- Latest available (Revised)
- Point in Time (31/01/2020)
- Original (As adopted by EU)
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1182 of 20 April 2017 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the Union scales for the classification of beef, pig and sheep carcasses and as regards the reporting of market prices of certain categories of carcasses and live animals
When the UK left the EU, legislation.gov.uk published EU legislation that had been published by the EU up to IP completion day (31 December 2020 11.00 p.m.). On legislation.gov.uk, these items of legislation are kept up-to-date with any amendments made by the UK since then.
Legislation.gov.uk publishes the UK version. EUR-Lex publishes the EU version. The EU Exit Web Archive holds a snapshot of EUR-Lex’s version from IP completion day (31 December 2020 11.00 p.m.).
Point in time view as at 31/01/2020.
There are outstanding changes not yet made to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1182. Any changes that have already been made to the legislation appear in the content and are referenced with annotations.
Changes and effects yet to be applied by the editorial team are only applicable when viewing the latest version or prospective version of legislation. They are therefore not accessible when viewing legislation as at a specific point in time. To view the ‘Changes to Legislation’ information for this provision return to the latest version view using the options provided in the ‘What Version’ box above.
Development of carcass profiles, and in particular the essential parts (round, back, shoulder)
Conformation class | Additional provisions | |
---|---|---|
S Superior | Round: very highly rounded double-muscled visibly separated seams | Topside spreads very markedly over the symphysis (symphisis pelvis) |
Back: very wide and very thick, up to the shoulder | Rump very rounded | |
Shoulder: very highly rounded | ||
E Excellent | Round: very rounded | Topside spreads markedly over the symphysis (symphisis pelvis) |
Back: wide and very thick, up to the shoulder | Rump very rounded | |
Shoulder: very rounded | ||
U Very good | Round: rounded | Topside spreads over the symphysis (symphisis pelvis) |
Back: wide and thick, up to the shoulder | Rump rounded | |
Shoulder: rounded | ||
R Good | Round: well-developed | Topside and rump are slightly rounded |
Back: still thick but less wide at the shoulder | ||
Shoulder: fairly well-developed | ||
O Fair | Round: average development to lacking development | |
Back: average thickness to lacking thickness | Rump: straight profile | |
Shoulder: average development to almost flat | ||
P Poor | Round: poorly developed | |
Back: narrow with bones visible | ||
Shoulder: flat with bones visible |
Amount of fat on the outside of the carcass and in the thoracic cavity
Class of fat cover | Additional provisions |
---|---|
1 Low | No fat within the thoracic cavity |
2 Slight | Within the thoracic cavity the muscle is clearly visible between the ribs |
3 Average | Within the thoracic cavity the muscle is still visible between the ribs |
4 High | The seams of fat on the round are prominent. Within the thoracic cavity the muscle between the ribs may be infiltrated with fat |
5 Very high | The round is almost completely covered with fat, so that the seams of fat are no longer clearly visible. Within the thoracic cavity the muscle between the ribs is infiltrated with fat |
Development of carcass profiles, and, in particular the essential parts (hindquarter, back, shoulder).
Conformation class | Additional provisions |
---|---|
S Superior | Hindquarter: double muscled. Profiles extremely convex Back: extremely convex, extremely wide, extremely thick Shoulder: extremely convex and extremely thick |
E Excellent | Hindquarter: very thick. Profiles very convex Back: very convex, very wide and very thick to the shoulder Shoulder: very convex and very thick |
U Very good | Hindquarter: thick. Profiles convex Back: wide and thick to the shoulder Shoulder: thick and convex |
R Good | Hindquarter: profiles mainly straight Back: thick but less wide to the shoulder Shoulder: good development, but less thick |
O Fair | Hindquarter: profiles tending to slightly concave Back: lacking width and thickness Shoulder: tending to narrow. Lacking thickness |
P Poor | Hindquarter: profiles concave to very concave Back: narrow and concave with bones apparent Shoulder: narrow, flat and bones apparent |
Amount of fat on the external and of the internal parts of the carcass.
