Print Options
PrintThe Whole
Instrument
PrintThe Whole
Part
PrintThe Whole
Cross Heading
PrintThis
Section
only
Changes over time for: Section 60B
Timeline of Changes
This timeline shows the different points in time where a change occurred. The dates will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. The first date in the timeline will usually be the earliest date when the provision came into force. In some cases the first date is 01/02/1991 (or for Northern Ireland legislation 01/01/2006). This date is our basedate. No versions before this date are available. For further information see the Editorial Practice Guide and Glossary under Help.
Status:
Point in time view as at 01/11/2013.
Changes to legislation:
There are currently no known outstanding effects for the The Young Offender Institution Rules 2000, Section 60B.
Changes to Legislation
Revised legislation carried on this site may not be fully up to date. At the current time any known changes or effects made by subsequent legislation have been applied to the text of the legislation you are viewing by the editorial team. Please see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ for details regarding the timescales for which new effects are identified and recorded on this site.
[Review of adjudicator’s punishmentE+W
60B.—(1) A reviewer means [the Senior District Judge (Chief Magistrate)] or any deputy of such a judge as nominated by that judge.
(2) [Where an adjudicator imposes a punishment under rule 60A(1) or rule 65(1A), a compensation requirement under rule 60AB(2), or both] an inmate may, within 14 days of receipt of the punishment [or the imposition of the compensation requirement, whichever is later], request in writing that a reviewer conducts a review.
(3) The review must be commenced within 14 days of receipt of the request and must be conducted on the papers alone.
[(4) The review may be of the punishment, the compensation requirement or both (whether or not the inmate requested a review of both) but must not be a review of the finding of guilt.]
(5) On completion of the review, if it appears to the reviewer that the [imposition of the punishment, the compensation requirement or both] was manifestly unreasonable, he may [do such of the following as he considers appropriate]—
(a)reduce the number of any additional days awarded;
(b)for whatever punishment has been imposed by the adjudicator, substitute another punishment which is, in his opinion, less severe; ...
(c)quash the punishment entirely;
[(d)reduce the amount of the compensation requirement.]
(6) An inmate requesting a review shall serve any additional days awarded under rule 60A(1)(b) or 65(1A)(b) unless and until they are reduced.]
Back to top