- Latest available (Revised)
- Original (As enacted)
This is the original version (as it was originally enacted).
(1)An intimate sample may be taken from a person in police detention only—
(a)if a police officer of at least the rank of superintendent authorises it to be taken ; and
(b)if the appropriate consent is given.
(2)An officer may only give an authorisation if he has reasonable grounds—
(a)for suspecting the involvement of the person from whom the sample is to be taken in a serious arrestable offence; and
(b)for believing that the sample will tend to confirm or disprove his involvement.
(3)An officer may give an authorisation under subsection (1) above orally or in writing but, if he gives it orally, he shall confirm it in writing as soon as is practicable.
(4)The appropriate consent must be given in writing.
(5)Where—
(a)an authorisation has been given ; and
(b)it is proposed that an intimate sample shall be taken in pursuance of the authorisation,
an officer shall inform the person from whom the sample is to be taken—
(i)of the giving of the authorisation ; and
(ii)of the grounds for giving it.
(6)The duty imposed by subsection (5)(ii) above includes a duty to state the nature of the offence in which it is suspected that the person from whom the sample is to be taken has been involved.
(7)If an intimate sample is taken from a person—
(a)the authorisation by virtue of which it was taken ;
(b)the grounds for giving the authorisation ; and
(c)the fact that the appropriate consent was given,
shall be recorded as soon as is practicable after the sample is taken.
(8)If an intimate sample is taken from a person detained at a police station, the matters required to be recorded by subsection (7) above shall be recorded in his custody record.
(9)An intimate sample, other than a sample of urine or saliva, may only be taken from a person by a registered medical practitioner.
(10)Where the appropriate consent to the taking of an intimate sample from a person was refused without good cause, in any proceedings against that person for an offence—
(a)the court, in determining—
(i)whether to commit that person for trial; or
(ii)whether there is a case to answer ; and
(b)the court or jury, in determining whether that person is guilty of the offence charged,
may draw such inferences from the refusal as appear proper; and the refusal may, on the basis of such inferences, be treated as, or as capable of amounting to, corroboration of any evidence against the person in relation to which the refusal is material.
(11)Nothing in this section affects sections 5 to 12 of the [1972 c. 20.] Road Traffic Act 1972.
The Whole Act you have selected contains over 200 provisions and might take some time to download. You may also experience some issues with your browser, such as an alert box that a script is taking a long time to run.
Would you like to continue?
The Whole Act you have selected contains over 200 provisions and might take some time to download.
Would you like to continue?
The Whole Act you have selected contains over 200 provisions and might take some time to download. You may also experience some issues with your browser, such as an alert box that a script is taking a long time to run.
Would you like to continue?
Latest Available (revised):The latest available updated version of the legislation incorporating changes made by subsequent legislation and applied by our editorial team. Changes we have not yet applied to the text, can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area.
Original (As Enacted or Made): The original version of the legislation as it stood when it was enacted or made. No changes have been applied to the text.
Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Use this menu to access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including: