Print Options
PrintThe Whole
Act
PrintThe Whole
Schedule
PrintThe Whole
Part
PrintThis
Cross Heading
only
Changes over time for: Cross Heading: Failure to comply with information requirement
Timeline of Changes
This timeline shows the different points in time where a change occurred. The dates will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. The first date in the timeline will usually be the earliest date when the provision came into force. In some cases the first date is 01/02/1991 (or for Northern Ireland legislation 01/01/2006). This date is our basedate. No versions before this date are available. For further information see the Editorial Practice Guide and Glossary under Help.
Version Superseded: 26/07/2013
Status:
Point in time view as at 31/10/2009.
Changes to legislation:
There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008, Cross Heading: Failure to comply with information requirement.
Changes to Legislation
Revised legislation carried on this site may not be fully up to date. At the current time any known changes or effects made by subsequent legislation have been applied to the text of the legislation you are viewing by the editorial team. Please see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ for details regarding the timescales for which new effects are identified and recorded on this site.
Failure to comply with information requirementU.K.
23(1)If on an application made by—U.K.
(a)an enforcement authority, or
(b)a local weights and measures authority or DETINI pursuant to arrangements made with the OFT—
(i)by or on behalf of the authority; or
(ii)by DETINI,
it appears to the court that a person (the “information defaulter”) has failed to do something that they were required to do under paragraph 19(1), the court may make an order under this paragraph.
(2)An order under this paragraph may require the information defaulter—
(a)to do the thing that they failed to do within such period as may be specified in the order;
(b)otherwise to take such steps to remedy the consequences of the failure as may be so specified.
(3)If the information defaulter is a body corporate, a partnership or an unincorporated body of persons that is not a partnership, the order may require any officer of the body corporate, partnership or body, who is (wholly or partly) responsible for the failure to meet such costs of the application as are specified in the order.
(4)In this paragraph “the court” means—
(a)in England and Wales and Northern Ireland, the High Court or the county court;
(b)in Scotland, the Court of Session or the sheriff court.
Back to top