a The additional provisions for the abdominal cavity do not apply for the purposes of Annex III. | |||
Class of fat cover | Additional provisionsa | ||
---|---|---|---|
1. Low | External | Traces of or no fat visible | |
Internal | Abdominal | Traces of or no fat visible on kidneys | |
Thoracic | Traces of or no fat visible between ribs | ||
2. Slight | External | A slight layer of fat covers part of the carcass but may be less evident on the limbs | |
Internal | Abdominal | Traces of fat or slight layer of fat envelops part of the kidneys | |
Thoracic | Muscle clearly visible between ribs | ||
3. Average | External | A light layer of fat covering most or all of the carcass. Slightly thickened fat zones of the base of the tail | |
Internal | Abdominal | Light layer of fat envelops part or all of the kidneys | |
Thoracic | Muscle still visible between ribs | ||
4. High | External | A thick layer of fat covering most of all of the carcass but may be thinner on limbs and thickening on shoulders | |
Internal | Abdominal | Kidney is enveloped in fat | |
Thoracic | Muscle between ribs may be infiltrated with fat. Fat deposits may be visible on the ribs | ||
5. Very high | External | Very thick fat cover Patches of fat sometimes visible | |
Internal | Abdominal | Kidneys enveloped in thick layer of fat | |
Thoracic | Muscle between ribs infiltrated with fat. Fat deposits visible on ribs. |
a Determined on the flank of the rectus abdominis by reference to a standardised colour chart. | ||||||
b As defined in point C.III of Annex IV to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. | ||||||
Category | A | B | C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weight | ≤ 7 kg | 7,1 — 10 kg | 10,1 — 13 kg | |||
Quality | 1st | 2nd | 1st | 2nd | 1st | 2nd |
Meat coloura | clear pink | other colour or other fat level | clear pink or pink | other colour or other fat level | clear pink or pink | other colour or other fat level |
Class of fat coverb | (2) (3) | (2) (3) | (2) (3) |
The members of the jury shall work in an independent and anonymous way.
The Member State concerned shall nominate a coordinator of the authorisation test who shall:
not be part of the jury;
have satisfactory technical knowledge and be fully independent;
monitor the independent and anonymous functioning of the members of the jury;
collect the classification results of the members of the jury and those obtained by using the automated grading methods;
ensure that, during the entire duration of the authorisation test, the classification results obtained by using the automated grading methods shall not be available to any of the members of the jury and vice versa nor to any other interested party;
validate the classifications for each carcass and may decide, for objective reasons to be specified, to reject carcasses from the sample to be used for the analysis.
each of the classes of conformation and of fat cover shall be subdivided into three subclasses;
a sample of at minimum 600 validated carcasses shall be required;
the percentage of failures shall be no more than 5 % of the carcasses that are fit for classification by using automated grading methods.
To estimate the performance of the automated grading method, the results of the automated grading method shall, for each validated carcass, be compared to the median of the results of the jury. The resulting accuracy of the grading by automated grading methods is established by using a system of points that are attributed as follows:
Conformation | Fat cover | |
---|---|---|
No error | 10 | 10 |
Error of one unit (i.e. one subclass up or down) | 6 | 9 |
Error of two units (i.e. two subclasses up or down) | – 9 | 0 |
Error of three units (i.e. three subclasses up or down) | – 27 | – 13 |
Error of more than three units (i.e. more than three subclasses up or down) | – 48 | – 30 |
With a view to authorisation, the automated grading methods should achieve at least 60 % of the maximum number of points for both conformation and fat cover.
In addition, the classification by using the automated grading methods must be within the following limits:
Conformation | Fat cover | |
---|---|---|
Bias | ± 0,30 | ± 0,60 |
Slope of the regression line | 1 ± 0,15 | 1 ± 0,30 |
Where during an authorisation test more than one carcass presentation is used, the differences between those carcass presentations shall not lead to differences in the classification results.
The dates on which the authorisation test shall take place;
a detailed description of the carcasses of bovine animals aged eight months or more classified in the Member State concerned or a part thereof;
the statistical methods used for selecting the sample of carcasses that shall be representative, in terms of category, classes of conformation and of fat cover, of bovine animals aged eight months or more and sheep slaughtered in the Member State concerned or a part thereof;
the name and address of the slaughterhouse(s) where the authorisation test shall take place, an explanation of the organisation and performance of the processing line(s), including the speed per hour;
the carcass presentation(s) that shall be used during the authorisation test;
a description of the automated grading technique and its technical functions, in particular the security concept of the apparatus against any type of manipulation;
the licensed experts nominated by the Member State concerned to take part in the authorisation test as members of the jury;
the coordinator of the authorisation test, proving his satisfactory technical knowledge and full independence;
the name and address of the independent body designated by the Member State concerned that shall analyse the results of the authorisation test.
A summary of the classification results signed by the members of the jury and by the coordinator during the authorisation test;
a report of the coordinator on the organisation of the authorisation test in view of the conditions and minimum requirements set out in Part A;
a quantitative analysis, according to a methodology to be agreed upon by the Commission, of the results of the authorisation test indicating the classification results of each expert classifier and those obtained by using the automated grading methods. The data used for the analysis must be provided in an electronic format to be agreed upon by the Commission;
the accuracy of the automated grading methods established in accordance with the provisions in point 3 of Part A.
The authorisation test shall consist of:
The selection of a representative sample of pig carcasses to be involved in a dissection trial.
The representative sample shall reflect the pig population concerned and shall consist of at least 120 carcasses.
The recording of measurements (predictor variables) on the representative sample of pig carcasses.
The measurements used to estimate the lean meat percentage are recorded in one or more slaughterhouses using the grading technique(s) to be authorised.
A dissection trial for the assessment of the reference lean meat percentage of the pig carcasses as described in point 2 of Part A.
The trial involves the dissection of the sample of pig carcasses into meat, fat and bone. The lean meat content of a pig carcass shall be the relationship between the total weight of the red striated muscles provided that they are separable by knife, and the weight of the carcass. The total weight of the red striated muscles is obtained either
by total dissection of the carcass as laid down in point 2.2 of Part A; or
by partial dissection of the carcass as laid down in point 2.3 of Part A; or
by a combination of total or partial dissection with a national quick method based on accepted statistical methods.
The total dissection referred to in point (i) may also be replaced by assessing the lean meat percentage with a computer tomography (CT) apparatus on the condition that satisfactory comparative dissection results are provided.
If a combination with a national quick method is used as referred to in point (iii), the number of carcasses for total or partial dissection may be reduced to 50 if the Member State can demonstrate that the precision is at least equal to that obtained using standard statistical methods on 120 carcasses.
The calculation of an equation (formula) for the grading method to be authorised.
An equation shall be derived to estimate the lean meat percentage of the representative sample of carcasses from the predictor variables measured on those carcasses.
The lean meat percentage of each carcass involved in the dissection trial shall be estimated from this formula.
The standard statistical analysis for the assessment of the result of the dissection trial.
The lean meat percentage estimated by the grading method concerned shall be compared to the reference lean meat percentage obtained from the dissection trial.
The introduction or amendment of an equation for the grading method for the prediction of the lean meat percentage of a pig carcass.
The equation shall be integrated into the grading technique after the application of the grading methods are authorised by the Commission.
Grading methods shall be authorised only if the root mean squared error of prediction (RMSEP), computed by a full cross-validation technique or by a test set validation on a representative sample of at least 60 carcasses, is less than 2,5. In addition, any outliers shall be included in the calculation of RMSEP.
Where, during an authorisation test, more than one carcass presentation is used, the differences between those carcass presentations shall not lead to differences in the classification results.
The weight of the lean meat shall be calculated by subtracting the total weight of the non-lean elements from the total carcass weight before dissection. The feet and the head, except the cheek, are not dissected.
The weight of the lean in the four major cuts (shoulder, loin, ham and belly) shall be calculated by subtracting the total weight of the non-lean elements of the four cuts from the total weight of the cuts before dissection.
The bias between total and partial dissection is corrected based on a subsample with total dissection.
If the slaughter pig population to be sampled has the same characteristics as the population for which partial dissection or a CT procedure has been previously bias corrected, no additional total dissection is required.
If a CT procedure is described and is traceable by measurements to total dissection or another, bias-corrected CT procedure, no additional total dissection is required.
the trial period and time schedule for the whole authorisation procedure,
the number and location of the slaughterhouses,
the description of the pig population concerned by the assessment method,
the indication of the chosen dissection method (total or partial),
where use is made of a computer tomography apparatus as referred to in Part 1 of Part A to this annex a description of the procedure,
a presentation of the statistical methods used in relation to the sampling method chosen,
the description of the national quick method, if applied,
the exact presentation of the carcasses to be used.
a presentation of the statistical methods used in relation to the sampling method chosen,
the equation which will be introduced or which has been amended,
a numerical and a graphic description of the results,
a description of the apparatus(es) concerned,
the weight limit of the pigs for which the new method may be used and any other limitation in relation to the practical use of the method,
the data used for the analysis must be provided in an electronic format.
Regulation (EC) No 1249/2008 | This Regulation | Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1184 |
---|---|---|
Article 2(4) | Article 1 | |
Article 3 | Article 3(1) | |
Article 4 | Article 4 | |
Article 5 | Article 2(1) | |
Article 6(1) | Article 7(1) | |
Article 6(2), first paragraph | Article 7(3)(a) | |
Article 6(2), second paragraph | Article 7(5) | |
Article 6(3) | Article 8(2)(a) | |
Article 6(3), second and third paragraph | Article 8(3)(a) | |
Article 6(3), second paragraph | Article 8(4) | |
Article 6(4)(c) | Article 8(4) | |
Article 6(4)(d) | Article 8(5) | |
Article 6(7) | Article 8(6)(b) | |
Article 7 | Article 1 | |
Article 8 | Article 9 | |
Article 9 | Article 10 | |
Article 10 | Article 12 | |
Article 11(1) | Article 2(2) | |
Article 11(2), first paragraph | Article 2(1) and Article 3(2)(a) | |
Article 11(2), second paragraph | Article 3(2)(c)(i) | |
Article 11(2), third paragraph | Article 25(5) | |
Article 11(3) | Article 3(3) | |
Article 11(4) | Article 2(3) | |
Article 12 | Article 4 | |
Article 13(1) | Article 14(1) and (2) | |
Article 13(2) | Article 14(3) | |
Article 13(3) | Article 6(3) | |
Article 13(4) | Article 6(4) | |
Article 13(5), first paragraph | Article 5(1) | |
Article 13(5), second paragraph | Article 5(2) | |
Article 14(1) | Article 7 | |
Article 14(2) | Article 6 | |
Article 15 | Article 8 | |
Article 16(1), first paragraph | Article 14 | |
Article 16(1), second paragraph | Article 13(1), first paragraph | |
Article 16(2) | Article 14(4) | |
Article 16(3) | Article 17(2) | |
Article 16(4), second paragraph | Article 17(1) | |
Article 16(5) | Article 13(2), first and second paragraph | |
Article 16(7)(a) | Article 13(2), third paragraph | |
Article 18 | Article 18 | |
Article 19 | Article 25(1) and (2) | |
Article 20(2)(a) | Article 2(1)(b) | |
Article 20(2)(b) | Article 2(2)(a) | |
Article 21(1), first paragraph | Article 7(1) | |
Article 21(1), second paragraph | Article 7(2) | |
Article 21(2) | Article 5, second paragraph | |
Article 21(3), first paragraph | Article 8(1) and Article 8(2)(b) | |
Article 21(3), second paragraph | Article 8(4) | |
Article 21(3) fourth paragraph | Article 8(3)(c) | |
Article 21(4) | Article 8(6)(a) | |
Article 21(5) | Article 6(1) | |
Article 22(2), first paragraph | Article 7(3)(b) | |
Article 22(2), second paragraph | Article 14(3) | |
Article 22(2), third paragraph | Article 7(4)(a) | |
Article 23(4) | Article 11(3) | |
Article 23(5) | Article 11(5) | |
Article 24(2), first paragraph | Article 2(1) and Article 3(2)(b) | |
Article 24(2), second paragraph | Article 3(2)(c)(ii) | |
Article 24(4) | Article 2(3) | |
Article 25(2) | Article 9 | |
Article 26(1) | Article 14(1) | |
Article 26(2) | Article 14(2) and (3) | |
Article 26(3) | Articles 19 and 25 | |
Article 27(3) | Article 25(3) | |
Article 28 | Article 3(2) | |
Article 29 | Article 3(1) | |
Article 30(2) | Article 7(3)(a) | |
Article 30(3), first paragraph | Article 8(2)(a) and (3)(b) | |
Article 30(3), second paragraph | Article 8(4) | |
Article 30(4) | Article 8(5) | |
Article 31 | Article 9 | |
Article 33(1) | Article 15(1), first paragraph | |
Article 33(2) | Article 15(4) | |
Article 35 | Article 21 | |
Article 38 | Articles 16, 17 and 18 |
Regulation (EC) No 315/2002 | This Regulation | Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1184 |
---|---|---|
Article 2 | Article 15(1)(b) |
Regulation (EU) No 807/2013 | This Regulation | Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1184 |
---|---|---|
Article 1(1) | Article 22 | |
Article 1(2), first paragraph | Article 22 | |
Article 1(2), second paragraph | Article 16(2) | |
Article 1(3) | Article 16(1)(a) | |
Article 2(1) | Article 23 | |
Article 2(2), first paragraph | Article 12 | |
Article 2(2), second paragraph | Article 16(2) | |
Article 2(3) | Article 16(1)(b) | |
Article 3(1) | Article 20 | |
Article 3(2), first paragraph | Article 10 | |
Article 3(2), second paragraph | Article 15(1) | |
Article 3(3)(a) to (d) | Article 6(2) | |
Article 3(3), second paragraph | Article 5(1) | |
Article 3(4) | Article 15(3) | |
Article 4(1) | Article 13(1) |
Latest Available (revised):The latest available updated version of the legislation incorporating changes made by subsequent legislation and applied by our editorial team. Changes we have not yet applied to the text, can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area.
Original (As adopted by EU): The original version of the legislation as it stood when it was first adopted in the EU. No changes have been applied to the text.
Point in Time: This becomes available after navigating to view revised legislation as it stood at a certain point in time via Advanced Features > Show Timeline of Changes or via a point in time advanced search.
Geographical Extent: Indicates the geographical area that this provision applies to. For further information see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’.
Show Timeline of Changes: See how this legislation has or could change over time. Turning this feature on will show extra navigation options to go to these specific points in time. Return to the latest available version by using the controls above in the What Version box.
Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
This timeline shows the different versions taken from EUR-Lex before exit day and during the implementation period as well as any subsequent versions created after the implementation period as a result of changes made by UK legislation.
The dates for the EU versions are taken from the document dates on EUR-Lex and may not always coincide with when the changes came into force for the document.
For any versions created after the implementation period as a result of changes made by UK legislation the date will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. For further information see our guide to revised legislation on Understanding Legislation.
Use this menu to access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including: