[67A.Defence to offence of contravening section 63(a) or (b): product not sold or suppliedU.K.
(1)This section applies in a case where—
(a)a person (“the defendant”) is charged with an offence under section 67(2) of contravening section 63(a) or (b) in respect of a medicinal product; and
(b)the product is not sold or supplied in its adulterated state.
(2)Where the defendant is charged with contravening section 63(a), it is a defence for the defendant to prove that—
[(a)the adulteration took place—
(i)at a registered pharmacy, or
(ii)in the course of the provision of a relevant pharmacy service;]
(b)the defendant—
(i)was a registrant acting in the course of his or her profession, or
(ii)was acting under the supervision of a person who was a registrant acting in the course of his or her profession; and
(c)at the time of the alleged contravention, the defendant did not know that the product was being adulterated.
(3)Where the defendant is charged with contravening section 63(b), it is a defence for the defendant to prove that—
[(a)the adulteration took place—
(i)at a registered pharmacy, or
(ii)in the course of the provision of a relevant pharmacy service;]
(b)the person who adulterated the product—
(i)was a registrant acting in the course of his or her profession, or
(ii)was acting under the supervision of a person who was a registrant acting in the course of his or her profession; and
(c)at the time of the alleged contravention, the defendant did not know that the product had been adulterated.]