- Latest available (Revised)
- Point in Time (24/09/2011)
- Original (As made)
Version Superseded: 06/04/2016
Point in time view as at 24/09/2011.
There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to The Plant Protection Products (Fees and Charges) Regulations 2011. Any changes that have already been made by the team appear in the content and are referenced with annotations.
Changes and effects yet to be applied by the editorial team are only applicable when viewing the latest version or prospective version of legislation. They are therefore not accessible when viewing legislation as at a specific point in time. To view the ‘Changes to Legislation’ information for this provision return to the latest version view using the options provided in the ‘What Version’ box above.
Statutory Instruments
Pesticides
Fees And Charges
Made
25th August 2011
Laid before Parliament
2nd September 2011
Coming into force
24th September 2011
The Secretary of State is designated for the purposes of section 2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972(1) in relation to the common agricultural policy of the European Union(2), measures in the veterinary and phytosanitary fields for the protection of public health(3), and in relation to the environment(4).
The Secretary of State makes these Regulations in exercise of the powers conferred by section 2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972 and by section 56(1) of the Finance Act 1973(5).
In accordance with section 56(1) of the Finance Act 1973 the Treasury consents to the making of these Regulations.
1.—(1) These Regulations may be cited as the Plant Protection Products (Fees and Charges) Regulations 2011 and, subject to paragraph (2), come into force on 24th September 2011.
(2) Regulations 3(2) and 6 come into force on 26th November 2011.
2.—(1) In these Regulations—
“authorisation holder” means the holder of a valid authorisation or permit for a plant protection product—
issued in accordance with Regulation 1107/2009, or
deemed to be issued in accordance with that Regulation,
unless there is a nominated sales representative for that plant protection product, in which case it means that person;
“the Directive” means Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides(6);
“import tolerance” has the same meaning as in the MRL Regulation;
“liability period” means the period between 1 April in any year and 31 March in the following year;
“the MRL Regulation” means Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC(7);
“nominated sales representative” means any person who has agreed in writing with the holder of a valid authorisation or permit for a plant protection product, issued in accordance with Regulation 1107/2009 or deemed to be issued in accordance with that Regulation, to be a sales representative for the authorised or permitted plant protection product and to pay the charge under these Regulations;
“Regulation 1107/2009” means Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC(8) and 91/414/EEC(9);
“United Kingdom competent authorities” means—
in relation to England and Wales, the Secretary of State;
in relation to Northern Ireland, the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development in Northern Ireland; and
in relation to Scotland, the Scottish Ministers.
(2) Expressions used in both these Regulations and Regulation 1107/2009, other than “authorisation holder”, have the same meaning in these Regulations as they have in Regulation 1107/2009.
3.—(1) The functions of the Member State referred to in Article 74(1) of Regulation 1107/2009 are to be performed by the United Kingdom competent authorities.
(2) The functions of the Member State referred to in Article 19(1) of the Directive are to be performed by the United Kingdom competent authorities.
4.—(1) A United Kingdom competent authority may charge fees for work carried out within the scope of Regulation 1107/2009 which relates to evaluating applications made to it for the—
(a)authorisation of plant protection products;
(b)approval of active substances, safeners, synergists or basic substances; or
(c)official recognition of a test facility or organisation,
and such fees are payable in accordance with Schedule 1.
(2) A United Kingdom competent authority may charge fees for applications for import tolerances under Article 7 of the MRL Regulation and such fees are payable in accordance with Schedule 2.
(3) The fees in these Regulations apply in relation to any activity carried out after they come into force, provided no invoice has been issued under the Plant Protection Product (Fees) Regulations 2007(10) or the Plant Protection Products (Fees) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2004(11) in relation to that work.
(4) Fees are payable by the applicant, on invoice, to a United Kingdom competent authority.
(5) A United Kingdom competent authority is under no obligation to process or to issue a decision in respect of an outstanding application if there are outstanding fees in relation to it.
(6) In paragraph (5), “outstanding application” means any application for which a fee has been charged under the Plant Protection Products (Fees) Regulations 2007, the Plant Protection Products (Fees) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2004 or under these Regulations.
(7) Any unpaid fee may be recovered by a United Kingdom competent authority as a civil debt.
5. A United Kingdom competent authority may make an annual charge in respect of any costs incurred by it, or on its behalf—
(a)associated with any work carried out within the scope of Regulation 1107/2009; or
(b)arising from obligations under the MRL Regulation,
other than for collecting and processing information, or monitoring the effect of the use of plant protection products, for which a charge has been made under section 18(2)(b) or (c) of the Food and Environment Protection Act 1985(12).
6. A United Kingdom competent authority may make an annual charge in respect of any costs incurred by it, or on its behalf, in relation to carrying out work pursuant to obligations within the scope of the Directive.
7.—(1) In respect of a given liability period a charge shall be payable by an authorisation holder, on invoice, to a United Kingdom competent authority.
(2) A United Kingdom competent authority shall not charge for any costs under paragraph (1) in respect of which a fee is payable under regulation 4(1) and Schedule 1, or regulation 4(2) and Schedule 2.
(3) A United Kingdom competent authority may exclude an authorisation holder from the requirement to pay a charge where that authority decides it would be uneconomical to collect that charge.
(4) Where an authorisation holder becomes liable to pay a charge in accordance with paragraph (1) at any time during the liability period, that person will be liable to pay a charge for the whole of that liability period.
(5) If an authorisation holder fails to pay the charge in full, the United Kingdom competent authority may suspend any or all of the authorisations or permits for plant protection products held by the authorisation holder or for which the authorisation holder is the nominated sales representative.
(6) Any unpaid charge may be recovered by a United Kingdom competent authority as a civil debt.
8.—(1) The United Kingdom competent authorities must calculate the amounts which authorisation holders are liable to pay under regulations 5 and 6 in accordance with the following paragraphs.
(2) Where an authorisation holder is liable to pay a charge in respect of more than one plant protection product, the authorisation holder shall be treated as one authorisation holder for the purposes of calculating the charge and collecting payments.
(3) The United Kingdom competent authorities will calculate the charge payable by an authorisation holder by applying a percentage to the authorisation holder’s annual turnover. The percentage must be calculated by applying the following formula—
A/B x 100% = the percentage
where—
=
the total costs incurred in the liability period, and
=
the total annual turnover.
(4) An authorisation holder must provide a United Kingdom competent authority with evidence of its annual turnover for a given liability period on request.
(5) If insufficient evidence of annual turnover is submitted or if no evidence is submitted by an authorisation holder, the annual turnover will be such figure as the United Kingdom competent authorities consider reasonable.
(6) In this regulation—
“total costs incurred” means the costs referred to in regulations 5 and 6 excluding any costs in respect of which a fee is payable under regulation 4(1) and Schedule 1, or regulation 4(2) and Schedule 2;
“total annual turnover” means the annual turnover of all authorisation holders;
“annual turnover” means the amounts derived from sales in the financial year ending between 1st October and 30th September the following year, the latter date being in the calendar year in which the liability period starts by—
the holder of a valid authorisation or permit for a plant protection product issued in accordance with Regulation 1107/2009 or of a valid authorisation or permit for a plant protection product deemed to be issued in accordance with that Regulation, and
any nominated sales representative for the authorised or permitted plant protection product;
“amounts derived from sales” includes the costs of packaging, containers and labelling and excludes value added tax and returned products;
“sales” means the sales of authorised or permitted plant protection products in the United Kingdom.
9. The following regulations are revoked—
(a)The Fees for Assessment of Active Substances (Third Stage Review) Regulations 2005(13);
(b)The Fees for Assessment of Active Substances (Fourth Stage Review) Regulations 2005(14); and
(c)The Plant Protection Products (Fees) Regulations 2007.
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
Henley
Parliamentary Under Secretary of State
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
20th August 2011
We consent
James Duddridge
Angela Watkinson
Two of the Lords Commissioners of Her Majesty’s Treasury
25th August 2011
Regulation 4(1)
1. Fees for product-related applications are in accordance with the following table, and each item is charged cumulatively.
Item | Chargeable item | Fee(£) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Notes | ||||||
(1) Application for authorisation under Regulation 1107/2009 not involving evaluation of technical information or data. | ||||||
(2) The fee for an application for extension of authorised use received before 1st April 2012 is £1,495. The fee for an application for extension of authorised use received on or after 1st April 2012 is £1,700. | ||||||
(3) Application for authorisation under Regulation 1107/2009 involving no technical consideration. | ||||||
(4) Application for a parallel trade permit for personal use only. | ||||||
(5) Where the application relates to a number of different products, this charge applies to each additional product. | ||||||
(6) Application for a parallel trade permit for other than personal use. | ||||||
(7) Verification that the product to be traded is identical to a product authorised in the part of the United Kingdom to which the application relates in accordance with Regulation 1107/2009. | ||||||
(8) “Standard technical stream applications” are all applications other than items 1-5, 10, 11 and 12. | ||||||
(9) The co-ordination of applications for new products or a change to an existing product. | ||||||
(10) Chemistry covers assessment of the technical specification of the active substance, safeners and synergists in the product and the physico-chemical properties of the product. | ||||||
(11) Toxicology covers assessment of the mammalian metabolism and toxicology of the active substance, safeners and synergists in the product and determination of the types of hazard to which the product can give rise. | ||||||
(12) Operator exposure additionally covers exposure of other persons resulting from the product use. | ||||||
(13) Consumer exposure covers exposure of consumers resulting from consumption of produce from treated crops, treated produce or products derived from either, including products from animals to which any such matter has been fed. | ||||||
(14) Fate and behaviour in the environment covers the potential environmental exposure from product use, including the identity and quantity of the active substance, metabolites, degradation products and reaction products, safeners and synergists which may be available in the soil, water or air and are of toxicological or environmental significance. | ||||||
(15) Ecotoxicology covers the assessment of the potential impact on non-target species likely to be at risk from exposure to the product, including the active substance, and toxicologically or environmentally significant metabolites, degradation products and reaction products, safeners and synergists. | ||||||
(16) Efficacy covers the assessment of whether a product consistently controls the target pest and whether the product adversely affects the treated crops, following crops or treated produce. | ||||||
(17) Pre-submission meetings may be held at the request of the applicant prior to the submission of an application to the United Kingdom to act as lead zonal rapporteur. | ||||||
(18) A Zonal surcharge is applied to any new product or re-registration application for which the United Kingdom has been requested to act as the Central Zone lead Member State. This fee covers the additional co-ordination and evaluation work required to support approvals in other Member States over and above what is required in the United Kingdom. Zonal surcharge 1 is the minimum additional fee applied. Zonal Surcharge 2 is applied for any use or uses required in another Member State but not in the United Kingdom. For particularly complex protocols requiring significant specialist input it may be necessary to charge a data module fee in the relevant specialist area. | ||||||
(19) The fee is equivalent to a specialist case fee and relates to requests from applicants for the United Kingdom to comment on the study design in advance of the data being generated and an application being submitted. For particularly complex protocols requiring significant specialist input it may be necessary to charge a data module fee in the relevant specialist area. | ||||||
1 | Administrative research and development application(1) | 50 | ||||
2 | Extension of use application including administration, co-ordination and technical consideration | 1,495 or 1,700 (2) | ||||
3 | Preliminary consideration of application type listed in items 4, 5, 7,12 or 13 to determine whether the application can proceed further | 220 | ||||
4 | Administrative application(3)(4) for a new product or change to an existing product— | |||||
4a | one product | 150 | ||||
4b | each additional product(5) | 50 | ||||
5 | Parallel trade applications— | |||||
5a | co-ordination of application for a new product or change to an existing product involving parallel trade(5) | 700 | ||||
5b | parallel trade verification(7) | 200 | ||||
6 | Evaluation of a label in any application | 200 | ||||
7 | Co-ordination of standard technical stream applications (9) (9) | 1,800 | ||||
8 | Evaluation of simple reasoned cases in each of the following specialist areas— | |||||
8a | chemistry(10) | 400 | ||||
8b | toxicology(11) | 400 | ||||
8c | operator exposure(12) | 400 | ||||
8d | residues and consumer exposure(13) | 400 | ||||
8e | fate and behaviour in the environment(14) | 400 | ||||
8f | ecotoxicology(15) | 400 | ||||
8g | efficacy(16) | 400 | ||||
9 | Evaluation of data, modelling and detailed scientific cases in each of the following specialist areas— | |||||
9a | chemistry(10) | 750 | ||||
9b | toxicology(11) | 750 | ||||
9c | operator exposure(12) | 750 | ||||
9d | residues and consumer exposure(13) | 750 | ||||
9e | fate and behaviour in the environment(14) | 1,800 | ||||
9f | ecotoxicology(15) | 1,800 | ||||
9g | efficacy(16) | 1,800 | ||||
10 | Withdrawal of an application for a product specified in items 2, 4, 5, 7, 12 or 13 before any work other than preliminary consideration has been done | 100 | ||||
11 | Pre-submission meetings for lead zonal re-registration and new product applications(17) | 5,000 | ||||
12 | Zonal surcharge for lead zonal re-registration and new product applications. This fee is in addition to those described in 7 to 9 above (18) | |||||
Zonal surcharge 1 | 7,500 | |||||
Zonal surcharge 2 | 15,000 | |||||
13 | Commenting on draft study protocols(19) | 400 |
2. The fees for evaluation for approval, or renewal of approval under Regulation 1107/2009 of an active substance, safener or synergist, are in accordance with the following table.
Item | Application | Fee(£) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Notes | |||||||
(1) The initial evaluation carried out in order to notify the applicant whether his or her application can proceed further. | |||||||
(2) Application in accordance with Article 30 of Regulation 1107/2009 for a provisional authorisation in the United Kingdom (not exceeding 3 years) for a plant protection product containing a new active substance for which a decision on approval has been delayed by more than 30 months from the date of admissibility of the original application. | |||||||
(3) A full data package comprises the complete dossier (the information referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 8 of Regulation 1107/2009) to support one or more representative use of one product. Where a data package also contains a large number of extra study reports submitted to refine risk assessments, to characterise metabolites or to support additional uses of the product, these studies will be treated as an additional partial data package. See also note (4). | |||||||
(4) The size of a partial data package is banded as a proportion of a full data package. The proportion is estimated on the basis of the amount of time required to evaluate the data and to conduct the necessary risk assessments. Applicants will be notified of the appropriate Band prior to an evaluation taking place. Partial data packages include one or more of the following— (a) additional data over and above a ‘standard’ core dossier for example situations where there are significantly more metabolites, or very large novel studies to be evaluated; (b) additional study submissions during evaluation required to clarify the initial dossier; (c) resubmissions, for example, where the previous application for approval or inclusion in Annex 1 to Directive 91/414/EEC(15) or for approval or renewal of approval under Regulation 1107/2009 has been unsuccessful and a new application is made in an attempt to address all the concerns raised from that earlier submission; (d) data to support the extension of the approval of an active substance, safener or synergist under Regulation 1107/2009 once the initial approval period has expired or to change the conditions of approval during the approval period; (e) data to support the evaluation of an active substance under Regulation 1107/2009 once the initial period of inclusion in Annex 1 of Directive 91/414/EEC has expired. The full dossier is not required just additional data to demonstrate compliance with any new guidance, regulations or scientific advances; (f) large data packages in one or more areas of the risk assessment that have been submitted in support of product related applications (e.g. re-registration and new product applications under Regulation 1107/2009) that significantly exceed the standard fees specified in the product-related application fees table (paragraph 1, items 9a-g above). (g) Additional studies submitted to support an adverse data review. | |||||||
A joint evaluation where the United Kingdom and one or more other Member States share the evaluation of a dossier and evaluation of scientific peer reviewed open literature on the active substance and its relevant metabolites will be treated as partial data packages. | |||||||
Where an active substance, safener or synergist is neither a biocontrol agent nor a pheromone | |||||||
1 | Preliminary evaluation(1) of the admissibility of an application | 5,000 | |||||
2 | Processing an application for provisional authorisation (2) | 35,000 | |||||
3 | Helping the European Food Safety Authority to evaluate the draft assessment report where the United Kingdom is the rapporteur or co-rapporteur Member State in relation to an application for approval | 35,000 | |||||
4 | Evaluation of a full data package(3) | 110,000 | |||||
5 | Evaluation of a partial data package(4): | ||||||
Band 1 | 7,500 | ||||||
Band 2 | 15,000 | ||||||
Band 3 | 30,000 | ||||||
Band 4 | 50,000 | ||||||
Band 5 | 70,000 | ||||||
Band 6 | 90,000 | ||||||
Band 7 | 110,000 | ||||||
Where an active substance is a biocontrol agent | |||||||
6 | Evaluation of a full data package (3) | 22,500 | |||||
7 | Helping the European Food Safety Authority to evaluate the draft assessment report where the United Kingdom is the rapporteur or co-rapporteur Member State in relation to an application for approval | 7,500 | |||||
8 | Evaluation of a partial data package(4): | ||||||
Band 1 | 5,500 | ||||||
Band 2 | 11,250 | ||||||
Band 3 | 17,000 | ||||||
Band 4 | 22,500 | ||||||
Where an active substance is a pheromone | |||||||
9 | Evaluation of a full data package(3) | 13,000 | |||||
10 | Helping the European Food Safety Authority to evaluate the draft assessment report where the United Kingdom is the rapporteur or co-rapporteur Member State in relation to an application for an approval | 7,500 | |||||
11 | Evaluation of a partial data package:(4) | ||||||
Band 1 | 3,250 | ||||||
Band 2 | 6,500 | ||||||
Band 3 | 9,750 | ||||||
Band 4 | 13,000 | ||||||
For all evaluations | |||||||
12 | Meeting before the submission of an application in support of a new active substance, safener, synergist, biocontrol agent or pheromone | 5,000 |
3. The fees for the official recognition of a test facility or organisation are in accordance with the following table(1).
Item | Activity | Fee (£) |
---|---|---|
Notes | ||
(1) Article 29(3) of Regulation 1107/2009 requires that compliance with certain authorisation requirements is established by official or officially recognised tests and analyses. | ||
1 | Initial official recognition of the test facility | 2,000 |
2 | Renewal of an official recognition | 2,000 |
3 | Each re-inspection | 1,500 |
4. The fees for work involved in assisting an applicant in preparing or submitting an application for approval of a basic substance under Article 23 of Regulation 1107/2009 are in accordance with the following table.
Item | Application | Fee(£) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Notes | ||||
(1) A full data package comprises the complete dossier (the information referred to in Article 23(3) of Regulation 1107/2009) to support one or more uses of the basic substance. Where a data package also contains a large number of extra study reports submitted to refine risk assessments, to characterise metabolites or to support additional uses, these studies will be treated as an additional partial data package. See also note (2). | ||||
(2) The size of a partial data package is banded as a proportion of a full data package. The percentage is estimated on the basis of the amount of time required to evaluate the data and to conduct the necessary risk assessments. Applicants will be notified of the appropriate Band prior to an evaluation taking place. Partial data packages include one or more of the following — (a) additional data over and above a ‘standard’ core dossier, for example, situations where there are significantly more metabolites, or very large novel studies to be evaluated; (b) additional study submissions during evaluation required to clarify the initial dossier; (c) resubmissions, for example, where the previous application for approval under Regulation 1107/2009 has been unsuccessful and a new application is made in an attempt to address all the concerns raised from that earlier submission; (d) data to support a change to the conditions of approval of the basic substance; (e) joint evaluation where the United Kingdom and one or more other Member States share the evaluation of the dossier; | ||||
The evaluation of scientific peer reviewed open literature on the basic substance and its relevant metabolites is treated as a partial data package. | ||||
1 | Assistance with a full data package(1) | 110,000 | ||
2 | Assistance with a partial data package(2): | |||
Band 1 | 7,500 | |||
Band 2 | 15,000 | |||
Band 3 | 30,000 | |||
Band 4 | 50,000 | |||
Band 5 | 70,000 | |||
Band 6 | 90,000 | |||
Band 7 | 110,000 |
Regulation 4(2)
Fees for product-related applications are in accordance with the following table.
Item | Category | Fee(£) |
---|---|---|
Notes | ||
(1) This category is mainly for plant protection products not currently authorised in any Member State. In certain cases, it may also include plant protection products still being reviewed if toxicological endpoints have not yet been agreed at a European level. | ||
(2) This category is for plant protection products where toxicological endpoints have already been agreed at a European level, but the residue definition has only been established for crop groups unrelated to the intended use or imported produce. | ||
(3) This category is for plant protection products where relevant toxicological endpoints and residue definition have already been agreed at European level. | ||
1 | Full Human health description(1) | 15,600 |
2 | Metabolism and residues evaluation(2) | 6,500 |
3 | Residues evaluation(3) | 1,950 |
(This note is not part of the Regulations)
1. These Regulations provide the charging regime in relation to—U.K.
(a)Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC (OJ No L309, 24.11.2009, p.1) (“Regulation 1107/2009”);
(b)Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC (OJ No L70, 16.3.2005, p.1) (“the MRL Regulation”); and
(c)Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides (OJ No L 4, 6. 1. 96, p.16) (“the Directive”).
2. Regulation 1107/2009 replaces the existing scheme for approval under Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (OJ No L230, 19.8.1991, p.1), and lays down rules for the approval of active substances and the authorisation of plant protection products.U.K.
3. These Regulations set fees, chargeable by the Secretary of State, the Scottish Ministers and the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development in Northern Ireland (“the United Kingdom competent authorities”) for—U.K.
(a)work carried out within the scope of Regulation 1107/2009 which relates to evaluating applications for the authorisation of plant protection products, the approval of active substances, safeners, synergists and basic substances and official recognition of a test facility or organisation, and
(b)applications for import tolerances under Article 7 of the MRL Regulation.
4. These Regulations also provide for an annual charge to be paid by authorisation holders for costs incurred by or on behalf of the United Kingdom competent authorities associated with any work carried out within the scope of Regulation 1107/2009 and work arising from the obligations under the MRL Regulation (other than for work charged under section 18(2)(b) or (c) of the Food and Environment Protection Act 1985) and, after 26th November 2011, work pursuant to obligations within the scope of the Directive. These Regulations also set out the consequences of failure to pay fees or charges.U.K.
5. These Regulations revoke and replace—U.K.
(a)The Fees for Assessment of Active Substances (Third Stage Review) Regulation 2005 (S.I. 2005/117);
(b)The Fees for Assessment of Active Substances (Fourth Stage Review) Regulation 2005 (S.I. 2005/1811); and
(c)the Plant Protection Products (Fees) Regulations 2007(S.I. 2007/295).
6. A full regulatory impact assessment of the effect that this instrument will have on the costs to business and the voluntary sector has also been prepared. A copy of this document has been placed in the library of each House of Parliament and is available on DEFRA’s website (www.defra.gov.uk). A copy of the regulatory impact assessment is also annexed to the Explanatory Memorandum to the Plant Protection Products Regulations 2011 and to these Regulations and is available alongside the instruments on the legislation website (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/).U.K.
7. The new fees compared with those fixed by or determined under the previous fee-charging provisions are as follows:U.K.
Type of Fee | Previous Fee (£) | New Fee (£) | Percentage Increase/Decrease | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Schedule 1 | ||||
1. Product related applications | ||||
1.— U.K. | Administrative research and development application | 30.00 | 50.00 | 66.67% |
2.— U.K. | Extension of use application including administration, co-ordination and technical consideration | 1,495.00 | 1,495.00 | 0.00% |
Extension of use application from 1 April 2012 | 1,495.00 | 1,700.00 | 13.71% | |
3.— U.K. | Preliminary consideration of application type listed in item 4, 5, 7, 12 or 13, to determine whether the application can proceed further | 150.00 (electronic) or 175.00 (other) | 220.00 | 46.67% or 25.71% |
4.— U.K. | Administrative application for a new product or change to an existing product, | |||
(a) | One product | 120.00 | 150.00 | 25.00% |
(b) | Each additional product | 40.00 | 50.00 | 25.00% |
5.— U.K. | Parallel trade application; | |||
(a) | Co-ordination of application for new product or change to existing product involving parallel trade | 710.00 | 700.00 | -1.41% |
(b) | Parallel trade verification | 200.00 | 200.00 | 0.00% |
6.— U.K. | Evaluation of a label in any application. | 300.00 | 200.00 | -33.33% |
7.— U.K. | Coordination of standard technical stream application | 1,100.00 (technical) or 1,800.00 (data evaluation) | 1,800.00 | 45.45% or 0.00% |
8.— U.K. | Evaluation of simple reasoned cases in each of the following specialist areas: | |||
(a) | Chemistry | 250.00 | 400.00 | 60.00% |
(b) | Toxicology | 250.00 | 400.00 | 60.00% |
(c) | Operator exposure | 250.00 | 400.00 | 60.00% |
(d) | Residues/consumer exposure | 250.00 | 400.00 | 60.00% |
(e) | Fate and behaviour in the environment | 250.00 | 400.00 | 60.00% |
(f) | Ecotoxicology | 250.00 | 400.00 | 60.00% |
(g) | Efficacy | 250.00 | 400.00 | 60.00% |
9.— U.K. | Evaluation of data, modelling and detailed scientific cases in each of the following specialist areas: | |||
(a) | Chemistry | 425.00 | 750.00 | 76.47% |
(b) | Toxicology | 500.00 | 750.00 | 50.00% |
(c) | Operator exposure | 750.00 | 750.00 | 0.00% |
(d) | Residues/consumer exposure | 1,000.00 | 750.00 | -25.00% |
(e) | Fate and behaviour in the environment | 1,000.00 | 1,800.00 | 80.00% |
(f) | Ecotoxicology | 1,000.00 | 1,800.00 | 80.00% |
(g) | Efficacy | 1,500.00 | 1,800.00 | 20.00% |
Crop Safety (£500) and Effectiveness (£1000) previously charged separately | ||||
10.— U.K. | Withdrawal of an application for a product specified in items 2, 4, 5, 7, 12 or 13 before any work other than preliminary consideration has been done | 100.00 | 100.00 | 0.00% |
11.— U.K. | Pre-submission meetings for lead zone re-registration and new product applications | 0.00 | 5,000.00 | New item |
12.— U.K. | Zonal surcharges for lead zonal re-registration and new product applications. This fee is in addition to these described in 7 to 9 above | |||
Zonal surcharge 1 | 0.00 | 7,500.00 | New item | |
Zonal surcharge 2 | 0.00 | 15,000.00 | New item | |
13.— U.K. | Commenting on draft study protocols | 0.00 | 400.00 | New item |
2. Active substances related applications | ||||
Where an active substance, safener or synergist is neither a biocontrol agent nor a pheromone | ||||
1.— U.K. | Preliminary evaluation of an application’s admissibility | 5,000.00 | 5,000.00 | 0.00% |
2.— U.K. | Processing an application for provisional authorisation | 35,000.00 | 35,000.00 | 0.00% |
3.— U.K. | Helping the European Food Safety Authority to evaluate the draft assessment report where the United Kingdom is the rapporteur or co-rapporteur member state | 35,000.00 | 35,000.00 | 0.00% |
4.— U.K. | Evaluation of a full data package | 105,000.00 | 110,00.00 | 4.76% |
5.— U.K. | Evaluation of a partial data package: | |||
Band 1 | 7,500.00 | New item | ||
Band 2 | 15,000.00 | 15,000.00 | 0.00% | |
Band 3 | 30,000.00 | 30,000.00 | 0.00% | |
Band 4 | 40,000.00 | 50,000.00 | 25.00% | |
Band 5 | 60,000.00 | 70,000.00 | 16.67% | |
Band 6 | 80,000.00 | 90,000.00 | 12.50% | |
Band 7 | 105,000.00 | 110,000.00 | 4.76% | |
Where an active substance is a biocontrol agent | ||||
6.— U.K. | Evaluation of a full data package | 22,500.00 | 22,500.00 | 0.00% |
7.— U.K. | Helping the European Food Safety Authority to evaluate the draft assessment report where the United Kingdom is the rapporteur or co-rapporteur member State | 7,500.00 | 7,500.00 | 0.00% |
8.— U.K. | Evaluation of a partial data package: | |||
Band 1 | 5,500.00 | 5,500.00 | 0.00% | |
Band 2 | 11,250.00 | 11,250.00 | 0.00% | |
Band 3 | 17,000.00 | 17,000.00 | 0.00% | |
Band 4 | 22,500.00 | 22,500.00 | 0.00% | |
Where an active substance is a pheromone | ||||
9.— U.K. | Evaluation of a fill data package | 13,000.00 | 13,000.00 | 0.00% |
10.— U.K. | Helping the European Food Safety Authority to evaluate the draft assessment report where the United Kingdom is a rapporteur or co-rapporteur member State. | 7,500.00 | 7,500.00 | 0.00% |
11.— U.K. | Evaluation of a partial data package: | |||
Band 1 | 3,250.00 | 3,250.00 | 0.00% | |
Band 2 | 6,500.00 | 6,500.00 | 0.00% | |
Band 3 | 9,750.00 | 9,750.00 | 0.00% | |
Band 4 | 13,000.00 | 13,000.00 | 0.00% | |
For all evaluations | ||||
12.— U.K. | Meeting before the submission of an application in support of new active substance, safener or synergist, biocontrol and pheromone applications | 0.00 | 5,000.00 | New item |
3. Fees for official recognition of a test facility or organisation | ||||
Initial official recognition of the test facility | 1,500.00 | 2,000.00 | 33.33% | |
Renewal of an official recognition | 1,500.00 | 2,000.00 | 33.33% | |
Each re-inspection | 1,125.00 | 1,500.00 | 33.33% | |
4. Basic substance applications | ||||
1.— U.K. | Assistance with a full data package | 0.00 | 110,000.00 | New item |
2.— U.K. | Assistance with a partial data package: | |||
Band 1 | 0.00 | 7,500.00 | New item | |
Band 2 | 0.00 | 15,000.00 | New item | |
Band 3 | 0.00 | 30,000.00 | New item | |
Band 4 | 0.00 | 50,000.00 | New item | |
Band 5 | 0.00 | 70,000.00 | New item | |
Band 6 | 0.00 | 90,000.00 | New item | |
Band 7 | 0.00 | 110,000.00 | New item | |
Schedule 2 | ||||
Import tolerance fee | ||||
1.— U.K. | Full human health evaluation | 15,600.00 | 15,600.00 | 0.00% |
2.— U.K. | Metabolism and residues evaluation | 6,500.00 | 6,500.00 | 0.00% |
3.— U.K. | Residues evaluation | 1,950.00 | 1,950.00 | 0.00% |
1972 c. 68. The power of the Secretary of State, as designated Minister, to make Regulations that (i) extend to Scotland remains exercisable by virtue of section 57(1) of the Scotland Act 1998 (c.46); (ii) extend to Northern Ireland remains exercisable by virtue of article 3(2) of the European Communities (Designation)(No 3) Order 2000 (S.I. 2000/2812), article 2(3) of the European Communities (Designation) (No 2) Order 1999 (S.I. 1999/2027) and article 2(a) of the European Communities (Designation) Order 2008 (S.I. 2008/301); and (iii) apply in Wales remains exercisable by virtue of article 6(1) of the European Communities (Designation) (No 5) Order 2010 (S.I. 2010/2690), article 5(1) of the European Communities (Designation) (No.2) Order 2008 (S.I. 2008/1792) and article 2(a) of the European Communities (Designation) Order 2008 (S.I. 2008/301).
OJ No L 4, 6. 1. 96, p.16.
OJ No L 70, 16.3.2005, p. 1.
OJ No. L309, 24.11.2009, p.1.
OJ No L 309, 24. 11. 2009, p. 1.
OJ No. L230, 19.8.1991, p.1.
Latest Available (revised):The latest available updated version of the legislation incorporating changes made by subsequent legislation and applied by our editorial team. Changes we have not yet applied to the text, can be found in the ‘Changes to Legislation’ area.
Original (As Enacted or Made): The original version of the legislation as it stood when it was enacted or made. No changes have been applied to the text.
Point in Time: This becomes available after navigating to view revised legislation as it stood at a certain point in time via Advanced Features > Show Timeline of Changes or via a point in time advanced search.
Geographical Extent: Indicates the geographical area that this provision applies to. For further information see ‘Frequently Asked Questions’.
Show Timeline of Changes: See how this legislation has or could change over time. Turning this feature on will show extra navigation options to go to these specific points in time. Return to the latest available version by using the controls above in the What Version box.
Explanatory Memorandum sets out a brief statement of the purpose of a Statutory Instrument and provides information about its policy objective and policy implications. They aim to make the Statutory Instrument accessible to readers who are not legally qualified and accompany any Statutory Instrument or Draft Statutory Instrument laid before Parliament from June 2004 onwards.
Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Impact Assessments generally accompany all UK Government interventions of a regulatory nature that affect the private sector, civil society organisations and public services. They apply regardless of whether the regulation originates from a domestic or international source and can accompany primary (Acts etc) and secondary legislation (SIs). An Impact Assessment allows those with an interest in the policy area to understand:
This timeline shows the different points in time where a change occurred. The dates will coincide with the earliest date on which the change (e.g an insertion, a repeal or a substitution) that was applied came into force. The first date in the timeline will usually be the earliest date when the provision came into force. In some cases the first date is 01/02/1991 (or for Northern Ireland legislation 01/01/2006). This date is our basedate. No versions before this date are available. For further information see the Editorial Practice Guide and Glossary under Help.
Use this menu to access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:
Click 'View More' or select 'More Resources' tab for additional information including: