115(e) of the Guidelines, that plan need not contain all the elements set out in points 47 to 52 of the Guidelines, but must, as a minimum, identify the actions that the beneficiary must take to restore its long-term viability without State support.
For example, where the aid to be granted enhances the beneficiary's equity position, the own contribution should similarly include measures that are equity-enhancing, such as raising fresh equity from incumbent shareholders, the write-down of existing debt and capital notes or the conversion of existing debt to equity, or the raising of new external equity on market terms.
For example where the State provides grants, injects capital or writes off debt.
Please note where less than 10 years have elapsed since the rescue aid or temporary restructuring support was granted or the restructuring period came to an end or implementation of the restructuring plan was halted (whichever occurred the latest), further rescue aid, restructuring aid or temporary restructuring support can be only granted: (a) where temporary restructuring support follows the granting of rescue aid as part of a single restructuring operation; (b) where restructuring aid follows the granting of rescue aid or temporary restructuring support as part of a single restructuring operation; (c) where rescue aid or temporary restructuring support has been granted in accordance with these guidelines and that aid was not followed by restructuring aid, if: (i) it could reasonably have been believed that the beneficiary would be viable in the long term when the aid pursuant to these guidelines was granted, and (ii) new rescue or restructuring aid or temporary restructuring support becomes necessary after at least five years due to unforeseeable circumstances for which the beneficiary is not responsible; (d) in exceptional and unforeseeable circumstances for which the beneficiary is not responsible.
Including any such aid granted before the date from when the Commission applies the Guidelines, i.e. before 1.8.2014.
Member States are not obliged to require such measures from small enterprises, except where otherwise provided by rules on State aid in a particular sector. However, small enterprises should not normally increase their capacity during a restructuring period.
Divestments, write-offs and closure of loss-making activities which would at any rate be necessary to restore long-term viability will generally not be considered sufficient.
Such measures should take place in the market(s) where the beneficiary will have a significant market position after the restructuring, in particular those where there is significant excess capacity.
Divestments to limit distortions of competition should take place without undue delay, taking into account the type of asset being divested and any obstacles to its disposal, and in any case within the duration of the restructuring plan.
This could in particular include measures to open up certain markets directly or indirectly linked to the beneficiary's activities to other Union operators, in compliance with Union law. Such initiatives may replace other measures to limit distortions of competition that would normally be required of the beneficiary.
Communication from the Commission on State aid for films and other audiovisual works (OJ C 332, 15.11.2013, p. 1).
EU Guidelines for the application of State aid rules in relation to the rapid deployment of broadband networks (OJ C 25, 26.1.2013, p. 1).
EUROPE 2020 — A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, COM(2010) 2020.
For details see points 56 to 60 of the Broadband Guidelines.
For details see points 82 to 85 of the Broadband Guidelines.
See for an example the Commission Guide to high speed broadband investment (http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/presenta/broadband2011/broadband2011_en.pdf.
Directive 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the award of concession contracts (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 1), Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 65) and Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC, (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243).
For instance, investment and business model selected, size and characteristics of the geographic intervention areas or measures to control projects costs.
The list of Commission decisions on State aid to broadband are available on DG Competition's homepage: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/sectors/telecommunications/broadband_decisions.pdf.
OJ C 200, 28.6.2014, p. 1. For some details concerning the use of this supplementary notification sheet in agriculture and the fishery and aquaculture sectors see point 14 of the EEAG.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 of 17 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty (OJ L 187, 26.6.2014, p. 1).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1407/2013 of 18 December 2013 on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to de minimis aid (OJ L 352, 24.12.2013, p. 1).
See section 3.7 of EEAG, aid in the form of reductions in or exemptions from environmental taxes and in the form of reductions in funding support for electricity from renewable sources.
When introducing a measure co-financed by the European Structural and Investments Funds, Member States may rely on the reasoning in the relevant Operational Programmes in indicating the environmental or energy objectives pursued.
The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity.
For the purpose of demonstrating the appropriateness of schemes, the Member State can also rely on the results of past evaluations as described in Chapter 4 of the EEAG.
“Start of works” is defined in point 19(44) of the EEAG.
That requirement is not applicable to SMEs and is without prejudice to the assessment of the incentive effect of State aid for energy-efficiency measure prescribed by or carried out as a result of the energy audit or those resulting from other tools (see points 56 and 57 of the EEAG).
For details see points 72 to 76 of the EEAG.
The correct counterfactual is the cost of a technically comparable investment that provides a lower degree of environmental protection (corresponding to mandatory Union standards in force) which could possibly be carried out without aid. See point 73(b) of the EEAG. For instance see list provided in Annex 2 to the EEAG. In case the reference investment is not the one listed in Annex 2, please explain and justify its appropriateness.
Please note that this condition does not apply if the intangible asset is technically out of date.
See Annex 2 to the EEAG: The extra investment costs consist of the additional investment costs necessary to go beyond the level of environmental protection required by the Union standards.
Please note that the cost of investments needed to reach the level of protection required by the Union standards is not eligible.
See point 78(a) of the EEAG.
See point 78(b) of the EEAG.
See point 78(c) of the EEAG. “Eco-innovation” is defined in point 19(4) of the EEAG.
For details of the genuinely competitive bidding process required, see the definition in point 19(43) of the EEAG.
Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p. 1).
Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC (OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 16).
For aid schemes the information can be provided in the form of atypical calculation (or several examples).
Please note that the Commission can authorise such notified measures for a period of 10 years.
The decision as to whether the aid is necessary will take account of the costs and revenue resulting from the production and sale of the electric power or heat.
The production cost may include the plant's normal return on capital, but any gains by the undertaking in terms of heat production must be deducted from production costs.
Please note that any investment aid granted to the undertaking in respect of the new plant must be deducted from production costs.
Please note that the duration must be limited to maximum 5 years.
See section 3.7.1 of the EEAG.
As set out in point 19(16) of the EEAG, “Union minimum tax level” means the minimum level of taxation provided for in Union legislation. For energy products and electricity, the Union minimum tax level means the minimum level of taxation laid down in Annex I to Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (OJ L 283, 31.10.2003, p. 51).
In this respect, Member States may provide estimations of, inter alia, the product price elasticity of the sector concerned in the relevant geographic market as well as estimates of lost sales and/or reduced profits for the companies in the sector/category concerned.
Guidelines on certain State aid measures in the context of the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme post 2012 (OJ C 158, 5.6.2012, p. 4).
The most direct way to demonstrate the causal link is by reference to a charge or levy on top of the electricity price, which is dedicated to the funding of energy from renewable sources. An indirect way to demonstrate the additional costs would be to calculate the impact of higher net costs for the electricity suppliers from green certificates and calculate the impact on the electricity price assuming the higher net costs are passed on by the supplier.
Guidelines on State aid to promote risk finance investments (OJ C 19, 22.1.2014, p. 4).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 of 17 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty (OJ L 187, 26.6.2014, p. 1).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1407/2013 of 18 December 2013 on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to de minimis aid (OJ L 352, 24.12.2013, p. 1).
Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6).
Commission Notice on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of guarantees (OJ C 155, 20.6.2008, p. 10).
The RFG (paragraphs 46 – 49) require that an ex-ante assessment be carried out and submitted for all notifiable risk finance measures.
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 320).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 of 17 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty (OJ L 187, 26.6.2014, p. 1).
SWD(2014)179 final of 28.5.2014.
Beyond providing a general description of the objectives and eligibility rules of the scheme, the aim of this section is to assess how the eligibility and exclusion rules of the scheme may be used to identify the effect of aid. In some cases, the precise eligibility rules may not be known in advance. In those cases the best available expectations should be provided.
Examples of negative effects are regional and sectorial biases or crowding out of private investments induced by the aid scheme.
Aid schemes defined in Article 1(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 are excluded from the scope of the Regulation six months after their entry into force. After having assessed the evaluation plan, the Commission may decide to extend the application of the Regulation to such schemes for a longer period. Member States are invited to precisely indicate the intended duration of the scheme.
Please make reference to SWD(2014)179 final of 28.5.2014.
Please note that the evaluation might require sourcing of both historical data and data that will become progressively available during the deployment of the aid scheme. Please identify the sources for both types of information. Both types of data should preferably be collected from the same source as to guarantee consistency across time.
Guidelines on State aid to airports and airlines (OJ C 99, 4.4.2014, p. 3).
The costs relating to the investments in airport infrastructure, including planning costs, ground handling infrastructure (such as baggage belts, etc.) and airport equipment can be eligible as investment aid to airports. Investment costs relating to non-aeronautical activities (in particular parking, hotels, restaurants, and offices) are ineligible. The investment costs relating to the provision of ground handling services (such as buses, vehicles, etc.) are ineligible, insofar as they are not part of ground handling infrastructure.
“Catchment area of an airport” means a geographic market boundary that is normally set at around 100 kilometres or around 60 minutes travelling time by car, bus, train or high-speed train; however, the catchment area of a given airport may be different and needs to take into account the specificities of each particular airport. The size and shape of the catchment area varies from airport to airport, and depends on various characteristics of the airport, including its business model, location and the destinations it serves.
Please use the following categories of sizes: airports with annual passenger traffic up to 200 000 passengers; airports with annual passenger traffic of between 200 000 and 1 million; airports with annual passenger traffic of 1–3 million.
For example, direct grants, exemptions or reductions in taxes, social security or other compulsory charges, or the supply of land, goods or services at favourable prices, etc.
For example, low-interest loans or interest rebates, state guarantees, the purchase of a shareholding or an alternative provision of capital on favourable terms.
The capital cost funding gap is the difference between the positive and negative cash flows including investment costs into fixed capital assets over the lifetime of the investment in net present value terms.
Guidelines on State aid to airports and airlines (OJ C 99, 4.4.2014, p. 3).
“Operating funding gap” means the operating losses of an airport over the relevant period, discounted to their current value using the cost of capital, that is to say the shortfall (in Net Present Value terms) between airport revenues and operating costs of the airport.
Balance sheet, profit and loss statement, statement of chartered accountant or audit firm.
Services provided by an airport or any of its subsidiaries, to ensure the handling of aircraft, from landing to take-off, and of passengers and freight, so as to enable airlines to provide air transport services, including the provision of ground handling services and the provision of centralised ground handling infrastructure.
Underlying costs of an airport in respect of the provision of airport services, including cost categories such as cost of personnel, contracted services, communications, waste, energy, maintenance, rent and administration, but excluding the capital costs, marketing support or any other incentives granted to airlines by the airport, and costs falling within a public policy remit.
“Catchment area of an airport” means a geographic market boundary that is normally set at around 100 kilometres or around 60 minutes travelling time by car, bus, train or high-speed train; however, the catchment area of a given airport may be different and needs to take into account the specificities of each particular airport. The size and shape of the catchment area varies from airport to airport, and depends on various characteristics of the airport, including its business model, location and the destinations it serves.
For example, direct grants, exemptions or reductions in taxes, social security or other compulsory charges, or the supply of land, goods or services at favourable prices, etc.
For example, low-interest loans or interest rebates, State guarantees, the purchase of a shareholding or an alternative provision of capital on favourable terms.
“Operating funding gap” means the operating losses of an airport over the relevant period, discounted to their current value using the cost of capital, that is to say the shortfall (in Net Present Value terms) between airport revenues and operating costs of the airport.
Guidelines on State aid to airports and airlines (OJ C 99, 4.4.2014, p. 3).
“High-speed rail service” is a service provided with trains capable of reaching speeds of over 200 km/h.
“Catchment area of an airport” means a geographic market boundary that is normally set at around 100 kilometres or around 60 minutes travelling time by car, bus, train or high-speed train; however, the catchment area of a given airport may be different and needs to take into account the specificities of each particular airport. The size and shape of the catchment area varies from airport to airport, and depends on various characteristics of the airport, including its business model, location and the destinations it serves.
Actual average annual passenger traffic during the two financial years preceding that in which the aid is notified or actually granted or paid in the case of non-notified aid. In the case of a newly created passenger airport, the forecasted average annual passenger traffic during the two financial years after the beginning of the operation of commercial passenger air traffic should be considered. These thresholds refer to a one-way count. As a result a passenger flying for example to the airport and back would be counted twice; the count applies to individual routes.
Decision 2006/682/EC of the Council and of the Representatives of the Member States of the European Union meeting within the Council on the signature and provisional application of the Multilateral Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, the Republic of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Republic of Croatia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, the Republic of Iceland, the Republic of Montenegro, the Kingdom of Norway, Romania, the Republic of Serbia and the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo on the Establishment of a European Common Aviation Area (ECAA) (OJ L 285, 16.10.2006, p. 1).
For example, low-interest loans or interest rebates, State guarantees, the purchase of a shareholding or an alternative provision of capital on favourable terms.
Eligible costs are the airport charges in respect of the route.
Guidelines on State aid to airports and airlines (OJ C 99, 4.4.2014, p. 3).
Where the route concerned links remote regions, such as outermost regions, islands, and sparsely populated areas, the aid could cover the entire population of that region.
Such as outermost regions, islands and sparsely populated areas.
Community guidelines on State aid to maritime transport (OJ C 13, 17.1.2004, p. 3).
The Whole Regulation you have selected contains over 200 provisions and might take some time to download. You may also experience some issues with your browser, such as an alert box that a script is taking a long time to run.
Would you like to continue?
The Schedules you have selected contains over 200 provisions and might take some time to download. You may also experience some issues with your browser, such as an alert box that a script is taking a long time to run.
Would you like to continue?
Latest Available (revised):The latest available updated version of the legislation incorporating changes made by subsequent legislation and applied by our editorial team. Changes we have not yet applied to the text, can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area.
Original (As adopted by EU): The original version of the legislation as it stood when it was first adopted in the EU. No changes have been applied to the text.
Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Use this menu to access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including: